Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2012 Parasitism of Neosilba perezi (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) Larvae by a Braconid, Phaenocarpa neosilba (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae)
L. J. Gisloti, A. P. Prado
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Neosilba perezi (Romero & Ruppel) is known as the cassava shoot fly or shoot fly, because, unlike other species of its genus, its larvae feed exclusively on shoots of cassava (Manihot esculenta Crantz). These larvae kill the affected cassava shoots. Natural parasitism by a braconid, Phaenocarpa neosilba Arouca & Penteado-Dias, 2006, on shoot fly larvae was studied at 3 locations in the southwestern region of the state of São Paulo, Brazil. Larvae-infested shoots of cassava were collected at 3 distinct locations where cassava crops were grown. The shoots were kept in plastic boxes for pupation and emergence of adult flies and the parasitoid. The percentage of parasitism was separately correlated with temperature, rainfall, and age of the cassava plants. The average percent parasitism was 24.36%. A negative correlation between temperature and percent parasitism was observed at 1 location. At all 3 study areas percent parasitism of N. perezi showed a negative correlation with plant age. Therefore, given the high percent parasitism observed at the 3 locations, natural biological control may be an important factor in the population dynamics of N. perezi.

The cassava shoot fly, Neosilba perezi (Romero & Ruppel) (Diptera: Lonchaeidae), is commonly found in southeastern Brazil, where it occurs mainly in the coastal and inland regions of the state of São Paulo (Graner 1942; Lourenção et al. 1996; Gisloti & Prado 2011a). The larvae of this species feed exclusively on shoots of cassava, Manihot esculenta Crantz (Malpighiales: Euphorbiaceae), and the herbivorism of these immatures often leads to the complete destruction of infested shoots (Bellotti et al. 1999).

However, despite its broad distribution in Brazil and high prevalence in cassava crops, N. perezi has been the subject of few studies, and many aspects of its bioecology remain unknown. As regards the natural enemies of this species, a study in an inland region of the state of São Paulo reported Aganaspis pelleranoi Brethes (reported as Ganaspis pelleranoi) (Hymenoptera: Figitidae) as a parasitoid of larvae of N. perezi (Lourenção et al. 1996).

Gisloti & Prado (2011a) recently discovered a new species of braconid (Alysiinae) causing an intense infestation of N. perezi larvae in agricultural systems of southwestern São Paulo. This study aimed to discover some aspects of the parasitic interaction between N. perezi larvae and the braconid parasitoid in cassava crop systems of southwestern São Paulo. The characterization of hosts and their parasitoids is fundamentally important to elucidate the dynamics of the populations involved in such complex ecological interactions.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The study was carried out in 3 organic cassava crops located in the municipalities of Jaguariúna/São Paulo (Area 1, S 22° 40′ 20′ W 46° 59′ 09″; average 584 m asl), Mogi Mirim/São Paulo (Area 2, S 22° 25′ 55″ W 46° 57′ 28″; average 588 m asl), and Mogi Guaçu/São Paulo (Area 3, S 22° 22′ 20″ W 46° 56′ 32″; average 640 m asl). Area 1 is located approximately 50 km from Area 3, which in turn is located roughly 10 km from Area 2. All 3 areas were equivalent in terms of crop size (approximately 100 ha) and plant age at the start of sampling (2 mo after planting).

On a monthly basis from Jun to Dec 2008, 50 shoots visibly damaged by the presence of shoot fly larvae were collected from each studied area. The samples were kept at room temperature and humidity, stored in plastic boxes (25 × 50 × 10 cm) sealed with nylon organza and lined with moist, autoclaved fine sand (± 2 cm layer) as a substrate for larval pupation. After the larvae had pupated 15 to 25 d after the material was brought in from the field, the substrate was sieved to collect the puparia, which were counted and transferred to emergence boxes kept under the same environmental conditions. Daily over a period of 40 d, substrate humidity was checked and the emergence of flies and parasitoids was monitored. The emerged parasitoids were fed with honey and water for 3 d, to fix the coloring that would allow their correct identification. They were then killed and preserved in 70% ethanol in labeled flasks for subsequent counting and species identification.

