Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 March 2012 Antennal Responses of West Indian and Caribbean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) to Ammonium Bicarbonate and Putrescine Lures
David A. Jenkins, Paul E. Kendra, Nancy D. Epsky, Wayne S. Montgomery, Robert R. Heath, Daniel M. Jenkins, Ricardo Goenaga
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Efforts to monitor and detect tephritid fruit flies in the genus Anastrepha currently involve MultiLure traps baited with two food-based synthetic attractants, ammonia (typically formulated as ammonium acetate or ammonium bicarbonate) and putrescine (1,4-diaminobutane). These baits are used in Central America, Florida, Texas, and the Caribbean to target/capture economically important Anastrepha spp. within each region. The efficacy of these baits varies by region and by species. Antennal responses to these compounds have been quantified for A. suspensa populations in Florida, but not elsewhere. This is the first report of antennal responses of Puerto Rican populations of A. obliqua and A. suspensa to the bait odors emitted from ammonium bicarbonate and putrescine lures. Responses to lure volatiles (tested separately and in combination), as measured by electroantennography (EAG), were dose dependant for both species and both sexes. Although the average response to ammonium bicarbonate in combination with putrescine was always numerically higher than responses to ammonium bicarbonate alone within a species and a sex, this result was never statistically significant. Males of A. obliqua were less sensitive than females, while males of A. suspensa were more sensitive than females to all volatiles and volatile mixtures, but these differences were not statistically significant at any dose. Female A. obliqua were more sensitive than A. suspensa females at all doses for all volatiles and all volatile mixtures, and these differences were statistically significant at the two highest doses of ammonium bicarbonate and ammonium bicarbonate plus putrescine. Our results are broadly similar with the electrophysiological studies conducted on Florida populations of A. suspensa, but there are important differences, most notably that the Florida study detected significantly lower responses by males than females to putrescine and ammonium bicarbonate plus putrescine. The implications of our results are discussed with respect to monitoring practices in different regions.

The genus Anastrepha (Diptera: Tephritidae) is a group of approximately 200 species of flies restricted in their natural range to the tropics and subtropics of the western hemisphere (Norrbom 2004). While fewer than 10% of these species are considered economically important, several, including A. obliqua (Macquart), A. suspensa (Loew), A. ludens (Loew), A. fraterculus (Wiedemann), A. grandis (Macquart), A. serpentina (Wiedemann) and A. striata Schiner have a profound impact on the production of tropical and subtropical fruits (White & Elson-Harris 1992; Aluja 1994). Growers in areas where any of these flies are known to occur may be restricted from exporting to certain markets, or may be forced to subject their fruit to expensive and potentially damaging post-harvest sterilization measures (Simpson 1993). Regulatory agencies have long been interested in tools to detect the arrival of economically important species and to monitor population fluctuations of species that already occur in a given area.

For all species of frugivorous Tephritidae studied to date, adult females are anautogenous (require protein consumption for ovary development) at eclosion (Drew & Yuval 2000). Consequently, females are highly attracted to volatile chemical cues indicative of protein-rich meals. In the past, surveillance programs used glass McPhail traps baited with liquid protein, usually consisting of hydrolyzed torula yeast with borax as a preservative/buffering agent (see review in Heath et al. 1993). Research has shown that ammonia vapor is the key attractant escaping from proteinaceous baits (Bateman & Morton 1981; Mazor et al. 1987) and this has led to the development of ammonia-based synthetic lures, including ammonium bicarbonate (Robacker & Warfield 1993) and ammonium acetate (Heath et al. 1995; Epsky et al. 1995), but female tephritids are also attracted to natural sources, such as avian feces and urine (Piñero et al. 2003). Amines, including putrescine (1,4-diaminobutane), were shown to enhance the efficacy of ammonia-baited traps for capture of A. ludens (Heath et al. 1995, 2004) and A. suspensa (Kendra et al. 2008). However, putrescine, a metabolic product of the amino acids ornithine and arginine (Robinson 1991), is not attractive alone (Heath et al. 1995, 2004). Current monitoring and detection programs use the plastic Multilure trap baited with ammonium acetate and putrescine lures (Anonymous 2010), but the effectiveness of these baits and this trap recently has been called into question (Díaz-Fleischer et al. 2009). In particular, Díaz-Fleischer et al. (2009) point out that the response of flies to the baits is influenced by a number of variables, including species, sex, and nutritional status. This variability in response to baits is highlighted by similar variability in the responses of laboratory-strain flies versus wild flies (Díaz-Fleisher et al. 2009; Kendra et al. 2010). Similarly, Kendra et al. (2005a, 2009) demonstrated strong effects of physiological status (stage of ovary development) on both electroantennographic (EAG) and behavioral responses of female A. suspensa to lure volatiles. Understanding how these variables influence trap catch may help improve trap efficiency.

