1.

F. S. Andersen 1944. Contributions to the breeding biology of the Ruff (Philomachus pugnax). Dansk Ornithol. Foren. Tidsskr. 38: 26–30. Google Scholar

2.

F. S. Andersen 1948. Contributions to the biology of the Ruff (Philomachus pugnax (L.)) II. Dansk Orn. Foren. Tidsskr. 42: 125–148. Google Scholar

3.

F. S. Andersen 1951. Contributions to the biology of the Ruff (Philomachus pugnax (L.)) III. Dansk Orn. Foren. Tidsskr. 45: 145–173. Google Scholar

4.

E. A. Armstrong 1947. Bird display and behavior. London-Oxford. Google Scholar

5.

G. P. Baerends & J. M. Baerends-van Roon . 1950. An introduction to the study of the ethology of cichlid fishes. Behavior, Suppl. 1. Google Scholar

6.

P. Bancke & H. Meesenburg . 1952. A study of the display of the Ruff (Philomachus pugnax (L.)). Dansk Orn. Foren. Tidsskr. 46: 98–109. Google Scholar

7.

P. Bancke & H. Meesenburg . 1958. A study of the display of the Ruff (Philomachus pugnax (L.)). II. Dansk Orn. Foren. Tidsskr. 52: 118–141. Google Scholar

8.

F. Christoleit 1924. Zum Balzspiel des Kampfläufers. Pallasia 1: 181–197. Google Scholar

9.

A. Daanje 1951. On locomotory movements and the intention movements derived from them. Behaviour 3: 48–98. Google Scholar

10.

E. B. Ford 1945. Polymorphism. Biol. Rev. 20: 73–88. Google Scholar

11.

E. B. Ford 1964. Ecological genetics. London. Methuen. Google Scholar

12.

F. Goethe 1953. Färbungstypen männlicher Kampfläufer aus den Pripet- Sumpfen. Vogelring 22: 43–47. Google Scholar

13.

E. Howard 1964. Territory in bird life. London. Collins (Fontana Library). Google Scholar

14.

J. S. Huxley 1955. Morphism in birds. Acta XI Congr. Int. Orn. (Basel, 1954): 309–328. Google Scholar

15.

F. B. Kirkman & B. A. Oxon . (Eds.) 1910. British bird book. London- Edinburgh. Jack. Google Scholar

16.

J. P. Kruijt 1964. Ontogeny of social behaviour in Burmese Red Junglefowl (Gallus gallus spadiceus). Behaviour Suppl. 12. Google Scholar

17.

W. von Lindemann 1951. Über die Balzerscheinungen und die Fortpflanzungs-biologie beim Kampfläufer (Philomachus pugnax L.). Z. Tierpsych. 8: 210–224. Google Scholar

18.

P. R. Lowe 1915a. Coloration as a factor in family and genetic differentiation. Ibis: 320–346. Google Scholar

19.

P. R. Lowe 1915b. Studies on the Charadriiformes. I. On the systematic position of the Ruff (Machetes pugnax) and the Semipalmated Sandpiper (Ereunetes pusillus), together with a review of some osteological characters which differentiate the Eroliinae. Ibis : 609–616. Google Scholar

20.

G. Mauersberger 1957. Über das Pränuptialkleid des Kampfläufers, Philomachus pugnax (L.). J. f. Orn. 98: 356–357. Google Scholar

21.

H. Mildenberger 1953. Zur Fortpflanzungsbiologie des Kampfläufers (Philomachus pugnax (L.)). J. f. Orn. 94: 128–143. Google Scholar

22.

Oordt G & G. C. A. Junge . 1934. The relation between the gonads and the secondary sexual characters in the Ruff (Philomachus pugnax). Acta Soc. Biol. Latviae 4: 141–145. Google Scholar

23.

Oordt G & G. C. A. Junge . 1936. Die hormonale Wirkung der Gonaden auf Sommer- und Prachtkleid. III. Der Einfluss der Kastration auf männliche Kampfläufer (Philomachus pugnax). Wilhelm Roux' Archiv für Entwicklungsmechanik der Organismen 134: 112–121. Google Scholar

24.

F. A. Pitelka 1959. Numbers, breeding schedule, and territoriality in Pectoral Sandpipers of northern Alaska. Condor 61: 233–264. Google Scholar

25.

A. F. J. Portielje 1931. Versuch zu einer Verhaltungs-Psychologischen Deutung des Balzgebarens der Kampfschnepfe, Philomachus pugnax (L.). Proc. VII Int. Orn. Congr. (Amsterdam, 1930): 156–172. Google Scholar

26.

E. Selous 1906–1907. Observations tending to throw light on the question of sexual selection in birds, including a day-to-day diary on the breeding habits of the Ruff (Machetes pugnax). Zoologist (4) 10: 201–219, 285–294, 419–428; 11: 60–65, 161–182, 367–381. Google Scholar

27.

P. M. Sheppard 1958. Natural selection and heredity. London. Hutchinson. Google Scholar

28.

C. G. Sibley 1957. The evolutionary and taxonomic significance of sexual dimorphism and hybridization in birds. Condor 59: 166–191. Google Scholar

29.

N. Tinbergen 1959. Photographic studies of some less familiar birds. C. Ruff. (Photographs by C. C. Doncaster and J. B. and S. Bottomley). Brit. Birds 52: 302–306. Google Scholar

30.

H. F. Witherby & F. C. R. Jourdain , N. F. Ticehurst , B. W. Tucker . 1952. Handbook of British birds. 4 London. Witherby. Google Scholar

31.

V. C. Wynne-Edwards 1962. Animal dispersion in relation to social behaviour. London. Oliver & Boyd. Google Scholar