Daily meteorological reports with temperature and rainfall data were provided by the Agrometeorology Information Center (CIIAGRO - Jaguariúna; S 22° 40′W 46° 59″) for Area 1, by the Mogi Mirim Weather Station for Area 2 (Agritempo, S 22° 43′ W 46°95″), and by the Ecological Station of Mogi Guacu (S 22° 22′ W 47° 47″) for Area 3. For each sampling event, we calculated the average daily recorded temperature (°C) and rainfall (mm) over the previous mo.

Percent parasitism was calculated as the proportion of emerged parasitoids to total number of pupae obtained at each sampling event. The data were analyzed through variance testing. The Kolmogorov-Smirnov (Lilliefors) test was used to check for normality, and the samples that presented normal distribution and similar variances underwent ANOVA testing.

The percent parasitism on N. perezi larvae was separately correlated with plant age, average local temperature, and local rainfall for each studied area. The correlations were tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient. The software used to process and analyze the data was BioEstat v5.0 (Ayres et al. 2007), with a significance level of 5%. All specimens are deposited in the Entomological Collection of the Departamento de Biologia Animal, Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp).

RESULTS

After 7 collections, a total of 1,412 pupae of N. perezi were obtained, from which emerged 544 shoot fly adults and 367 parasitoids. Approximately 36% (501) of the puparia failed to produce live adults (Table 1). The average percent parasitism considering the 3 analyzed areas was 24.36%. All of the emerged parasitoids belonged to the same species, which was found to be Phaenocarpa neosilba Arouca & Penteado-Dias, 2006 (Arouca & Penteado-Dias 2011).

In the comparative analysis of the 3 studied areas, the variance analyses did not detect a statistically significant difference in percent parasitism (P > 0.05), i.e., all 3 areas presented very similar average values. Area 1 showed the highest values compared to the other 2 in all the analyzed parameters: the highest total number of pupae (535) and non-viable pupae (181), total number of emerged adult flies (203), and percent parasitism (28.2%). On the other hand, Area 3 showed the lowest percent parasitism (23.6%) and the smallest number of emerged flies (169), total pupae (406), and non-viable pupae (141) (Table 1, Fig. 1).

There was a negative linear correlation between average temperature in the month prior to sampling and percent parasitism, but only in Area 1 (r = -0.8; P = 0.02), where higher temperatures (above 20 °C) had a negative effect on parasitism on N. perezi larvae (Fig. 2). Rainfall does not appear to influence parasitism of these larvae (P > 0.05).

Also, Pearson's correlation coefficient showed a negative correlation between plant age and percentage of parasitism in Areas 1, 2 and 3 (r = -0.89, P = 0.006; r = -0.88, P = 0.007; and r = -0.84, P = 0.017, respectively). In other words, on older plants the N. perezi larvae were less subject to parasitism than those on younger plants (Fig. 3).

DISCUSSION

Parasitoids were present on larvae of N. perezi at every month of sampling, and every parasitoid belonged to the same species. They were identified as an undescribed species and were submitted to specialists, who described them as Phaenocarpa neosilba sp. nov. Arouca & Penteado-Dias, 2006. However, the parasitoids found during this work were different from those observed by Lourenção et al. (1996), who found N. perezi larvae to be parasitized by Ganaspis pelleranoi Brethes (Hymenoptera: Eucoilidae), which is a parasitoid of Tephritidae fruit flies.

TABLE 1.

TOTAL NUMBER OF NEOSILBA PEREZI PUPAE OBTAINED (P), EMERGED FLIES (F), EMERGED PHAENOCARPA NEOSILBA PARASITOIDS (PAR), NON-VIABLE PUPAE (NP) (*), AND THEIR RESPECTIVE PERCENTAGES (**) IN JAGUARIUNA (AREA 1), MOGI MIRIM (AREA 2), AND MOGI GUAÇU (AREA 3), FROM JUNE TO DECEMBER 2008.

t01_900.gif

Some species of Phaenocarpa are parasitoids of Drosophila (Prince 1976; Janssen et al. 1988; Ideo et al. 2008) and Anastrepha fruit flies (Canal Daza et al. 1994; Leonel et al. 1996; Carrejo & Gonzáles 1999; Trostle et al. 1999). Costa et al. (2009) found Phaenocarpa pericarpa infesting larvae of Neosilba sp. that were feeding on fruits of Eschweiler a atropetiolata (Ericales: Lecythidaceae).

