Journal of the North American Benthological Society

Published by: The Society for Freshwater Science



Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28(4):1051-1069. 2009
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1899/08-153.1

Urban streams across the USA: lessons learned from studies in 9 metropolitan areas

Larry R. Brown5a, Thomas F. Cuffney6b, James F. Coles7c, Faith Fitzpatrick8d, Gerard McMahon9b, Jeffrey Steuer10d, Amanda H. Bell11d, and Jason T. May12a

aUS Geological Survey, Placer Hall, 6000 J Street, Sacramento, California 95819 USA

bUS Geological Survey, 3916 Sunset Ridge Road, Raleigh, North Carolina 27607 USA

cUS Geological Survey, 331 Commerce Way, Pembroke, New Hampshire 03275 USA

dUS Geological Survey, 8505 Research Way, Middleton, Wisconsin 53562 USA

Abstract

Studies of the effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems have usually focused on single metropolitan areas. Synthesis of the results of such studies have been useful in developing general conceptual models of the effects of urbanization, but the strength of such generalizations is enhanced by applying consistent study designs and methods to multiple metropolitan areas across large geographic scales. We summarized the results from studies of the effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems in 9 metropolitan areas across the US (Boston, Massachusetts; Raleigh, North Carolina; Atlanta, Georgia; Birmingham, Alabama; Milwaukee-Green Bay, Wisconsin; Denver, Colorado; Dallas-Fort Worth, Texas; Salt Lake City, Utah; and Portland, Oregon). These studies were conducted as part of the US Geological Survey's National Water-Quality Assessment Program and were based on a common study design and used standard sample-collection and processing methods to facilitate comparisons among study areas. All studies included evaluations of hydrology, physical habitat, water quality, and biota (algae, macroinvertebrates, fish). Four major conclusions emerged from the studies. First, responses of hydrologic, physical-habitat, water-quality, and biotic variables to urbanization varied among metropolitan areas, except that insecticide inputs consistently increased with urbanization. Second, prior land use, primarily forest and agriculture, appeared to be the most important determinant of the response of biota to urbanization in the areas we studied. Third, little evidence was found for resistance to the effects of urbanization by macroinvertebrate assemblages, even at low levels of urbanization. Fourth, benthic macroinvertebrates have important advantages for assessing the effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems relative to algae and fishes. Overall, our results demonstrate regional differences in the effects of urbanization on stream biota and suggest additional studies to elucidate the causes of these underlying differences.

