Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
19 February 2024 Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 17
Eckhard von Raab-Straube, Thomas Raus
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

This is the seventeenth of a series of miscellaneous contributions, by various authors, where hitherto unpublished data relevant to both the Med-Checklist and the Euro+Med (or Sisyphus) projects are presented. This instalment deals with the families Aizoaceae, Anacardiaceae, Asparagaceae, Bignoniaceae, Boraginaceae, Cannabaceae, Caryophyllaceae, Casuarinaceae, Chenopodiaceae, Compositae, Crassulaceae, Cyperaceae, Euphorbiaceae, Gentianaceae, Gramineae, Iridaceae, Labiatae, Leguminosae, Malvaceae, Myrtaceae, Oleaceae, Onagraceae, Orobanchaceae, Oxalidaceae, Papaveraceae, Portulacaceae, Ranunculaceae, Rosaceae, Rubiaceae, Sapindaceae, Sapotaceae, Solanaceae, Typhaceae, Violaceae and Vitaceae. It includes new country and area records and taxonomic and distributional considerations for taxa in Acer, Ampelopsis, Argania, Blackstonia, Buglossoides, Carduus, Carex, Casuarina, Celtis, Chenopodium, Clematis, Eleusine, Elytrigia, Eucalyptus, Euphorbia, Euphrasia, Fraxinus, Galium, Hibiscus, Hieracium, Iris, Koelreuteria, Lathyrus, Loeflingia, Ludwigia, Malus, Melampyrum, Mesembryanthemum, Muscari, Orobanche, Oxalis, Papaver, Physalis, Podranea, Portulaca, Pseudodictamnus, Pulmonaria, Ranunculus, Schinus, Sedum, Stachys, Typha, Viola and Vitis, and a new combination in Pseudodictamnus.

Citation

For the whole article: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.) 2024: Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 17. – Willdenowia 54: 5–45. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.54.54101

For a single contribution (example): Fos S., Laguna E., Smith G. F. & Verloove F. 2024: Mesembryanthemum haeckelianum A. Berger. – Pp. 7–8 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 17. – Willdenowia 54: 5–45. https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.54.54101

Version of record first published online on 19 February 2024 ahead of inclusion in April 2024 issue.

Notice

A succinct description of the Euro+Med project, with a list of recognized territories and their abbreviations, and the conventions used to indicate the status and presence of taxa, can be found in the introduction to the first instalment of the Euro+Med Notulae (Greuter & Raab-Straube 2005: 223–226) and on the Euro+Med PlantBase website (Euro+Med 2006+). For the previous instalment of the Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, see Raab-Straube & Raus (2023).

Contributors

  • B. Baranovsky, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Hagarina Ave., 72, 49010 Dnipro, Ukraine; boris .baranovski@ukr.net

  • E. Bergmeier, Vegetation Analysis & Plant Diversity, Albrecht von Haller Institute of Plant Sciences, University of Göttingen, Untere Karspüle 2, 37073 Göttingen, Germany; erwin.bergmeier@uni -goettingen.de

  • O. Bilyk, Ustymivka Experimental Station of Plant Production of V. Ya. Yuriev Plant Production Institute, NAAS of Ukraine Ustymivka, 39074 Ustymivka village, Kremenchuk Raion, Poltava Oblast, Ukraine; helena.ost@ukr.net

  • D. Borovyk, M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, NAS of Ukraine, Tereshchenkivska 2, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine; and Department of Botany and Zoology, Masaryk University, Kotlářská 267/2, 611 37 Brno, Czech Republic; dariiaborovyk@gmail.com

  • E. Bulakh, M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany of NAS of Ukraine, 2 Tereshchenkivska Str., 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine; anemone@ukr.net

  • H. Chorna, Pavlo Tychyna Uman State Pedagogical University, Sadova Str. 2, 20300 Uman, Cherkasy Oblast, Ukraine; udpu_botanika@ukr.net

  • E. Del Guacchio, Department of Biology, University of Naples Federico II, Botanical Garden, via Foria 223, 80139 Naples, Italy; emanuele.delguacchio@unina.it

  • D. Dimitrov, National Natural Historical Museum, 1 Tsar Osvoboditel Blvd., 1000 Sofia, Bulgaria; dimitrov .npm@gmail.com

  • H. Drabyniuk, Natural Reserve Elanetskyi Step, 55553 Kalynivka village, Voznesensk Raion, Mykolaiv Oblast, Ukraine; zapovidnik96@gmail.com

  • T. S. Dvirna, M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany of NAS of Ukraine, 2, Tereshchenkivska Str., 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine; dvirna_t@ukr.net

  • N. Doiko, Oleksandriya State Dendrological Park, NAS of Ukraine, 09113 Bila Tserkva-13, Kyiv Oblast, Ukraine; magnoliya.pw@gmail.com

  • R. El Mokni, Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences A, Laboratory of Botany, Cryptogamy and Plant Physiology, Faculty of Pharmacy of the University Monastir, BP. No. 207, Avenue Avicenne, 5000 Monastir, Tunisia; riridah@hotmail.com

  • S. Fos, VAERSA, Generalitat Valenciana, Avinguda Corts Valencianes 20, 46015 Valencia, Spain; flora_catalo gada@gva.es

  • S. Glukhova, Syretsky Dendrological Park of national importance, Tyraspolska Str., 43, 04136 Kyiv, Ukraine; syrets.dendropark@gmail.com

  • G. Gottschlich, Hermann-Kurz-Str. 35, 72074 Tübingen, Germany; ggtuebingen@yahoo.com

  • D. Iamonico, Department of Environmental Biology, University of Rome Sapienza, Piazzale Aldo Moro 5, 00185 Rome, Italy; duilio.iamonico@uniroma1.it

  • A. Kabar, Botanical Garden of the Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Hagarina Ave., 72, 49010 Dnipro, Ukraine; didur@ua.fm

  • K. Kalashnik, Institute of Marine Biology, NAS of Ukraine, Pushkinska Str. 37, 65048 Odesa, Ukraine; kalashnik.eka@gmail.com

  • H. Kalheber, Rheinbergstraße 1, 65594 Runkel, Germany; hh.kalheber@t-online.de

  • L. Karmyzova, Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Hagarina Ave., 72, 49010 Dnipro, Ukraine; linakarmyzova@gmail.com

  • V. Kolomiychuk, Acad. O. V. Fomin Botanical Garden of the Taras Shevchenko Kyiv National University, Symona Petliury Str., 1, 01032 Kyiv, Ukraine; vkolo miychuk@ukr.net

  • T. Kostruba, M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden, NAS of Ukraine, Sadovo-Botanichna Str., 1, 01014 Kyiv, Ukraine; tanyska_11@ukr.net

  • A. Y. Kudrinskaya, Independent researcher, Sevastopol, Crimea; bouffonnn@gmail.com

  • N. Kuzmanović, Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; nkuzmanovic@bio.bg.ac.rs

  • E. Laguna, Centre per la Investigació i Experimentació Forestal, Generalitat Valenciana, Avda. Comarques del País Valencià 114, 46930 Quart de Poblet, València, Spain; laguna_emi@gva.es

  • V. Lazzeri, Via Fiorenza 1/C, 57125 Livorno, Italy; valerio.lazzeri@gmail.com

  • L. Levchuk, Botanical Garden of I. I. Mechnykov Odesa National University, Frantsuzskyi Bulvar, 48/50, 65000 Odesa, Ukraine; lyuda.levchuk@gmail.com

  • M. Lonati, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy; michele .lonati@unito.it

  • L. Lyubinska, Kamyanets-Podilsky Ivan Ohienko National University, Ohienko Str., 61, 32301 Kamianets-Podilsky, Khmelnytskyi Oblast, Ukraine; kvitkolub@gmail.com

  • T. Mamchur, Uman National University of Horticulture, Instytutska Str., 1, 20300 Uman, Cherkasy Oblast, Ukraine; mamchur-tv@ukr.net

  • Y. Marinov, Regional Natural History Museum of Plovdiv, 34 Hristo G. Danov Str., 4000 Plovdiv, Bulgaria; julianmarinov@abv.bg

  • A. Mátis, Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Geology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; matisattila@gmail.com

  • Z. Miholcsa, Hungarian Department of Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Biology and Geology, Babeş-Bolyai University, Cluj-Napoca, Romania; hczsombor @gmail.com

  • O. Miskova, M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany, NAS of Ukraine, Tereshchenkivska Str., 2, 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine; lena.miskova.enot@gmail.com

  • G. Nota, Department of Agricultural, Forest and Food Sciences (DISAFA), University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy; ginevra .nota@unito.it

  • A. Oprea, University Alexandru Ioan Cuza of Iaşi, Botanical Garden Anastasie Fătu, 7–9, Dumbrava Roşie Str., 700487, Iaşi, Romania; a_aoprea@yahoo.co.uk

  • O. Orlov, State Institution «Institute of Environmental Geochemistry of NAS of Ukraine», Academician Pal-ladin Ave., 34A, 03142 Kyiv, Ukraine; orlov.botany@gmail.com

  • H. Pidtykana, Research and breeding dendrological forest center Veseli Bokovenky, Davydova Aleya, 1, 28513 Veseli Bokovenky village, Kropyvnytskyi Raion, Kirovohrad Oblast, Ukraine; park_vbokovenki@ukr.net

  • G. Pils, Buchscheiden 18, 9560 Feldkirchen in Kärnten, Österreich; gerhardpils@yahoo.de

  • M. Pittarello, Department of Veterinary Sciences (DSV), University of Torino, Largo Paolo Braccini 2, 10095 Grugliasco (TO), Italy; marco.pittarello@unito.it

  • S. Rätzel, Georg-Friedrich-Händel-Straße 13, 15234 Frankfurt an der Oder, Germany; stefan.raetzel @googlemail.com

  • Th. Raus, Botanischer Garten Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Königin-Luise-Str. 6–8, 14195 Berlin, Germany; t.raus@bo.berlin

  • L. E. Ryff, Flora and Vegetation Laboratory, Nikitsky Botanical Garden – National Scientifc Centre, Nikita, Yalta, Crimea; ryffljub@ukr.net

  • A. Saci, Direction Générale des Forêts (DGF), 21 000 Skikda, Algeria; amarsaci21@gmail.com

  • M. Shevera, M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany of NAS of Ukraine, 2 Tereshchenkivska Str., 01601 Kyiv, Ukraine; and Ferenc Rákóczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian College of Higher Education, 6 Koshut Sq., 90200 Beregove, Zakarpatska Oblast, Ukraine; shevera.myroslav@ukr.net

  • H. Shol, Kryvyi Rih Botanical Garden, NAS of Ukraine, Marshaka Str., 50, 50089 Kryvyi Rih, Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Ukraine; shol.uf@meta.ua

  • O. Shynder, M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden, NAS of Ukraine, Sadovo-Botanichna Str., 1, 01014 Kyiv, Ukraine; shinderoleksandr@gmail.com

  • C. Sîrbu, University of Life Sciences Ion Ionescu de la Brad, 3, M. Sadoveanu Alley, 700490, Iaşi, Romania; csirbu@uaiasi.ro

  • G. F. Smith, Ria Olivier Herbarium, Department of Botany, Nelson Mandela University, P.O. Box 77000, Gqeberha, 6031 South Africa; smithgideon1@gmail.com

  • L. Somlyay, Hungarian Natural History Museum, Department of Botany, P.O. Box 137, 1431 Budapest, Hungary; somlyay.lajos@nhmus.hu

  • I. Stevanoski, Institute of Botany and Botanical Garden, Faculty of Biology, University of Belgrade, 11000 Belgrade, Serbia; ijankovic@bio.bg.ac.rs

  • S. Stoyanov, Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research, Bulgarian Academy of Sciences, Acad. G. Bonchev Str., bl. 23, 1113 Sofia, Bulgaria; tjankata@abv.bg

  • S. A. Svirin, Flora and Vegetation Laboratory, Nikitsky Botanical Garden – National Scientific Centre, Yalta, Crimea; sapsan7@mail.ru

  • M. Tarabun, State Dendrological Park Trostjanets, NAS of Ukraine, 16742 Trostjanets village, Pryluky Raion, Chernihiv Oblast, Ukraine; marina.tarabun@gmail.com

  • S. Tsiftsis, International Hellenic University, Department of Forest and Natural Environment Sciences, 66132 Drama, Greece; stsiftsis@for.ihu.gr

  • H. Uhlich, Gartenstraße 19, 56357 Welterod, Germany; uhlich.holger@googlemail.com

  • E. Véla, AMAP lab, Université de Montpellier / CIRAD / CNRS / INRA / IRD, Montpellier, France; errol.vela@cirad.fr

  • F. Verloove, Meise Botanic Garden, Nieuwelaan 38, 1860 Meise, Belgium; filip.verloove@plantentuin meise.be

  • K. Vidakis, International Hellenic University, Department of Forest and Natural Environment Sciences, 66132 Drama, Greece; k.vidakis@gmail.com

  • O. Volutsa, Yuryi Fed'kovych Chernivtsi National University, 11 Fed'kovych Str., Chernivtsi, 58022, Ukraine; and Khotyns'ki National Nature Park, 69 Olimpiys'ka Str., Khotyn, 60000, Chernivtsi Oblast, Ukraine; o.volutsa@chnu.edu.ua

  • A. V. Yena, Agrotechnological Academy of V. I. Vernadsky Crimean Federal University, Agrarnoye, Simferopol 295492, Crimea; an.yena@gmail.com

  • P. E. Yevseyenkov, independent researcher, Sevastopol, Crimea; fhunt@flora.crimea.ru

Aizoaceae

Mesembryanthemum haeckelianum A. Berger (≡ Aptenia haeckeliana (A. Berger) Bittrich ex Gerbaulet ≡ Platythyra haeckeliana (A. Berger) N. E. Br.) – Fig. 1. A Hs(S): Spain: Valencia, Paiporta, l'Horta, Sant Joaquim, camí de l'Hort de Colom, 39°25′8.72″N, 00°24′46.43″W, 17.5 m, nitrophilous grasslands on roadsides, 8 Dec 2020, Fos & Laguna (VAL 243737), det. G. F. Smith & F. Verloove. – Mesembryanthemum haeckelianum, which is endemic to South Africa's Eastern Cape province, is sometimes used as a groundcover in domestic horticulture and landscaping. However, as a groundcover, it is not as popular as the purple-flowered M. cordifolium L. f. and the red-flowered hybrid between these two species, M. ×vascosilvae (Gideon F. Sm. & al.) L. Sáez & Aymerich (see Smith & al. 2020; Sáez & Aymerich 2020), at least in the Valencian Community (Spain) and other parts of the Iberian Peninsula. Nevertheless, both species and the hybrid between them are marketed for ornamental use and plants are sold on-site in nurseries and garden centres as well as online. Note though that material of all three taxa is often confusingly sold as varieties of M. cordifolium. Mesembryanthemum haeckelianum is reported here as a new alien plant for the flora of Spain and Europe. Beyond its natural geographical distribution range, it has been reported from Belgium and Germany, but these records clearly refer to living plants cultivated in the Botanical Gardens of Meise and Darmstadt, respectively. There is also a record from Lajares, Lanzarote (Canary Islands) reported by GBIF (2022), but without access to information on the origin of this material nor any evidence such as pictures or herbarium sheets to aid its identification, it could possibly be of cultivated plants. The specimens found in Valencia (Fig. 1) cover a surface area of 3–4 m2 with some branches scrambling to a height of about 2 m into a Cupressus sempervirens L. tree that grows nearby. Mesembryanthemum haeckelianum grows in nitrophilous plant communities on a roadside in association with Beta vulgaris subsp. maritima (L.) Thell., Cichorium intybus L., Crepis vesicaria subsp. taraxacifolia (Thuill.) Thell., Diplotaxis erucoides (L.) DC., Emex spinosa (L.) Campd., Fumaria capreolata L., Malva parviflora L., Oxalis pes-caprae L., Euphorbia peplus L., E. terracina Lag., Piptatherum miliaceum Coss. and Plantago lagopus L., among others. Because of its creeping and scrambling habit, it has not been possible to confirm the number of naturalized individuals, although the material could be derived from a single specimen. Plants flower sporadically throughout the year, as does M. ×vascosilvae, incidentally, although in winter the flowers are smaller and paler yellow to almost white. Fruits with well-developed seeds have also been observed. Mesembryanthemum L. and Aptenia N. E. Br. are often united by contemporary authors, as a result of molecular phylogenetic studies (Klak & al. 2007, Klak & Bruyns 2013). Online databases such as the International Plant Names Index (IPNI 2023), the World Flora Online (WFO 2023) the Catalogue of Life (Bánki & al. 2023), POWO (2023) but also the Euro+Med PlantBase (Raab-Straube 2018+a) adhere to this view. We have previously referred to this species under Aptenia (Smith & al. 2020).

S. Fos, E. Laguna, G. F. Smith & F. Verloove

Fig. 1.

Mesembryanthemum haeckelianum – A: flowering plant in nitrophilous grassland habitat; B: detail of plant with flowers; C: detail of fruits. – Spain, Valencia, Paiporta, Sant Joaquim, 1 May 2023 (A), 8 Dec 2020 (B, C), photographs by S. Fos.

img-z4-1_05.jpg

Anacardiaceae

Schinus polygama (Cav.) Cabrera (≡ Amyris polygama Cav.) – Fig. 2.

A Tn: Tunisia: Jendouba, Aïn Draham, 36°46′46″N, 08°41′11″E, 720 m, roadsides beneath walls of old buildings, 17 Oct 2021, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – As part of ongoing studies on updating the list of alien Anacardiaceae in Tunisia (El Mokni 2019), Schinus polygama is here reported for the first time for the adventitious Tunisian flora (Henning & Raab-Straube 2016+a; APD 2023) where it seems to have recently escaped from cultivation and therefore can be considered as a local casual alien. Admitting that known varieties of S. polygama are connected with each other on intermediate macromorphological features, collected Tunisian material shows predominately an overflowered infructescence with dark purple fruits and is rather assigned to S. polygama var. parviflora (Marchand) F. A. Barkley (vs few-flowered inflorescence with black fruits in var. chilensis F. A. Barkley; cf. Barkley 1944: 176). Schinus L. species are distributed in Argentina, Bolivia, Chile and Peru, where they can be found in the inter-Andean valleys and Andean cloud forests as well as at low altitudes in SE to NE Argentina, extending into Uruguay, Paraguay and S Brazil; few endemic Chilean species occur in sclerophyllous forests in a Mediterranean climate (Silva Luz & al. 2019, 2022). In particular Schinus areira L., S. molle L., S. terebinthifolia Raddi (commonly known as pepper trees) and S. polygama have become invasive species outside their native range (Silva Luz & al. 2022); the latter has a native range from Chile to Mendoza in Argentina (POWO 2023). It is a dioecious shrub or tree growing to 3(–5) m tall, with simple leaves and reddish, pink to purple globose, obovoid drupes. The species was introduced to California and Tajikistan (POWO 2023) and to Brazil, Uruguay, the Iberian Peninsula, Belgium and New Zealand (GBIF 2023). In Africa, it was reported only in the Maghreb countries of Morocco and Algeria (GBIF 2023), however with “unknown status”. An analytical key is proposed here for the adventitious species of the genus Schinus in Africa (derived from Miller & Wilken 2012; NSW Flora Online 2023).

Analytical key to species of Schinus introduced into Africa

1. Plants ≤ 5 m tall; branches ending in thorns; leaves simple S. polygama

– Plants > 5 m tall; branches not ending in thorns; leaves compound 2

2. Leaves pendent; leaflets generally > 15, lanceolate to linear, 2–10 mm wide S. molle

– Leaves not pendent; leaflets 7–13, elliptic to oblong-ovate, > 10 mm wide S. terebinthifolia

R. El Mokni

Fig. 2.

Schinus polygama, fruiting branches. – Tunisia, Jendouba, Aïn Draham, 17 Oct 2021, photograph by R. El Mokni.

img-z5-2_05.jpg

Asparagaceae

Muscari armeniacum H. J. Veitch

A Uk: Ukraine: Cherkasy Oblast, NW vicinity of Uman city, a small group (a clone and several single plants) in bushes far from urban built-up area, 28 Apr 2023, Kostruba, Chorna & Shynder (KWHA 103186; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/180742252); Kirovohrad Oblast, Hayvoron city, 48.332691°N, 29.861607°E, single plants on roadsides, spontaneous, reproducing by seeds and spreading beyond flower gardens, 25 Apr 2023, Shynder & Mamchur (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/158060830); Odesa city, 46.382489°N, 30.749556°E, steppe slope above seashore, spontaneous, 16 Apr 2016, Kalashnik (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/178884079); Sumy Oblast, Putivl city, one plant spontaneous on side of street, 51.335461°N, 33.873895°E, 3 May 2022, Miskova (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/115097911). – Muscari armeniacum grows wild in the Caucasus, extending to Anatolia and the Balkan Peninsula, and is widely cultivated as an ornamental plant in spring flower gardens (Mashkovska 2015; Stuart 2011). Examples of spontaneous spread of M. armeniacum in botanical gardens and dendrological parks were reported (Shynder & al. 2022). As an established neophyte, M. armeniacum has already been indicated for Austria (Fischer & al. 2008: 1076), the Czech Republic (Pyšek & al. 2012), France (Tison & Foucault 2014), Germany (Hand & al. 2023), Great Britain and Ireland (Stace 2010: 922), Italy (Conti & al. 2005), and as casual with uncertain degree of naturalization in some other European countries (Belgium, Finland, the Netherlands, see Euro+Med 2006+). In Ukraine, this plant currently has the status of a casual alien, escaped from cultivation. It is observed growing spontaneously in cities and suburbs, at various distances apart from flower gardens where it is grown. It reproduces well by seeds, so it may become naturalized in Ukraine in the near future.

Fig. 3.

Podranea ricasoliana – A: flowering branch; B: habit. – Italy, Liguria, Taggia (Imperia), 15 Sep 2022, photographs by M. Lonati.

img-z6-1_05.jpg

O. Shynder, H. Chorna, N. Doiko, K. Kalashnik, T. Kostruba, T. Mamchur & O. Miskova

Bignoniaceae

Podranea ricasoliana (Tanfani) Sprague – Fig. 3.