Fig. 1.

Total number of pupae obtained, emerged flies, emerged parasitoids, and non-viable pupae from cassava shoots collected in Jaguariuna (Area 1), Mogi Mirim (Area 2), and Mogi Guaçu (Area 3), from Jun to Dec 2008. P > 0.05.

f01_900.jpg

When we investigated the influence of temperature on percent parasitism, we observed a negative correlation between parasitism and temperature in only one of the studied areas (Area 1), where temperatures above 20 °C had a negative effect on the number of emerged parasitoids. This means that temperature may affect the prevalence of parasitism on shoot fly larvae, but in practice, the effects of environmental conditions may be strongly contingent on the response of other members of the community, such as the availability of resources—host larvae, in this case. Gisloti & Prado (2011a, b) observed the same negative correlation between temperature and shoot fly populations, which indicates that the high prevalence of parasitism found in this work at moderate temperatures may have to do with the high availability of larvae.

Fig. 2.

Correlation between average temperature during the month prior to sampling and percent parasitism in Area 1, Jaguariúna/SP, 2009. (y = -3.0614x + 87.135; r2 = 0.6612; r = -0.8 and P = 0.02).

f02_900.jpg

Fig. 3.

Correlation between cassava plant age and parasitism by braconids (%) in Jaguariuna (Area 1), Mogi Mirim (Area 2), and Mogi Guaçu (Area 3), from Jun to Dec 2008. (y = -0.1344x + 46.461; r2 = 0.803; r = -0.89; P = 0,006 for Area 1), (y = -0.1583x + 46.179; r2 = 0.7919; r = -0.88; P = 0.007 for Area 2), (y = -0.1261x + 43.382; r2 = 0.7089; r = -0.84; P = 0.017 for Area 3).

f03_900.jpg

De Moraes et al. (1998) observed that plants damaged by herbivores attract parasitoids through the volatile compounds that are secreted by the damaged plant tissues. Area 1 presented the highest number of pupae and adult flies throughout the experiment, suggesting that the plants in this area were more intensely infested by N. perezi. Accordingly, the high infestation of shoot flies in this area induced a higher production of volatile compounds liberated by the consumed plants, which attracted more parasitoids.

Plant age is also negatively correlated with parasitism, i.e., young cassava plants attract more parasitoids. This explains the low percent parasitism observed during the later sampling events, which were conducted on old cassava plants. Gisloti & Prado (2011a, b) observed the same correlation between host plant age and infestation by larvae of N. perezi. As suggested by Boza & Waddil (1978), young plants are probably more attractive to insects for oviposition because their shoots are more tender, facilitating the penetration of larvae. Consequently, young plants probably host a considerably larger number of host larvae, thus increasing the rate of parasitism.

Finally, the high percentage of parasitism observed in the 3 areas suggests that natural biological control may be an important factor in the population dynamics of N. perezi.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

R. G. Arouca , and A. M. Penteado-Dias 2011. A new species of Phaenocarpa Foerster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae) from Brazil parasitizing Neosilba perezi (Diptera: Lonchaeidae). Studies Neotrop. Fauna Environ. 46: 63–67. Google Scholar

2.

M. Ayres , M. Ayres Jr. , D. L Ayres , and A. S. Santos 2007. BioEstat 5.0 - Statistical Applications in the areas of biological and medical sciences. Sociedade Civil Mamirauá, Belém, Pará, Brasil. (In Portuguese.) Google Scholar

3.

A .C Bellotti , L. Smith , and S. L. Lapointe 1999. Recent Advances in Cassava Pest Management. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 44: 343–370. Google Scholar

4.

J. A. Boza , and V. H. Waddill 1978. A cassava shoot fly, Neosilva perezi Romero and Ruppel: notes on biology and effect on cassava yield. Proc. Tropical Region, American Soc. Hort. Sci. 22: 226–230. Google Scholar

5.