Our aim was to quantify the antennal olfactory response of feral Puerto Rican A. obliqua and A. suspensa to commercially available lures of ammonium bicarbonate and putrescine, both separately and in combination. Ammonium bicarbonate lures release equimolar amounts of two potential attractants, ammonia vapor and carbon dioxide (Kendra et al. 2005b); putrescine lures release a combination of putrescine and 1-pyrroline (an oxidative byproduct of putrescine, Robacker 2001). These EAG responses were compared to those obtained previously with A. suspensa populations in Florida (Kendra et al. 2005a, 2005b, 2009). This approach will allow us to assess geographical variations in EAG responses of one species (A. suspensa populations in Florida and Puerto Rico) as well as variations between 2 closely-related species (A. obliqua and A. suspensa) that occur sympatrically in Puerto Rico.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Insects

Anastrepha suspensa and A. obliqua adults were reared from fruit collected beneath or on host trees at the USDA-ARS Tropical Agricultural Research Station in Mayagüez, Puerto Rico; A. obliqua emerged from Mangifera indica and Spondias mombin (Anacardiaceae) and A. suspensa emerged from Psidium guajava and Eugenia uniflora (Myrtaceae). Fruit was placed on a plastic mesh suspended above a layer of vermiculite approximately three cm deep. All pupae were removed from the vermiculite after two weeks and placed into plastic Petri dishes with moistened vermiculite (no more than 50 pupae per dish). The pupae were then monitored daily for the emergence of adults. Emerged adults were placed into a 30 × 30 × 30 cm square cage (Bugdorm, Bioquip, Rancho Dominguez, California) with approx. 50:50 sex ratio. Flies were fed ad libitum a mixture of refined cane sugar and yeast hydrolysate (4:1); water was provided using agar blocks. The cages were stored at 26 °C (± 1) and 75% RH at 12:12 h L:D. All flies subjected to electrophysiological tests were 18 – 24 d post eclosion. Ovary dissections confirmed that flies of this age were sexually mature (ovarian stages 5 and 6, Kendra et al. 2006).

Electroantennography

Olfactory responses were recorded using a Syntech EAG system (Hilversum, Netherlands) and EAG 2000 software. The EAG system consisted of probe/micromanipulator (MP-15), data acquisition interface box (serial IDAC-232), and a stimulus air controller (CS-5). Antennal preparations were made as described previously (Kendra et al. 2009). Briefly, freshly severed fly heads were mounted onto a spot of salt-free electrode gel (Spectra 360; Parker Laboratories, Fairfield, New Jersey) at the tip of a glass capillary electrode. The ends of the antennae were stuck onto a separate spot of salt-free electrode gel at the tip of a separate glass capillary reference electrode. The electrodes were drawn from thin-walled borosilicate glass capillaries (1.5 mm o.d., World Precision Instruments, Sarasota, Florida) and filled with 0.1 N KCl solution and silver wire (0.5 mm, World Precision Instruments) interfaced with the EAG probes. Changes in potential were recorded and analyzed using the Syntech EAG 2000 program.

Electroantennogram studies are typically coupled with behavioral assays. Because there are published accounts of the behavioral responses of these species to ammonium acetate and putrescine (Jenkins et al. 2011; Kendra et al. 2005b), we did not include such an assay in this study.