A It: Italy: Liguria, Taggia (Imperia), 43.863695°N, 7.851043°E, 68 m, on a chalky SE-facing rock wall, 15 Sep 2022, Lonati, Pittarello & Nota (B 10 1246800). – Podranea ricasoliana, commonly known as Port Saint Johns creeper, is a liana species generally considered endemic to South Africa, with a very restricted range confined to the mouth of the Mzimvubu River in Port Saint Johns, Eastern Cape Province (Senar & Cardero 2019). However, many South African botanists suspect that this species may not be indigenous to S Africa but rather was introduced from E Africa (Malawi, Mozambique, Zambia) by slave traders (Malan & Notten 2002). As an ornamental species it is cultivated in all warm climate regions of the world. It is naturalized in N Africa (Algeria), in the United States (Florida, Hawaii), Central and South America, Australia and New Zealand (Hurrell & al. 2012; Senar & Cardero 2019). In the Euro+Med area, the species is considered a casual alien in the Canary Islands, and naturalized in the Azores, continental Spain and Corsica (Laguna & Mateo 2001; Tison & de Foucault 2014; Raab-Straube 2018+b; Senar & Cardero 2019). In the locality described in this note, a large individual has settled on a vertical wall facing the Monastero di S. Caterina da Siena, while two other specimens grow in the terraces above. On the basis of our observations in the field, P. ricasoliana is to be considered a casual alien in Italy.

M. Lonati, M. Pittarello & G. Nota

Boraginaceae

Buglossoides incrassata (Guss.) I. M. Johnst. subsp. incrassata (≡ Lithospermum incrassatum Guss. ≡ B. arvensis subsp. incrassata (Guss.) Kerguélen) – Fig. 4.

+ Cm: Crimea: Sevastopol region, Cape Aya Nature Reserve, Biller ridge, Demir-Capu tract, 24 Apr 2010, Turbanov (photo); ibid., Inzhir tract, 13 Apr 2012, Yevseyenkov (photo); ibid., SW slope of Biller ridge, 600 m, gravelly slope, 28 Apr 2012, Svirin (YALT as B. tenuiflora); ibid., Balaclava vicinity, Vitmer ravine, 44°30′03″N, 33°37′44″E, 175 m, open Juniperus excelsa M. Bieb. forest, 10 Jun 2019, Ryff (herb. Ryff + photo); ibid., 44°30′04″N, 33°37′33″E, 140 m, 27 Apr 2021, Ryff (herb. Ryff + photo); ibid., Mekenzi mountains, 44°39′15.30″N, 33°41′22.06″E, clearing in Quercus pubescens Willd. and Carpinus orientalis Mill. forest, 2 Apr 2023, Yevseyenkov (photo). – Buglossoides incrassata subsp. incrassata is an annual, distributed from the W Mediterranean to W Iran (Zippel & Wilhalm 2003; Valdés & Raab-Straube 2011+; POWO 2023). In some sources, it is listed as a native plant also for the Canary Islands (POWO 2023), and as a casual alien for Germany (Hand & al. 2023; Valdés & Raab-Straube 2011+) and the Czech Republic (Danihelka 2014; Randall 2017; Pyšek & al. 2022; POWO 2023). There is an opinion that this species may also grow in the Caucasus and C Asia (Popov 1953). In Crimea, plants of this taxon were recorded for the first time in 2010, on the spurs of Cape Aya in the vicinity of Sevastopol by I. S. Turbanov. But he identified them as B. tenuiflora (L. f.) I. M. Johnst. and showed his photos under this name on the Plantarium website ( https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/52917.html;  https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/52918.html). Similar plants were subsequently photographed and collected in the same area by S. A. Svirin and P. E. Yevseyenkov. For several years they were not correctly identified because all these finds were only represented by young, flowering specimens. The finding by one of us (LER) in 2019 of mature fruiting specimens and comparison of plants from the vicinity of Sevastopol with specimens stored in the KW and LE herbaria, as well as presented on GBIF (2023) and other internet sources, showed that, in terms of their main characteristic morphological features (bright blue corolla with oblong obtuse lobes, strongly thickened pedicel, enlarged calyx base, oblique receptacle, nutlet with rugose-scrobiculate surface, etc.) they are identical to specimens of B. incrassata subsp. incrassata from the Mediterranean, and especially from the Balkan Peninsula. We investigated the seed-surface ultrastructure of B. incrassata subsp. incrassata from Sevastopol using SEM. The nutlets are pyramidal-triangular, ovoid or subtrigonal, with subcircular areoles; the ventral side has a keel, while the dorsal side is convex; the beak is short and blunt; the shoulders are pronounced; and the surface is irregularly deeply furrowed, with protuberances with type I papillae (Fig. 4E). The features of seed morphology correspond to those given for B. incrassata subsp. incrassata (Edmondson 1978; Cecchi & al. 2014). SW Crimea is so far the only known locality of B. incrassata subsp. incrassata in E Europe. It is a native plant there and found only in natural habitats: on rocky and clayey slopes in juniper and oak woodlands.

Fig. 4.

Buglossoides incrassata subsp. incrassata – A: flowering plant; B: flower; C: fruiting plant; D: calyces of fruiting plant; E: SEM of nutlet. – A, B: Crimea, Balaclava, 27 Apr 2021; C: ibid., 10 Jun 2019; D: 27 May 2020 (collected 10 Jun 2019), photographs by L. E. Ryff; E: ibid., 31 May 2021 (collected 10 Jun 2019), photograph by T. S. Dvirna & M. Shevera.

img-z7-1_05.jpg

L. E. Ryff, T. S. Dvirna & M. Shevera

Pulmonaria obscura Dumort.

+ Mk: North Macedonia: Southwest region, Mt Jablanica, forests above village of Lakaica, 21°20′24″N, 20°31′34″E, 1900 m, 17 Aug 1947, Kitanov (SOM 171 338), det. D. Dimitrov. – No previous published records of this taxon from North Macedonia are known (Valdes & Raab-Straube 2011+). The cited specimen corroborates a comment by Matevski (2010: 116) on the possible occurrence of “Pulmonaria officinalis var. obscura” (= P. officinalis subsp. obscura (Dumort.) Murb.) on Mt Skopska Črna Gora, however by not accepting that taxon as a member of the North Macedonian flora. It should be noted that the taxonomic opinion to regard P. officinalis L. and P. obscura as two independent species, based on Sauer (1975) and Bolliger (1982) and currently advocated by Euro+Med (2006+) and POWO (2023), has been recently disproved by phylogenetic analyses based on nuclear and plastid DNA sequences, making the resurrection of subspecies rank for the two taxa more appropriate (Kirchner 2004: 103).

D. Dimitrov & Th. Raus

Cannabaceae

Celtis caucasica Willd. (≡ C. australis subsp. caucasica (Willd.) C. C. Towns.)

A Uk: Ukraine: Odesa Oblast, Odesa city, 46.444784°N, 30.764291°E, 46 m, along fence outside Botanical Garden of I. I. Mechnikov Odesa National University, several young plants, 16 Sep 2022, Shynder & Levchuk (KWHA 102515; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/151467932); Odesa city, 46.44079°N, 30.76807°E, Botanical Garden of I. I. Mechnikov Odesa National University, spontaneously in undergrowth in arboretum, 17 Sep 2022, Shynder & Levchuk (KWHA 102507; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/151643748); Zakarpattia Oblast, Uzhhorod city, 48.618504°N, 22.305502°E, in anthropogenic habitats, between Botanical Garden of Uzhhorod National University and Uzhhorod children railway, 5 Sep 2022, Shynder (KW s.n.; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/151284173); ibid., 16 Sep 2022, Shevera; ibid, 4 Jun 2023, Shynder (KWHA 103178; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/178956564); Kyiv City, M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden, spontaneous generative reproduction, 16 Aug 2023, Shynder (KWHA 103171; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/178701241). – Celtis caucasica is a tree native to the S Balkans, Caucasus, SW & C Asia to W Himalaya (Grudzinskaya 1979; Tutin 1993). There was information that C. caucasica was possibly autochthonous in Crimea, but this data has not yet been confirmed (Yena 2012). In Ukraine, C. caucasica is occasionally cultivated, mainly in the S region and Crimea. Currently this species has the status of a casual alien, escaped from cultivation.

O. Shynder, L. Levchuk & M. Shevera

Celtis planchoniana K. I. Chr. (= C. glabrata Steven ex Planch.)

A Uk: Ukraine: Odesa city, Chkalov Sanatorium Park, 46.445385°N, 30.768454°E, young tree spontaneous in underwood, 17 Sep 2022, Shynder (KWHA 102524; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152606203); ibid., 46.445112°N, 30.768772°E, top of slope above sea near park, young tree 4–5 years old, 26 Sep 2022, Shynder (KW s.n.). – Celtis planchoniana is a tree with a native range in the E submediterranean region (Balkans, Caucasus, Crimea, Anatolia and SW Asia) (Grudzinskaya 1979; Tutin 1993; POWO 2023; Yena 2012). In continental Ukraine, C. glabrata is occasionally cultivated in the S region, for example in Odesa, where it is starting to naturalize. The young plants we discovered had a specific scattered pubescence of hooked hairs, a diagnostic character of C. planchoniana f. aspera Medw. (Grudzinskaya 1979). The species also spreads spontaneously in the Botanical Garden of the I. I. Mechnikov Odesa National University.

O. Shynder & L. Levchuk

Fig. 5.

Alien Casuarina species in Tunisia – A: C. cunninghamiana subsp. cunninghamiana, juvenile plant. – B, C: C. glauca; B: ferruginous cylindric cones; C: branchlet apex. – A: Tunisia, Mahdia, Rejiche, 7 Jul 2023; B, C: ibid., Monastir, Monastir city, 18 Jul 2023, photographs by R. El Mokni.

img-z9-1_05.jpg

Caryophyllaceae

Loeflingia hispanica L.

? It: Italy: Campania, “Presa nei contorni di Napoli ed alla Cava”, s.d. [de facto first half of 19th century], s.c., s.n. (RO [herb. Borgia]). – Loeflingia hispanica is native to a wide area from the Canary Islands to the Mediterranean area, SW Iran and the Arabian Peninsula, according to POWO (2023); the record from Italy seems based on Heywood (1993: 153) who, however, recorded the species in Sicily. In fact, both Marhold (2011+a) and the Portale della flora d'Italia (PFI 2023) indicated L. hispanica in Sicily only. Nevertheless, it was already given by Cortesi (1906) for the surroundings of Naples and Cava de' Tirreni (province of Salerno), both localities in the region of Campania (SW Italy), based on the specimen cited above. This specimen consists of three flowering plants with a single label. Cesare Borgia (1776–1837) was an influential nobleman of the Papal State and a learned naturalist who intensively collected plants especially in Sicily and Campania (Cortesi 1906a, 1906b). It is to be noted that, according to Guadagno (1926), the indications from Campania might be due to a misplacing in the herbarium; however, both “Loeflingia hispanica” and the gathering places were handwritten by Borgia on the same label. On the other hand, L. hispanica is a rare and localized species of sandy meadows in Sicily (Giardina & al. 2007); this habitat is hardly compatible with the two localities of Campania, even at that time. In addition, no one else has noticed this plant in the region. This casts into doubt that the examined herbarium sheet might refer to cultivated or escaped individuals. In fact, the plant was rarely cultivated in the botanical gardens of the region, as recorded by Tenore (1809) from the erstwhile Garden of the Prince of Bisignano in Barra, from where a specimen is preserved in the herbarium of Giovanni Gussone (NAP0002244), a correspondent of Borgia himself (Cortesi 1906a). In addition, many samples of the herbarium Borgia derived from cultivated plants, frequently from the gardens of Cava de' Tirreni (including his own garden) and Catania (Sicily) (see Cortesi 1906a), normally without any note on the labels appropriate to clarify the possibly native status of the gathered plants.

D. Iamonico & E. Del Guacchio

Casuarinaceae

Casuarina cunninghamiana Miq. subsp. cunninghamianaFig. 5A.

A Tn: Tunisia: Mahdia, Rejiche, 35°28′41″N, 11°03′02″E, 27–30 m, roadsides, 7 Jul 2023, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – The casuarinas are a group of 90–96 species of trees and shrubs placed in four genera: Allocasuarina L. Johnson, Casuarina L., Ceuthostoma L. Johnson and Gymnostoma L. Johnson (Wilson & Johnson 1989). The genus Casuarina comprises c. 17 tree species (Boland & al. 1996), mostly endemic to Australia, but with some representatives in SE Asia and the Pacific Islands. Chiefly due to their ability of nitrogen-fixing, fast-growing and tolerance to a wide range of adverse conditions including periodic waterlogging, drought, salt spray and highly saline soils, three main species, viz. C. cunninghamiana, C. equisetifolia L. and C. glauca Sieber ex Spreng. have widely been planted outside their native range (National Research Council 1984). In N Africa, C. cunninghamiana and C. glauca have been reported as cultivated in Algeria (see, e.g., APD 2023; POWO 2023; Jury 2009+; Belaid & al. 2022), the former also as cultivated in Tunisia (Greuter & Domina 2015: 31). A fourth species, C. stricta Aiton, was reported as introduced to Morocco and Tunisia (Dobignard & Chatelain 2011: 292). During the last few years, few juvenile specimens of C. cunninghamiana were discovered growing on roadsides in the region of Rejiche (Mahdia, CE Tunisia). The taxon seems to be naturalizing near some localities where it was successfully planted and can be considered currently as a casual alien; this is also its first report as a casual alien for N Africa. Tunisian collected material shows marcescent 8–10 teeth (reduced leaves), yellow at base, darker brown toward in the apex and is assigned to subsp. cunninghamiana (cf. Wilson & Johnson 1989: 106).

R. El Mokni

Casuarina glauca Sieber ex Spreng. – Fig. 5B, C.

N Tn: Tunisia: Monastir, Monastir city, between department buildings of Faculty of Pharmacy of Monastir, 35°45′49″N, 10°49′50″E, 10 m, 27 Jun 2020, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir), ibid, 18 Jul 2023, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Bizerta, Sejnane toward Nefza, 37°03′34″N, 09°13′25″E, 140 m, roadside, 11 Jul 2023, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – Casuarina glauca is an 8–20 m tall tree with typical long-recurved teeth (reduced leaves) on young permanent shoots (Wilson & Johnson 1989: 104 & 107–108), originating from the coast of SE Australia (Elfers 1988). The species has been successfully introduced in saline soils of Cyprus, Egypt, Florida, India, Israel, Kenya, Malawi, and South Africa (National Research Council 1984). In N Africa, C. glauca was introduced only to Morocco (POWO 2023) and Tunisia (pers. obs.), actually with unknown status. It is reported here for the first time as an established alien in Tunisia after the discovery of many juvenile seedlings and saplings with different stem diameters and heights since 2020 in the Monastir region (CE Tunisia) and more recently also of few juvenile specimens from seedlings in the Bizerta region (NE Tunisia). An analytical key is proposed here for the two alien species of the genus Casuarina occurring in Tunisia (derived from Wilson & Johnson 1989: 104; Verloove & Silva 2022: 34).

Analytical key to alien species of Casuarina occurring in Tunisia

1. Root suckers frequent; leaf teeth (reduced leaves) 12–20; samara (winged achene) to 5 mm long C. glauca

– Root suckers absent; leaf teeth 8–10; samara 3–4 mm long C. cunninghamiana subsp. cunninghamiana

R. El Mokni

Chenopodiaceae

Chenopodium pratericola Rydb.

A Cm: Crimea: Simferopol, food market Privoz, roadside, 27 Dec 2022, Yena (CSAU); Simferopolsky Rayon, Perovo Village, vicinity of Yuzhnaya poultry farm, 29 Sep 2022, Oleshko (CSAU). – This species is native to North America but as an alien plant spread to Europe, Asia, and South America (GBIF 2023). In the European area, C. pratericola is known from N, C and E Europe (Uotila 2011+a) reaching S as far as Bulgaria (Grozeva 2012) and the Ukraine (Mosyakin & al. 1994). For Crimea, C. pratericola is given here for the first time. The whole plant has a narrowly conic or fusiform habit. From the 17 species of Chenopodium s.l. that occur in the Crimean Peninsula (Yena 2012), C. pratericola is well distinguished by its markedly small (up to 17 mm long), lanceolate (length: width ratio (3–)4: 1), toothless leaves, pointed at the tip and wedge-shaped at the base, tapering into a petiole. One of the most distinctive features of this species is its venation pattern: the leaf is 3-veined from the base, lateral veins are arcuate and twice as short as the midrib (on very small leaves the lateral veins may be faint or sometimes absent). The upper leaf surface is smooth, the lower surface as well as the calyx and petioles are moderately to densely white mealy. The pericarp peels off easily, the flattened, round and nearly keeled, shiny black seeds reach 1–1.3 mm in diam. In general, all morphological characters correspond well to those given in the literature (Mosyakin 1996; Clemants & Mosyakin 2003; Sukhorukov 2014). It seems no coincidence that the pioneering findings of C. pratericola in Crimea were made in areas where active transportation of food and feed occurs. The further fate of this ephemerophyte will be traced in the area.

A. V. Yena

Compositae (Asteraceae)

Carduus acicularis Bertol. (≡ C. pycnocephalus var. acicularis (Bertol.) Weiss) – Fig. 6.

A Cm: Crimea: Yalta region, vicinity of Goluboy Zaliv (Blue Bay) settlement, Limeny valley, territory of Yalta Nature Reserve, 44°24′19″N, 33°58′52″E, 140 m, Pinus plantation, side of fire-fighting country road, 9 Jun 2023, Ryff (YALT + photo); ibid., recreational complex near sea coast, 44°24′07″N, 33°59′17″E, 15 m, roadside, 28 Jun 2023, Ryff (photo). – This species is native to the Mediterranean and Bulgaria. In Switzerland, it is probably alien (Greuter 2006+; POWO 2023). Compared to the closely related Carduus pycnocephalus L. s.l., C. acicularis is more slender, has longer (11–15 cm) and narrower (c. 1 mm in diam.) peduncles, narrower involucral bracts (not more than 0.5 mm wide in the middle part) and rugulose achenes (Amaral Franco & Rocha Afonso 1976; Devesa & al. 2009). Carduus acicularis was probably accidentally introduced into Crimea in recent decades with building materials or seedlings of ornamental plants from the Mediterranean. Only two micropopulations in one area with a total number of c. 30 individuals have been found so far. However, it is possible that this species is more widely distributed, but it is easily confused with C. pycnocephalus, which often occurs on the S coast of Crimea in anthropogenic and seminatural habitats. In the coastal ruderal habitats of Goluboy Zaliv, C. acicularis grows together with C. pycnocephalus subsp. pycnocephalus. Carduus acicularis is also similar in habit to and can be confused with Tyrimnus leucographus (L.) Cass., which was recently found in SW Crimea (Seregin & al. 2015).

L. E. Ryff

Fig. 6.

Carduus acicularis – A: flowering plant; B: capitulum; C: achene. – D: C. acicularis (left), C. pycnocephalus subsp. pycnocephalus (right), mature capitula. – E: C. acicularis (left), Carduus pycnocephalus subsp. pycnocephalus (right), achenes. – A–C: Crimea, Goluboy Zaliv, Jun 2023; D, E: ibid., 30 Jun 2023 (collected 28 Jun 2023), photographs by L. E. Ryff.

img-z11-1_05.jpg

Hieracium umbrosum subsp. abietinum (Boiss. & Heldr.) Greuter (≡ H. vulgatum var. abietinum Boiss. & Heldr. ≡ H. vulgatum subsp. abietinum (Boiss. & Heldr.) Fr. ≡ H. abietinum (Boiss. & Heldr.) Boiss. ≡ H. umbrosum [subsp. umbrosum] var. abietinum (Boiss. & Heldr.) Zahn) + Rm: Romania: Banat, Băile Herculane [Herkulesbad], “Im Buchenwald um Suskului”, 24 Jun 1905, Schröter (ZT-00275378). – As shown in the synonymy, the taxonomic position of this Greek taxon has often changed. The rank adopted by Zahn is obviously undervalued for this remarkable taxon with its nearly circular basal leaves. Besides in Greece, it was recently detected in S Italy (Gottschlich & al. 2017) and is thereby an interesting case for an amphi-Adriatic range.

G. Gottschlich

Crassulaceae

Sedum sediforme (≡ Petrosedum sediforme (Jacq.) Grulich) A Uk: Ukraine: Odesa Oblast, Odesa Raion, upper reaches of Khadzhybey estuary, 46.690551°N, 30.392068°E, limestone slopes, spontaneous colony with an area of c. 0.03 ha, 1 Oct 2022, Kalashnik (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/178887319); ibid, 18 Jun 2023, Kalashnik (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/178888664). – New for the continental part of Ukraine as a casual alien, of Mediterranean origin, escaped from cultivation. Spontaneous seed dispersal was also noted in the Odesa Botanical Garden, 18 Sep 2017, Shynder (obs.). The species is already listed as naturalized in Crimea (Yena 2012). It is cultivated very rarely in Ukraine.

K. Kalashnik & O. Shynder

Fig. 7.

Euphorbia serrata, inflorescence. – Greece, Argolis, Limnes to Angelokastro, 19 May 2023, photograph by Ute Bergmeier.

img-z12-1_05.jpg

Cyperaceae

Carex umbrosa Host subsp. umbrosa

+ Mk: North Macedonia: Pelagonia region, Nidže Planina, Dobro Pole peak, 41.05056°N, 21.88349°E, 1100 m, 14 Jun 1916, Mrkvicka (SOM 10 401, 10 411), det. B. Davidov. – Not previously recorded from North Macedonia, according to Jiménez-Mejías & Luceño (2011+). The species is not mentioned in the published Reliquiae mrkvičkanae of Velenovský (1922: 22). The collector, Jan Mrkvicka, an officer in the Bulgarian army, was killed in World War I on 17 Aug 1916 near the Grazhden peak which is situated SW of the North Macedonian Dobro Pole peak. Mrkvicka was buried in the village of Gradeshnitsa eventually. He could certainly not have crossed enemy lines to collect this plant on Greek territory. However, C. umbrosa subsp. umbrosa is also known to occur directly S of the Greek-North Macedonian border, in a shallow depression known under the similar toponym of Dobro Polje (Kali Pediada), where it grows in swampy open meadows over micaceous schist, partly with Sphagnum mosses and stagnant water (Strid 2006: 727).

D. Dimitrov

Carex viridula Michx. (= C. serotina Mérat)

+ Mk: North Macedonia: Southwest region, Mt Jablanica, E slope of Sliva peak, 1200 m, swamp near spring, 14 Jul 1948, Kitanov (SOM 171731), det. D. Dimitrov. – Jiménez-Mejías & Luceño (2011+) did not report this species for North Macedonia. Bornmüller (1928), who collected intensively in what is today North Macedonia, did not observe this taxon which is, however, known to occur in adjacent Albania (Barina & al. 2018: 143, as C. serotina), N Greece (Dimopoulos & al. 2013: 89) and Bulgaria (Assyov & al. 2012: 121, as C. serotina).

D. Dimitrov

Euphorbiaceae

Euphorbia serrata L. – Fig. 7.