Received: October 29, 2008; Accepted: August 17, 2009



Literature Cited

Allan, J. D. 2004. Landscapes and riverscapes: the influence of landuse on stream ecosystems. Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics 35:257284. CrossRef
Barbour, M. T., J. Gerritsen, B. D. Snyder, and J. B. Stribling. 1999. Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates, and fish. 2nd edition. EPA 841-B-99-002 Office of Water US Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC.
Bluestone, B., M. H. Stevenson, and R. Williams. 2008. The urban experience: economics, society, and public policy Oxford University Press New York.
Booth, D. B. 1990. Stream-channel incision following drainage-basin urbanization. Water Resources Research 26:407417.
Booth, D. B. and C. R. Jackson. 1997. Urbanization of aquatic systems: degradation thresholds, stormwater detection, and the limits of mitigation. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 33:10771090. CrossRef, CSA
Brown, L. R. 2000. Fish communities and their associations with environmental variables, lower San Joaquin River drainage, California. Environmental Biology of Fishes 57:251269. CrossRef, CSA
Brown, L. R., M. B. Gregory, and J. T. May. 2009. Relation of urbanization to stream fish assemblages and species traits in nine metropolitan areas of the United States. Urban Ecosystems doi 10.1007/s11252-009-0082-2.
Bryant, W. L. and S. L. Goodbred. 2008. The response of hydrophobic organics and potential toxicity in streams to urbanization of watersheds in six metropolitan areas of the United States. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment doi 10.1007/s10661-008-0546-5.
Bryant, W. L., S. L. Goodbred, T. L. Leiker, L. Inouye, and B. T. Johnson. 2007. Use of chemical analysis and assays of semipermeable membrane devices extracts to assess the response of bioavailable organic pollutants in streams to urbanization in six metropolitan areas of the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5113 US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia.
Carlisle, D. M., C. P. Hawkins, M. R. Meador, M. Potapova, and J. Falcone. 2008. Biological assessments of Appalachian streams based on predictive models for fish, macroinvertebrate, and diatom assemblages. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 27:1637. BioOne
Carter, T., C. R. Jackson, A. Rosemond, C. Pringle, D. Radcliffe, W. Tollner, J. Maerz, D. Leigh, and A. Trice. 2009. Beyond the urban gradient: barriers and opportunities for timely studies of urbanization effects on aquatic ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28:10381050. BioOne
Charles, D. F., C. Knowles, and R. S. Davis. 2002. Protocols for the analysis of algal samples collected as part of the U.S. Geological Survey National Water-Quality Assessment Program. Report No. 02-06 Patrick Center for Environmental Research, Philadelphia Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. (Available from: http://diatom.ansp.org/nawqa/pdfs/ProtocolPublication.pdf).
Chin, A. 2006. Urban transformation of river landscapes in a global context. Geomorphology 79:460487. CrossRef
Cianfrani, C. M., W. C. Hession, and D. M. Rizzo. 2006. Watershed imperviousness impacts on stream channel condition in southeastern Pennsylvania. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 42:941956. CrossRef
Clarke, K. R. and R. N. Gorley. 2006. PRIMER user manual/tutorial. Version 6 PRIMER-E Plymouth, UK.
Coles, J. F., A. Bell, B. Scudder, and K. Carpenter. 2009. The effects of urbanization and other environmental gradients on algal assemblages in nine metropolitan study areas across the United States. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2009–5022 US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia.
Coles, J. F., T. F. Cuffney, and G. McMahon. 2004. The effects of urbanization on the biological, physical, and chemical characteristics of coastal New England streams. U.S. Geological Survey Professional Paper 1695 US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia.
Cuffney, T. F. and J. F. Falcone. 2009. Derivation of nationally consistent indices representing urban intensity within and across nine metropolitan areas of the conterminous United States. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2008–5095 US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia.
Cuffney, T. F., M. E. Gurtz, and M. R. Meador. 1993. Methods for collecting benthic invertebrate samples as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 93-406 US Geological Survey Raleigh, North Carolina.
Cuffney, T. F., H. Zappia, E. M. P. Giddings, and J. F. Coles. 2005. Effects of urbanization on benthic macroinvertebrate assemblages in contrasting environmental settings: Boston, Massachusetts; Birmingham, Alabama; and Salt Lake City, Utah. American Fisheries Society Symposium 47:361407.
