Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 June 2012 Estimating wild boar Sus scrofa population size using faecal DNA and capture-recapture modelling
Cornelia Ebert, Felix Knauer, Bettina Spielberger, Bernhard Thiele, Ulf Hohmann
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Increasing populations of wild boar and feral domestic pigs Sus scrofa have evoked growing concern due to their potential as disease reservoir and as an origin of agricultural damages. Reliable population estimates are needed for effective management measures of this species. As an alternative to traditional methods, non-invasive genetic population estimation approaches based on hair or faeces sampling have yielded promising results for several species in terms of feasibility and precision. We developed and applied a non-invasive population estimation approach based on wild boar faeces in a study area situated in the Palatinate Forest, southwestern Germany. We collected 515 faeces samples along transects in January 2008. We carried out genotyping using six microsatellite markers to discriminate between individuals. During the trial, we identified 149 individual wild boar. Using multimodel inference and model averaging, we obtained relatively consistent estimates. Population densities calculated using the estimated population sizes ranged from 4.5 (2.9-7.8) to 5.0 (4.0-7.0) wild boar/km2. In the future, to further improve the precision of population estimates based on wild boar faeces, the detection probability should be increased. However, even when comparing a conservative population estimate to the hunting bag, our results show that the present hunting regime in our study area is not effective in regulating the wild boar population. The method which we present here offers a tool to calibrate hunting or other management measures for wild boar.

Cornelia Ebert, Felix Knauer, Bettina Spielberger, Bernhard Thiele, and Ulf Hohmann "Estimating wild boar Sus scrofa population size using faecal DNA and capture-recapture modelling," Wildlife Biology 18(2), 142-152, (1 June 2012). https://doi.org/10.2981/11-002
Received: 4 January 2011; Accepted: 1 January 2012; Published: 1 June 2012
KEYWORDS
Bayesian estimate
genotyping
individual identification
population density
sample size
Sus scrofa
transects
Back to Top