+ Gr: Greece: Peloponnisos, Argolis, Municipality of Mykines, between Limnes and Angelokastro, 37°44.307′N 22°56.860′E, 770 m, arable field, 19 May 2023, Bergmeier 23-252 (herb. Bergmeier). – Only two plants of the species were found in the surveyed field, which was traditionally cultivated with barley and oats. The weed vegetation was very species-rich, the most abundant wild plants being Bi-fora testiculata (L.) Spreng., Dasypyrum villosum (L.) P. Candargy, Neslia apiculata C. A. Mey., Papaver rhoeas L., Ranunculus arvensis L., Rhagadiolus stellatus (L.) Gaertn., Valerianella echinata (L.) DC., Veronica glauca subsp. peloponnesiaca (Boiss. & Orph.) Maire & Petitm. and Vicia striata M. Bieb., among many others. Euphorbia serrata is widely distributed in the W and C Mediterranean, where it occurs in species-rich cereal fields on base-rich soils (see, e.g., Nezadal 1989). The occurrence in S Greece should be considered native, because there was no incidence of recent casual introductions in the field and its surroundings, and the seeds of the cereals are domestic.

E. Bergmeier

Gentianaceae

Blackstonia acuminata (W. D. J. Koch & Ziz) Domin (≡ Chlora acuminata W. D. J. Koch & Ziz = B. perfoliata subsp. serotina (Rchb.) Vollm.) – Fig. 8.

+ Ag: Algeria: Skikda, Skikda city, cité Zeramna, 36°51′23″N, 06°55′13″E, 90 m, clayey and rocky N-facing slope in suburban environment, 15 May & 2 Jun 2021; 27 May, 11 Jun & 6 Jul 2022, Saci (photos [Fig. 8]), det. E. Véla. – This is the first confirmed record of Blackstonia acuminata in Algeria, more precisely in the former province of Constantine; see following entry.

E. Véla & A. Saci

Blackstonia perfoliata (L.) Huds. (≡ Chlora perfoliata L.)

– Ag: The first surveys of the genus Blackstonia Huds. (≡ Chlora Adans.) in N Africa during the 18th century (Poiret 1789: 158; Desfontaines 1798: 327) only refer to B. perfoliata sensu lato (as C. perfoliata). After the description of B. grandiflora (Viv.) Pau by Viviani (1830: 4, as C. grandiflora), the Algerian floras only considered that taxon (Munby 1847: 40; 1859: 21; 1866: 23). At the end of the 19th century, Battandier (1890: 590, as C. perfoliata) reintroduced the name B. perfoliata for Algeria, however with doubt, saying “des échantillons de la province de Constantine m'ont paru s'y rapporter”. Nevertheless Julien (1894: 186) accepted B. perfoliata (as C. perfoliata) for Algeria in addition to the common B. grandiflora. Battandier (1890: 590) claimed the occurrence of B. perfoliata also for Tunisia, but Bonnet & Barratte (1896: 288, as C. imperfoliata L. f.) argued that the latter record concerned B. imperfoliata (L. f.) Samp. Accordingly, Battandier & Trabut (1905: 228) then accepted B. imperfoliata as the second species for Tunisia, but not for Algeria where they considered only the occurrence of B. grandiflora. Battandier (1910: 63) also confirmed B. imperfoliata for Tunisia, but considered B. perfoliata to be deleted from the flora of Algeria. On the contrary, Quézel & Santa (1963: 741) reconsidered, additionally to the common B. grandiflora (as B. perfoliata subsp. grandiflora (Viv.) Maire), the presence of B. perfoliata in Algeria (as B. perfoliata subsp. “eu-perfoliata” Maire). Pottier-Alapetite (1981: 699) forgot to mention the historical presence of B. imperfoliata but added B. perfoliata (subsp. “eu-perfoliata” Maire) to the flora of Tunisia, based on three collections (two from herself and one from Cuénod). Finally, Le Floc'h & al. (2010: 209) reconsidered the historical presence of B. imperfoliata (as B. perfoliata subsp. imperfoliata) in Tunisia, but did not consider the possibility of any misidentification concerning B. perfoliata subsp. perfoliata. As a consequence, they accepted three Blackstonia taxa for Tunisia (followed by Marhold 2011+c). Flowering plants illustrated on the sharing network iNaturalist by one of us (AS) allowed the other (EV) to identify them as B. acuminata (W. D. J. Koch & Ziz) Domin (see preceding entry). None of the main, independent backbone databases on the N African flora gives this species for Algeria (nor Tunisia). We carried out a digital search on specimens of the genus Blackstonia from “Afrique du Nord” stored in the herbarium P, which gave 217 results ( https://science.mnhn.fr/institution/mnhn/collection/p/item/list?specificEpithet=imperfoliata&secteur=AFN& genus=Blackstonia, accessed 3 Jan 2023). Among them, 11 sheets from the Canaries, Morocco and Tunisia (but none from Algeria) are correctly sorted under B. imperfoliata, 133 sheets from all three N African countries are correctly sorted under B. grandiflora and 72 sheets are sorted under “B. perfoliata”; only seven of them, all from Morocco, effectively concern B. perfoliata s.str., a further three from Morocco fall within the variability of B. acuminata, whereas the majority shows specimens of B. grandiflora from all three countries (mostly labelled “subsp./var. grandiflora”). As a consequence, we cannot confirm any specimen of B. perfoliata s.str. from Algeria, and this taxon should therefore be retracted from the national checklist.

E. Véla & A. Saci

Fig. 8.

Blackstonia acuminata – A: flower; B: inflorescence. – A: Algeria, Skikda, cité Zeramna, 15 May 2021; B: ibid., 2 Jun 2021, photographs by A. Saci.

img-z13-2_05.jpg

Fig. 9.

Eleusine indica – A: flowering plants; B: inflorescence. – A, B: Crimea, Yalta, 8 Jul 2023, photographs by L. E. Ryff.

img-z14-1_05.jpg

Gramineae (Poaceae)

Eleusine indica (L.) Gaertn. (≡ Cynosurus indicus L.) – Fig. 9.

A Cm: Crimea: Yalta, Ignatenko Street, cracks between paving slabs, asphalt cracks, sidewalks, bases of walls of buildings, 44°29′49″N, 34°10′18″E, 10 m, 1 Jul 2023, Ryff (YALT); ibid., 8 Jul 2023, Ryff (YALT + photo); ibid., Radina square, 44°29′47″N, 34°10′21″E, 11 m, 21 Aug 2023, Ryff (YALT); ibid., Komsomol'skaya square, 44°29′51″N, 34°10′22″E, 15 m, 21 Aug 2023, Ryff (YALT + photo); ibid., Moskovskaya Street, 44°29′53″N, 34°10′13″E, 10 m, 21 Aug 2023, Ryff (photo). – This species is widespread in tropical and warm-temperate zones of the world. It is native to S, SE and SW Asia and Africa (except N Africa). Information about its status, whether native or alien, in the E Mediterranean and Caucasus is conflicting. In the rest of its range, including Europe, Eleusine indica is an alien species. In the Euro+Med PlantBase (Valdés & Scholz 2009+) it is given for Ukraine, taken from the Vascular plants of Ukraine (Mosyakin & Fedoronchuk 1999). However, this publication clearly states that E. indica was collected once in Kyiv in 1991, but subsequently its population disappeared (Mosyakin & Shevera 1993; Mosyakin & Fedoronchuk 1999). There are no more recent records of this species in Ukraine (Shevera, pers. comm.). Eleusine indica has not been previously reported for the flora of Crimea (Yena 2012). It was accidentally introduced to Yalta, apparently several years ago, most likely from the Caucasus, either by road transport or with building materials when laying new paving slabs. Now E. indica is actively spreading in various anthropogenic habitats in the area of its initial introduction in the centre of the city. The population includes c. 1000 individuals and occupies an area of c. 0.25 km2, its density is up to 10–20 plants per m2. Eleusine indica forms monodominant groups or grows in a weed community with Amaranthus deflexus L., A. retroflexus L., Chenopodiastrum murale (L.) S. Fuentes & al., Digitaria sanguinalis (L.) Scop., Eragrostis minor Host, Erigeron canadensis L., E. sumatrensis Retz., Poa annua L., Polygonum aviculare L., Portulaca oleracea L. s.l., Setaria viridis (L.) P. Beauv., Symphyotrichum squamatum (Spreng.) G. L. Nesom and other ruderal plants. Currently, E. indica is only locally distributed in Crimea and can be considered as a casual alien. But this species is considered one of the most problematic weeds worldwide (Holm & al. 1991) due to its invasive behaviour and rapid spread. Therefore, we can expect its further expansion in Crimea.

L. E. Ryff

Elytrigia atherica (Link) Kerguélen (≡ Elymus athericus (Link) Kerguélen = Elymus pycnanthus (Godr.) Melderis) – Fig. 10.

+ Cm: Crimea: Sevastopol, Kruglaya Bay (Omega Bay), 44°35′43″N, 33°26′54″E, 1 m, sea shore, 2 Aug 2014, Yevseyenkov (photos:  https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/400093.html [Fig. 10A],  https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/400094.html [Fig. 10C],  https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/400095.html); ibid., 13 Jun 2018, Yevseyenkov (photo:  https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/594550.html); ibid., Kamyshovaya Bay, 44°34′23.34″N,33°25′34.82″E,seashore,26Mar2020,Yev-seyenkov (photo:  https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image /id/649618.html); ibid., Kruglaya Bay, 44°35′43″N, 33°26′54″E, 1–2 m, sea shore, 19 Jul 2020, Ryff (photo); ibid., 19 Jul 2020, Ryff, Yevseyenkov & Kudrinskaya (YALT); ibid., Kamyshovaya Bay, 44°34′23″N, 33°25′39″E, 1 m, sea shore, 19 Jul 2020, Ryff, Yevseyenkov & Kudrinskaya (YALT); ibid., Kazachya Bay, 44°34′08″N, 33°24′49″E, 1 m, sea shore, 19 Jul 2020, Ryff, Yevseyenkov & Kudrinskaya (YALT); ibid., Streletskaya Bay, 44°35′39″N, 33°28′06″E, 2–3 m, sea coast, 19 Jul 2020, Ryff, Yevseyenkov & Kudrinskaya (YALT). – This is a characteristic plant of sea shores. The taxonomy of the group of couch grass, united by the common English name sea couch (Elymus pungens (Pers.) Melderis, Elymus pycnanthus (Godr.) Melderis, Elytrigia atherica and Thinopyrum acutum (DC.) Banfi), is very confusing and requires further study. In the present note we adhere to the concept adopted in the Euro+Med PlantBase (Valdés & Scholz 2009+) and consider the plants we found under the name Elytrigia atherica. This species is native to the Mediterranean, W and C Europe, and the Black Sea coast of Turkey, Bulgaria and Romania (Ciocârlan 1994, 2011; Valdés & Scholz 2009+; Doroftei & al. 2011; Assyov & al. 2012; POWO 2023). In the Black Sea region it is rare and therefore it is included (as Elymus pycnanthus (Godr.) Melderis) in the Red List of Bulgarian vascular plants and the Red Book of the Black Sea (Dumont 1999; Petrova & Vladimirov 2009). For E Europe, sea couch is indicated as an alien species based on a single herbarium specimen from 1859 from an unknown collector from Kotlin island (city of Kronstadt) in the Gulf of Finland near Saint Petersburg. This find was cited in different sources under different names: Elytrigia pungens (Pers.) Tutin (Tzvelev 1964), Elymus pycnanthus (Melderis 1985) or Elytrigia atherica (Tzvelev 2006). For the Baltic region, hybrids with the formula E. pycnanthus × Elytrigia repens (L.) Nevski are mentioned (Tzvelev 1964; Melderis 1980). To date, such plants have disappeared from the vicinity of Kronstadt (Tzvelev & Probatova 2019), and there is no current information from the Baltic countries. In S Ukraine, sea couch was found in 1868 near the coast of the Tiligul estuary, and there is a relevant herbarium specimen in BRNU, identified as Triticum pungens Pers. (GBIF 2023). However, in Vascular plants of Ukraine (Mosyakin & Fedoronchuk 1999) this species is not indicated for the territory of the country. In Crimea, sea couch was first found by one of us (PY) in 2014 in the Kruglaya Bay of the Black Sea in the city of Sevastopol. Subsequently, the same plants were identified by PEY and AYK along the shores of other bays of Sevastopol – Kamyshovaya, Kazachya and Streletskaya. Their photos were shown in Plantarium (2007–2023), but the identification of the plant caused difficulties. It was assumed that this was ×Agrotrigia hajastanica (Tzvelev) Tzvelev – a rare intergeneric hybrid of Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertn. s.l. × Elytrigia repens (Seregin & al. 2015). However, a more careful study convinced us that the plants from Sevastopol are identical with Elytrigia atherica from the Mediterranean. As in other areas of its range, in Sevastopol this species grows exclusively along the seashore. It forms a pure sward or communities of the class Juncetea maritimi Br.-Bl. in Br.-Bl. & al. 1952 together with Elytrigia elongata (Host) Nevski, E. repens, Phragmites australis (Cav.) Steud. and some other species. Without doubt, this is a species native to the flora of Crimea and, accordingly, E Europe.

L. E. Ryff, P. E. Yevseyenkov & A. Y. Kudrinskaya

Fig. 10.

Elytrigia atherica – A: flowering plants; B: spike in flower; C: spike in fruit. – A, C: Crimea, Sevastopol, 2 Aug 2014; B: ibid., 16 Jul 2020, photographs by P. E. Yevseyenkov.

img-z16-1_05.jpg

Iridaceae

Iris foetidissima L.

N Cm: Crimea: Urban District Yalta, Nizhnyaya Oreanda, 44.46412°N, 34.146639°E, forest, 5 Sep 2003, Levon (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/67905405); ibid., Foros, Forossky Park, mature individuals with seedlings, 30 Dec 2012, Gayvoronskaya (photo:  https://www.plantarium.ru/lang/en/page/image/id/170042.html; Gayvoronskaya 2013); Miskhor, Miskhorsky park, near stream, escaped, 7 Nov 2020, Zorina (photo: https://www.plantarium.ru/lang/en/page/image/id/760954.html; Plantarium 2023); ibid., surroundings of Nikita, 44°30′56″N, 34°14′03″E, 230 m, disturbed ash-oak forest, 7 Jun 2023, Sadogurskiy (photo); ibid., 11 Jul 2023, Ryff (YALT); ibid., Magarach, 44°30′31″N, 34°13′06″E, 125 m, disturbed ash-oak forest, 25 Jul 2023, Ryff (YALT). – This species is native to W Europe and the W Mediterranean (Euro+Med 2006+). Iris foetidissima is widely cultivated as an ornamental plant and sometimes escapes from cultivation. Now it is naturalized in many regions of the world, especially in North America and Australia (Randall 2017; GBIF 2023; POWO 2023). It has been grown for a long time in the Nikitsky Botanical Garden and in other parks as well as in private gardens along the S coast of Crimea. For the first time in the region, escaped plants of I. foetidissima (erroneously determined as I. musulmanica Fomin; see following entry) were revealed by the first author in the eastern, abandoned edge of the Massandrovsky Park in Yalta in the second half of the 1980s. Numerous plants of I. foetidissima, together with another adventive species, Daphne laureola L., grow there in a dense shibljak of Carpinus orientalis Mill. and Quercus pubescens Willd, in a ground vegetation layer of Hedera helix L. In 2022, a spontaneously sprouted plant of this species was found near the settlement of Nikita, approximately 500 m apart from the cultivated population in the Verkhniy Park of the Nikitsky Botanical Garden. In 2023, a population of I. foetidissima in the vicinity of Magarach was examined in detail. Evidently, the population has been growing spontaneously in this place for several decades. To date, it occupies an area of about 200 m2 and has more than 20 individual clones of different age, of which at least three are generative; they bloom and bear fruit and reproduce by seeds and vegetatively. The largest clones reach 2 m in diam. and consist of 10–15 elementary individuals. Flowering time is in the middle of June. The population grows not far from a stream, in the lowland and on adjacent slopes in a disturbed Quercus-Fraxinus forest. It forms a plant community with Brachypodium sylvaticum (Huds.) P. Beauv., Clematis vitalba L., Hedera helix L., Rubus caesius L., Ruscus aculeatus L., Solanum dulcamara L. and other mesophytic species. Iris foetidissima is known from a few localities in S Crimea and its populations are small. It persists in the natural flora for a long period, at least more than 30 years, successfully reproducing and spreading by seeds, slowly expanding its range. The species is therefore considered to have become naturalized in Crimea.

A. V. Yena & L. E. Ryff

Iris spuria subsp. musulmanica (Fomin) Takht. (≡ I. musulmanica Fomin)

– N Cm: This name has been erroneously applied to two different taxa of Iris L. that occur in Crimea. Firstly, it concerns alien Iris plants naturalized in Yalta, on the S coast of Crimea, and originally given for the Crimean flora at the very end of the 20th century (Didukh & Yena 1999). Later the same name was included in the annotated checklist of the regional spontaneous flora (Yena 2012) and mentioned with reference to that monograph in the Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 16 (Svirin & Kashirina 2023). According to the taxonomic re-examination of those plants, I. spuria subsp. musulmanica is to be excluded from the Crimean flora and all records for this region mentioned here refer to I. foetidissima L. (see preceding entry). Secondly, the name I. spuria subsp. musulmanica was also misapplied to a herbarium specimen in MW collected in the Sevastopol area on 30 May 2012 (Seregin 2023), which turned out to belong to the autochthonous I. halophila Pall. (Svirin & Kashirina 2023). This error is also mirrored in the occurrence data for I. spuria subsp. musulmanica provided by GBIF (2023); the locality on the Gerakleysky Peninsula in Crimea shown there refers in fact to I. halophila.

A. V. Yena

Labiatae (Lamiaceae)

Pseudodictamnus mediterraneus subsp. lycius (Hub.-Mor.) Raus, comb. nov.Ballota pseudodictamnus subsp. lycia Hub.-Mor. in Bauhinia 2: 203. 1963. – From a phylogenetic analysis based on nuclear and plastid DNA sequences representing all genera of the tribe Marrubieae, Siadati & al. (2018) revealed the necessity of splitting the genus Ballota L., in its traditional concept, into two well-supported clades matching well with the genera Ballota s.str. (2 or 3 species, with calyx limb regularly dentate, 5-toothed) and Pseudodictamnus Fabr. (13 species, with calyx limb undulate or crenate or irregularly dentate with 10 to many teeth). In this context, 13 new names and combinations in Pseudodictamnus at specific rank were proposed, among them P. mediterraneus Salmaki & Siadati (Siadati & al. 2018: 779), known as Ballota pseudodictamnus (L.) Benth. in previous floristic literature. This is an E Mediterranean geoelement with its nominate subspecies P. mediterraneus subsp. mediterraneus (≡ B. pseudodictamnus subsp. pseudodictamnus) distributed in the S Aegean area (Crete and Andikithira, see Strid 2016: 537, map 2116), extending to opposite N Africa (Cyrenaica, Patzak 1959: 52; POWO 2023), and a second subspecies occurring in SW Asia (Stapf 1885: 41; Davis & Doroszenko 1982: 157–158), originally described as B. pseudodictamnus subsp. lycia Hub.-Mor., which differs mainly by its larger calyx limb with more prominently mucronate teeth (Huber-Morath 1963: 203). For the latter, a still lacking name under Pseudodictamnus is proposed here.

Th. Raus

Stachys obliqua Waldst. & Kit.

+ Mk: North Macedonia: Southwest region, Mt Jablanica, E slope of Vokari peak, 1400 m, limestone, 24 Jul 1948, Kitanov (SOM 177 242), det. D. Dimitrov. – New to North Macedonia. The species is not mentioned or keyed out in the Labiatae treatment of the most recent flora of the country (Matevski 2021).

D. Dimitrov

Leguminosae (Fabaceae)

Lathyrus cassius Boiss. – Fig. 11A, B.

+ Bu: Bulgaria: Thracian lowland, Haskovo district, 1.5 km NE of Simeonovgrad town, 19 Jun 2021, Mátis & Miholcsa (obs.); ibid., 42.04326°N, 25.84557°E, 90 m, dry grasslands among sparse Paliurus spina-christi Mill. scrub, 15 Jun 2023, Stoyanov & Marinov (SOM 178626); ibid., 42.04386°N, 25.84665°E, 15 Jun 2023, Stoyanov & Marinov (SOM 178627, SOM 178628). – This is the first record of Lathyrus cassius from Bulgaria. Up to now, Lathyrus L. was represented by 30 species in the Bulgarian flora (Kožuharov 1976; Tosheva 2005). Lathyrus cassius, an E Mediterranean element, was known only from SW Asia (Anatolia and the Levant) until a few years ago (Davis 1970). It was recently reported for the first time for the European flora, from Edirne Province in European Turkey (Güneş & Çırpıcı 2015). The Bulgarian locality of L. cassius is about 160 km N of the one from near Edirne and therefore now represents the northernmost outpost of the range of the species. Among the Bulgarian members of the genus, L. cassius is closely related to L. annuus L. The latter is a circum-mediterranean species, growing sympatrically with the former but in more humid, more or less scrubby habitats. Morphologically, the two species are well distinguished. Lathyrus cassius has pale pink flowers and its peduncles, calyx teeth and legumes are covered with more or less dense, sessile glands, whereas L. annuus shows yellow to orange-yellow flowers, without or with only a few, sparse glands (Fig. 11C, D). Furthermore, the legumes of L. cassius are 28–35 mm long, whereas those of L. annuus are 40–80 mm long (Davis 1970). The two species also differ significantly in phenology: L. annuus blooms in the second half of May, whereas L. cassius a month later. The population of L. cassius occupies the S slope of a small hill NE of Simeonovgrad town and consists of about 100 individuals. The species grows in dry grasslands dominated by Aegilops speltoides Tausch and Hordeum bulbosum L., alongside other typical Mediterranean or submediterranean species such as Bituminaria bituminosa (L.) C. H. Stirt., Bupleurum odontites L., Convolvulus betonicifolius Mill., Cota tinctoria (L.) J. Gay, Cruciata pedemontana (Bellardi) Ehrend., Crupina vulgaris Cass., Echinops microcephalus Sm., Linum trigynum L., Pimpinella peregrina L., Polygala monspeliaca L., Rumex tuberosus L., Rapistrum rugosum (L.) All., Stachys obliqua Waldst. & Kit., Teucrium capitatum L., Ziziphora capitata L. Due to extensive grazing, ruderal plants such as Bromus arvensis L., Cephalaria transsylvanica (L.) Roem. & Schult., Ononis spinosa L., Eryngium campestre L., Phleum paniculatum Huds. and Xeranthemum cylindraceum Sm. were also abundant in the grasslands.