Doyle, M. W., J. M. Harbor, C. F. Rich, and A. Spacie. 2000. Examining the effects of urbanization on streams using indicators of geomorphic stability. Physical Geography 21:155181.
Duong, T. T., A. Feurtet-Mazel, M. Coste, D. K. Dan, and A. Boudou. 2007. Dynamics of diatom colonization process in some rivers influenced by urban pollution (Hanoi, Vietnam). Ecological Indicators 7:839851. CrossRef
Eisler, R. 1987. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon hazards to fish, wildlife, and invertebrates: a synoptic review. Biological Report 85(1.11) US Fish and Wildlife Service Laurel, Maryland.
Elmore, A. J. and S. S. Kaushal. 2008. Disappearing headwaters: patterns of stream burial due to urbanization. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 6:308312. CrossRef
Ewing, R., R. Pendall, and D. Chen. 2002. Measuring sprawl and its impact Smart Growth America Washington, DC.
Falcone, J., J. Stewart, S. Sobieszczyk, J. Dupree, G. McMahon, and G. Buell. 2007. A comparison of natural and urban characteristics and the development of urban intensity indices across six geographic settings. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5123 US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia.
Falke, J. A. and K. B. Gido. 2006. Effects of reservoir connectivity on stream fish assemblages in the Great Plains. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences 63:480493. CrossRef
Fitzpatrick, F. A., M. W. Diebel, M. A. Harris, T. L. Arnold, M. A. Lutz, and K. D. Richards. 2005. Effects of urbanization on the geomorphology, habitat, hydrology, and fish index of biotic integrity of streams in the Chicago area, Illinois and Wisconsin. American Fisheries Society Symposium 47:87115.
Fitzpatrick, F. A., M. A. Harris, T. L. Arnold, and K. D. Richards. 2004. Urbanization influences on aquatic communities in northeastern Illinois streams. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 40:461475. CrossRef
Fitzpatrick, F. A. and M. C. Peppler. 2007. Changes in aquatic habitat and geomorphic response to urbanization, with implications for assessing habitat degradation. in K. C. Kabbes (Editor). Restoring Our Natural Habitat. Proceedings of the World Environmental and Water Resources Congress 2007, May 15–19, 2007. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, Virginia. (Available on CD-ROM only from: http://https://secure.asce.org/ASCEWebSite/BOOKSTORE/BookDescription.aspx?ProdId=5497).
Fitzpatrick, F. A., I. R. Waite, P. J. D'Arconte, M. R. Meador, M. A. Maupin, and M. E. Gurtz. 1998. Revised methods for characterizing stream habitat in the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. U.S. Geological Survey Water-Resources Investigations Report 98-4052 US Geological Survey Raleigh, North Carolina.
GeoLytics 2001. Census 2000 and street 2000. GeoLytics, East Brunswick, New Jersey. (Available from: http://www.geolytics.com/Default.asp).
Giddings, E. M. P., A. H. Bell, K. M. Beaulieu, T. F. Cuffney, J. F. Coles, L. R. Brown, F. A. Fitzpatrick, J. Falcone, L. A. Sprague, W. L. Bryant, M. C. Peppler, C. Stephens, and G. McMahon. 2009. Selected physical, chemical, and biological data used to study urbanizing streams in nine metropolitan areas of the United States, 1999–2004. U.S. Geological Survey Data Series 423 US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia.
Giddings, E., L. R. Brown, T. M. Short, and M. R. Meador. 2006. Relation of fish communities to environmental conditions in urban streams of the Wasatch Front, Utah. Western North American Naturalist 66:155168. BioOne
Gilliom, R. J., J. E. Barbash, C. G. Crawford, P. A. Hamilton, J. D. Martin, N. Nakagaki, L. H. Nowell, J. C. Scott, P. E. Stackelberg, G. P. Thelin, and D. M. Wolock. 2006. The quality of our nation's waters—pesticides in the nation's streams and ground water, 1992–2001. U.S. Geological Survey Circular 1291 US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia.
Grimm, N. B., S. H. Faeth, N. E. Golubiewski, C. L. Redman, J. Wu, X. Bai, and J. M. Briggs. 2008. Global change and the ecology of cities. Science 319:756760. CrossRef, PubMed
Grimm, N. B., R. W. Sheibley, C. L. Crenshaw, C. N. Dahm, W. J. Roach, and L. H. Zeglin. 2005. N retention and transformation in urban streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24:626642. BioOne
Gurtz, M. E. 1993. Design of biological components of the National Water-Quality Assessment (NAWQA) Program. 323354. in S. L. Loeb, A. Spacie (Editors). Biological monitoring of aquatic systems Lewis Publishers Boca Raton, Florida.
Harden, B. 2005. Out west, a paradox: densely packed sprawl Washington Post, August 11, 2005.
