Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2017 Host Associations of Gall-Inducing Prodiplosis longifila (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Bolivia: Implications for Its Use as a Biological Control Agent for Jatropha gossypiifolia (Euphorbiaceae)
Kunjithapatham Dhileepan, Stefan Neser, Damian Rumiz, Anantanarayanan Raman, Anamika Sharma
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Based on field host range and damage potential, we explored the prospects of exploiting a gall midge from Jatropha clavuligera Müll. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae) in Bolivia as a “new-association” biological control agent for Jatropha gossypiifolia L. (Euphorbiaceae), a major rangeland weed in Australia. The gall midge, determined morphologically as Prodiplosis longifila Gagné (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), induces rosette galls, resulting in shoot tip dieback in J. clavuligera in Bolivia. Although P. longifila is reported to occur on a range of crops in the Neotropics, its feeding on J. clavuligera in Bolivia is strikingly different in that it induces rosette galls on its shoots. In other countries, P. longifila larvae feed on leaves, buds, flowers and fruits, with no gall symptoms. There was no evidence of P. longifila-induced galls on crop plants (reported hosts in other countries), other species of Jatropha, or other species of Euphorbiaceae in Bolivia, and in choice tests conducted in the quarantine facility in South Africa. Bolivian entomological records do not report any damage to crops by P. longifila. We propose that P. longifila in Bolivia is possibly a new species restricted to a few closely related species of Jatropha and a part of a cryptic species complex. Based on the susceptibility of J. gossypiifolia to the gall-inducing P. longifila in the field in Bolivia and in quarantine tests in South Africa, we propose that the gall-inducing P. longifila sourced from J. clavuligera in Bolivia is a potential “new-association” biological control agent for J. gossypiifolia in Australia.

Classical weed biological control involves the importation and establishment of self-perpetuating, host-specific natural enemies from the native landscape of the target weed. Host-specific natural enemies are usually sourced from the same target weed in the native landscape (e.g., Goolsby et al. 2006; McFadyen 1998). However, natural enemies from congeners also have been successfully used as biological con trol agents to manage weeds (e.g., Dodd 1940; Julien 2012; Palmer & McFadyen 2012; Palmer & Sims-Chilton 2012; van Klinken & Morin 2012). In this paper, we report the exploration of a similar strategy of using agents from Jatropha clavuligera Müll. Arg. (Euphorbiaceae), as a “new-association” biological control agent for Jatropha gossypiifolia L. (Euphorbiaceae), a weed of national significance in Australia.

Jatropha gossypiifolia, a deciduous perennial shrub native to tropical America, is a major and expanding weed of rangelands and riparian zones in dry tropical parts of northern Australia (Bebawi et al. 2007). Jatropha gossypiifolia forms dense thickets, reducing the usefulness of land for grazing by competing with pasture species and poisoning stock. It also reduces biological diversity, affects fire regimes, and increases erosion along creek and river banks (Csurhes 1999, Bebawi et al. 2007). Biological control is the most economically viable and longterm management solution for J. gossypiifolia (Dhileepan et al. 2014).

Native-range surveys in Mexico, Central and northern South America, and the Caribbean for potential biological control agents resulted in the release of seed-feeding Agonosoma trilineatum (Fab.) (Hemiptera: Scutelleridae) in Australia, which failed to establish (Heard et al. 2012). With no prospects of gaining any additional biological control agents from Mexico, Central America, and the Caribbean (Heard et al. 2012), survey efforts were redirected to South America (Dhileepan et al. 2014). Because all J. gossypiifolia in South America (e.g., Bolivia, Paraguay, Peru, and Brazil) were found either in home gardens or as garden escapes (Dhileepan et al. 2014), other Jatropha species native to South America also were surveyed for specialist natural enemies with their host range limited to a few closely related Jatropha species. With no native Jatropha species in Australia and with Jatropha species not regarded as major ornamentals or crops, use of a host-specific agent from congeners as a “new-association” biological control agent for J. gossypiifolia in Australia is a promising option.

Surveys in Bolivia revealed populations of Prodiplosis longifila Gagné (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae), which induce rosette galls on the shoot terminals of J. clavuligera, a close relative of J. gossypiifolia, in Bolivia, resulting in shoot-tip dieback (Dhileepan et al. 2014). Prodiplosis longifila has been reported as a pest of various crops such as citrus (Citrus spp., Rutaceae), asparagus (Asparagus officinalis L., Asparagaceae), alfalfa (Medicago sativa L., Fabaceae), potato (Solanum tuberosum L., Solanaceae), tomato (S. lycopersicum L., Solanaceae), bean (Phaseolus spp., Fabaceae), peppers (Capsicum spp., Solanaceae), wild cotton (Gossypium sp., Malvaceae), artichoke (Cynara cardunculus L., Asteraceae), cucurbits (Cucurbita spp., Cucurbitaceae), avocado (Persea americana Mill., Lauraceae), onion (Allium cepa L., Amaryllidaceae), grapevine (Vitis vinifera L., Vitaceae) and castor-oil plant (Ricinus communis L., Euphorbiaceae) in the Neotropics (Gagné 1986; Peña et al. 1989; Gagné & Jaschhof 2014). However, gall induction on J. clavuligera and the field host range of P. longifila in Bolivia suggest that the populations of P. longifila inducing galls on J. clavuligera in that country belong to a host-specific, cryptic species within the P. longifila species complex. The P. longifila populations living on other plants are possibly a complex of cryptic species, rather than a single polyphagous species (EPPO 2015). Similar morphologically indistinguishable cryptic species pose significant challenges in other weed biological control projects (Mound et al. 2010; Toševski et al. 2011, 2013; Rafter et al. 2013; Paterson et al. 2016).