A. Mátis, Z. Miholcsa, Y. Marinov & S. Stoyanov

Malvaceae

Hibiscus syriacus L.

A Uk: Ukraine: Cherkasy Oblast, Cherkasy city, 49.425286°N, 32.054533°E, spontaneous seedlings near flower beds, 21 Aug 2022, Chorna & Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/148261389); Umancity,48.750379°N,30.223615°E,youngplantsalong edges of sidewalks in several places, 1 Jul 2023, Chorna (obs.); Chernivtsi city, 48.287608°N, 25.936161°E, Cathedral of the Holy Spirit, several self-sowing plants along sidewalk, 2–3 years old, 5 Jan 2023, Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/155428815); Kyiv City, 50.41437°N, 30.561165°E, M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden, plants of various ages (including flowering ones) in cracks of paths and foundations of buildings, spontaneous, 12 Apr 2020, Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/143890294); ibid, 29 Sep 2020, Shynder (KWHA 102587); Kyiv Oblast, Bila Tserkva city, square near railway station, several young plants (2–3 years old) in cracks along edge of sidewalk, 49.811361°N, 30.108871°E, 12 Aug 2023, Doiko (BCK s.n.); Odesa city, 46.404526°N, 30.751991°E, self-sown in flower beds and on sides of sidewalks and roads, 26 Sep 2022, Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/155382645); Ternopil Oblast, Ternopil city, 49.562659°N, 25.594468°E, along edges of sidewalks in several places, 23 Jul 2023, Shynder (obs.); Chortkiv city, plants spreading beyond flower gardens, 1–15 Jul 2023, Sobolenko (obs.); Zakarpattia Oblast, Mukachevo Raion, Svalyava city, 48.549765°N, 22.982052°E, a generative plant in crack in sidewalk along central street, 30 Aug 2022, Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/155429219); ibid., Berehove city, territory of B. Linner Berehove District Hospital, near central entrance, near place of culture, several self-sown plants, 28 Aug 2022, Shevera & Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152538461); Berehove city, 48.204664°N, 22.633318°E, several 2–3 year old plants along walls and edges of sidewalks, 28 Aug 2022, Shevera & Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152384970); Berehove city, 48.217651°N, 22.645113°E, spontaneous group of mature plants on roadside, 1 Sep 2022, Shynder & Shevera (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/152491353); ibid., Uzhhorod city, spontaneous in undergrowth of Botanical Garden of Uzhhorod National University, 15 Jul 2022, Shevera (obs.); ibid, flower embankment between Botanical Garden of Uzhhorod National University (where species is cultivated) and Uzhhorod children railway, escaped, 16 Sep 2022, Shevera (obs.). – A shrubby species of E Asian origin. Nowadays, it is often used for decorative gardening almost throughout Ukraine, but 20–30 years ago it was almost never grown in the N regions due to its low winter hardiness. New for the continental part of Ukraine as a casual alien, escaped from cultivation.

M. Shevera, O. Shynder, H. Chorna & N. Doiko

Fig. 11.

A, B: Lathyrus cassius; A: flowers; B: young legume. – C, D: L. annuus; C: flowers; D: young legume. – A: Bulgaria, Simeonovgrad, 19 Jun 2021, photograph by A. Mátis; B: ibid., 15 Jun 2023; C, D: ibid., 22 May 2023, photographs by S. Stoyanov.

img-z19-1_05.jpg

Fig. 12.

Alien Eucalyptus species in Tunisia – A, B: E. botryoides; A: flaky-fibrous grey bark; B: cylindric fruits. – C–E: E. cylindrocarpa; C: basal part of planted individual with flaky bark and two juvenile individuals of different age; D: cylindric buds with conic operculum; E: flowers and ovoid fruits. – F, G: E. gomphocephala; F: subfibrous fissured bark; G: cylindric to ovoid fruits. – A, B: Tunisia, Jendouba, Aïn Draham, Babouch to Tabarka, 15 Oct 2022; C–E: ibid., Monastir, Jemmal to Touza, 20 Sep 2022; F, G: ibid., Bizerta, Sidi Salem to Nadhour, 1 Oct 2022, photographs by R. El Mokni.

img-z20-1_05.jpg

Myrtaceae

Eucalyptus botryoides Sm. – Fig. 12A, B.

A Tn: Tunisia: Jendouba, Aïn Draham, road from Babouch toward Tabarka, 36°48′46″N, 08°40′43″E, 485 m, escaped on roadsides, 15 Oct 2022, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – Aiming at updating the list of alien Myrtaceae in Tunisia (see, e.g., El Mokni 2021), Eucalyptus botryoides is reported here from the Kroumirian mixed oak forest in NW Tunisia as a casual alien species new for the adventitious flora of Tunisia and Africa (see APD 2023). The species is native to SE Australia (Victoria, New South Wales); in the Mediterranean region, it is reported as a casual alien only in Italy, Sardinia, Sicily and Malta, and as cultivated in Portugal (Raab-Straube 2022+).

R. El Mokni

Eucalyptus cylindrocarpa Blakely – Fig. 12C–E.

A Tn: Tunisia: Monastir, road from Jemmal toward Touza, 35°37′46″N, 10°48′29″E, 1–2 m, escaped on roadsides, 20 Sep 2022, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – A casual alien species new for the adventitious flora of Tunisia, Africa and the Mediterranean area. Eucalyptus cylindrocarpa (Austin 1960: 102, sheet 40) is restricted to W Australia (POWO 2023) and has not been recorded beyond its native range before, except in the Americas (Raab-Straube (2022+; APD 2023; GBIF 2023). In the Euro+Med region, the species is known to occur only in Tunisia, where it was successfully introduced and escaped into the Touza region. For identification and more details, see Chippendale (1988: 310).

R. El Mokni

Eucalyptus gomphocephala DC. – Fig. 12F, G.

A Tn: Tunisia: Bizerta, road from Sidi Salem toward Nadhour, 37°17′13″N, 09°52′20″E, 7–10 m, escaped on roadsides, 1 Oct 2022, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Jendouba, Ghar Dimaou, El Ghorra, Aïn gampho, 36°35′16″N, 08°23′30″E, 1000 m, 6 Jul 2022, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); Monastir (Monastir city), 35°45′50″N, 10°49′38″E, 12–15 m, roadsides and under walls of buildings, 29 Oct 2020, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – A casual alien species new for the adventitious flora of Tunisia and Africa. Eucalyptus gomphocephala is an evergreen tree up to 40 m tall native to W Australia. As many species of the genus, it has been widely introduced around the world and can be found in cultivation used for wood production, windbreakers, stabilization of sands near the sea shore and afforestation and also as an important tree for honey production. In the Mediterranean the taxon is reported as a casual alien in Sardinia and Sicily (Galasso & al. 2018) and introduced in Spain, whereas only as cultivated for Morocco, Italy and Cyprus (Raab-Straube 2022+). For Africa, the taxon is cited with “unknown status” only from Morocco, Tunisia and Libya (see, e.g., Greuter & Domina 2015: 45; APD 2023). The actual status of E. gomphocephala in Tunisia and N Africa is defined here as casual alien. Three distant sporadic subpopulations of few juvenile individuals of different ages have been observed growing not far apart from successful introductions in the regions of Bizerta, Jendouba and Monastir.

R. El Mokni

Oleaceae

Fraxinus angustifolia subsp. oxycarpa (Willd.) Franco & Rocha Afonso (≡ F. oxycarpa Willd.)

A Uk: Ukraine: Kirovohrad Oblast, Kropyvnytskyi city, near Kovalivsky Park, 48.517684°N, 32.261230°E, young plants in cracks of pavement, 22 Jul 2023, Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/181019035); Kyiv City, 50.40998°N, 30.56021°E, M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden, Caucasus and Crimea plots, in plantations and spontaneously, 19 Sep 2022, Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/135759608); Mykolaiv Oblast, Voznesensk Raion, 47.565823°N, 31.85712°E, sporadically on side of highway, spontaneous offspring in roadside plantings, 9 Oct 2022, Shynder (obs.); Odesa Oblast, Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi Raion, W vicinity of Mayaky village, 46.4185°N, 30.175°E, along highway, a spontaneously established young tree, 20 Jun 2019, Shynder (KWHA 102712); ibid., 46.437651°N, 30.191667°E, young self-sown tree, 23 Sep 2022, Shynder (KW s.n.); ibid., 46.418578°N, 30.175048°E, 24 Sep 2022, Shynder (KWHA 102489); ibid., 46.411699°N, 30.166699°E, group of trees along edge of reed swamp, 24 Sep 2022, Shynder (KWHA 102490); Odesa city, near Sport Palace, 46.446450°N, 30.758812°E, young tree weedy among Juniperus sabina L. plantation, 16 Sep 2022, Shynder (obs.); Odesa city, 46.445978°N, 30.763767°E, Botanical Garden of I. I. Mechnykov Odesa National University, new territory, mature tree in plantations with spontaneous offspring, 16 Sep 2022, Shynder & Levchuk (KW s.n.; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/150573368,  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/150573365); Odesa city, 46.384336°N, 30.749836°E, on slope above seashore, mature planted trees with scattered young spontaneous offspring, 24 Sep 2022, Shynder (KW s.n.; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/181061258); Vinnytsia Oblast, Bershad city, 48.360249°N, 29.523069°E, between slabs along embankment near park, dense self-sown seedlings, 14 Aug 2023, Shynder (KWHA 103173); Zakarpattia Oblast, Berehove city, spontaneous growth in old cemetery, 29 Aug 2022, Shynder & Shevera (KW s.n.); ibid., Berehove, 48.211269°N, 22.657157°E, spontaneous growth on side of road near old estate, 29 Aug 2022, Shynder & Shevera (KW s.n.). – The native range of this tree is submediterranean, including S Crimea. However, this taxon is listed as indigenous also for the continental part of Ukraine (Raab-Straube 2022+), based on Prokudin (1987), where exact original data are missing. Therefore, we checked the existing information and found no original data on the natural occurrence of Fraxinus angustifolia subsp. oxycarpa in the continental part of Ukraine – this taxon is either not mentioned at all, or indicated only as a cultivated plant, or general statements are given that cannot be verified. Our indications are the first specifying the status of this subspecies as a casual alien in the continental part of Ukraine, where is has escaped from cultivation in several places given above.

O. Shynder, M. Levchuk & M. Shevera

Onagraceae

Ludwigia brevipes (Britton & al.) Eames (≡ Ludwigiantha brevipes Britton & al.) – Fig. 13.

A Cm: Crimea: Sevastopol, coast of Streletskaya Bay, 44°35′37″N, 33°28′11″E, 1 m, wasteland on ruins of ancient manor, 1 Sep 2022, Yevseyenkov (photo:  https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/741947.html); ibid., 4 Sep 2022, Yevseyenkov (photo:  https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/742251.html); ibid., 20 Sep 2022, Yevseyenkov (photo:  https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/744223.html); ibid., 20 Sep 2022, Svirin (photos:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/153577017 as L. repens J. R. Forst.); ibid., 28 Sep 2023, Yevseyenkov (YALT; photo:  https://www.plantarium.ru/page/image/id/781950.html). – The native range of Ludwigia brevipes is SE North America (POWO 2023). Its natural habitats are shores of seasonal ponds and shallow waterbodies, marshes, moist dune hollows and edges of impoundments and ditches. The species is widespread as an ornamental aquatic plant, especially in aquarium keeping. It is listed as an alien invasive species for Great Britain (CABI 2023). There is no information about records of L. brevipes in other European countries. In Crimea, Ludwigia was first found in 2021 by one of the authors (SAS), and in 2022 it was independently rediscovered in the same habitat by the second author (PEY). The species was originally identified as L. repens. A more thorough study showed that the plants were morphologically closer to L. brevipes, which differs from L. repens in its narrower leaf blades, larger flower parts, sepals 2–3 times longer than wide (vs approximately equally long and wide) and significantly longer fruiting pedicels. Both species belong to the same hybridogenic complex, are hexaploids and have the same genome composition (Liu & al. 2020). The plants we found have morphological and morphometric characters intermediate between typical L. brevipes and L. repens. The length: width ratio of the sepals of 2: 1. Clearly visible and persistent petals and the presence of relatively long fruiting pedicels allow us to consider the Crimean plants as L. brevipes, although it is possible that they belong to the hybrid L. brevipes × L. repens. The only known locality of this taxon in the city of Sevastopol is the territory of the archeological monument, rural estate No. 101A, of the khôra of the ancient Tauric Chersonese. The plants grow in two soil-filled pithos holes cut into the limestone rock. Currently, the population includes about 100 individuals forming dense mats and covering an area of 1–1.5 m2. Ludwigia L. is a new genus for the flora of Crimea; only one species of this genus, L. palustris (L.) Elliott, is native to Europe (Raab-Straube 2018+c). The same species was considered the only representative of Ludwigia in the flora of E Europe, where it is reliably known only from Ukrainian Transcarpathia (Prokudin 1987; Skvortsov 1996). Therefore, L. brevipes is the second species of this genus in E Europe, and to our knowledge the first report of this species for mainland Europe as a whole.

S. A. Svirin, P. E. Yevseyenkov, L. E. Ryff

Orobanchaceae

Euphrasia liburnica Wettst.

+ Mk: North Macedonia: Southwest region, Mt Jablanica, slope of Beličko Bardo, 1400 m, Kitanov (SOM 171 806), det. D. Dimitrov. – Widespread in the mountains of the Balkan Peninsula but not previously reported from North Macedonia (Marhold 2011+b). Several populations of this species that occur close to the borders of North Macedonia are known from Albania (Barina 2017: 330) and Greece (Mts Varnous, Kajmakčalan, Vitek 1991: 239; Mt Tzena, Chasapis & al. 2020).

D. Dimitrov

Melampyrum scardicum Wettst. – Fig. 14.

+ Gr: Greece: E Macedonia, Nomos of Drama, Mt Falakron, c. 3 km SE of Ochiro village, 41°17′N, 23°52′E, 640 m, edges of old dirt road, with Carpinus orientalis Mill., Ostrya carpinifolia Scop., Syringa vulgaris L., 24 Jun 2022, Vidakis (obs.); ibid., 14 Jun 2023, Vidakis & Tsiftsis (IHUF). – Melampyrum scardicum is known from Albania, Bulgaria, North Macedonia and Serbia (Petrova & Vladimirov 2010). It was not reported for Greece in the previously published Vascular plants of Greece (Dimopoulos & al. 2013, 2016). In the various Balkan countries, the species presents considerable differences in its distribution. In Bulgaria the species is widespread and occurs from sea level to 2000 m (Petrova & Vladimirov 2010; Assyov & Petrova 2012), whereas in Albania it is rather rare, confined to high-elevation areas of 1900–2200 m (Barina 2017). In Greece, M. scardicum has so far been found only in a very small area, which is threatened by extensive marble quarrying.

S. Tsiftsis & K. Vidakis

Orobanche litorea Guss.

+ Ma: Morocco: not far from Bouznika, 33.840538°N, 07.108651°W, sandy areas covered with vegetation behind dunes, 8 Apr 2010, Pils (obs., photo; see also Pils 2022: 407, as O. artemisiae-campestris Gaudin). – After El Mokni & al. (2015: 8) and particularly Rätzel & al. (2018: 207 ff.) clarified the status of this species, which is presumably related to O. minor Sm. or O. artemisiae-campestris, O. litorea is better recognized as an independent species (see also El Mokni & Domina 2019) and has been reported or photographed more often, even if sometimes under a false name. This species was previously not known to occur in Morocco. The finding extends the range of O. litorea Guss. along the N African coast far to the west.

H. Uhlich, S. Rätzel & G. Pils

Fig. 13.

Ludwigia brevipes – A: flowering branches; B: flower; C: fruiting branch. – A: Crimea, Sevastopol, 1 Sep 2022; B: ibid., 20 Sep 2022, photographs by P. E. Yevseyenkov; C: ibid., 20 Sep 2022, photograph by S. A. Svirin.

img-z23-1_05.jpg

Orobanche teucrii Holandre

+ Gr: Greece: W Macedonia, Kozani, S Velventos, 557 m, deciduous forest, 1 May 2019, Willing & Willing 295688 (B 10 1089280, as O. caryophyllacea Sm.). – Already in 1989, Uhlich (in Uhlich & al. 1995: 42 fig. 29, 97) found Orobanche teucrii in Bulgaria (C Pirin, descent from Premkata pass to Banderiza refuge, here f. aurea Teyber), about 45 km distant from the border with Greece. It was only a matter of time that the species would be detected for the first time also in Greece.

H. Uhlich & S. Rätzel

Orobanche variegata Wallr.

? Al: Orobanche variegata was reported for Albania by Shuka & Tan (2019) from various locations. However, the plant depicted in the published photograph is to be identified rather as O. gracilis Sm. Orobanche variegata is always a larger plant, often producing more than one stem, while its corolla is almost always uniformly dark red in the upper 3/4–4/5 without any yellow colour in its upper part. Moreover, the lower corolla lobe is usually larger and the thorat margins are less denticulate to subentire. Frequent misidentification of O. gracilis as O. variegata in the past lead to an alleged excessively broad distribution range of the latter taxon. Indeed, rare individuals of O. gracilis that are both robust and display an almost entirely red corolla may pose some uncertainty of identification. The same is true for single individuals with all-yellow corollas. Notwithstanding, O. variegata is a species belonging to the SW Mediterranean chorotype occurring from Morocco to Tunisia in NW Africa and having its easternmost populations in Sicily and northernmost ones in Sardinia (Sánchez Pedraja & al. 2016). In this light, it seems unlikely that O. variegata could be found also in the Balkans. The record published by Shuka & Tan (2019) could have been premature, because, according to what was written in their note, it is possible that Rätzel and Uhlich identified only one photograph, and the authors then seem to have extended this one provision to all their material.

V. Lazzeri

Fig. 14.

Melampyrum scardicum – A: flowering plant; B: inflorescence. – Greece, Mt Vrondous, 24 Jun 2022, photographs by K. Vidakis.

img-z24-1_05.jpg

Oxalidaceae

Oxalis articulata Savigny (≡ Acetosella articulata (Savigny) Kuntze; = O. rubra A. St.-Hil. ≡ O. articulata subsp. rubra (A. St.-Hil.) Lourteig) – Fig. 15.

A Cm: Crimea: Vicinity of Yalta, Nikita village, 44°30′56″N, 34°14′14″E, 250 m, ruderal habitat on roadside, 7 Jun 2023, Ryff (YALT + photo). – Oxalis articulata is a tuberous geophyte. Its native range is SE South America. This species is widely in cultivation as an ornamental, food and medicine plant in all continents and often escapes (Randall 2017). Oxalis articulata is listed as an alien species for many European countries (Henning & Raab-Straube 2016+b; POWO 2023). There are no indications in the scientific literature for E Europe, but a single find is known in N Ukraine (GBIF 2023). The species was recently reported as alien in Bulgaria (Petrova & Vladimirov 2019), a neighbouring region with a similar climate to the Crimean Peninsula. In recent years O. articulata has been widely cultivated in the Nikitsky Botanical Garden and other parks, in urban landscaping and private gardens of S Crimea, where it is suggested to have escaped from cultivation (Ryff 2021). In 2023, a small population of c. 30 individuals was found in the settlement of Nikita in a ruderal habitat, associated with Hordeum murinum subsp. leporinum (Link) Arcang., Humulus lupulus L., Lepidium draba L. and Sonchus oleraceus L. Oxalis articulata has been recorded as a casual alien only in this single locality so far and does not yet show a tendency to spread, in contrast to the recently identified invasive bulb-bearing Oxalis latifolia Kunth (Ryff 2021), which is actually expanding its range in Crimea.

L. E. Ryff

Papaveraceae

Papaver atlanticum (Ball) Coss. A Uk: Ukraine: Zhytomyr Oblast, Berdychiv Raion, N vicinity of Ruzhyn town, 49.742867°N, 29.187592°E, edge of wheat field, 26 Jun 2023, Orlov (KW s.n., KWHA 103182). – An ephemerophyte new for Ukraine. The spontaneous spread of the species beyond the borders of the flower gardens in the M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of Kyiv City was also noted on 21 May 2022, Shynder & Kostruba (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/118053714).

O. Shynder, O. Orlov & T. Kostruba

Portulacaceae

Portulaca oleracea L. is a common weed in Romania (Grinţescu 1952; Anghel & al. 1972; Ciocârlan & al. 2004; Ciocârlan 2009 etc.). It has been reported in this country since the 18th century (Baumgarten 1816; Schur 1866; Edel 1835–1853 & Guebhard 1842–1848 cited in Brândză 1879–1883; Uechtritz & Sintenis 1876 cited in Kanitz 1879–1881; Herbich 1859; Grecescu 1898; Brândză 1898 etc.). Portulaca oleracea subsp. sativa (Haw.) Čelak. was mentioned as a garden vegetable by Schur (1866) and Porcius (1885) from Transylvania (as P. sativa Haw.) and by Grecescu (1898) from the extra-Carpathian regions (as P. oleracea var. sativa (Haw.) DC.) (Sîrbu & Oprea 2011). In the botanical works from the last century as well as in recent times, the following species of Portulaca have been reported from Romania: P. oleracea L. (Prodan 1939; Borza 1947; Grinţescu 1952; Beldie 1977; Oprea 2005; Ciocârlan 2009; Sîrbu & Oprea 2011; Sârbu & al. 2013), P. grandiflora Hook. as casual alien (Morariu 1937; see other references in Sîrbu & Oprea 2011) and P. pilosa L. as naturalized alien (Nagodă & al. 2013).

Special research on the Portulaca oleracea aggregate based on micromorphological peculiarities of the seed surface was triggered by the investigations of Avinoam Danin in different countries of the world (Danin 2011a, 2011b; Danin & al. 2008, 2012, 2016). In this context, two morphotypes new for Romania were found, viz. P. granulatostellulata (Poelln.) Ricceri & Arrigoni (Danin 2011a) and P. trituberculata Danin & al. (2011b).

Fig. 15.

Oxalis articulata, flowering plants. – Crimea, Nikita, 7 Jun 2023, photograph by L. E. Ryff.

img-z25-1_05.jpg

Our special investigation of the Portulaca oleracea complex in Romania was started in 2022 by C. Sîrbu and A. Oprea with material from different regions of the country (34 specimens). Some morphotypes new for the Romanian flora were identified: P. cypria Danin, P. daninii Galasso & al., P. macrantha (Maire) Ricceri & Arrigoni, P. nitida (Danin & H. G. Baker) Ricceri & Arrigoni, P. oleracea L. s.str., P. rausii Danin, P. sardoa Danin & al. and P. socotrana Domina & Raimondo, and P. granulatostellulata and P. trituberculata were confirmed (11 morphotypes in total).