N. A. Canal Daza , R. A. Zucchi , N. M. Silva , and F. L. Leonel Jr. 1994. Recognition of parasitoids species (Hym.: Braconidae) of fruit flies (Dip.: Tephritidae) in 2 municipalities of the State of Amazonas, Brazil. Bol. Museo Entomol. la Univer. del Valle 2: 1–17. (In Spanish, with abstract in English). Google Scholar

6.

N. S. Carrejo , and R. González 1999. Parasitoids reared from species of Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Valle del Cauca, Colombia. Florida Entomol. 82: 113–118. Google Scholar

7.

S. G. M. Costa , R. B. Querino , B. Ronchi-Teles , A. M. M. Penteado-Dias , and R. A. Zucchi 2009. Parasitoid diversity (Hymenoptera: Braconidae and Figitidae) on frugivorous larvae (Diptera: Tephritidae and Lonchaeidae) at Adolpho Ducke Forest Reserve, Central Amazon Region, Manaus, Brazil. Brazilian J. Biol. 69: 363–370. Google Scholar

8.

C. M. De Moraes , W. J. Lewis , P. W. Paré , H. T. Alborn , and J. H. Tumlinson 1998. Herbivore-infested plants selectively attract parasitoids. Nature 393: 570–573. Google Scholar

9.

L. J. Gisloti , and A. P. Prado 2011a. Cassava shoot infestation by larvae of Neosilba perezi (Romero & Ruppell) (Diptera, Lonchaeidae) in southeastern São Paulo State, Brazil. Neotrop. Entomol. 40: 312–315. Google Scholar

10.

L. J. Gisloti , and A. P. Prado 2011b. Infestation of cassava genotypes by Neosilba perezi (Romero & Ruppell) (Diptera: Lonchaeidae). Neotrop. Entomol. 40: 613–616. Google Scholar

11.

E. A. Graner 1942. Treatment of cassava by colchicine: II. Polypoid forms obtained. Bragantia 2: 23–54. (In Portuguese with abstract in English). Google Scholar

12.

S. Ideo , M. Watada , H. Mitsui , and M. T. Kimura 2008. Host range of Asobara japonica (Hymenoptera: Braconidae), a larval parasitoid of drosophilid flies. Entomol. Sci. 11: 1–6. Google Scholar

13.

A. Janssen , G. Driessen , M. De Haan , and N. Roodbol 1988. The impact of parasitoids on natural populations of temperate woodland Drosophila. Netherlands J. Zool. 38: 61–73. Google Scholar

14.

F. L. Leonel Jr. , R. A. Zucchi , and N. A. Canal Daza 1996. Parasitismo de moscas-das-frutas (Diptera: Tephritidae) por Braconidae (Hymenoptera) em duas localidades do Estado de São Paulo. An. Soc. Entomol. Brasil 25: 199–205. (In Portuguese with abstract in English). Google Scholar

15.

A. L. Lourenção , L. O. Lorenzi , and G. M. B. Ambrosano 1996. Comportamento de clones mandioca em relação à infestação por Neosilba perezi (Romero & Ruppell) (Diptera: Lonchaeidae). Scientia Agrícola 53: 304–308. (In Portuguese with abstract in English). Google Scholar

16.

G. J. Prince 1976. Laboratory Biology of Phaenocarpa persimilis Papp (Braconidae: Alysiinae), a Parasitoid of Drosophila. Australian J. Zool. 24: 249–264. Google Scholar

17.

M. Trostle , N. S. Carrero , I. Mercado , and R. A. Wharton 1999. Two new species of Phaenocarpa Foerster (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae) from South America. Proc. Entomol. Soc. Washington 101: 197– 207. Google Scholar
L. J. Gisloti and A. P. Prado "Parasitism of Neosilba perezi (Diptera: Lonchaeidae) Larvae by a Braconid, Phaenocarpa neosilba (Hymenoptera: Braconidae: Alysiinae)," Florida Entomologist 95(4), 900-904, (1 December 2012). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0412
Published: 1 December 2012
KEYWORDS
biological control
cassava
control biologico
Neosilba perezi
Phaenocarpa neosilba
yuca
Back to Top