In this study, we explored the feasibility of exploiting the gall-inducing P. longifila sourced from J. clavuligera (the native host) in Bolivia as a biological control agent for J. gossypiifolia (the novel host) in Australia, based on the incidence, damage levels, and field host range of gallinducing P. longifila on J. clavuligera in Bolivia, and on the susceptibility of J. gossypiifolia to P. longifila gall damage in a field transplant experiment in Bolivia and in no-choice tests in quarantine in South Africa.

Materials and Methods

NATIVE-RANGE SURVEY

Based on herbarium records of the Missouri Botanical Garden, Kew Royal Botanic Gardens, National Herbarium Nederland, New York Botanical Garden, Rio de Janeiro Botanical Garden, and the Harvard University Herbarium, and related published literature (Dehgan 2012), surveys were conducted on J. gossypiifolia, J. clavuligera, J. excisa Griseb., J. hieronymii Kuntze and J. curcas L., at 13 sites in Bolivia in Apr 2013, Nov 2014, Mar 2015, and Feb 2016 (Table 1). Jatropha gossypiifolia and J. curcas found in Bolivia were cultivated in home gardens, suggesting that these 2 species are not native taxa here. Other Bolivian native species of Jatropha, such as J. clavuligera, J. excisa, and J. hieronymii occurred mainly along road verges, in conservation areas, and arid-zone forests. The incidence (measured as percentage of plants) of P. longifila galls on J. clavuligera, J. gossypiifolia, J. excisa, J. curcas, and J. hieronymii was recorded at all sites during sampling. Because P. longifila galls were found only on J. clavuligera, the percentage of J. clavuligera shoot tips with galls was recorded at 3 sites (Pulquina Cacti Garden, San Isidro, and La Villa near Punata; Table 1) in Feb 2016. The field-collected galls were dissected out to determine if there were live or developing larvae, parasitoids, and also to verify possible fungal associations within galls. The larvae of P. longifila extracted from galls were reared to adults in a quarantine facility at the Agricultural Research Council—Plant Protection Research Institute (ARC—PPRI) in Pretoria, South Africa. Alcohol-fixed P. longifila specimens were sent to Raymond Gagné (USDA-ARS) for determination.

LIGHT MICROSCOPY

Galled shoots of J. clavuligera were spot fixed in FAA [formalin, ethanol (95%), glacial-acetic acid, distilled water:10, 50, 5, 35 ml, making up to 100 ml], followed by processing in alcohol series (30, 50, 70, 80, 90, 100%, each change 12 h), histolene, and paraffin-wax embedding (65 °C). The wax-embedded tissues were sectioned at 8 µm using a rotary microtome, deparaffinized in histolene, contrasted with 1% toluidine blue (in 1% aqueous-borax solution), and mounted in DPX. Micrographs were made in a photomicroscope (BX-51, Olympus Optical Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). Staining with toluidine blue (1%) also localized phenolic materials (McCully 1966).

PRELIMINARY MULTIPLE AND NO-CHOICE TESTS IN QUARANTINE

Field-collected P. longifila galls and young, bare-rooted (uprooted seedlings with soil washed off from roots and roots wrapped with moist paper towel) J. clavuligera plants bearing P. longifila galls were imported into the ARC-PPRI quarantine facility in Pretoria, South Africa, in Nov 2014. Field-collected J. clavuligera plants with early symptoms of gall development were transplanted into pots in the quarantine facility and the larvae were allowed to mature and pupate in the soil. The emergent P. longifila adults (3 to 4 adults per d over a wk) were exposed to potted ungalled J. gossypiifolia control plants maintained individually in insect-proof cages (50 cm × 50 cm × 100 cm; 1 J. gossypiifolia plant per cage), under no-choice conditions, to verify whether gall-inducing P. longifila obtained from J. clavuligera in Bolivia induced galls also on J. gossypiifolia. Simultaneously, the emergent P. longifila adults (3 to 4 adults per d over a wk) were exposed to potted ungalled J. clavuligera plants maintained individually in insect-proof cages (50 cm × 50 cm × 100 cm; 1 J. clavuligera plant per cage), under no-choice conditions, as control plants to compare the nature of galls induced on J. clavuligera, the native host, and on J. gossypiifolia, the novel host. Both J. gos sypiifolia and J. clavuligera control plants without galls exposed to P. longifila adults were monitored for gall development.

Table 1.

Incidence and abundance of Prodiplosis longifila galls or larval feeding damage on Jatropha species, closely related Euphorbiaceae species and crops at survey sites in Bolivia.

t01_777.gif

Jatropha clavuligera without galls, together with combinations (4 test plants per cage) of tomato, bell pepper (Capsicum annuum L.), castor-oil plant, lemon (Citrus limon [L.] Burm.f.), J. gossypiifolia, J. curcas and 4 Euphorbiaceae native to southern Africa, viz., J. zeyheri Sond., Croton gratissimus Burch., Synadenium cupulare (Boiss.) L.C. Wheeler, and Flueggia virosa (Willd.) Voigt., were included in choice tests for oviposition and gall induction by P. longifila. These trials were conducted in insect-proof cages in a quarantined glasshouse in Pretoria, South Africa. Newly emerged females and males of P. longifila were introduced into insect-proof cages with batches of test plants, over a period of up to 1 wk, as they became available from field-collected galls (3 to 4 adults per d over a wk). Due to limited number of female emergence, no replications were possible in the preliminary choice tests (1 replication for each test plant species). The plants were observed for morphological changes in shoot tips and gall development for 2 wk after the last gravid female was introduced into each cage.