See Supplemental content online for  Fig. S1–S3 (wi.54.54101_Supplement.pdf).

E. Bulakh, C. Sîrbu, A. Oprea, O. Volutsa & M. Shevera

Portulaca cypria Danin –  Fig. S1A, B (wi.54.54101_Supplement.pdf).

A Rm: Romania: Buzău, Râmnicu Sărat, 45.38231°N, 27.03869°E, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI). – New area record for this taxon, identified by SEM study of the seeds. Its native range is the Mediterranean basin. It is also found in many other European countries (POWO 2023).

E. Bulakh, C. Sîrbu, A. Oprea, O. Volutsa & M. Shevera

Portulaca daninii Galasso & al. (≡ P. oleracea subsp. tuberculata Danin & H. G. Baker) –  Fig. S1C, D (wi.54.54101_Supplement.pdf).

N Rm: Romania: Iaşi, M. Sadoveanu Alley, 47.20946°N, 27.53154°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Iaşi, Miroslava, Ion Vodă cel Viteaz Street, 47.4082°N, 27.54360°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Iaşi, Șorogari, 47.20260°N, 27.58781°E, roadside, 1963, Zanoschi(IASI); ibid., Iaşi, Mircea cel Bătrân residential area, 47.15605°N, 27.56213°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Vrancea, Focşani, 45.67287°N, 27.17918°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Buzău, Râmnicu Sărat, 45.39353°N, 27.04560°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Buzău, ring road, 45.13493°N, 26.78704°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Ilfov, Urziceni, 44.71385°N, 26.62536°E, 2022, roadside, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Ilfov, Urziceni, 44.71955°N, 26.62721°E, roadside ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Ilfov, Urziceni, 44.71624°N, 26.62611°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Buzău, Râmnicu Sărat, 45.39778°N, 27.04790°E, roadside ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Bucureşti, Splaiul Independenţei Street, 44.43768°N, 26.06922°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Bucureşti, Biological Research Institute, 44.44694°N, 26.04603°E, garden, 2022, Sîrbu & A. Oprea, (IASI); ibid., Bucureşti, right bank of river Dâmboviţa, 44.44734°N, 26.04030°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea, (IASI). – New area record for this taxon, identified by SEM study of the seeds. Its native range is Tropical America. It has recently been noted from Ukraine (Bulakh & al. 2020) and Poland (Bulakh & al. 2022).

E. Bulakh, C. Sîrbu, A. Oprea, O. Volutsa & M. Shevera

Portulaca macrantha Ricceri & Arrigoni (≡ P. oleracea subsp. macrantha Maire, nom. illeg.) –  Fig. S1E, F (wi.54.54101_Supplement.pdf).

A Rm: Romania: Iaşi, Țuţora, 47.13540°N, 27.79433°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Iaşi, Mircea cel Bătrân residential area, 47.15605°N, 27.56213°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Ilfov, Urziceni, 44.71385°N, 26.62536°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Ilfov, Urziceni, 44.71955°N, 26.62721°E, roadside ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Ilfov, Urziceni, 44.71624°N, 26.62611°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Bucureşti, Cotroceni Street, 44.43705°N, 26.06689°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI). – New area record for this taxon, identified by SEM study of the seeds. It is native to the Canary Islands and Morocco (Dobignard & Chatelain 2013), and introduced in Tunisia (Domina & al. 2010), Poland (Bulakh & al. 2022) and Ukraine (Bulakh & al. 2023).

E. Bulakh, C. Sîrbu, A. Oprea, O. Volutsa & M. Shevera

Portulaca nitida (Danin & H. G. Baker) Ricceri & Arrigoni (≡ P. oleracea subsp. nitida Danin & H. G. Baker) –  Fig. S2A, B (wi.54.54101_Supplement.pdf).

A Rm: Romania: Vrancea, Slobozia Bradului, 45.49367°N, 27.06135°E, vineyard, 1996, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Vaslui, Bădeana, 46.16738°N, 27.60062°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Vrancea, Focşani, 45.69015°N, 27.20203°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Bucureşti, right bank of river Dâmboviţa, 44.46040°N, 26.04160°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI). – New area record for this taxon, identified by SEM study of the seeds. The area of distribution is Europe to C Asia and N Africa (POWO 2023).

E. Bulakh, C. Sîrbu, A. Oprea, O. Volutsa & M. Shevera

Portulaca oleracea L. s.str. –  Fig. S2C, D (wi.54.54101_Supplement.pdf).

N Rm: Romania: Vaslui, Bădeana, 46.16738°N, 27.60062°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Buzău, ring road, 45.13493°N, 26.78704°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Bucureşti, right bank of river Dâmboviţa, 44.46040°N, 26.04160°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI). – New area record for this taxon, identified by SEM study of the seeds.

E. Bulakh, C. Sîrbu, A. Oprea, O. Volutsa & M. Shevera

Portulaca papillatostellulata (Danin & H. G. Baker) Danin (≡ P. oleracea subsp. papillatostellulata Danin & H. G. Baker) –  Fig. S2E, F (wi.54.54101_Supplement.pdf).

N Rm: Romania: Iaşi, M. Sadoveanu Alley, 47.20946°N, 27.53154°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Iaşi, Miroslava, Voineşti Street, 47.14633°N, 27.55206°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Iaşi, Alexandru cel Bun residential area, 47.16030°N, 27.57270°E, railway embankment, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Iaşi, train station, 47.16619°N, 27.56796°E, railway embankment, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Galaţi, Târgu Bujor, 45.86607°N, 27.90437°E, vineyard, 1996, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Iaşi, Mircea cel Bătrân residential area, 47.15605°N, 27.56213°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Vaslui, Bădeana, 46.16738°N, 27.60062°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Galaţi, Tecuci, 45.85010°N, 27.38700°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Vrancea, Focşani, 45.67287°N, 27.17918°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Vrancea, Focşani, 45.68437°N, 27.19392°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Buzău, Râmnicu Sărat, 45.39353°N, 27.04560°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Buzău, 45.13453°N, 26.78952°E, railway embankment, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Ilfov, Urziceni, 44.71385°N, 26.62536°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Buzău, Râmnicu Sărat, 45.39778°N, 27.04790°E, roadside ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Bucureşti, E81 street, 44.43453°N, 26.08174°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Bucureşti, Biological Research Institute, 44.44694°N, 26.04603°E, garden, 2022, Sîrbu & A. Oprea, (IASI); ibid., Bucureşti, right bank of river Dâmboviţa, 44.44734°N, 26.04030°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI). – New area record for this taxon, identified by SEM study of the seeds. The native range is the Mediterranean; it is also given as native for some countries of Europe (POWO 2023).

E. Bulakh, C. Sîrbu, A. Oprea, O. Volutsa & M. Shevera

Portulaca rausii Danin (≡ P. oleracea subsp. rausii (Danin) Greuter) –  Fig. S3A, B (wi.54.54101_Supplement.pdf).

A Rm: Romania: Iaşi, Sărărie Street, 47.18018°N, 27.57376°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Iaşi, Păcurari Street, 47.17283°N, 27.53111°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Iaşi, Miroslava, Ion Vodă cel Viteaz Street, 47.14082°N, 27.54360°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Buzău, Râmnicu Sărat, 45.39353°N, 27.04560°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Buzău, Râmnicu Sărat, 45.38231°N, 27.03869°E, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Buzău, ring road, 45.13493°N, 26.78704°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Bucureşti, Cotroceni Street, 44.43705°N, 26.06689°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Bucureşti, right bank of river Dâmboviţa, 44.44734°N, 26.04030°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI). – New area record for this taxon, identified by SEM study of the seeds. Its native range is the Mediterranean (POWO 2023).

E. Bulakh, C. Sîrbu, A. Oprea, O. Volutsa & M. Shevera

Portulaca sardoa Danin & al. –  Fig. S3C, D (wi.54.54101_Supplement.pdf).

A Rm: Romania: Iaşi, Sărărie Street, 47.18018°N, 27.57376°E, disturbed ground, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Iaşi, Țuţora, 47.13540°N, 27.79433°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu (IASI); ibid., Galaţi, Cosmeşti, 45.86197°N, 27.30917°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Buzău, Râmnicu Sărat, 45.38231°N, 27.03869°E, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Buzău, 45.13453°N, 26.78952°E, railway embankment, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI); ibid., Bucureşti, Cotroceni Street, 44.43705°N, 26.06689°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI). – New area record for this taxon, identified by SEM study of the seeds. This taxon is given only for Sardinia, Corsica (Danin & al. 2012, 2016; POWO 2023) and recently for Ukraine (Bulakh & al. 2023).

E. Bulakh, C. Sîrbu, A. Oprea, O. Volutsa & M. Shevera

Portulaca socotrana Domina & Raimondo –  Fig. S3E, F (wi.54.54101_Supplement.pdf). A Rm: Romania: Bucureşti, E81 street, 44.43453°N, 26.08174°E, roadside, 2022, Sîrbu & Oprea (IASI). – New area record for this taxon. Preliminarily determined as P. cf. socotrana, identified by SEM study of the seeds, and requiring additional research. The taxon was described from the island of Socotra (Domina & Raimondo 2009), now noted from Iran (Amini Rad & al. 2017) and Ukraine (Crimea) (Bulakh & al. 2023).

E. Bulakh, C. Sîrbu, A. Oprea, O. Volutsa & M. Shevera

Ranunculaceae

Clematis serratifolia Rehder – Fig. 16.

A Uk: Ukraine: Chernihiv Oblast, Pryluky Raion, Trostyanets village, surroundings of Trostianets State Dendrological Park, 50.78810819°N, 32.8046822°E, where an invasive colony is registered outside the park boundary, escaped from the park, 1 Oct 2022, Tarabun & Shynder (KW s.n., KWHA 102526; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/181019984 [Fig. 16]); ibid, Trostianets State Dendrological Park, 50.788390°N, 32.805177°E, several invasive colonies in the arboretum, 1 Oct 2022, Tarabun & Shynder (KWHA 102528). – Clematis serratifolia is a woody liana, native to the Russian Far East and Korea. In the territory of Ukraine, it is occasionally cultivated in some botanical gardens and dendrological parks. It is new for Ukraine as a casual alien, escaped from cultivation.

O. Shynder, M. Tarabun & O. Bilyk

Ranunculus cornutus DC.

+ AE(G): Greece: East Aegean Islands, Nomos of Dodekanisos, Eparchia of Rhodos, Rhodos island, c. 1 km N of Laerma, outskirts of town, 36°10′N, 27°56′E, 250 m, ruderal in wet ditch by forest road to Moni Artamiti, 3 Apr 1996, Kalheber 96-151 (FR); ibid., Nomos of Lesvos, Eparchia of Mitilini, Lesvos island, hills above Kato Tritos W of Kolpos Geras, c. 500 m SW of chapel of Ag. Michail, 36°04′30″N, 27°25′45″E, 150–230 m, 9 Apr 2000, Kalheber 00-031 (FR). – This chiefly SW Asian species, extending E to Kazakhstan and W to coastal NE Africa (POWO 2023), is given as absent from Greece in recent floras and checklists (Dimopoulos & al. 2013, 2020; Strid & Tan 2002). The occurrence of Ranunculus cornutus in Europe was first reported by Hayek (1924: 343) for “Thra” (Thrace) under its synonym R. lomatocarpus Fisch. & C. A. Mey. This record, however, was queried by Tutin & Akeroyd (1993: 277) but is in fact corroborated by collections from Turkey-in-Europe kept in B (Istanbul-Čatalca, 16 Apr 1876, Dingler; Edirne, 1904, Dingler, det. H. Demiriz, confirm. Th. Raus). Strid (2002: 48) therefore conjectured the possible occurrence of R. cornutus also in continental NE Greece. According to Pampanini (1923), the Italian agronomist N. Mazzocchi-Alemanni surveyed Rhodos economically in 1922 when it was under Italian rule (Mazzocchi-Alemanni 1924). During his fieldwork he collected R. cornutus on the island, later published as R. lomatocarpus by Ciferri (1944: 39), but without giving a precise locality. The record was accepted by Rechinger in his influential Flora aegaea (Rechinger 1944: 193) but finally rejected by Carlström (1987: 48) as “probably erroneous”. As a consequence, both Med-Checklist (Greuter & al. 1989: 429) and Flora hellenica (Strid & Tan 2002: 48) discarded R. cornutus from the flora of the E Aegean Islands which, however, is disproved now. It should be noted that for the time being R. cornutus is not determinable with European floras and can be keyed out only in the Floras of Turkey, Cyprus and SW Asia.

H. Kalheber & Th. Raus

Rosaceae

Malus niedzwetzkyana Dieck (= M. pumila Mill. s.l. = M. domestica Borkh. s.l.)

A Uk: Ukraine: Zhytomyr Oblast, E vicinity of Berdychiv city, 49.89703°N, 28.6577°E, edge of Trykutnyk forest, near highway, 5–6 year old self-sown tree, probably spontaneously escaped by zoochory from plantation 1.8 km away, 21 Jun 2021, Shynder & Orlov (KW s.n.; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/102732945). – A tree species of C Asian origin. It is occasionally cultivated in many regions of Ukraine, but its occurrence outside cultivation has not been noted before. New for Ukraine as a casual alien, escaped from cultivation.

O. Shynder & O. Orlov

Fig. 16.

Clematis serratifolia – A: habitat (invasive in conifer plantation) and habit; B: flowering branch; C: fruiting branch. – Ukraine, Chernihiv Oblast, 1 Oct 2022, photographs by O. Shynder.

img-z28-1_05.jpg

Malus toringo (Siebold) de Vriese (≡ M. sieboldii Rehder) A Uk: Ukraine: Kirovohrad Oblast, Holovanivsk Raion, Novoselytsia village, 48.303917°N, 30.326258°E, several mature trees planted in local arboretum, from there abundant self-sown seedlings and saplings outside arboretum, more than 35 individuals at more than 230 m from mature trees, 29 Jun 2021, Shynder (KW s.n., KWHA 102155; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/112017489,  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/93347016); ibid., Kyiv City, M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden, edge of path in Syringaria plot, 50.417317°N, 30.563095°E, 3 year old sapling spontaneously spread (probably offspring from mature tree 110 m away), 30 Jun 2022, Levon (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/124858344). – A tree species of SE Asian origin, new for Ukraine as a casual alien, escaped from cultivation.

O. Shynder

Rubiaceae

Galium debile Desv.

+ Hu: Hungary: between cities of Szentendre and Pomáz N of Budapest, 47°39′36.64″N, 19°02′38.44″E, wet and somewhat saline meadow characterized by Galatella sedifolia (L.) Greuter and Iris spuria L., in flowering stage, 28 May 2023, Somlyay (BP); ibid, 47°39′35.38″N, 19°02′37.58″E, with ripe fruits, 5 Jul 2023, Somlyay (BP). – Only a single record of this species has so far been published from the territory of present-day Hungary (Menyhárth 1877). This record was considered erroneous by Degen (1908) and dubious by Jávorka (1924–1925). Indeed, Menyhárth's only known voucher from the vicinity of Kalocsa city (S Hungary) labelled as “G. debile” represents G. palustre L. (rev. L. Somlyay). Later, Hungarian determination keys (e.g. Soó & Kárpáti 1968; Simon 1992; Vidéki 2009) did not include G. debile, and Hungary is not covered by the distribution range of the species in the Euro+Med PlantBase (Marhold 2011+d) and POWO (2023) websites. My recent revision in the Herbarium Carpato-Pannonicum (BP), however, revealed that several Galium specimens collected in Hungary, and identified under different names by their collectors, actually belong to G. debile. They are as follows: Transdanubia (Dunántúl): Sopron, meadow at Városliget, 2 Jul 1933, Kárpáti (as G. palustre); Pannonian plains (Alföld): Dorog, 20 Jun 1903, Jávorka (as G. palustre × ? and (duplicate) G. austriacum L.); Makó, wet meadow, 9 Jun 1902, Thaisz (as G. palustre); Pákozd, margin of reed stand at Lake Velence, 21 Jun 1980, Felföldy (as G. uliginosum f. glabratum, revised by Bauer as G. pumilum Murray); Pákozd, wet meadow Kerek-tói-lapos at Lake Velence, 2 Jun 2015, Bauer (as G. palustre subsp. elongatum); Szolnok, near Tisza river, 15 Jul 1944, Timár (as G. uliginosum). Furthermore, several old (and quite unripe) specimens from the vicinity of Buda (Budapest) may also represent G. debile. The species is assessed here as native to Hungary considering the records of G. debile scattered all over the region and covering a long period of collecting. Being very similar to G. palustre, G. debile can easily be overlooked. Moreover, sufficiently ripe fruits (a feature diagnostic for G. debile, see, e.g., Kliphuis & al. 1986) are seldom observable, due to early mowing on wet meadows in the region.

L. Somlyay

Sapindaceae

Acer monspessulanum L.

A Uk: Ukraine: Kirovohrad Oblast, Dolyna Community, N vicinity of Ivanivka village, 48.20802°N, 32.85166°E, young self-sown tree by roadside, 7 Oct 2022, Pidtykana, Shynder & Kolomiychuk (KWHA 102577); Mykolaiv Oblast, vicinity of Trykraty village, Trikraty forest, young plants spontaneously spread, 3 May 2020, Borovyk (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/100952984); Odesa city, 46.384287°N, 30.74988°E, lower part of slope above sea, self-sown trees (c. 10 years old) on both sides of road, 46.384357°N, 30.749866°E, 26 Sep 2022, Shynder (KW s.n.; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/181061257). – Acer monspessulanum is a tree of Mediterranean origin. In Ukraine, it is grown in the steppe zone and is occasionally found in botanical gardens and arboretums, where it sometimes produces self-sown offspring. New for Ukraine as a casual alien, escaped from cultivation.

O. Shynder, D. Borovyk, V. Kolomiychuk & H. Pidtykana

Koelreuteria paniculata Laxm.

A Uk: Ukraine: Khmelnytskyi Oblast, Kamianets-Podilskyi city, 48.667925°N, 26.582607°E, several plants along Lesia Ukrainka street, outside fence of Botanical Garden of Kamianets-Podilskyi University, 30 Oct 2022, Lyubinska, Shynder & Kolomiychuk (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/155434377); Odesa Oblast, Odesa city, near Sport Palace, 46.445583°N, 30.759605°E, self-sown offspring near mature trees along street, 17 Sep 2022, Shynder (KW s.n.); Zakarpattia Oblast, Uzhhorod city, between Botanical Garden of Uzhhorod National University (where it is cultivated) and Uzhhorod children railway, 48.619911°N, 22.302777°E, small colony of young generative plants escaped from Botanical Garden, 5 Sep 2022, Shynder (KW s.n.; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/151286876); ibid., 16 Aug 2022, Shevera (obs.). – A tree species of E Asian origin (POWO 2023). Koelreuteria paniculata is often cultivated in the S and Crimean regions of Ukraine, and in the N and W regions it is grown mainly in plant introduction centres. In places of cultivation in Ukraine it forms vegetative colonies, e.g.: Odesa city, Botanical Garden of I. I. Mecnykov Odesa National University, 16 Sep 2022, Levchuk & Shynder (KWHA 102522); Dnipro city, Botanical Garden of Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, 17 Oct 2022, Kabar & Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/171521198); Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Kryvyi Rih Botanical Garden, 8 Oct 2022, Shol (KRW s.n.); Zakarpattia Oblast, J. Szikura Botanical Garden of Ferenc Rákóczi II Transcarpathian Hungarian College of Higher Education, 3 Jun 2023, Shevera & Shynder (UU s.n.); Kyiv City, O. V. Fomin Botanical Garden of Taras Shechenko National University of Kyiv (Mosyakin & Yavorska 2001; Shynder & al. 2022); Kyiv City, Syretskyi Dendrological Park, 13 Jun 2022, Glukhova & Shynder (KWHA s.n.). Noted for Crimea (Protopopova & Shevera 2014) as a plant escaped from cultivation. New for the continental part of Ukraine as a casual alien, escaped from cultivation.

O. Shynder, M. Shevera, V. Kolomiychuk, L. Lyubinska, L. Levchuk, A. Kabar, H. Shol & S. Glukhova

Sapotaceae

Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels (≡ Sideroxylon spinosum L.) – Fig. 17.

A Tn: Tunisia: Nabeul, Korbous, 36°50′04″N, 10°35′34″E, Quercus coccifera L. forest of Korbous (where the species was successfully introduced), 227–230 m, 12 Apr 2019, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir); ibid., 30 May 2022, El Mokni (herb. Univ. Monastir). – Argania spinosa is a shrub or tree with a native range from S Morocco and W Algeria to N Western Sahara and N Mauritania. The plant was introduced to scattered areas around the world including the Canary Islands and, in Europe, the Netherlands, Belgium and Spain (e.g. Rivera & Ruiz 1978; Martínez-Gómez & al. 2020; Labarca-Rojas & al. 2022; GBIF 2023), as well as to Mexico and Argentina in the W hemisphere (Falasca & al. 2018). In Tunisia, introduction of the plant started in 1963, but no published report of its naturalization in the country is known by now (Raab-Straube 2020+; APD 2023; POWO 2023; GBIF 2023). During the monitoring of the floristic diversity of the Korbous forest, many juvenile individuals of A. spinosa were discovered resulting from seeds of the local mature planted trees. This is therefore the first record of A. spinosa as a possibly establishing xenophyte in Tunisia. It should be noted that, on recent molecular results, the genus Argania Roem. & Schult. is embedded in the genus Sideroxylon L. and should therefore better be sunk in the synonymy of the latter (Stride & al. 2014).

R. El Mokni

Fig. 17.

Argania spinosa – A: flowering branch; B: fruits. – Tunisia, Nabeul, Korbous, 30 May 2022, photographs by R. El Mokni.

img-z30-1_05.jpg

Solanaceae

Physalis peruviana L.

A Uk: Ukraine: Cherkasy Oblast, vicinity of Uman city, near random dump on edge of forest, a few flowering plants, 21 Oct 2018, Shynder, Chorna & Kostruba (KWHA 104076; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/150587239); Kyiv Oblast, Vasylkiv city, abandoned railway track, a few plants, 20 Oct 2020, Shynderhttps://www.inaturalist.org/observations/112016901). – The species is occasionally cultivated as an ornamental vegetable crop. In many European countries (as well as in other continents) it is an alien plant at various stages of naturalization (POWO 2023; Valdés 2012+). In Ukraine it currently has the status of a casual alien (ephemerophyte).

O. Shynder, H. Chorna & T. Kostruba

Typhaceae

Typha shuttleworthii W. D. J. Koch & Sond. (≡ T. latifolia subsp. shuttleworthii (W. D. J. Koch & Sond.) Stoj. & Stef.; = T. latifolia var. bethulona (Costa) Kronf.)