Antennae under test were positioned at the outlet of the air delivery tube, in an orientation transverse to the airstream. A stream of humidified air, purified by activated charcoal, was delivered at a flow rate of 400 mL/min. Volatiles were manually injected into the airstream, using gastight syringes (VICI Precision Sampling, Baton Rouge, Louisiana) through a port in the delivery tube 13 cm from the antennal preparations. All volatiles tested were prepared by placing the chemical/commercial bait in an airtight 500 mL glass jar with a rubber septum to allow sampling of the volatiles in the jar. Jars were left for at least 24 hours at room temperature (25 °C ±1) prior to sampling to ensure that the headspace became saturated at the vapor pressure of the respective bait(s). 2-Butanone (Aldrich) was used as the standard in all tests because it elicited a strong EAG response in other Tephritidae, including Bactrocera tryoni (Hull & Cribb 2001), A. suspensa (Kendra et al. 2005a), and Ceratitis capitata (Niogret et al. 2011). Although ethyl butyrate and ethyl hexanoate have elicited strong EAG responses in A. obliqua specifically (Cruz-Lopez et al. 2006), a principle goal of this study was to compare our results with studies conducted on A. suspensa and these studies had used 2-butanone as their standard; using a different standard would make comparison of relative response values impossible. Furthermore, previous trials have demonstrated that 2-butanone elicited strong EAG responses in A. obliqua (DAJ, unpublished data). Ammonium bicarbonate and putrescine were obtained from commercial lures (Suterra, LLC; Bend, Oregon). Although ammonium acetate is more commonly used in the field, we used ammonium bicarbonate for two reasons: 1) EAG response to ammonium bicarbonate has been published previously for A. suspensa (Kendra et al. 2005a, 2005b, 2009), facilitating comparative analysis; and 2) the acetic acid liberated by ammonium acetate lures tends to interfere with electrophysiological recordings (P. E. K., unpublished data). Each antennal preparation was first standardized by addition of 20 µL 2-butanone, then subjected to a series of test injections (0.125 mL, 0.25 mL, 0.5 mL, 1.00 mL, 2.00 mL, and 4.00 mL) of the volatiles to be tested (ammonium bicarbonate, putrescine, and mixtures of ammonium bicarbonate and putrescine). To control for diminishing activity of antennae during the experiments, each series of volatile injections was followed by a second injection of the standard. The lures tested were selected in random order, and dose levels were administered in decreasing order for some antennal preparations and in increasing order for others. To control for the effects of injecting gas from the syringe, test injections were also made of ambient air at the same dose volumes as the tested volatiles. Depolarization of antennae, recorded as changes in potential in mV and adjusted for responses to injections of ambient air, were normalized as percentages of the response to the standard, using a software adjustment in SYNTECH EAG 2000 to compensate for declines in response to the standard. Data from antennal preparations responding less than 1.2 mV to the standard were discarded, since such antennal preparations tended to lose responsiveness entirely before tests were completed.

Statistical Analyses

The responses of the flies to the different volatiles were compared separately at each dose using multivariate analyses of variance (MANOVA) (SAS Institute 1985), with the variables being fly species, sex, and the 3 volatiles or volatile mixtures. Commercial graphing software (SigmaPlot 10.0, Systat Software Inc., Chicago, Illinois) was used to evaluate several regression models, including logistic, sigmoidal, and hyperbolic, to fit the dose responses. Ultimately a hyperbolic regression model was used as it resulted in the most physiologically reasonable fits to the data. Hyperbolic equations are commonly used for ligand-binding studies and have been shown previously to serve well for characterization of EAG dose-response relationships in tephritid species (Kendra et al. 2009; Niogret et al. 2011). In addition, this regression model allowed for more consistent comparisons to previously reported results with A. suspensa (Kendra et al. 2009). The hyperbolic model was of the form

e01_28.gif
where y is the normalized antennal response, x is the dose of the attractant in mL, and a and b are empirical coefficients representing maximal EAG response and receptor binding affinity, respectively (Table 1).