FIELD TRANSPLANT EXPERIMENTS

To ascertain the susceptibility of J. gossypiifolia to gall induction by P. longifila under natural field conditions, 16 field-collected J. gossypiifolia seedlings from Santa Cruz (17.5200°S, 63.0700°W) and Angostura (18.0900°S, 63.2900°W) were planted around 4 J. clavuligera plants bearing galls induced by P. longifila. The 4 J. gossypiifolia seedlings were planted 60 cm apart from each J. clavuligera plant along the 4 compass points at the Pulquina Cacti Garden (18.0500°S, 64.2500°W) near Comarapa in Bolivia in Nov 2014. In addition, 20 seedlings and 5 stem cuttings of J. gossypiifolia also were planted individually in polybags and maintained in the shade under a randomly selected tree at the Pulquina Cacti Garden. The susceptibility of J. gossypiifolia plants (16 transplanted and 25 in polybags) to gall induction by P. longifila was checked in Mar 2015 and Feb 2016.

Because the Cecidomyiidae on J. clavuligera had been identified as P. longifila (Raymond Gagné, personal communication), a field transplant experiment was initiated at the Pulquina Cacti Garden in Mar 2015 to check whether P. longifila will induce galls on those plants reported as hosts for P. longifila in countries other than Bolivia. Four plots (9 m2 each) with mature J. clavuligera plants with P. longifila gall damage were used. In each plot, 3 to 4 J. clavuligera plants bearing galls induced by P. longifila were identified as the source plants. Tomato, potato, bell pepper, orange, and castor-oil plants (reported hosts for P. longifila) and J. clavuligera as control were transplanted at 60 cm distance from each J. clavuligera plant with P. longifila galls in a split-plot design (6 test plant species × 3 replications × 4 plots). The experiment was checked for freshly induced galls on transplanted J. clavuligera and the 5 economically important plant species in Feb 2016.

FIELD -HOST RANGE

The crops and other plants reported as hosts for P. longifila in the USA (Florida), Peru, Ecuador, and Colombia, were surveyed in Bolivia for either P. longifila incidence or its damage symptoms (Table 1). In Apr 2013, the castor-oil plant (reported host of P. longifila), J. gossypiifolia, J. curcas, and J. excisa occurring along road verges were sampled at 6 sites (Table 1). In Nov 2014, J. excisa, J. curcas, and J. hieronymii were sampled at 5 sites (Table 1). In Mar 2015, orange trees in 2 orchards and castor-oil plants at 2 sites along road verges were sampled (Table 1). In Feb 2016, tomato, both wild and cultivated, potato, orange, castor-oil plant, and wild cotton along road verges adjacent to natural populations of J. clavuligera bearing P. longifila galls were sampled at 3 sites (Table 1). In addition, Cnidosculus tubulosus (Müll. Arg.) I. M. Jonson (Euphorbiaceae) co-existing with J. clavuligera in Pulquina Cacti Garden also was sampled to check if the gall midge occurs on other closely related plants. The shoot terminals of tomato, wild cotton, castor-oil plant, and C. tubulosus were checked for P. longifila larval incidence.

DATA ANALYSIS

Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the relative incidence of gall induction by P. longifila on J. clavuligera in Apr 2013, Nov 2014, Mar 2015, and Feb 2016 with individual sites nested within each season. ANOVA was applied to compare gall incidence at Pulquina Cacti Garden, San Isidro, and La Villa near Punata sites in Feb 2016 with individual plants used as replicates. The means were compared using Tukey's HSD test. Regression analysis was employed to study the relationship between the number of branches per plant in J. clavuligera and the percentage of shoot tips with P. longifila galls. Statistical analyses were carried out using Sigmastat version 3.5.

Results

GALL MORPHOLOGY

In Bolivia, P. longifila induces rosette galls consisting of malformed and abnormally thickened leaves and petioles by modifying axillary and terminal vegetative buds of J. clavuligera (Fig. 1A). Developing larvae feed on the nutritive cells that form the inner-most layer in the gall, with no evidence of either cell necrosis or fungal mycelia in them (Fig. 1B). Larval feeding on shoot terminals results in the telescoping of the shoot axis, involving the inhibition of normal shoot growth, in 2 to 3 wk. The thickened and poorly differentiated leaves therefore crowd at shoot terminals. They do not spread out, but curl inwards. With maturation, basal portions of the petioles, rachis, and leaf blades thicken, including hypertrophied cells. The overall color changes from green to purple-red. Due to gall development, the shoot terminals are completely destroyed, often resulting in shoot-tip dieback.