+ Cg: Montenegro: Northern region, Boljanići, Sađe, Jakupov grob, swamp, 8 Aug 2022, Kuzmanović & Stevanoski (BEOU 45965); ibid., Boljanići, Čardak, in Typhetum shuttleworthii, 8 Aug 2022, Kuzmanović & Stevanoski (BEOU 45966). – According to Cook (1980), Typha shuttleworthii is distributed in SC and SE Europe, except Hungary where its occurrence is doubtful. However, according to Király (2007) and POWO (2023), it is considered extinct for this country. In former Yugoslavia it is known from Slovenia (Martinčić & al. 1999), Croatia (Nikolić 2015+), Bosnia and Herzegovina (Hayek & Markgraf 1933) and Serbia (Jovanović 1986; Niketić & Tomović 2018; Tomović & al. 2020; Jenačković-Gocić & al. 2020; Sabovljević & al. 2021). A record for Montenegro in the surroundings of Spuž and Danilovgrad (Rohlena 1942: 499, as T. latifolia var. bethulona (Costa) Kronf.), was in fact overlooked by Uotila (2011+b), but Rohlena reported the species even earlier from a swamp near Danilovgrad (Rohlena 1904: 86, as T. latifolia var. bethulona) noting that he could not be sure whether the plants he collected were T. shuttleworthii because the material was not in fruit. The populations found near Pljevlja (Boljanići) cover an area of about 5 m2 each and corroborate the occurrence of that species in the N part of the country. At the first site near Jakupov grob it was found in a swamp together with Deschampsia cespitosa (L.) P. Beauv., Equisetum arvense L., Juncus inflexus L., Mentha longifolia (L.) L. and Valeriana officinalis L., neighboured by Filipendula ulmaria (L.) Maxim. tall herb vegetation. The second site at Čardak is a small shallow pond where the association Typhetum shuttleworthii was recorded. The species is known from similar habitats in Serbia.

N. Kuzmanović & I. Stevanoski

Fig. 18.

Viola hissarica – A: synanthropic habitat; B: flowering plant. – Ukraine, Dnipro city, 25 Mar 2020, photographs by L. Karmyzova.

img-z31-1_05.jpg

Violaceae

Viola hissarica Juz. – Fig. 18.

A Uk: Ukraine: Dnipro city, 48.4525°N, 35.0626°E, campus of Oles Honchar Dnipro National University, Gagarina Avenue, plentiful on lawn, 24 Apr 2012, Baranovsky (DSU); ibid, Olesya Honchara Street, 48.4513°N, 35.0560°E, small colony near residential building; ibid., 48.4510°N, 35.0558°E, ornamental garden area, 9 Apr 2017, Karmyzova (DSU s.n.); ibid, Kniahyni Olhy Street, 48.4755°N, 35.0252°E, small colony near residential building, 25 Mar 2020; Odesa city, Prymorska Street, 46.4864°N, 30.7430°E, small colony from ornamental garden area, spontaneously spreading, 15 Oct 2021, Kamyzova (obs.); Odesa city, Hoholya Street, spontaneous near flower bed, along cracks in sidewalk, plentiful, 16 Sep 2022, Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/149924369); ibid., 21 Apr 2023, Kalashnik (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/178880099); Odesa city, Panteleimonovska Street, around parking lot, cracks in road surface, scattered, several tens of plants, 21 Apr 2023, Kalashnik (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/178879343); Zaporizhzhya city, Zaporizhzhya City Children Botanical Garden, plentifully along cracks of paths near administrative building and greenhouses, spontaneous, 1 Jul 2023, Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/180431803); Kyiv City, Arboretum of M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden, in shade (planted c. 10 years ago, origin of plants could not be established, now dense carpet of new-generation plants has developed), 16 Apr 2023 (KWHA 103184; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/178718229); ibid., 21 Jun 2023 (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/170976692); Odesa city, Botanical Garden of I. I. Mechnykov Odesa National University, self-sown in flower bed, 16 Sep 2022, Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/151494601). – Viola hissarica is a narrow endemic of C Asia (Shishkin & Bobrov 1949), known only from one locality (Hisar Valley in Tajikistan). It was considered endangered (Takhtajan 1981), listed in the Red Book of the USSR (Borodin 1984) and in the Red Book of Tajikistan (Rahimi & al. 2017). Currently, the state of the population in its native habitat is unknown (Rahimi & al. 2017). In Ukraine, this species was indicated in Soviet times in the O. V. Fomin Botanical Garden of National Taras Schevchenko University of Kyiv (Lapin 1983), although it is currently not mentioned in the catalogues and publications of this institution (Solomakha 2007). The species is not mentioned in modern catalogues of other botanical gardens in Ukraine, although it is represented in some of them. In 1999, V. hissarica was found by V. V. Tarasov on the territory of the Botanical Garden of the Dnipro National University (DNU) (Tarasov 2005; Karmyzova & Baranovsky 2020). This species may have been spontaneously introduced together with other plants from C Asia. It was then found by B. Baranovsky near the Botanical Garden on the DNU campus in 2012, from where it began to spread actively into suitable urban habitats of Dnipro city. Now populations of up to 80 specimens per 1 m2 are common in the territory of Dnipro city. In 2021, the species was found by L. Karmyzova and in 2022 by O. Shynder in Odesa, and in 2023 by O. Shynder in the botanical gardens of Kyiv and Zaporizhzhya. Now V. hissarica is at the initial stage of expansion in the continental part of Ukraine and should still be considered as a casual alien species. Additional findings of V. hissarica cannot be excluded. It is primarily characterized by its lanceolate-triangular leaves (with a length: width ratio of 1: 2–3.5), winged petioles and whitish-violet bicolored flowers.

L. Karmyzova, B. Baranovsky & O. Shynder

Vitaceae

Ampelopsis aconitifolia Bunge

A Uk: Ukraine: Zakarpattia Oblast, Uzhhorod city, 48.618607°N, 22.305243°E, ruderal habitats between Botanical Garden and Uzhhorod children railway, a small colony of several young individuals, escaped from Botanical Garden, 5 Sep 2022, Shynder (KWHA 102504; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/151284174);ibid., 16 Sep 2022, Shevera (obs.). – Woody liana of SE Asian origin. New for Ukraine as a casual alien, escaped from cultivation. In addition, there have been recorded cases of spontaneous reproduction of Ampelopsis aconitifolia in botanical gardens and dendrological parks in Ukraine, e.g.: Odesa city, Botanical Garden of I. I. Mechnykov Odesa National University, 16 Sep 2022, Levchuk & Shynder (KW); Zakarpattia Oblast, Botanical Garden of Uzhhorod National University, 5 Sep 2022, Shynder & Shevera (UU s. n.); Donetsk city Donetsk Botanical Garden, (Burda & Koniakin 2019); Dnipropetrovsk Oblast, Kryvyi Rih Botanical Garden, 8 Oct 2022, Shol (obs.); Kyiv City, M. M. Grysko Botanical Garden, 2016–2023, Shynder (KWHA s.n.); Cherkasy Oblast, Sofiyivka National Dendrological Park (Chorna & al. 2021); Chernihiv Oblast, Trostianets State Dendrological Park (Iljenko & Medvedev 2012).

O. Shynder, M. Shevera, H. Chorna, H. Shol, L. Levchuk & M. Tarabun

Vitis ×instabilis Ardenghi & al. (= V. riparia Michx. × V. rupestris Scheele)

A Uk: Ukraine: Mykolaiv Oblast, Mykolaiv Raion, 47.380441°N, 31.628250°E, Natural Reserve Elanetskyi Step, Mykhaylivske division, Kemlych ravine, carbonate shrub-steppe slope, 1 young generative and 2 young vegetative plants, 9 Oct 2022, Shynder, Drabyniuk & Kolomiychuk (KWHA 1024944; photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/181068932,  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/181068933); Odesa Oblast, Bilhorod-Dnistrovskyi Raion, N vicinity of Kozatske village, 46.371549°N, 30.084136°E, bank of canal, 1 mature plant, 23 Sep 2022, Shynder (photo:  https://www.inaturalist.org/observations/176392550). – Vitis ×instabilis is a shrub with long, somewhat twisted shoots, a nothospecies of anthropogenic hybrid origin (Ardenghi & al. 2014). It is widely cultivated as a Phylloxera-resistant rootstock in areas of industrial viticulture (Goldammer 2018) and is characterized by an upright habit (not a classic liana) and leaf bases broadly U- or V-shaped to truncate and cuneate (Ardenghi & al. 2014). New for Ukraine as a casual alien.

O. Shynder, H. Drabyniuk & V. Kolomiychuk

Acknowledgements

The fieldwork during which Lathyrus cassius was recorded was financially supported within the project “Flora, vegetation and natural habitats of Bulgaria and the Balkan Peninsula” of the Institute of Biodiversity and Ecosystem Research of the Bulgarian Academy of Sciences. O. Shynder thanks M. Whitson for help with the identification of Physalis peruviana. L. Karmyzova, B. Baranovsky and O. Shynder would like to thank L. Levchuk and K. Kalashnik for adding to the information about Viola hissarica in Odesa city. M. Shevera and H. Chorna thank L. Sobolenko for information about the synanthropic habitat of Hibiscus syriacus. A. V. Yena would like to thank S. Sadogurskaya, S. Sadogurskiy and T. Belich for their help in finding and studying Iris foetidissima as well as A. Sukhorukov (M. V. Lomonosov Moscow State University, Russia) for his help in studying specimens of Chenopodium pratericola. Three anonymous reviewers are thanked for their comments on earlier versions of these Notulae.

© 2024 The Authors ·

This open-access article is distributed under the  CC BY 4.0 licence

References

1.

Amaral Franco do J. & Rocha Afonso M. L. 1976: Carduus L. – Pp. 220–232 in: Tutin T. G., Heywood V. H., Burges N. A., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (ed.), Flora europaea 4. Plantaginaceae to Compositae (and Rubiaceae). – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

2.

Amini Rad M., Sajedi S. & Domina G. 2017: First data on the taxonomic diversity of the Portulaca oleracea aggregate (Portulacaceae) in Iran. – Turk. J. Bot. 41: 535–541.  https://doi.org/10.3906/bot-1611-43 Google Scholar

3.

Anghel G., Chirilă C., Ciocârlan V. & Ulinici A. 1972: Buruienile din culturile agricole şi combaterea lor. – Bucureşti: Editura Ceres. Google Scholar

4.

APD 2023: African Plant Database (version 4.0.0). – Published at  https://africanplantdatabase.ch/[accessed 28 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

5.

Ardenghi N. M. G., Galasso G., Banfi E., Zoccola A., Foggi B. & Lastrucci L. 2014: A taxonomic survey of the genus Vitis L. (Vitaceae) in Italy, with special reference to Elba Island (Tuscan Archipelago). – Phytotaxa 166: 163–198.  https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.166.3.1 Google Scholar

6.

Assyov B., Petrova A., Dimitrov D. & Vassilev R. 2012: Conspectus of the Bulgarian vascular flora: distribution maps and floristic element, ed. 4. – Sofia: Bulgarian Biodiversity Foundation. Google Scholar

7.

Austin G. C. 1960: Trees of Western Australia. 39. Comet Vale mallee (Eucalyptus comitaevallis). 40. Wood-line mallee (E. cylindrocarpa Blakely). 41. Ribbon-barked mallee (E. sheathiana Maiden). 42. Burracoppin mallee (E. burracoppinensis Maiden et Blakely). 43. Cap-fruited mallee (E. dielsii C. A. Gardn.). 44. Spearwood mallee (E. doratoxylon F. Muell.) 45. Apple mallee (E. buprestium F. Muell.). 46. Goblet mallee (E. scyphocalyx (F. Muell.) Maiden et Blakely). – J. Dept. Agric. Western Australia, ser. 4, 1 : 100–111.  https://library.dpird.wa.gov.au/journal_agriculture4/vol1/iss2/2  Google Scholar

8.

Bánki O., Roskov Y., Döring M., Ower G., Vandepitte L., Hobern D., Remsen D., Schalk P., DeWalt R. E., Keping M., Miller J., Orrell T., Aalbu R., Abbott J., Adlard R., Adriaenssens E. M., Aedo C., Aescht E., Akkari N. & al. 2023: Catalogue of Life checklist (version 2023-02-07). – Published at  https://doi.org/10.48580/dfrq[accessed 30 Mar 2023]. Google Scholar

9.

Barina Z., Mullaj A., Pifkó D., Somogyi G., Meco M. & Rakaj M. 2017: Distribution atlas of vascular plants in Albania. – Budapest: Hungarian Natural History Museum. Google Scholar

10.

Barina Z., Somogyi G., Pifkó D. & Rakaj M. 2018: Checklist of vascular plants of Albania. – Phytotaxa 378: 1–339.  https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.378.1.1 Google Scholar

11.

Barkley F. A. 1944: Schinus L. – Brittonia 5: 160–198.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2804751 Google Scholar

12.

Battandier J. A. 1888–1890: Flore de l'Algérie: con-tenant la description de toutes les plantes signalées jusqu'a ce jour comme spontanées en Algérie et catalogue des plantes du Maroc 1. – Alger: A. Jourdan; Paris: F. Savy. Google Scholar

13.

Battandier J. A. 1910: Flore de l'Algérie: Supplément aux phanérogames. – Paris: P. Klincksieck. Google Scholar

14.

Battandier J. A. & Trabut L. C. 1905 [“1902”]: Flore analytique & synoptique de l'Algérie & de la Tunisie. – Alger: I. Giralt. Google Scholar

15.

Baumgarten J. C. G. 1816: Enumeratio stirpium magno Transsilvaniae principatui praeprimis indigenarum in usum nostratum botanophilorum conscripta inque ordinem sexuali-naturalem concinnata 2. – Wien: Libraria Comesinae. Google Scholar

16.

Belaid K., Potgieter L. J., Amrani S., Zizi M. & Gherbi H. 2022: Casuarina species in Algeria: reviewing identity, distribution and symbiotic status. – Bois Forêts Trop. 351: 15–28.  https://doi.org/10.19182/bft2022.351.a36386 Google Scholar

17.

Beldie A. 1977: Flora României. Determinator ilustrat al plantelor vasculare I. – Bucureşti: Editura Academiei R. S. Române. Google Scholar

18.

Boland D. J., Moncur M. W. & Pinyopusarerk K. 1996: Review of some floral and vegetative aspects to consider when domesticating Casuarina. – Pp. 17–25 in: Pinyopusarerk K., Turnbull J. W. & Midgley S. J. (ed.), Recent Casuarina research and development. Proceedings of the 3rd International Casuarina Workshop, 4–7 March 1996, Da Nang, Vietnam. – Melbourne: CSIRO Publishing. Google Scholar

19.

Bolliger M. 1982: Die Gattung Pulmonaria in Westeuropa. – Vaduz: J. Cramer. – Phanerog. Monogr. 8. Google Scholar

20.

Bonnet E. & Barratte G. 1896: Exploration scientifique de la Tunisie. Catalogue raisonné des plantes vasculaires de la Tunisie. – Paris: Imprimerie nationale. Google Scholar

21.

Bornmüller J. 1928: Beiträge zur Flora Mazedoniens III. Sammlungen in den Kriegsjahren 1916–1918. – Bot. Jahrb. Syst. 61(Beibl. 140 ): 1–195. Google Scholar

22.

Borodin A. M. (ed.) 1984: Red Book of the USSR 2. –Moscow: Lesnaya Promyshlennost. Google Scholar

23.

Borza A. 1947: Conspectus florae Romaniae regionumque affinium. – Cluj: Editura Cartea Românească. Google Scholar

24.

Brândză D. 1879–1883: Prodromul floreĭ române saŭ enumeraţiunea plantelor pănă astă-dĭ cunoscute în Moldova şi Valachia. – Bucureşti: Tipografia Academiei Române.  https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.9972  Google Scholar

25.

Bulakh E., Ryff L. E. & Shevera M. V. 2023: Portulacaceae [Crimea]. – Pp. 65–71 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med Checklist Notulae, 16. – Willdenowia 53: 57–77.  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.53.53104  Google Scholar

26.

Bulakh E., Shevera M. V., Skudlarz P., Bulakh P. Y. & Celka Z. 2022: Identification of new taxa of Portulaca oleracea L. aggregate from Poland based on seed coat micromorphological characteristics. – Acta Soc. Bot. Poloniae 91(9118).  https://doi.org/10.5586/asbp.9118  Google Scholar

27.

Bulakh O. V., Volutsa O. D., Tokaryuk A. I., Budzhak V. V., Korzhan K. V., Zavialova L. V., Kucher O. O. & Shevera M. V. 2020: Portulaca oleracea aggregate (Portulacaceae) from the Chernivtsi region (Ukraine). – Nauk. Visn. Chernivetsk. Univ. Biol. (Biol. Sistemi) 12: 251–262.  https://doi.org/10.31861/biosystems2020.02.251 Google Scholar

28.

Burda R. I. & Koniakin S. N. 2019: The non-native woody species of the flora of Ukraine: Introduction, naturalization and invasion. – Biosyst. Diversity 27: 276–290.  https://doi.org/10.15421/011937 Google Scholar

29.

CABI 2023: Ludwigia brevipes. – In: Invasive species compendium. – Wallingford: CAB International. – Published at  https://www.cabidigitallibrary.org/doi/full/10.1079/cabicompendium.115391[accessed 29 Sep 2023]. Google Scholar

30.

Carlström A. 1987: A survey of the flora and phytogeography of Rodhos, Simi, Tilos and the Marmaris Peninsula (SE Greece, SW Turkey). – Lund: PhD thesis, University of Lund. Google Scholar

31.

Cecchi L., Coppi A., Hilger H. H. & Selvi F. 2014: Nonmonophyly of Buglossoides (Boraginaceae: Lithospermeae): phylogenetic and morphological evidence for the expansion of Glandora and reappraisal of Aegonychon. – Taxon 63: 1065–1078.  https://doi.org/10.12705/635.4 Google Scholar

32.

Chasapis M., Samaras D. A., Theodoropoulos K. & Eleftheriadou E. 2020: The vascular flora of Mt Tzena (northern Greece). – Fl. Medit. 30: 55–63 + electronic supplementary file.  https://doi.org/10.7320/FlMedit30.055 Google Scholar

33.

Chippendale G. M. 1988: MyrtaceaeEucalyptus, Angophora. – Pp. 1–494 in: George A. S. (ed.), Flora of Australia 19. – Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Google Scholar

34.

Chorna G. A., Shynder O. I. & Kostruba T. M. 2021: Addition to the list of species of spontaneous flora of the National Dendrological Park “Sofiyivka” of the National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine (Uman, Cherkasy region). – Chornomorski Bot. J. 17: 302–315.  https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu1990-553X/2021-17-4-1 Google Scholar

35.

Ciferri R. 1944: Flora e vegetazione delle isole italiane dell'Egeo. – Atti Ist. Bot. Lab. Crittog. Univ Pavia, ser. 5, Suppl. A : 1–200. Google Scholar

36.

Ciocârlan V. 1994: Flora Deltei Dunării – Cormophyta. – Bucureşti: Editura Ceres. Google Scholar

37.

Ciocârlan V. 2009: Flora ilustrată a României. Pteridophyta et Spermatophyta , ed. 3. – Bucureşti: Editura Ceres. Google Scholar

38.

Ciocârlan V. 2011: Vascular flora of the Danube Delta. – Analele Şti. Univ. “Al. I. Cuza” Iaşi, Ser. Nouă, 2.a, Biol. Veget. 57: 41–64. Google Scholar

39.

Ciocârlan V., Berca M., Chirilă C., Coste I. & Popescu G. 2004: Flora segetală a României. – Bucureşti: Editura Ceres. Google Scholar

40.

Clemants S. E. & Mosyakin S. L. 2003: Chenopodium L. – Pp. 275–299 in: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed.), Flora of North America north of Mexico 4. – New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

41.

Conti F., Abbate G., Alessandrini A. & Blasi C. 2005: An annotated checklist of the Italian vascular flora. – Roma: Fratelli Palombi. Google Scholar

42.

Cook C. D. K. 1980: Typha L. – Pp. 275–276 in: Tutin T. G., Heywood H. V., Burges N. A., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (ed.), Flora europaea 5. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

43.

Cortesi F. 1906a: Illustrazione dell'Erbario Borgia. – Ann. Bot. (Rome) 4: 217–267. Google Scholar

44.

Cortesi F. 1906b: Un botanico sconosciuto del secolo XIX. – Ann. Bot. (Rome) 4: 63–77. Google Scholar

45.

Danihelka J. 2014: Lithospermum arvense agg. – Pp. 157–161 in: Hadinec J. & Lustyk P. (ed.), Additamenta ad floram Reipublicae Bohemicae. XII. – Zprávy Českoslov. Bot. Společn. 49: 73–206. Google Scholar

46.

Danin A. 2011a: Collections of microspecies of the Portulaca oleracea aggregate from Europe and the Mediterranean areas. – Fl. Medit. 21: 305–307. Google Scholar

47.

Danin A. 2011b: Portulacaceae. – Pp. 131–134 in: Greuter W. & Raab-Straube E. von (ed.), Euro+Med Notulae, 5 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes 27]. – Willdenowia 41: 129–138.  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.41.41117  Google Scholar

48.

Danin A., Buldrini F., Bandini Mazzanti M., Bosi G., Caria M. C., Dandria D., Lanfranco E., Mifsud S. & Bagella S. 2016: Diversification of Portulaca oleracea L. complex in the Italian peninsula and adjacent islands. – Bot. Lett. 163: 261–272.  https://doi.org/10.1080/23818107.2016.1200482 Google Scholar

49.

Danin A., Caria M. C., Marrosu G. M. & Bagella S. 2012: A new species of Portulaca oleracea aggregate from Sardinia, Italy. – Pl. Biosyst. 146: 137–141.  https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2012.681319 Google Scholar

50.

Davis P. H. 1970: Lathyrus L. – Pp. 328–369 in: Davis P. H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 3. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar

51.

Davis P. H. & Doroszenko A. 1982: Ballota L. – Pp. 156–165 in: Davis P. H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 7. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar

52.

Degen Á. 1908: Megjegyzések néhány keleti növényfajról. Bemerkungen über einige orientalische Pflanzenarten. – Magyar Bot. Lapok 7: 92–110. Google Scholar

53.

Desfontaines R. L. 1798: Flora atlantica sive historia plantarum quae in Atlante, agro tunetano et algeriensi crescunt 1. – Paris: L. G. Desgranges.  https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.323  Google Scholar

54.