RESULTS

Flies of both species and sexes responded in a dose dependent manner to ammonium bicarbonate, putrescine, and the combined presentation of ammonium bicarbonate with putrescine (Figs. 1 and 2). The responses to ammonium bicarbonate plus putrescine were consistently numerically higher than responses to ammonium bicarbonate alone within species and sexes, though it was only statistically significant at the 1 mL and 2 mL doses (at the 1 mL dose: F = 10.7, P = 0.002, df = 108,4; at the 2 mL dose: F = 4.9, P = 0.029, df = 108,4). Anastrepha obliqua were consistently more sensitive than A. suspensa to ammonium bicarbonate and ammonium bicarbonate with putrescine, although this was only significant for females at the doses of 2 and 4 mL (F = 7.36; P = 0.0078; df = 108,4: F = 11.97; P =0.0008; df = 108, 4: and AB: P =0.0092; F = 7.97; df = 108,4;AB+Pt: P = 0.0336; F = 4.98; df = 108, 4 [for 2 mL and 4mL, respectively]). Male A. suspensa responded at numerically higher levels than females and the converse was true for A. obliqua, though we did not detect statistical differences in the responses of the sexes.

DISCUSSION

Our EAG results with A. suspensa are broadly similar to those obtained by Kendra et al. (2009) in terms of the magnitude of response to identical doses of ammonium bicarbonate, putrescine, and ammonium bicarbonate in combination with putrescine. We noted higher sensitivity by all flies to ammonium bicarbonate in conjunction with putrescine than to ammonium bicarbonate alone. However, we did not see a difference in the magnitude of response between males and females for any volatile at any dose. Kendra et al. (2009) recorded significant differences between male and female EAG responses to putrescine and to the combination of ammonium bicarbonate plus putrescine. As part of that same study, two-choice bioassays indicated that more females were captured with ammonium bicarbonate plus putrescine than with ammonium bicarbonate alone. This difference was not observed in males, suggesting that the putrescine component is largely responsible for the female-biased attraction of the two-component lure. One explanation for the discrepancy in EAG results is that the A. suspensa assayed by Kendra et al. (2005a, 2005b, 2009) were all laboratory-reared flies, well synchronized in development (all with stage 5 ovaries, sexually mature but pre-ovipositional; Kendra et al. 2006). The current study used feral flies which were more variable in age (with ovarian development ranging from stage 5 to stage 6, ovipositional). Kendra et al. (2009) documented that the EAG response of A. suspensa to ammonium bicarbonate decreased in females from ovarian stage 5 to stage 6.

TABLE 1.

EMPIRICAL COEFFICIENTS USED IN A HYPERBOLIC EQUATION TO MODEL EAG RESPONSES TO AMMONIUM BICARBONATE, PUTRESCINE AND AMMONIUM BICARBONATE IN CONJUNCTION WITH PUTRESCINE.

t01_28.gif

Fig. 1.

Mean response (± SEM), normalized as a percent of the response to the standard, of female (circles) and male (triangles) Anastrepha suspensa to ammonium bicarbonate (light gray lines and shapes), putrescine (dark gray lines and shapes) and ammonium bicarbonate in combination with putrescine (black lines and shapes). Solid lines represent hyperbolic curves fitted to female responses and dashed lines represent hyperbolic curves fitted to male responses; see manuscript body for equation and coefficients.

f01_28.jpg

Fig. 2.

Mean response (± SEM), normalized as a percent of the response to the standard, of female (circles) and male (triangles) Anastrepha obliqua to ammonium bicarbonate (light gray lines and shapes), putrescine (dark gray lines and shapes) and ammonium bicarbonate in combination with putrescine (black lines and shapes). Solid lines represent hyperbolic curves fitted to female responses and dashed lines represent hyperbolic curves fitted to male responses; see manuscript body for equation and coefficients.