GALL INDUCTION AND DEVELOPMENT ON JATROPHA CLAVULIGERA

Bolivian populations of P. longifila induce galls on young shoot buds of J. clavuligera. Neonate larvae settle in primordial leaf axils of buds and feed at the axillary positions (Fig. 2A). This action induces shoot buds to grow into galls, each consisting of thickened stem axis, leaf blades, and petioles, including manifold layers of parenchyma (Fig. 2B, C). Because of larval feeding, the epidermal cells turn hypertrophied and hyperplasied (Fig. 2D). The epidermal cells close to larval feeding locations divide repeatedly vertically, while those along the sides of the larval feeding areas show fewer vertical divisions, but are immensely enlarged. The cortical parenchyma cells divide and enlarge consequent to larval feeding (Fig. 2E). The outer cortical cells of the stem, and a few of the epidermal cells differentiate into ‘nutritive’ cells. They bear thin cell walls, large nuclei, and dense cytoplasm (Fig. 2F). As the galls grow with age, they accumulate phenolic materials in their inner cortical cells (Fig. 2G, H).

GALL INCIDENCE ON JATROPHA CLAVULIGERA

Gall induction by P. longifila was evident in all sites with J. clavuligera in Bolivia, resulting in shoot tip dieback. Incidence of P. longifila galls (percentage of plants bearing galls) on J. clavuligera varied widely between sites and between yr (Fig. 3A). Although P. longifila galls were evident throughout the summer (Nov–Apr; Fig. 3B), live larvae within galls were more abundant in the summer—wet season (Mar 2015, Feb 2016) than in the late dry (Nov 2014) and early dry seasons (Apr 2013) (F3,16 = 20.19; P < 0.001; Fig. 3B). In Apr 2013, only 3 of the 113 galls collected had live larvae, whereas none of the 64 galls sampled in Nov 2014 had any live larvae. In contrast, the majority of galls sampled in Mar 2015 (n = 99) and Feb 2016 (n = 264) had live larvae in galls. The number of shoot terminals with galls increased with an increase in the number of branches per plant in all 3 sites (Fig. 4A), and the percentage of shoot tips with galls were significantly higher at La Villa, Punata, than at San Isidro and Pulquina Cacti Garden (F2,26 = 11.37; P < 0.001; Fig. 4B). Shoot tips with gall damage usually resulted in the shoot tip dieback causing stunted plant growth, and occasionally plant death.

Fig. 1.

Rosette galls induced by Prodiplosis longifila in the growing shoot tip of Jatropha clavuligera. (A) Rosette gall in the terminal and axillary buds of Jatropha clavuligera with swollen petiole and rachis and malformed leaves. (B) Young gall in Jatropha clavuligera showing early stage larvae feeding on the nutritive tissue of the gall with no evidence of cell necrosis and fungal growth.

f01_777.jpg

SUSCEPTIBILITY OF JATROPHA GOSSYPIIFO LIA TO GALL INDUCTION BY PRODIPLOSIS LONGIFILA

In Bolivia J. gossypiifolia and J. clavuligera did not co-occur. There was no evidence of P. longifila galls on J. gossypiifolia populations in home gardens in Santa Cruz and Angostura (Table 1). However, in the no-choice quarantine trials conducted in South Africa, P. longifila induced galls on J. clavuligera (Fig. 5A) and J. gossypiifolia (Fig. 5B) were morphologically similar, as determined through visual observation based on relative gall sizes. In the field transplant experiment conducted in Pulquina Cacti Garden in Bolivia, all of J. clavuligera and all of transplanted J. gossypiifolia (n = 16) bore old galls (galls with no live larvae of P. longifila) with deformed and crinkled leaves (Fig. 5C). Destructive sampling of galls revealed no live larvae on either J. clavuligera or on the transplanted J. gossypiifolia after 1 yr (in Mar 2015). In Feb 2016 (after 2 yr), only 5 of the 16 transplanted J. gossypiifolia survived, but P. longifila-induced galls were evident on all of them, with live larvae. Likewise, P. longifila galls with live larvae were evident on all 12 surviving J. gossypiifolia seedlings in polybags under shade in the Pulquina Cacti Garden.

PRELIMINARY CHOICE TESTS IN QUARANTINE

In choice tests, although conducted with only a few females and with no repetitions possible, galls developed on both J. clavuligera and J. gossypiifolia, but not on J. curcas, J. zeyheri, R. communis, C. gratissimus, S. cupulare (all Euphorbiaceae), nor on tomato, bell pepper and lemon. Evidence of deformation of new growth in shoot tips of both J. clavuligera and J. gossypiifolia became visible 1 wk after oviposition on them, and normal gall and larval development occurred, as determined through visual observation on relative gall sizes.

FIELD HOST RANGE

There was no evidence of P. longifila galls on any other species of Jatropha (viz., J. excisa, J. curcas, J. hieronymii, and J. gossypiifolia) in Bolivia, although none co-existed with J. clavuligera at any sampling site (Table 1). Sampling of Cnidosculus tubulosus (Müll. Arg.) I. M. Jonson (Euphorbiaceae), co-existing with J. clavuligera in Pulquina Cacti Garden, revealed no galls induced by P. longifila.

In the transplant field trial in Bolivia, involving potato, tomato, bell pepper, orange, and castor-oil plant, only the orange plants survived after 1 yr (Feb 2016) while the others died due to drought. Although galls were evident on J. clavuligera plants (9.5 ± 7.5 galls per plant) that were used as source-plants for the P. longifila, no evidence of P. longifila damage on the orange plants occurred, although the lack of young, fresh leaves on the orange plants made the results unreliable. Hence, we sampled tomato, potato, orange, bell pepper, cotton, and castor-oil plants growing at 5 to 100 m distance from J. clavuligera bearing galls.