Devesa J. A., Triano E. & Arnelas I. 2009: Carduus acicularis Bertol. (Asteraceae) en la Península Ibérica. – Acta Bot. Malac. 34: 1–6.  https://doi.org/10.24310/abm.v34i0.6891 Google Scholar

55.

Didukh Y. P. & Yena A. V. 1999: Nekotorye noveyshie dannye po fitoraznoobraziyu Kryma. – P. 60 in: Biologicheskoe i landshaftnoe raznoobrazie Kryma: problemy i perspektivy: Voprosy razvitiya Kryma 11. – Simferopol: SONAT. Google Scholar

56.

Dimopoulos P., Raus Th., Bergmeier E., Constantinidis Th., Iatrou G., Kokkini S., Strid A. & Tzanoudakis D. 2013: Vascular plants of Greece: an annotated checklist. – Berlin: Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin-Dahlem; Athens: Hellenic Botanical Society. – Englera31.  https://www.jstor.org/stable/i24365374  Google Scholar

57.

Dimopoulos P., Raus Th., Bergmeier E., Constantinidis Th., Iatrou G., Kokkini S., Strid A. & Tzanoudakis D. 2016: Vascular plants of Greece: an annotated checklist. Supplement. – Willdenowia 46: 301–347.  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.46.46303 Google Scholar

58.

Dimopoulos P., Raus Th. & Strid A. (ed.) 2020: Flora of Greece web. Vascular plants of Greece: an annotated checklist. Version III, April 2020. – Published at  https://portal.cybertaxonomy.org/flora-greece/[accessed 7 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

59.

Dobignard A. & Chatelain C. 2011: Index synonymique de la flore d'Afrique du Nord 3. Dicotyledoneae: BalsaminaceaeEuphorbiaceae. – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève. Google Scholar

60.

Dobignard A. & Chatelain C. 2013: Index synonymique de la flore d'Afrique du Nord 5. Dicotyledoneae: OleaceaeZygophyllaceae. – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin botaniques de la Ville de Genève. Google Scholar

61.

Domina G. & Raimondo F. M. 2009: A new species in the Portulaca oleracea aggregate (Portulacaceae) from the island of Soqotra (Yemen). – Webbia 64: 9–12.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00837792.2009.10670848 Google Scholar

62.

Doroftei M., Oprea A., Ştefan N. & Sârbu I. 2011: Vascular wild flora of Danube Delta Biosphere Reserve. – Scientific Annals of the Danube Delta Institute 17: 15–52. Google Scholar

63.

Dumont H. J. (ed.) 1999: Black Sea Red Data Book. – Ghent: United Nations Office for Project Services. Google Scholar

64.

Edmondson J. R. 1978: Buglossoides Moench. – Pp. 315–317 in: Davis P. H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 6. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar

65.

El Mokni R. 2019: Lithraea molleoides (Vell.) Engl., Schinus molle L., S. terebinthifolius Raddi. – Pp. 422–423 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med Checklist Notulae, 11 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 40]. – Willdenowia 49: 421–445.  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.49.49312  Google Scholar

66.

El Mokni R. 2021: Eucalyptus camaldulensis Dehnh. – P. 153 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 13 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 42]. – Willdenowia 51: 141–168.  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51112  Google Scholar

67.

El Mokni R. & Domina G. 2019: New records of Orobanche canescens C. Presl and O. litorea Guss. (Orobanchaceae) in North Africa with notes on their distribution in Tunisia. – Revue Fac. Sci. Bizerte 7: 62–67. Google Scholar

68.

El Mokni R., Domina G., Sebei H. & El Aouni M. H. 2015: Taxonomic notes and distribution of taxa of Orobanche gr. minor (Orobanchaceae) from Tunisia. – Acta Bot. Gallica 162: 5–10.  https://doi.org/10.1080/12538078.2014.993424 Google Scholar

69.

Elfers S. C. 1988: Element stewardship abstract for Casuarina equisetifolia Australian pine. – Arlington: The Nature Conservancy. Google Scholar

70.

Euro+Med 2006+ [continuously updated]: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://www.europlusmed.org/[accessed 29 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

71.

Falasca S. L., Pitta-Alvarez S. & Ulberich A. 2018: The potential growing areas for Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels (Sapotaceae) in Argentinean drylands. – Int. J. Agron. 2018(9262659).  https://doi.org/10.1155/2018/9262659 Google Scholar

72.

Fischer M. A., Oswald K. & Adler W. (ed.) 2008: Exkursionsflora für Österreich, Liechtenstein und Südtirol, ed. 3. – Linz: OÖ. Landesmuseen. Google Scholar

73.

Galasso G., Conti F., Peruzzi L., Ardenghi N. M. G., Banfi E., Celesti-Grapow L., Albano A., Alessandrini A., Bacchetta G., Ballelli S., Bandini Mazzanti M., Barberis G., Bernardo L., Blasi C., Bouvet D., Bovio M., Cecchi L., Del Guacchio E., Domina G., Fascetti S., Gallo L., Gubellini L., Guiggi A., Iamonico D., Iberite M., Jimenez-Mejias P., Lattanzi E., Marchetti D., Martinetto E., Masin R. R., Medagli P., Passalacqua N. G., Peccenini S., Pennesi R., Pierini B., Podda L., Poldini L., Prosser F., Raimondo F. M., Roma-Marzio F., Rosati L., Santangelo A., Scoppola A., Scortegagna S., Selvaggi A., Selvi F., Soldano A., Stinca A., Wagensommer R. P., Wilhalm T. & Bartolucci F. 2018: An updated checklist of the vascular flora alien to Italy. – Pl. Biosyst. 152: 556–592.  https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2018.1441197 Google Scholar

74.

GBIF 2022–2023: Global Biodiversity Information Facility. – Published at  https://www.gbif.org/[accessed 6 Dec 2022 – 30 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

75.

Giardina G., Raimondo F. M. & Spadaro V. 2007: A catalogue of plants growing in Sicily. – Bocconea 20: 5–582. Google Scholar

76.

Goldammer T. 2018: Grape grower's handbook. A guide to viticulture for wine production, ed. 3. – Centreville: Apex Publishers. Google Scholar

77.

Gottschlich G., Domina G. & Di Gristina E. 2017: Hieracium umbrosum subsp. abietinum (Asteraceae), a further example of amphi-Adriatic disjunction. – Pl. Biosystems 151: 792–794.  https://doi.org/10.1080/11263504.2017.1341439 Google Scholar

78.

Grecescu D. 1898: Conspectul florei României. Plantele vasculare indigene şi cele naturalizate ce se găsesc pe teritoriul României, considerate subt punctul de vedere sistematic şi geografic. – Bucureşti: Tipografia Dreptatea.  https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.9656  Google Scholar

79.

Greuter W. 2006+ [continuously updated]: Compositae (pro parte majore). – In: Greuter W. & Raab-Straube E. von (ed.): Compositae. Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/599e0bdb-a2e8-49b9-9907-5398259c4f00[accessed 28 Sep 2023]. Google Scholar

80.

Greuter W., Burdet H. M. & Long G. 1989: Med-Checklist. A critical inventory of vascular plants of the cir-cum-mediterranean countries 4. Dicotyledones (LauraceaeRhamnaceae). – Genève: Conservatoire et Jardin Botaniques; Berlin: Secrétariat Med-Checklist, Botanischer Garten und Botanisches Museum Berlin-Dahlem. Google Scholar

81.

Greuter W. & Domina G. 2015: Checklist of the vascular plants collected during the 12th “Iter Mediterraneum” in Tunisia, 24 March – 4 April 2014. – Bocconea 27: 21–61.  https://doi.org/10.7320/Bocc27.1.021  Google Scholar

82.

Greuter W. & Raab-Straube E. von (ed.) 2005: Euro+Med Notulae, 1 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes 16]. – Willdenowia 35: 223–239.  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.35.35201  Google Scholar

83.

Grinţescu G. 1952: Fam. Portulacaceae Rchb. – Pp. 614–616 in: Săvulescu T. (ed.), Flora R. P. Române 1. – Bucureşti: Editura Academiei R. P. Române. Google Scholar

84.

Grozeva N. H. 2012: Chenopodium pratericola (Chenopodiaceae): a new alien species for the Bulgarian flora. – Phytol. Balcan. 18: 121–126. Google Scholar

85.

Grudzinskaya I. 1979: Notae de genere Celtis in URSS. – Novosti Sist. Vyssh. Rast. 16: 90–95. Google Scholar

86.

Guadagno M. 1926: La vegetazione della Penisola Sorrentina. Parte IV, 2. – Bull. Orto Bot. Regia Univ. Napoli 8: 239–268. Google Scholar

87.

Güneş F. & Çırpıcı A. H. 2015: Lathyrus cassius (L. sect. Cicercula, Leguminosae), a new species for the flora of Europe. – Phytol. Balcan. 21: 111–115. Google Scholar

88.

Hand R., Thieme M. & Mitarbeiter 2023: Florenliste von Deutschland (Gefäßpflanzen) Version 13 (März 2023). – Published online at  https://florenliste-deutschland.de/florenliste/[accessed 30 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

89.

Hayek A. 1924–1927: Prodromus florae peninsulae balcanicae, 1 [pp. 1–352 (1924), pp. 353–672(1925), pp. 673–960(1926), pp. 961–1193 (1927)]. – Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. Beih. 30( 1 ). Google Scholar

90.

Hayek A. & Markgraf F. 1932–1933: Prodromus florae peninsulae balcanicae, 3. Monocotyledoneae. [pp. 1–368 (1932), pp. 369–472 (1932)]. – Repert. Spec. Nov. Regni Veg. Beih. 30( 3 ). Google Scholar

91.

Henning T. & Raab-Straube E. von 2016+a [continuously updated]: Anacardiaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/4f4dc48e-0a77-4aa7-9639-d867726f5e9c[accessed 29 Jul 2023]. Google Scholar

92.

Henning T. & Raab-Straube E. von 2016+b [continuously updated]: Oxalidaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/733d469d-921a-4ef4936e-66245ddbd8db[accessed 14 Sep 2023]. Google Scholar

93.

Herbich F. 1859: Flora der Bucovina. – Leipzig: F. Volckmar. Google Scholar

94.

Heywood V. H. 1993: Loeflingia L. – P. 185 in: Tutin T. G., Burges N. A., Chater A. O., Edmondson J. R., Heywood V. H., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. 1993: Flora europaea, ed. 2, 1. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

95.

Hoch P. C. 2021: Ludwigia Linnaeus. – In: Flora of North America Editorial Committee (ed.), Flora of North America north of Mexico. – New York & Oxford: Oxford University Press. – Published at  http://floranorthamerica.org/Ludwigia[accessed 14 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

96.

Holm L. G., Plucknett D. L., Pancho J. & Herberger J. 1991: The world's worst weeds: distribution and biology. – Florida: Krieger Publishing Company. Google Scholar

97.

Huber-Morath A. 1963: Novitiae florae anatolicae VI. – Bauhinia 2: 192–203. Google Scholar

98.

Hurrell J. A., Cabanillas P. A., Costantino F. B. & Delucchi G. 2012: Bignoniaceae adventicias en la Argentina. Primera cita de Podranea ricasoliana y nuevos registros de Campsis radicans. – Rev. Mus. Argentino Cienc. Nat. 14: 15–22.  https://doi.org/10.22179/REVMACN.14.207 Google Scholar

99.

Iljenko O. O. & Medvedev V. A. 2012: Distribution of self-regenerative arboreal introducents [sic] on territory of Dendropark Trostjanets. – Pl. Introd. (Kyiv) 56: 62–68.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.2542066 Google Scholar

100.

IPNI 2023: International Plant Names Index. – Royal Botanic Gardens, Kew, Harvard University Herbaria and Australian National Herbarium. – Published at  https://www.ipni.org/[accessed 23 Feb 2023]. Google Scholar

101.

Jávorka S. 1924–1925: Magyar flóra [Flora hungarica]. – Budapest: Studium. Google Scholar

102.

Jenačković-Gocić D., Bolbotinović L., Jušković M., Nikolić D. & Ranđelović V. 2020: Insight into the chorology of some endangered, rare and potentially invasive plant species in Serbia. – Biol. Nyssana 11: 71–84. Google Scholar

103.

Jiménez-Mejías P. & Luceño M. 2011+ [continuously updated]: Cyperaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/808b95c6-c361-45f4-97f1-39755ceb0b17[accessed 30 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

104.

Jovanović B. 1986: Typha shuttleworthii Koch & Sonder. – P. 256 in: Sarić M. & Diklić N. (ed.), Flora SR Srbije 10. – Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti. Google Scholar

105.

Julien A. 1894: Flore de la région de Constantine: comprenant la description succincte des caractères botaniques des plantes de la contrée, de leurs propriétés et leurs usages chez les Européens et chez les indigènes. – Constantine: Imprimerie a Vapeur Louis Marle (Nicolas Audrino, Gérant). Google Scholar

106.

Jury S. 2009+ [continuously updated]: Casuarinaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/688c147b-855d-459a-93cc-06455e2c50dd[accessed 25 Jul 2023]. Google Scholar

107.

Kanitz A. 1879–1881: Plantas Romaniae hucusque cognitas. – Claudiopoli [Cluj]: E. Demjén. Google Scholar

108.

Karmyzova L. & Baranovsky B. 2020: Flora of the Dnipro city. Monograph. – Rīga: Baltija Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.30525/978-9934-588-94-5  Google Scholar

109.

Király G. (ed.) 2007: Vörös Lista: A magyarországi edényes flóra veszélyeztetett fajai [Red List of the vascular flora of Hungary]. – Sopron: Saját kiadás. Google Scholar

110.

Kirchner D. E. 2004: Molekulare Phylogenie und Biogeographie der Gattung Pulmonaria L. (Boraginaceae). – Aachen: Verlagsgruppe Mainz. Google Scholar

111.

Klak C. & Bruyns P. V. 2013: A new infrageneric classification for Mesembryanthemum (Aizoaceae: Mesembryanthemoideae). – Bothalia 43: 197–206.  https://doi.org/10.4102/abc.v43i2.95 Google Scholar

112.

Klak C., Bruyns P. V. & Hedderson T. A. J. 2007: A phylogeny and new classification for Mesembryanthemoideae (Aizoaceae). – Taxon 56: 737–756.  https://doi.org/10.2307/25065857 Google Scholar

113.

Kliphuis E., Heringa J. & Hogeweg P. 1986: Cytotaxonomic studies on Galium palustre L. Morphological differentiation of diploids, tetraploids and octoploids. – Acta Bot. Neerl. 35: 383–392.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1438-8677.1986.tb00478.x Google Scholar

114.

Kožuharov S. 1976: Lathyrus L. – Pp. 503–548 in: Jordanov D. (ed.), Flora na Narodna Republika Bălgarija 6. – Sofija: Izdatelstvo na Bălgarskata akademija na naukite. Google Scholar

115.

Labarca-Rojas Y., Hernández-Bermejo J. E., Quero J. L. & Herrera-Molina F. 2022: Bioclimatic habitat limitations for argan trees (Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels) in northern Africa and Spain. – Reg. Environ. Change 22: 14.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-021-01869-w Google Scholar

116.

Laguna E. & Mateo G. 2001: Observaciones sobre la flora alóctona valenciana. – Fl. Montiber. 18: 40–44. Google Scholar

117.

Lapin P. I. (ed.) 1983: Redkie i ischezayushchie vidy prirodnoy flory SSSR, kultiviruemye v botanicheskih sadah i drugih introduktsionnyh tsentralh strany. – Moskwa: Nauka. Google Scholar

118.

Le Floc'h É., Boulos L. & Véla E. 2010: Catalogue synonymique commenté de la flore de Tunisie. – Tunis: Ministère de l'Environnement et du Développement durable. Google Scholar

119.

Liu Sh.-H., Yang H.-A., Kono Y., Hoch P. C., Barber J. C., Peng Ch.-I & Chung K.-F. 2020: Disentangling reticulate evolution of north temperate haplostemonous Ludwigia (Onagraceae). – Ann. Missouri Bot. Gard. 105: 163–182.  https://doi.org/10.3417/2020479 Google Scholar

120.

Malan C. & Notten A. 2002: Podranea ricasoliana (Tanf.) Sprague (Bignoniaceae). – Pretoria: South African National Biodiversity Institute (SANBI). – Published at  http://pza.sanbi.org/podranea-ricasoliana[accessed 11 Jun 2023] Google Scholar

121.

Marhold K. 2011+a [continuously updated]: Caryophyllaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/8b6d0d49-69ee-4d1c-be5e-835aaec95b6b[accessed 7 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

122.

Marhold K. 2011+b [continuously updated]: Euphrasia. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/db2cb961-ee29-448b-aa1e-ec78ce585f36[accessed 7 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

123.

Marhold K. 2011+c [continuously updated]: Gentianaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/eb3b01f5-305f-470e-9694-1e7f7871c253[accessed 4 Jan 2023] Google Scholar

124.

Marhold K. 2011+d [continuously updated]: Rubiaceae (pro parte majore). – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/decd5fca-9f5d-41ef-b2f9-4b691 cb1a098[accessed 10 Jul 2023]. Google Scholar

125.

Martinčić A., Wraber T., Jogan J., Podobnik A., Ravnik V., Turk B. & Vreš B. (ed.) 1999: Mala flora Slovenije (Flora of Slovenia), ed. 3. – Ljubljana: Tehniška Založba Slovenije. Google Scholar

126.

Martínez-Gómez P., Correa D., Sánchez-Blanco M. J., León J. Navarro S., López-Alcolea J. & Martínez-García P. J. 2020: Establecimiento de una plantación comercial de argán [Argania spinosa (L.) Skeels] en España. – Revista Frutic. 76: 66–77. Google Scholar

127.

Mashkovska S. P. (ed.) 2015: Kataloh dekoratyvnykh travyanystykh roslyn botanichnykh sadiv i dendroparkiv Ukrainy. – Kyiv: M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden, National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine. – Published at  http://www.nbg.kiev.ua/upload/biblio/katalog.pdf[accessed 5 Sep 2023]. Google Scholar

128.

Matevski V. 2010: Pulmonaria L. – Pp. 114–117 in: Matevski V. (ed.), Flora na Republika Makedonija 2( 1 ). – Skopje: Makedonska Akademija na Naukite i Umetnostite. Google Scholar

129.

Matevski V. 2021: Flora na RS Makedonija 2( 2 ). – Skopje: Makedonska Akademija na Naukite i Umetnostite. Google Scholar

130.

Mazzocchi-Alemanni N. 1924: Appunti agrologicoeconomici sull'isola di Rodi. Nota preliminare per la preorganizzazione del catasto dell'isola. – Atti R. Accad. Econ.-Agrar. Georgofili Firenze, ser. 5, 21 : 237–310. Google Scholar

131.

Melderis A. 1980: Elymus L. – Pp. 192–198 in: Tutin T. G., Heywood V. H., Burges N. A., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (ed.), Flora europaea 5. Alismataceae to Orchidaceae (Monocotyledones). – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

132.

Melderis A. 1985: Elymus L. – Pp. 206–227 in: Davis P. H. (ed.), Flora of Turkey and the East Aegean Islands 9. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar

133.

MenyhárthL.1877:Kalocsavidékéneknövénytenyészete. – Budapest: Hunyadi Mátyás Intézet.  https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.9844  Google Scholar

134.

Miller J. M. & Wilken D. H. 2012: Schinus. – In: Jepson Flora Project (ed.), Jepson eFlora. – Published at  https://ucjeps.berkeley.edu/eflora/eflora_display.php?tid=9980[accessed 29 July 2023]. Google Scholar

135.

Morariu I. 1937: Periodicitate şi amestecuri antropogene în flora mărginaşă a Bucureştilor. – Rev. Şti. Adamachi 23: 46–48. Google Scholar

136.

Mosyakin S. L. 1996: Chenopodium L. – Pp. 27–44 in: Tzvelev N. N. (ed.), Flora Europae orientalis 9. Magnoliophyta Magnoliopsida. – Petropoli [Saint Petersburg]: Mir i Semia-95. – Published at  https://www.researchgate.net/publication/283446334_Chenopodium_in_Flora_Europae_Orientalis_Vol_9_1996  Google Scholar

137.

Mosyakin S. L. & Fedoronchuk M. M. 1999: Vascular plants of Ukraine: a nomenclatural checklist. – Kiev: National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine & M. G. Kholodny Institute of Botany. Google Scholar

138.

Mosyakin S. L., Petrik S. P. & Vasilyeva-Nemertsalova T. V. 1994: Additions to the alien flora of Odessa. – Ukrayins'k. Bot. Zhurn. 51: 141–144. Google Scholar

139.

Mosyakin S. L. & Shevera M. V. 1993: Eleusine Gaertn. (Poaceae, Cynodonteae) – the new adventive genus of the Ukrainian Flora. – Ukrayins'k. Bot. Zhurn. 50: 94–97. Google Scholar

140.

Mosyakin S. L. & Yavorska O. G. 2001: New finds of adventive plants in the flora of the Kyiv urban agglomeration. – Ukrayins'k. Bot. Zhurn. 58: 493–498. Google Scholar

141.

Munby G. 1847: Flore de l'Algérie ou catalogue des plantes indigènes du royaume d'Alger. Accompagné des descriptions de quelques espèces nouvelles ou peu connues. – Paris: J.-B. Baillière. Google Scholar

142.

Munby G. 1859: Catalogus plantarum in Algeria sponte nascientium. – Oran: A. Perrier. Google Scholar

143.

Munby G. 1866: Catalogus plantarum in Algeria sponte nascentium, ed. 2. – Londini: Taylor et Francis. Google Scholar

144.

Nagodă E., Comănescu P. & Anastasiu P. 2013: Phemeranthus confertiflorus: new alien species to Europe. – J. Pl. Developm. 20: 141–147. Google Scholar

145.

National Research Council 1984: Casuarinas: nitrogen-fixing trees for adverse sites. – Washington DC: The National Academies Press. – Published at  https://doi.org/10.17226/19415[accessed 25 Jul 2023]. Google Scholar

146.

Nezadal W. 1989: Unkrautgesellschaften der Getreideund Frühjahrshackfruchtkulturen (Stellarietea mediae) im mediterranen Iberien. – Diss. Bot. 143. Google Scholar

147.

Niketić M. & Tomović G. 2018: Kritička lista vrsta vaskularne flore Srbije. An annotated checklist of vascular flora of Serbia 1. Lycopodiopsida, Polypodiopsida, Gnetopsida, Pinopsida and Liliopsida. – Beograd: Srpska akademija nauka i umetnosti. Google Scholar

148.

Nikolić T. (ed.) 2015+ [continuously updated]: Flora croatica database. – Zagreb: Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb. – Published at  https://hirc.botanic.hr/fcd/[accessed 17 Apr 2023]. Google Scholar

149.