f02_28.jpg

It is well known that protein lures attract higher proportions of females. Recent trials with Puerto Rican populations of A. suspensa and A. obliqua using corn protein hydrolysate and ammonium acetate and putrescine caught femalebiased numbers of both species with percentages of females captured ranging from 53% to 95% (Jenkins et al. 2011). Antennal responses of A. obliqua to ammonium bicarbonate and putrescine and their combination have not been reported previously. The population of A. obliqua females we tested had significantly stronger EAG responses than females of A. suspensa at the two highest doses (2 mL and 4 mL) of ammonium bicarbonate alone and in combination with putrescine. This difference in antennal chemoreception of lure volatiles suggests that different doses of attractant chemicals may be needed for optimal captures of the two species. Thomas et al. (2008) demonstrated that higher doses of ammonia significantly reduced captures of A. suspensa and A. ludens in field tests, and Kendra et al. (2005a) observed decreased captures of immature (but not mature) female A. suspensa with increasing doses of ammonia in flight tunnel assays. This behavioral response was correlated with higher EAG responses (increased antennal sensitivity) recorded from immature females relative to mature females.

The need to detect and monitor tephritid species of economic importance has led to extensive research on attractants for these insects. The ideal fly trap would be one that is useful in multiple regions for detection of multiple species. The current trapping system for Anastrepha spp., namely plastic MultiLure traps baited with ammonium acetate and putrescine, has received criticism that it does not fulfill these criteria (Díaz-Fleischer et al. 2009). Criticisms of this trapping system include differential effectiveness of the baits in different regions (Epsky et al. 2003; Robacker and Thomas 2007; Thomas et al. 2008; Jenkins et al. 2011), differential attractiveness to different sexes (Díaz-Fleischer et al. 2009; Kendra et al. 2009; Jenkins et al. 2011), differential attractiveness to females of different physiological status (Kendra et al. 2005a; Díaz-Fleischer et al. 2009) and just plain ineffectiveness (Díaz-Fleischer et al. 2009). There has been some interest in the attractiveness of ovipositional host odors (Cruz-López et al. 2006). Trials using caged flies indicated that a nine-component lure of compounds from Spondias mombin (Anacardiaceae), a common host of A. obliqua, captured significantly more flies than a hydrolyzed protein bait (Cruz-López et al. 2006). However, the nine-component lure was equally attractive as hydrolyzed protein in one field trial (Toledo et al. 2009) and was less attractive than ammonium acetate and putrescine in another field trial (López-Guillen et al. 2010). Similarly, a four-component lure containing compounds from Sargentia gregii S. Wats. (Rutaceae) was not as attractive to A. ludens as ammonium acetate and putrescine lures (Robacker & Heath 1997). Even if ovipositional host odors were effective for a given species, it is likely that such cues would be far more species-specific than food-based odors indicating protein-rich resources. Despite its draw-backs, the MultiLure trap baited with ammonium acetate and putrescine remains the most useful tool available for monitoring and detection of Anastrepha spp. in North and Central America and the Caribbean.

Our results illustrate that there are measurable differences in the physiological responses of A. obliqua and A. suspensa to volatiles emitted from the two-component lure in Puerto Rico. This may explain some differences observed in the efficacy of the current trapping system in different regions where the 2 species co-occur or represent a large proportion of the trapped flies.

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We thank Robert McPhail, Mabel Vega (USDA-ARS, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico), and Rosemarie Boyle (USDA-APHIS-PPQ, Mayagüez, Puerto Rico) for technical assistance. We would also like to thank 2 anonymous reviewers whose suggestions improved this manuscript. This report presents the results of research only; mention of a proprietary product does not constitute an endorsement by the USDA.

REFERENCES CITED

1.

M. Aluja 1994. Bionomics and management of Anastrepha. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 39: 155–173. Google Scholar

2.

Anonymous. 2010. Puerto Rico and USVI Fruit Fly Trapping Protocol. USDA-APHIS-PPQ. 312 pp. Google Scholar

3.

M. A. Bateman , and T. C. Morton , 1981. The importance of ammonia in proteinaceous attractants for fruit flies (Family: Tephritidae). Australian J. Agric. Res. 32: 883–903. Google Scholar

4.