Fig. 2.

Morphological and histological changes in the rosette galls induced by Prodiplosis longifila on Jatropha clavuligera. (A) Vertical sectional view of a portion of the galled shoot showing the inflamed axillary position () (bar = 1 mm). (B) Cross sectional view of a portion of the galled shoot showing the hyperplasied stems and leaves (bar = 0.33 mm); * indicates the location where the larvae congregate; le = leaf. (C) Cross sectional view of a galled leaf showing the intense hyperplasied upper mesophyll (bar = 0.18 mm); arrows point to the hypertrophied epidermis. (D) Cross sectional view of a leaf axil (bar = 0.33 mm); * indicates the location where the larvae congregate; note the vertically dividing epidermal cells towards the bottom, whereas the laterally occurring epidermal cells are hypertrophied. (E) Cross sectional view of the stem showing variously dividing cortical cells (bar = 30 µm); the arrow indicates cell proliferation. (F) Compactly arranged parenchymatous nutritive cells, each with a prominent nucleus (n) and dense cytoplasm (cyt) (bar = 10 µm). (G) Low magnification image of galled stem showing layers of nutritive cells (nc), where the larvae feed (lfs) (bar = 30 µm). In fact, the cells lying opposite, which appear to be empty, show signs of regeneration (rc). In the far interior of the stem cortex, numerous phenol-included cells (pic) occur. Far interior into the stem cortex numerous phenol including cells (pic) occur. (H) An enlarged view of a phenol-including cell (bar = 18 µm).

f02_777.jpg

Fig. 3.

Incidence of Prodiplosis longifila galls on Jatropha clavuligera (percentage of plants with galls) in relation to (A) sites and (B) sampling yr and season (± SE). Different letters above SE bars indicate significant differences (Tukey's test, P < 0.001).

f03_777.jpg

Fig. 4.

Relationship between the number of branches per plant and number of shoot tips with Prodiplosis longifila galls (A) and percentage of shoots (± SE) with Prodiplosis longifila galls (B) across 3 sites in Bolivia in Feb 2016. Different letters above SE bars indicate significant differences (Tukey's test, P < 0.001).

f04_777.jpg

Fig. 5.

Susceptibility of Jatropha gossypiifolia to Prodiplosis longifila. Morphologically similar galls induced on control Jatropha clavuligera (A) and Jatropha gossypiifolia (B) plants under no-choice conditions in quarantine in Pretoria, South Africa. Galling on a transplanted Jatropha gossypiifolia plant under the natural field conditions in Bolivia (C).

f05_777.jpg

In spite of a high level of gall incidence on J. clavuligera (53–87% of plants with galls), no damage occurred on tomato, potato, orange, bell pepper, and castor-oil plant sampled at Pulquina Cacti Garden and San Isidro near Comarapa in the Santa Cruz region, or at La Villa near Punata in the Cochabamba region (Table 1). Shoot terminals of tomato, orange, and wild cotton plants examined under a stereomicroscope confirmed that no larvae of P. longifila occurred on them.

Discussion

Phytophagous Cecidomyiidae generally have narrow host-plant ranges (Gagné 1986) with more than 90% of them inducing galls on a single host-plant species (Skuhrava et al. 1984; Yukawa & Rohfritsch 2005). Therefore, in Cecidomyiidae taxonomy, species distinctions are often made on the basis of host association (Gagné 1986). The Cecidomyiidae that induce galls on J. clavuligera in Bolivia have been identified as P. longifila, a polyphagous species of the Neotropics. Gallinducing symptoms of P. longifila on J. clavuligera appear starkly different from the effects of P. longifila reported previously on lime and orange flowers, tomato leaves, flowers and fruits, potato leaf buds, bell pepper and chili pepper leaves and fruits, artichoke flower buds, cucurbit leaves and fruits, bean fruits, leaves and flowers, avocado leaves, grapevine leaves, asparagus spears, and onion leaves in Peru, Ecuador, Florida (USA), and Colombia. No reports of P. longifila inducing galls on crops and other hosts from the Neotropics exist (Peña et al. 1989; Anonymous 2013; Hernandez et al. 2015; Maria Manzano, personal communication). Based on gall morphology and field host range, we propose that the gall-inducing P. longifila on J. clavuligera in Bolivia is a species with host range restricted to a few Jatropha species, and not a polyphagous pest species.

Among gall-inducing Cecidomyiidae, feeding activity of the first instar larvae induces galls that trigger the differentiation of metaplasied cells, which serve as the source of nutrition for the feeding larvae (Rohfritsch 1992). In Bolivia, P. longifila larvae induced galls on actively growing shoot terminals of J. clavuligera with young leaf primordia. Developing larvae feed on nutritive cells that line the inner cell layers of the gall and, on maturation, the larvae exit galls and pupate in the soil. Being a seasonally deciduous plant, fresh galls appear in the rainy season, when the new flush of leaves appears. Gall induction continues through the wet season (Nov–Mar). Annual sampling suggests that the gall midge remained active during the wet season. In the dry season (Apr–Oct), with no fresh flush of leaves and with all existing leaves shed, there were no fresh galls with larvae. We suspect that with no other known hosts in Bolivia, at the onset of dry season the gall-inducing P. longifila overwinter as pupae in the soil, to emerge in the following wet season.