NSW Flora Online 2023: Genus Schinus. – In: New South Wales Flora Online. – Published at  https://plantnet.rbgsyd.nsw.gov.au/cgi-bin/NSWfl.pl?page=nswfl&lvl=gn&name=Schinus[accessed 29 Jul 2023]. Google Scholar

150.

Oprea A. 2005: Lista critică a plantelor vasculare din România. – Iaşi: Editura Universităţii Alexandru Ioan Cuza. Google Scholar

151.

Pampanini R. 1923: L'esplorazione botanica dell'isola di Rodi dal 1761 al 1922. – L'Universo (Firenze) 4(11–12): 859–871, 955–971 + 3 plates and 1 map. Google Scholar

152.

Patzak A. 1959: Revision der Gattung Ballota Section Acanthoprasium und Section Beringeria. – Ann. Naturhist. Mus. Wien 63: 33–81. Google Scholar

153.

Petrova A. & Vladimirov V. (ed.) 2009: Red List of Bulgarian vascular plants. – Phytol. Balcan. 15: 63–94. Google Scholar

154.

Petrova A. & Vladimirov V. 2010: Balkan endemics in the Bulgarian flora. – Phytol. Balcan. 16: 293–311. Google Scholar

155.

Petrova A. & Vladimirov V. 2019: Reports of some ornamental plants as aliens for the Bulgarian flora. – Phytol. Balcan. 25: 387–394. Google Scholar

156.

PFI 2023+ [continuously updated]: Loeflingia hispanica L. – In: Portale della flora d'Italia / Portal to the flora of Italy. – Published at  https://dryades.units.it/floritaly/index.php?procedure=taxon_page&tipo=all&id=777[accessed 10 Sep 2023]. Google Scholar

157.

Pils G. 2022: Illustrated flora of Morocco. – Feldkirchen: Gerhard Pils Verlag. Google Scholar

158.

Plantarium 2007–2023: Plants and lichens of Russia and neighboring countries: open online galleries and plant identification guide. – Published at  https://www.plantarium.ru/lang/en.html[accessed 16 & 21 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

159.

Poiret J. L. M. 1789: Voyage en Barbarie. Seconde partie: recherches sur l'histoire naturelle de la Numidie. – Paris: J. B. F. Née de la Rochelle. Google Scholar

160.

Popov M. G. 1953: Burachnikovyye – Boraginaceae G. Don. – Pp. 97–691 in: Komarov V. L. (ed.), Flora SSSR 19. – Moscow and Leningrad: Izdatelstvo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Google Scholar

161.

Porcius F. 1885: Flora din fostul district românesc al Năsăudului în Transilvania. – Analele Acad. Române, ser. 2, 7 : 1–133. Google Scholar

162.

Pottier-Alapetite G. 1981: Flore de la Tunisie. Angiospermes–Dicotylédones. Gamopétales. – Tunis: Ministère de l'Enseignement Supérieur et de la Recherche Scientifique et le Ministère de l'Agriculture. Google Scholar

163.

POWO 2023: Plants of the World Online. – Published at  https://powo.science.kew.org/[accessed 20 Feb – 29 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

164.

Prodan I. 1939: Flora pentru determinarea şi descrierea plantelor ce cresc în România, ed. 2. – Cluj: Tipografia Cartea Românească. Google Scholar

165.

Prokudin Y. N. (ed.) 1987: Manual of higher plants of Ukraine. – Kiev: Naukova Dumka. Google Scholar

166.

Protopopova V. V. & Shevera M. V. 2014: Ergasiophytes of the Ukrainian flora. – Biodiv. Res. Conserv. 35: 31–46.  https://doi.org/10.2478/biorc-2014-0018 Google Scholar

167.

Pyšek P., Sádlo J., Chrtek J. jr ., Chytrý M., Kaplan Z., Pergl J., Pokorná A., Axmanová I., Čuda J., Doležal J., Dřevojan P., Hejda M., Kočár P., Kortz A., Lososová Z., Lustyk P., Skálová H., Štajerová K., Večeřa M., Vítková M., Wild J. & Danihelka J. 2022: Catalogue of alien plants of the Czech Republic (3rd edition): species richness, status, distributions, habitats, regional invasion levels, introduction pathways and impacts. – Preslia 94: 447–577.  https://doi.org/10.23855/preslia.2022.447 Google Scholar

168.

Quézel P. & Santa S. 1963: Nouvelle flore de l'Algérie et des régions désertiques méridionales 2. – Paris: Éditions du Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique. Google Scholar

169.

Raab-Straube E. von 2018+a [continuously updated]: Aizoaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/305f8101-b013-4906-930f-37942e6f4858[accessed on 3 Apr 2023]. Google Scholar

170.

Raab-Straube E. von 2018+b [continuously updated]: Bignoniaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/0e2cf035-2eaf-4317-ad87 -42ba81b10ef2[accessed 11 Jun 2023] Google Scholar

171.

Raab-Straube E. von 2018+c [continuously updated]: Onagraceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/8708470a-fb82-4dbe-99ea-86e1a515b643[accessed 27 Sep 2023]. Google Scholar

172.

Raab-Straube E. von 2020+ [continuously updated]: Sapotaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/da611d72-078a-480f-b1dc-b56d6a7a1526[accessed 29 Jul 2023]. Google Scholar

173.

Raab-Straube E. von 2022+ [continuously updated]: Myrtaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/9bc8578c-744d-44d5-9bdc-4bee1e4e7f12[accessed 27 Jul 2023]. Google Scholar

174.

Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.) 2023: Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 16. – Willdenowia 53: 57–77.  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.53.53104  Google Scholar

175.

Rahimi F., Ibodzoda K., Abdusalyamov I., Yakubova M., Saidov A., Hisoriev H. (ed.) 2017: The Red Book of the Republic of Tajikistan 1. – Dushanbe: Ganch. Google Scholar

176.

Randall R. P. (ed.) 2017: A global compendium of weeds, ed. 3. – Perth: R. P. Randall. Google Scholar

177.

Rätzel S., Holzgreve V., Kreinsen B. & Uhlich H. 2018: Orobanche litorea. – Pp. 207–209 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus T. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 9. – Willdenowia 48: 195–220.  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.48.48203  Google Scholar

178.

Rechinger K. H. 1944: Flora aegaea. Flora der Inseln und Halbinseln des ägäischen Meeres. – Akad. Wiss. Wien Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. Denkschr. 105( 1 ). Google Scholar

179.

Rivera D. & Ruiz J. B. 1978: Argania spinosa L (Skeel) Sapotaceae. Subespontanea en la Península ibérica. – Anales Jard. Bot. Madrid 44: 173. Google Scholar

180.

Rohlena J. 1904: Vierter Beitrag zur Flora von Montenegro. – Sitzungsber. Königl. Böhm. Ges. Wiss., Math.-Naturwiss. Cl. 38: 1–108. Google Scholar

181.

Ryff L. E. 2021: Oxalis latifolia Kunth. – Pp. 155–156 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 13 [Notulae ad floram euro-mediterraneam pertinentes No. 42]. – Willdenowia 51: 141–168.  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.51.51112  Google Scholar

182.

Sabovljević M. S., Tomović G., Boycheva P., Ivanov D., Denchev T. T., Denchev C. M., Stevanoski I., Marković A., Đurović S. Z., Buzurović U., Yaneva G., Ştefănuţ S., Ştefănuţ M. M., Knežević A., Petrović P., Assyov B., Pantović J., Niketić M., Vukojičić S., Ion R. & Tamas G. 2021: New records and noteworthy data of plants, algae and fungi in SE Europe and adjacent regions, 3. – Bot. Serbica 45: 119–127.  https://doi.org/10.2298/BOTSERB2101119S  Google Scholar

183.

Sáez L. & Aymerich P. 2020: A new nomenclatural combination in Mesembryanthemum L. (Mesembryanthemoideae, Aizoaceae). – Butl. Inst. Catalana Hist. Nat., Secc. Bot. 84: 71. Google Scholar

184.

Sánchez Pedraja Ó., Moreno Moral G., Carlón L., Piwowarczyk R., Laínz M. & Schneeweiss G. M. 2016: Index of Orobanchaceae. – Published at  http://www.farmalierganes.com/Otrospdf/publica/Orobanchaceae%20Index.htm[accessed 11 Jul 2023]. Google Scholar

185.

Sârbu I., Ştefan N. & Oprea A. 2013: Plante vasculare din România. Determinator ilustrat de teren. – Bucureşti: Editura Victor B Victor. Google Scholar

186.

Sauer W. 1975: Karyo-systematische Untersuchungen an der Gattung Pulmonaria (Boraginaceae): Chromosomen-Zahlen, Karyotyp-Analysen und allgemeine Hinweise auf die Entwicklungsgeschichte. – Biblioth. Bot. 131: 1–85. Google Scholar

187.

Schur J. F. 1866: Enumeratio plantarum Transsilvaniae ex-hibens stirpes phanerogamas sponte crescentes atque frequentius cultas, cryptogamas vasculares, characeas, etiam muscos hepaticasque. – Vindobonae [Wien]: G. Braumüller.  https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.9958  Google Scholar

188.

Senar R. & Cardero S. 2019: Dades de plantes al·lòctones per a l'est de la península Ibèrica. Collect. Bot. (Barcelona) 38(e009).  https://doi.org/10.3989/collectbot.2019.v38.009  Google Scholar

189.

Seregin A. P. (ed.) 2023: Specimen MW0606074 from the collection “Moscow University Herbarium”. – In: Depository of Live Systems (branch “Plants”): electronic resource. – Moscow: Moscow State University. – Published at  https://plant.depo.msu.ru/module/itempublic?d=P&openparams=%5Bopen-id%3D73670150%5D[accessed 29 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

190.

Seregin A. P., Yevseyenkov P. E., Svirin S. A. & Fateryga A. V. 2015: Second contribution to the vascular flora of the Sevastopol area (the Crimea). – Wulfenia 22: 33–82. Google Scholar

191.

Shishkin B. K. & Bobrov E. G. (ed.) 1949: Flora SSSR 15. – Moskva & Leningrad: Istdatelst'vo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Google Scholar

192.

Shuka L. & Tan K. 2019: Orobanche variegata Wallr. – Pp. 111–112 in: Vladimirov V., Aybeke M., Matevski V. & Tan K. (ed.), New floristic records in the Balkans: 38. – Phytol. Balcan. 25: 97–120. Google Scholar

193.

Shynder O. I. 2019: Spontaneous flora of M. M. Gryshko National Botanical Garden of the NAS of Ukraine (Kyiv). 3. Escaped plants. – Pl. Introd. (Kyiv) 83: 14–29.  https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3404101 Google Scholar

194.

Shynder O. I., Doiko N. M., Glukhova S. A., Mykhajluk S. M. & Negrash Y. M. 2022: New information about the flora of plant introduction institutions in Kyiv and Bila Tserkva (Kyiv region). – Chornomorski Bot. J. 18: 25–51.  https://doi.org/10.32999/ksu1990-553X/2022-18-1-2 Google Scholar

195.

Siadati S., Salmaki Y., Mehrvarz S. S., Heubl G. & Wei-gend M. 2018: Untangling the generic boundaries in tribe Marrubieae (Lamiaceae: Lamioideae) using nuclear and plastid DNA sequences. – Taxon 67: 770–783.  https://doi.org/10.12705/674.6 Google Scholar

196.

Silva Luz C. L. da, Mitchell J. D., Daly D. C., Bitencourt C., Pierre P. M. O., Pell S. K. & Pirani J. R. 2022: Hidden species of Anacardiaceae in the Andean cloud forests: a revision of Schinus section Myrtifolia. – Syst. Bot. 47: 1031–1064.  https://doi.org/10.1600/036364422X16674053033822  Google Scholar

197.

Silva Luz C. L. da, Pirani J. R., Mitchell J. D., Daly D., Capelli N. V., Demarco D., Pell S. K. & Plunkett G. M. 2019: Phylogeny of Schinus L. (Anacardiaceae) with a new infrageneric classification and insights into evolution of spinescence and floral traits. – Molec. Phylogen. Evol. 133: 302–351.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ympev.2018.10.013 Google Scholar

198.

Simon T. 1992: Magyarország edényes flóra határozója. Harasztok-virágos növények. – Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó. Google Scholar

199.

Sîrbu C. & Oprea A. 2011: Plante adventive în flora României. – Iaşi: Editura Ion Ionescu de la Brad. Google Scholar

200.

Skvortsov A. K. 1996: Onagraceae Juss. – Pp. 299–316 in: Tzvelev N. N. (ed.), Flora vostochnoy Evropy 9. –Saint Petersburg: Mir i sem'ya-95. Google Scholar

201.

Smith G. F., Laguna E., Verloove F. & Ferrer-Gallego P. P. 2020: Aptenia ×vascosilvae (A. cordifolia × A. haeckeliana) (Aizoaceae), the new nothospecies from which the horticulturally popular cultivar Aptenia ‘Red Apple’ is derived. – Phytotaxa 441: 221–224. Google Scholar

202.

Solomakha V. A. (ed.) 2007: O. V. Fomin Botanical Garden. Index Plantarum. – Kyiv: Phytosociocentre. Google Scholar

203.

Soó R. & Kárpáti Z. 1968: Növényhatározó II. kötet. Harasztok-virágos növények. – Budapest: Tankönyvkiadó. Google Scholar

204.

Soó R. & Webb D. A. 1972: Melampyrum. – Pp. 253–257 in: Tutin T. G., Heywood V. H., Burges N. A., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (ed.), Flora europaea 3. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

205.

Stace C. 2010: New flora of the British Isles, ed. 3. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

206.

Stapf O. 1885: Beiträge zur Flora von Lycien, Carien und Mesopotamien. I. Theil. Plantae collectae a Dre. Felix Luschan ann. 1881, 1882, 1883. – Denkschr. Kaiserl. Akad. Wiss. Wien Math.-Naturwiss. Kl. 50( 2 ): 73–120. Google Scholar

207.

Strid A. 2002: Ranunculus L. – Pp. 38–69 in: Strid A. & Tan K. (ed.), Flora hellenica 2. – Ruggell: A. R. G. Gantner. Google Scholar

208.

Strid A. 2006: Carex umbrosa Host subsp. umbrosa. – P. 727 in: Greuter W. & Raus Th. (ed.): Med-Checklist Notulae, 24. – Willdenowia 36: 719–730.  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.36.36207  Google Scholar

209.

Strid A. 2016: Atlas of the Aegean flora. Part 2: maps. – Berlin: Botanic Garden and Botanical Museum Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin. – Englera33( 2 ).  https://www.jstor.org/stable/i40216011  Google Scholar

210.

Strid A. & Tan K. (ed.) 2002: Flora hellenica 2. – Ruggell: A. R. G. Gantner. Google Scholar

211.

Stride G., Nylinder S. & Swenson U. 2014: Revisiting the biogeography of Sideroxylon (Sapotaceae) and an evaluation of the taxonomic status of Argania and Spiniluma. – Austral. Syst. Bot. 27: 104–118.  https://doi.org/10.1071/SB14010 Google Scholar

212.

Stuart D. C. 2011: Muscari Miller. – Pp. 124–125 in: Cullen J., Knees S. G. &. Cubey H. S. (ed.), Euro-paean garden flora, ed. 2, 1. Monocotyledons: Alismataceae to Orchidaceae. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

213.

Svirin S. & Kashirina E. 2023: Iris halophila Pall. – P. 61, 63 in: Raab-Straube E. von & Raus Th. (ed.), Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 16. – Willdenowia 53: 57–77.  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.53.53104  Google Scholar

214.

Takhtajan A. L. (ed.) 1981: Rare and endangered flora species of the USSR. – Leningrad: Nauka. Google Scholar

215.

Tarasov V. V. 2005: Flora of Dnipropetrovsk and Zaporizhzhya regions. Vascular plants. – Dnipropetrovsk: Dnipropetrovsk National University Press. Google Scholar

216.

Tenore M. 1809: Catalogo delle piante del giardino botanico del Signor Principe di Bisignano. – Napoli: Stamperia del Corriere. Google Scholar

217.

Tison J.-M. & de Foucault B. 2014: Flora gallica. Flore de France. – Mèze: Biotope. Google Scholar

218.

Tomović G., Sabovljević M. S., Đokić I., Petrović P., Đorđević V., Lazarević P., Mašić E., Barudanović S., Ştefănuţ S., Niketić M., Butorac B., Pantović J., Hajrudinović-Bogunić A., Bogunić F., Kabaš E., Vukojičić S., Kuzmanović N., Đurović S. Z. & Buzurović U. 2020: New records and noteworthy data of plants, algae and fungi in SE Europe and adjacent regions, 2. – Bot. Serbica 44: 251–259.  https://doi.org/10.2298/BOTSERB2002251T  Google Scholar

219.

Tosheva A. 2005: Lathyrus filiformis (Fabaceae) a new species for the Bulgarian flora. – Fl. Medit. 15: 397–402. Google Scholar

220.

Tutin T. G. 1993: Celtis L. – P. 77 in: Tutin T. G., Burges N. A., Chater A. O., Edmondson J. R., Heywood V. H., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (ed.), Flora europaea, ed. 2, 1. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

221.

Tutin T. G. & Akeroyd J. R. 1993: Ranunculus L. – Pp. 269–286 in: Tutin T. G., Burges N. A., Chater A. O., Edmondson J. R., Heywood V. H., Moore D. M., Valentine D. H., Walters S. M. & Webb D. A. (ed.), Flora europaea, ed. 2, 1. – Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar

222.

Tzvelev N. N. 1964: O nekotorykh kriticheskikh i novykh dlya evropeyskoy chasti SSSR vidakh zlakov. – Pp. 20–30 in: I. A. Linchevskiy (ed.), Novosti sistematiki vysshikh rasteniy. – Moscow & Leningrad: Nauka. Google Scholar

223.

Tzvelev N. N. 2006: Kratkiy konspekt zlakov (Poaceae) Vostochnoy Evropy: nachalo sistemy (triby BambuseaeBromeae). – Pp. 66–113 in: N. N. Tzvelev (ed.), Novosti sistematiki vysshikh rasteniy 38. – Moscow: KMK Scientific Press.  https://doi.org/10.31111/novitates/2006.38.66  Google Scholar

224.

Tzvelev N. N. & Probatova N. S. 2019: Grasses of Russia. – Moscow: KMK Scientific Press. Google Scholar

225.

Uhlich H., Pusch J. & Barthel K.-J. 1995: Die Sommerwurzarten Europas. (Neue Brehm-Bücherei Band 618 ). – Magdeburg: Westarp Wissenschaften. Google Scholar

226.

Uotila P. 2011+a [continuously updated]: Chenopodiaceae (pro parte majore). – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/3c3c555c-678d-4d96-8648-526fed4bf50f[accessed 29 Sep 2023]. Google Scholar

227.

Uotila P. 2011+b [continuously updated]: Typhaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/a01c6c43-a4ba-40cd-a06e-67e8706d452d[accessed 17 Apr 2023]. Google Scholar

228.

Valdés B. 2012+ [continuously updated]: Solanaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/a9306f67-5a16-4858-b41f-b20e49272ee6[accessed 11 Aug 2023]. Google Scholar

229.

Valdés B. & Raab-Straube E. von 2011+ [continuously updated]: Boraginaceae. – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/c029e2dd-0b84-49e4-8080-b20eadf281ee[accessed 12 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

230.

Valdés B. & Scholz H. (with contributions from Raab-Straube E. von & Parolly G.) 2009+ [continuously updated]: Poaceae (pro parte majore). – In: Euro+Med PlantBase – the information resource for Euro-Mediterranean plant diversity. – Published at  https://europlusmed.org/cdm_dataportal/taxon/5ea0f9b4-3446-43d7-b227-0f637bcbaab8[accessed 25 Oct 2023]. Google Scholar

231.

Vasil'ev V. N. 1952: Oleaceae Lindl. – Pp. 483–525 in: Shishkin B. K. & Bobrov E. G. (ed.), Flora SSSR 18. – Moskva & Leningrad: Istdatelst'vo Akademii Nauk SSSR. Google Scholar

232.

Velenovský J. 1922: Reliquiae mrkvičkanae. – Pragae: Fr. Řivnáč.  https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.79633  Google Scholar

233.

Verloove F. & Silva J. J. G. 2022: New records of alien vascular plants from the island of Madeira (Portugal). – Bol. Mus. Munic. Funchal. 72: 27–54. Google Scholar

234.

Vidéki R. 2009: Rubiaceae – Galajfélék családja. – Pp. 387–393 in: Király G. (ed.), Új magyar füvészkönyv, Magyarország hajtásos növényei, Határozókulcsok. – Jósvafő: Aggteleki Nemzeti Park Igazgatóság. Google Scholar

235.

Vitek E. 1991: Euphrasia L. – Pp. 236–240 in: Strid A. & Tan K. (ed.), Mountain flora of Greece 2. – Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press. Google Scholar

236.

Viviani D. 1830: Appendix altera ad florae corsicae prodromum. – Genuae: Typographia Pagano. Google Scholar

237.

WFO 2023: World Flora Online. – Published at  https://www.worldfloraonline.org[accessed 29 Mar 2023]. Google Scholar

238.

Willkomm M. & Lange J. 1880: Prodromus florae hispanicae, seu synopsis methodica omnium plantarum in Hispania sponte nascentium vel frequentius cultarum 3. – Stuttgartiae: E. Schweizerbart. Google Scholar

239.

Wilson K. L. & Johnson L. A. S. 1989: Casuarinaceae. – Pp. 100–189 in: George A. S. (ed.), Flora of Australia 3. Hamamelidales to Casuarinales. – Canberra: Australian Government Publishing Service. Google Scholar

240.

Yena A. V. 2012: Prirodnaya flora Krymskogo poluostrova. – Simferopol: N. Orianda. Google Scholar

241.

Zippel E. & Wilhalm T. 2003: Nachweis und Verbreitung annueller Buglossoides-Arten (Lithospermeae, Boraginaceae) in Südtirol (Italien). – Gredleriana 3: 347–360. Google Scholar

Appendices

Supplemental content online

See  https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.54.54101

 Fig. S1, S2 and S3 (wi.54.54101_Supplement.pdf). Portulaca oleracea aggregate, ultra-structural study of seed surfaces by SEM.

Eckhard von Raab-Straube and Thomas Raus "Euro+Med-Checklist Notulae, 17," Willdenowia 54(1), 5-45, (19 February 2024). https://doi.org/10.3372/wi.54.54101
Received: 8 May 2023; Accepted: 20 December 2023; Published: 19 February 2024
KEYWORDS
distribution
Euro+Med PlantBase
Europe
Med-Checklist
Mediterranean
new combination
new record
Back to Top