L. Cruz-López , E. A. Malo , J. Toledo , A. Virgen , A. Del Mazo , and J. C. Rojas 2006. A new potential attractant for Anastrepha obliqua from Spondias mombin fruits. J. Chem. Ecol. 32: 351–365. Google Scholar

5.

F. Díaz-Fleischer , J. Arredondo , S. Flores , P. Montoya , and M. Aluja 2009. There is no magic fruit fly trap: multiple biological factors influence the response of adult Anastrepha ludens and Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) individuals to Multilure traps baited with BioLure or NuLure. J. Econ. Entomol. 102: 86–94. Google Scholar

6.

R. A. I. Drew , and B. Yuval 2000. The evolution of fruit fly feeding behavior, pp. 737–740 In M. Aluja and A. L. Norrbom [eds.], Fruit Flies (Tephritidae): Phylogeny and Evolution of Behavior. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL. Google Scholar

7.

N. D. Epsky , R. R. Heath , A. Guzman , and W. L. Meyer 1995. Visual cue and chemical cue interactions in a dry trap with food-based synthetic attractant for Ceratitis capitata and Anastrepha ludens (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environ. Entomol. 24: 1387–1395. Google Scholar

8.

N. D. Epsky , P. E. Kendra , and R. R. Heath 2003. Development of lures for detection and delimitation of invasive Anstrepha fruit flies. Proc. Caribbean Food Crops Soc. 39: 84–89. Google Scholar

9.

R. R. Heath , N. D. Epsky , P. J. Landolt , and J. Sivinski 1993. Development of attractants for monitoring Caribbean fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomol. 76: 233–244. Google Scholar

10.

R. R. Heath , N. D. Epsky , A. Guzman , B. D. Deuben , A. Manukian , and Meyer W. L . 1995. Development of a dry plastic insect trap with food-based synthetic attractant for the Mediterranean and Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 88: 1307–1315. Google Scholar

11.

R. R. Heath , N. D. Epsky , D. Midgarden , and B. I. Katsoyannos 2004. Efficacy of 1,4-diaminobutane (putrescine) in a food-based synthetic attractant for capture of Mediterranean and Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 97: 1126–1131. Google Scholar

12.

C. D. Hull , and B. W. Cribb 2001. Olfaction in the Queensland fruit fly, Bactrocera tryoni I: identification of olfactory receptor neuron types responding to environmental odors. J. Chem. Ecol. 27: 871–887. Google Scholar

13.

D. A. Jenkins , N. D. Epsky , P. E. Kendra , R. R. Heath , and R. Goenaga 2011. Food-based lure performance in three locations in Puerto Rico: attractiveness to Anastrepha suspensa and A. obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomol. 94: 186–194. Google Scholar

14.

P. E. Kendra , W. S. Montgomery , D. M. Mateo , H. Puche , N. D. Epsky , and R. R. Heath 2005a. Effect of age on EAG response and attraction of female Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae) to ammonia and carbon dioxide. Environ. Entomol. 34: 584–590. Google Scholar

15.

P. E. Kendra , A. Vázquez , N. D. Epsky , and R. R. Heath 2005b. Ammonia and carbon dioxide: quantitation and electroantennogram responses of Caribbean fruit fly, Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). Environ. Entomol. 34: 569–575. Google Scholar

16.

P. E. Kendra , W. S. Montgomery , N. D. Epsky , and R. R. Heath 2006. Assessment of female reproductive status in Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomol. 89: 144–151. Google Scholar

17.

P. E. Kendra , N. D. Epsky , W. S. Montgomery , and R. R. Heath 2008. Response of Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae) to terminal diamines in a food-based synthetic attractant. Environ. Entomol. 37: 1119–1125. Google Scholar

18.

P. E. Kendra , W. S. Montgomery , N. D. Epsky , and R. R. Heath 2009. Electroantennogram and behavioral responses of Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae) to putrescine and ammonium bicarbonate lures. Environ. Entomol. 38: 1259–1266. Google Scholar

19.