Prodiplosis longifila has been reported as a polyphagous insect feeding on various crops in the Neotropics ( https://gd.eppo.int/taxon/PRDILO/hosts). So far, there is no record of P. longifila as a pest of any crops in Bolivia. This is the first time a gall inducing P. longifila has been reported from Bolivia, as well as on any Jatropha species. However, gall induction by P. longifila was not seen on orange, tomato, potato, bell pepper, or castor-oil plant, known as hosts in other countries, even when growing in the vicinity of J. clavuligera with P. longifila gall damage. Other phytophagous insects (e.g., Coccoidea on orange, Aphididae and Aleyrodidae on tomato, and Scarabaeidae on potato) were present on the crops, indicating that the absence of P. longifila galls or feeding was not due to pesticide treatments. There was no evidence of P. longifila galls on other Jatropha species present in the near vicinity (J. excisa, J. curcas, J. hieronymii, and J. gossypiifolia), none of which co-occurred with J. clavuligera. However, no-choice tests under quarantine conditions in South Africa and susceptibility tests under natural field conditions in Bolivia demonstrated that J. gossypiifolia is susceptible and a suitable host for gall induction by P. longifila. This suggests that the absence of P. longifila galls on J. gossypiifolia was likely due to geographic isolation, though it is possibly due to climate incompatibility as well.

Considerable variations occur in the nature of feeding damage, crop plants attacked, and host plants recorded for P. longifila in different countries. Although reported as a major pest of tomato, potato, and other horticultural crops in Peru, Colombia, and Ecuador, P. longifila has been reported only as a pest of lime and not of tomato or other crops in Florida in the USA. Likewise, P. longifila is a key pest of asparagus and potato crops in Peru (Cisneros 1995; Kroschel et al. 2012), but has not been reported as a pest of these crops in Colombia (Caicedo & Bellotti 2001; Hernandez et al. 2015). In Ecuador, P. longifila has not been reported on lime, though it is regarded as a pest of lime in Florida (USA), Peru, and Colombia. It has therefore been suggested that P. longifila populations collected from different hosts might correspond to a complex of cryptic species rather than a single polyphagous species (EPPO 2015). Based on ecological, behavioral and genetic studies, existence of host-related cryptic species have been identified in other Cecidomyiidae (Lloyd et al. 2005; Dorchin et al. 2009, 2015; Cook et al 2011; Mathur et al. 2012; Fitzpatrick et al. 2013). A similar approach, therefore, is needed to determine if the populations of P. longifila collected from different host plants in different countries correspond to a complex of cryptic species (Carneiro et al. 2009; Mathur et al. 2012). Due to difficulties in accessing the biological materials from multiple crops in multiple countries, the easier and quicker approach would be to conduct robust no-choice host-specificity tests in quarantine to resolve whether the gall-inducing P. longifila on J. clavuligera in Bolivia is a host-specific species with host range restricted to a few Jatropha species, or a polyphagous pest species with a wide host range.

In classical weed biological control programs there are several examples of successful exploitation of gall-inducing Cecidomyiidae as effective biological control agents (Winston et al. 2014). There are examples also of successful exploitation of insects sourced from plant species closely related to the target weed species in the native range (Dodd 1940; Julien 2012; Palmer & McFadyen 2012; Palmer & Sims- Chilton 2012; van Klinken & Morin 2012). With no native Jatropha species in Australia and with Jatropha species not regarded as major ornamental or food crops, a similar strategy of exploiting gall-inducing P. longifila sourced from J. clavuligera in Bolivia as a “new-association” biological control agent for J. gossypiifolia, if proven specific to a few closely related Jatropha species, appears promising.

Acknowledgments

We thank Raymond Gagné (ARS-USDA) for determining the Cecidomyiidae; Sexto Aguilar (Jardin de Cactáceas de Pulquina, Bolivia) for the facilities at the Cacti garden; Maria Magdalena Galindo (SENASAG, Santa Cruz, Bolivia) for the help with field surveys; Daniel Soto (Museo de Historia Natural, Noel Kempff Mercado, Santa Cruz, Bolivia) for help with the identification of native Jatropha species; Roger Price (ARC-PPRI, Pretoria, South Africa) for the quarantine facilities; and Rachel McFadyen, Di Taylor, Tony Pople, and S. Raghu for comments on the previous versions of the manuscript. The study was carried out under the Queensland Government's ‘War on Western Weeds’ initiative. Funding support from the Meat and Livestock Australia is gratefully acknowledged.

References Cited

1.

Anonymous. 2013. Pests and diseases in the cultivation of asparagus. Limgroup, The Netherlands.  https://www.limgroup.eu/applications/limgroupproductsite/assets/books/en/files/limboekengnet1.pdf (last accessed 20 Jul 2016). Google Scholar

2.

Bebawi FF, Vitelli JS, Campbell SD, Vogler WD, Lockett CJ, Grace BS, Lukitsch B, Heard TA. 2007. The biology of Australian weeds 47. Jatropha gossypiifolia L. Plant Protection Quarterly 22: 42–58. Google Scholar

3.

Caicedo AM, Bellotti AC. 2001. Entomofauna asociada con el cultivo del espárrago en el departamento del Cauca, Colombia. Revista Colombiana de Entomología 35: 15–21. Google Scholar

4.

Carneiro MAA, Branco CSA, Braga CED, Almada ED, Costa MBM, Maia VC, Fernandes GW. 2009. Are gall midge species (Diptera, Cecidomyiidae) hostplant specialists? Revista Brasileira de Entomologia 53: 365–378. Google Scholar

5.

Cisneros F. 1995. Control de Plagas Agrícolas [Control of agricultural pests], 2nd edn. AGCIS Electronics, Lima, Perú. Google Scholar

6.

Cook M, Ozeroff SN, Fitzpatrick SM, Roitberg BD. 2011. Host‐associated differentiation in reproductive behaviour of cecidomyiid midges on cranberry and blueberry. Entomologia Experimentalis et Applicata 141: 8–14. Google Scholar

7.

Csurhes SM. 1999. Bellyache Bush (Jatropha gossypiifolia) in Queensland. Pest Status Review Series - Land Protection. (Queensland Department of Natural Resources: Brisbane, Queensland, Australia.).  https://www.daf.qld.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0010/59338/IPA-BellyacheBush-PSA.pdf (last accessed 14 Jul 2016). Google Scholar

8.

Dehgan B. 2012. Jatropha (Euphorbiaceae). Flora of Neotropica Monograph 110. New York Botanical Garden, New York, USA. Google Scholar

9.

Dhileepan K, Neser S, De Prins J. 2014. Biological control of bellyache bush (Jatropha gossypiifolia) in Australia: South America as a possible source of natural enemies, pp. 5–10 In Impson FAC, Kleinjan CA, Hoffmann JH [Eds], Proceedings of the XIV International Symposium on Biological Control of Weed, Kruger National Park, South Africa, 2–7 Mar 2014. Google Scholar

10.

Dodd AP. 1940. The Biological Control Campaign against Prickly-Pear. Commonwealth Prickly Pear Board, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia, pp . 177. Google Scholar

11.

Dorchin N, Scott ER, Clarkin CE, Luongo MP, Jordan S, Abrahamson WG. 2009. Behavioural, ecological and genetic evidence confirm the occurrence of host‐associated differentiation in goldenrod gall‐midges. Journal of Evolutionary Biology 22: 729–739. Google Scholar

12.

Dorchin N, Joy JB, Hilke LK, Wise MJ, Abrahamson WG. 2015. Taxonomy and phylogeny of the Asphondylia species (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) of North American goldenrods: challenging morphology, complex host associations, and cryptic speciation. Zoological Journal of the Linnean Society 174: 265–304. https://doi.org/10.1111/zoj.12234 Google Scholar

13.

EPPO (European and Mediterranean Plant Protection Organisation). 2015. Prodiplosis longifila (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). EPPO RS 2015/209.  https://www.eppo.int/QUARANTINE/Alert_List/insects/Prodiplosis_longifila.htm (last accessed 13 Jul 2016). Google Scholar

14.

Fitzpatrick SM, Gries R, Khaskin G, Peach DA, Iwanski J, Gries G. 2013. Populations of the gall midge Dasineura oxycoccana on cranberry and blueberry produce and respond to different sex pheromones. Journal of Chemical Ecology 39: 37–49. Google Scholar

15.

Gagné RJ. 1986. Revision of Prodiplosis (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) with description of three new species. Annals of the Entomological Society of America 79: 235–245. Google Scholar

16.

Gagné RJ, Jaschhof M. 2014. Update for a Catalog of the Cecidomyiidae (Diptera) of the World. 3rd edition, digital version 2,  http://www.ars.usda.gov/SP2UserFiles/Place/12454900/Gagne_2014_World_Cecidomyiidae_ Catalog_3rd_Edition.pdf (last accessed 13 Jul 2016). Google Scholar

17.

Goolsby JA, van Klinken RD, Palmer WA. 2006. Maximising the contribution of native‐range studies towards the identification and prioritisation of weed biocontrol agents. Australian Journal of Entomology 45: 276–286. Google Scholar

18.

Heard TA, Dhileepan K, Bebawi F, Bell K, Segura R. 2012. Jatropha gossypiifolia L. bellyache bush, pp. 324–333 In Julien M, McFadyen REC, Cullen J [Eds], Biological Control of Weeds in Australia: 1960 to 2010, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Google Scholar

19.

Hernandez LM, Guzman YC, Martínez-Arias A, Manzano MR, Selvaraj JJ. 2015. The bud midge Prodiplosis longifila: Damage characteristics, potential distribution and presence on a new crop host in Colombia. SpringerPlus 4: 205. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40064-015-0987-6 Google Scholar

20.

Julien M. 2012. Salvinia molesta D.S. Mitchell — Salvinia, pp. 518–525 In Julien M, McFadyen REC, Cullen J [Eds] Biological Control of Weeds in Australia: 1960 to 2010, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Google Scholar

21.

Kroschel J, Mujica N, Alcazar J, Canedo V, Zegarra O. 2012. Developing integrated pest management for potato: experiences and lessons from two distinct potato production systems of Peru, pp. 419–450 In He Z, Larkin R, Honeycutt W [Eds], Sustainable Potato Production: Global Case Studies, Springer Science & Business Media, New York, USA. Google Scholar

22.