P. E. Kendra , N. D. Epsky , and R. R. Heath 2010. Effective sampling range of food-based attractants for female Anastrepha suspensa (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 103: 533–540. Google Scholar

20.

G. López-Guillen , J. Toledo , and J. C. Rojas 2010. Response of Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae) to fruit odors and protein-based lures in field trials. Florida Entomol. 93: 317–318. Google Scholar

21.

M. Mazor , S. Gothilf , and R. Galun 1987. The role of ammonia in the attraction of females of the Mediterranean fruit fly to protein hydrolysate baits. Entomol. Exp. Applic. 43: 25–29. Google Scholar

22.

J. Niogret , W. S. Montgomery , P. E. Kendra , R. R. Heath , and N. D. Epsky 2011. Attraction and electro-antennogram responses of male Mediterranean fruit fly to volatile chemicals from Persea, Litchi and Ficus wood. J. Chem. Ecol. 37: 483–491. Google Scholar

24.

J. Piñero , M. Aluja , A. Vázquez , M. Equihua , and J. Varon 2003. Human urine and chicken feces as fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae) attractants for resource-poor fruit growers. J. Econ. Entomol. 96: 334–340. Google Scholar

25.

D. C. Robacker 2001. Roles of putrescine and 1-pyrroline in attractiveness of technical-grade putrescine to the Mexican fruit fly (Diptera: Tephritidae). Florida Entomol. 84: 679–685. Google Scholar

26.

D. C. Robacker , and R. R. Heath 1997. Decreased attraction of Anastrepha ludens to combinations of two types of synthetic lures in a citrus orchard. J. Chem. Ecol. 23: 1253–1262. Google Scholar

27.

D. C. Robacker , and D. B. Thomas 2007. Comparison of two synthetic food odor lures for captures of feral Mexican fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) in Mexico and implications regarding use of irradiated flies to assess lure efficacy. J. Econ. Entomol. 100: 1147–1152. Google Scholar

28.

D. C. Robacker , and W. C. Warfield 1993. Attraction of both sexes of the Mexican fruit fly, Anastrepha ludens, to a mixture of ammonia, methylamine, and putrescine. J. Chem. Ecol. 19: 2999–3016. Google Scholar

29.

T. Robinson 1991. The Organic Constituents of Higher Plants: Their Chemistry and Interrelationships, 6th ed., pp. 300. Cordus Press, North Amherst Massachusetts. Google Scholar

30.

Sas Institute. 1985. SAS/STAT guide for personal computers. Vers. 6 ed. SAS Institute, Cary, North Carolina. Google Scholar

31.

S. E. Simpson 1993. Development of the Caribbean fruit-fly free zone certification protocol in Florida. Florida Entomol. 76: 228–233. Google Scholar

32.

D. B. Thomas , N. D. Epsky , C. A. Serra , D. G. Hall , P. E. Kendra , and R. R. Heath 2008. Ammonia formulations and capture of Anastrepha fruit flies (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Entomol. Sci. 43: 76–85. Google Scholar

33.

J. Toledo , E. A. Malo , L. Cruz-López , and J. C. Rojas 2009. Field evaluation of potential fruit-derived lures for Anastrepha obliqua (Diptera: Tephritidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 102: 2072–2077. Google Scholar

34.

I. M. White , and M. M. Elson-Harris 1992. Fruit flies of economic significance: their distribution and bionomics. CAB International Wallingford, xii + 601 pp. Google Scholar
David A. Jenkins, Paul E. Kendra, Nancy D. Epsky, Wayne S. Montgomery, Robert R. Heath, Daniel M. Jenkins, and Ricardo Goenaga "Antennal Responses of West Indian and Caribbean Fruit Flies (Diptera: Tephritidae) to Ammonium Bicarbonate and Putrescine Lures," Florida Entomologist 95(1), 28-34, (1 March 2012). https://doi.org/10.1653/024.095.0106
Published: 1 March 2012
KEYWORDS
ammonium bicarbonate
Anastrepha obliqua
Anastrepha suspensa
electroantennography
putrescine
Back to Top