Lloyd CJ, Hufbauer RA, Jackson A, Nissen SJ, Norton P. 2005. Pre- and post-introduction patterns in neutral genetic diversity in the leafy spurge gall midge, Spurgia capitigena (Bremi) (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae). Biological Control 33: 153–164. Google Scholar

23.

McFadyen REC. 1998. Biological control of weeds. Annual Review of Entomology 43: 369–393. Google Scholar

24.

Mathur S, Cook MA, Sinclair BJ, Fitzpatrick SM. 2012. DNA Barcodes suggest cryptic speciation in Dasineura oxycoccana (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on cranberry, Vaccinium macrocarpon, and blueberry, V. corymbosum. Florida Entomologist 95: 387–394. Google Scholar

25.

McCully ME. 1966. Histological studies on the genus Ficus. I. Light microscopy of the mature vegetative plant. Protoplasma 62: 287–305. Google Scholar

26.

Mound LA, Wheeler GS, Williams DA. 2010. Resolving cryptic species with morphology and DNA; thrips as a potential biocontrol agent of Brazilian peppertree, with a new species and overview of Pseudophilothrips (Thysanoptera). Zootaxa 2432: 59–68. Google Scholar

27.

Palmer WA, McFadyen REC. 2012. Ambrosia artemisiifolia L. — annual ragweed, pp. 52–59 In Julien M, McFadyen REC, Cullen J [Eds] Biological Control of Weeds in Australia: 1960 to 2010, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Google Scholar

28.

Palmer WA, Sims-Chilton N. 2012. Baccharis halimifolia L. — groundsel bush, pp. 86–95 In Julien M, McFadyen REC, Cullen J [Eds] Biological Control of Weeds in Australia: 1960 to 2010, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Google Scholar

29.

Paterson ID, Mangan R, Downie DA, Coetzee JE, Hill MP, Burke AM, Downey PO, Henry TJ, Compton SG. 2016. Two in one: cryptic species discovered in biological control agent populations using molecular data and crossbreeding experiments. Ecology and Evolution 6: 6139–6150. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.2297 Google Scholar

30.

Peña JE, Gagne RJ, Duncan R. 1989. Biology and characterization of Prodiplosis longifila (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) on lime in Florida. Florida Entomologist 72: 443–451. Google Scholar

31.

Rafter MA, Hereward JP, Walter GH. 2013. Species limits, quarantine risk and the intrigue of a polyphagous invasive pest with highly restricted host relationships in its area of invasion. Evolutionary Applications 6: 1195–1207.  http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/eva.12096 Google Scholar

32.

Rohfritsch O. 1992. Patterns in gall development, pp. 60–86 In Shorthouse JD, Rohfritsch O [Eds] Biology of Insect-induced Galls. Oxford University Press, New York, USA. Google Scholar

33.

Skuhrava M, Skuhrava V, Brewer JW. 1984. Biology of gall midges, pp. 169–222 In Ananthakrishnan TN [Ed], Biology of Gall Insects, Oxford & IBH Publishing, New Delhi, India. Google Scholar

34.

Toševski I, Caldara R, Jović J, Hernández-Vera G, Baviera C, Gassmann A, Emerson BC. 2011. Morphological, molecular and biological evidence reveal two cryptic species in Mecinus janthinus Germar (Coleoptera, Curculionidae), a successful biological control agent of Dalmatian toadflax, Linaria dalmatica (Lamiales, Plantaginaceae). Systematic Entomology 36: 741–753. Google Scholar

35.

Toševski I, Jović J, Krstic O, Gassmann A. 2013. PCRRFLP-based method for reliable discrimination of cryptic species within Mecinus janthinus species complex (Mecinini: Curculionidae) introduced in North America for biological control of invasive toadflaxes. Biocontrol 58: 563–573. Google Scholar

36.

van Klinken RD, Morin L. 2012. Xanthium occidentale Bertol. — Noogoora burr, pp. 591–600 In Julien M, McFadyen REC, Cullen J. [Eds], Biological Control of Weeds in Australia: 1960 to 2010, CSIRO Publishing, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia. Google Scholar

37.

Winston RL, Schwarzländer M, Hinz HL, Day MD, Cock MJW, Julien MH [Eds]. 2014. Biological Control of Weeds: A World Catalogue of Agents and Their Target Weeds, 5th edition. USDA Forest Service, Forest Health Technology Enterprise Team, Morgantown, West Virginia, USA. FHTET-2014-04. Google Scholar

38.

Yukawa J, Rohfritsch O. 2005. Biology and ecology of gall-inducing Cecidomyiidae, pp. 273–304 In Raman A, Schaeffer CW, Withers TM [Eds], Biology, Ecology and Evolution of Gall-Inducing Arthropods, Science Publishers Inc., Enfield, New Hampshire, USA. Google Scholar
Kunjithapatham Dhileepan, Stefan Neser, Damian Rumiz, Anantanarayanan Raman, and Anamika Sharma "Host Associations of Gall-Inducing Prodiplosis longifila (Diptera: Cecidomyiidae) from Bolivia: Implications for Its Use as a Biological Control Agent for Jatropha gossypiifolia (Euphorbiaceae)," Florida Entomologist 100(4), 777-786, (1 December 2017). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.100.0402
Published: 1 December 2017
KEYWORDS
control biológico de malezas
cryptic species
especies crípticas
especificidad del hospedero
field host range
gall midge
host specificity
Back to Top