Harding, J. S., E. F. Benfield, P. V. Bolstad, G. S. Helfman, and E. B. D. Jones. 1998. Stream biodiversity: the ghost of land use past. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 95:1484314847. CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Heatherly, T., M. R. Whiles, T. V. Royer, and M. B. David. 2007. Relationships between water quality, habitat quality, and macroinvertebrate assemblages in Illinois streams. Journal of Environmental Quality 36:16531660. CrossRef, PubMed
Hwang, H. and G. D. Foster. 2006. Characterization of polycyclic hydrocarbons in urban stormwater runoff flowing into the tidal Anacostia River, Washington, DC, USA. Environmental Pollution 140:416426. CrossRef, PubMed
Kaushal, S. S., W. M. Lewis Jr, and J. H. McCutchan. 2006. Land use change and nitrogen enrichment of a Rocky Mountain watershed. Ecological Applications 16:299312. CrossRef, PubMed
Leopold, L. B., M. G. Wolman, and J. P. Miller. 1964. Fluvial processes in geomorphology W. H. Freeman San Francisco, California.
Lerner, D. N. 2002. Identifying and quantifying urban recharge: a review. Hydrogeology Journal 10:143152. CrossRef, CSA
Light, T. and M. P. Marchetti. 2007. Distinguishing between invasions and habitat changes as drivers of diversity loss among California's freshwater fishes. Conservation Biology 21:434446. CrossRef, PubMed
Lowe, R. L. and Y. Pan. 1996. Benthic algal communities as biological monitors. 705740. in R. J. Stevenson, M. I. Bothwell, R. L. Lowe, J. H. Thorp (Editors). Algal ecology. Freshwater benthic ecosystems Academic Press San Diego, California.
Mahler, B. J., P. C. Van Metre, T. J. Bashara, G. T. Wilson, and D. A. Johns. 2005. Parking lot sealcoat—an unrecognized source of urban polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Environmental Science and Technology 39:55605566. CrossRef, PubMed
McAllister, D. E., S. P. Platania, F. W. Schueler, M. E. Baldwin, and D. S. Lee. 1986. Ichthyofaunal patterns on a geographic grid. 1757. in C. H. Hocutt, E. O. Wiley (Editors). The zoogeography of North American freshwater fishes Wiley New York.
McCarthy, K. 2006. Assessment of the usefulness of semipermeable membrane devices for long-term monitoring in an urban slough system. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment 118:293318. CrossRef, PubMed
McMahon, G., J. D. Bales, J. F. Coles, E. M. P. Giddings, and H. Zappia. 2003. Use of stage data to characterize hydrologic conditions in an urbanizing environment. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 39:15291546. CrossRef
Meador, M. R., J. F. Coles, and H. Zappia. 2005. Fish assemblage response to urban intensity gradients in contrasting metropolitan areas: Birmingham, Alabama and Boston, Massachusetts. American Fisheries Society Symposium 47:409423.
Meador, M. R., T. F. Cuffney, and M. E. Gurtz. 1993. Methods for sampling fish communities as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 93-104 US Geological Survey Raleigh, North Carolina.
Moulton, S. R., J. L. Carter, S. A. Grotheer, T. F. Cuffney, and T. M. Short. 2000. Methods of analysis by the U.S. Geological Survey National Water Quality Laboratory – processing, taxonomy, and quality control of benthic macroinvertebrate samples. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 00-212 US Geological Survey Denver, Colorado.
Moulton, S. R., J. G. Kennen, R. M. Goldstein, and J. A. Hambrook. 2002. Revised protocols for sampling algal, invertebrate, and fish communities as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 02-150 US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia.
Nadkami, S. and P. P. Shenoy. 2004. A causal mapping approach to constructing Bayesian networks. Decision Support Systems 38:259281. CrossRef
Omernik, J. M. 1987. Ecoregions of the conterminous United States. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 77:118125. CrossRef
Omernik, J. M. 2004. Perspectives on the nature and definition of ecological regions. Environmental Management 34(Supplement 1):s27s38. CrossRef
Ourso, R. T. and S. A. Frenzel. 2003. Identification of linear and threshold responses in streams along a gradient of urbanization in Anchorage, Alaska. Hydrobiologia 501:117131. CrossRef
Paul, M. J. and J. L. Meyer. 2001. Streams in the urban landscape. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics 32:333365. CrossRef, CSA
Paul, M. J., D. W. Bressler, A. H. Purcell, M. T. Barbour, E. T. Ranking, and V. H. Resh. 2009. Assessment tools for urban catchments: defining observable biological potential. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 45:320330. CrossRef
Pickett, S. T. A., M. L. Cadenasso, J. M. Grove, P. M. Groffman, L. E. Band, C. G. Boone, W. R. Burch, C. S. B. Grimmond, J. Hom, J. C. Jenkins, N. L. Law, C. H. Nilon, R. V. Pouyat, K. Szlavecz, P. S. Warren, and M. A. Wilson. 2008. Beyond urban legends: an emerging framework of urban ecology, as illustrated by the Baltimore Ecosystem Study. BioScience 58:139150. BioOne
Poff, N. L., B. D. Bledsoe, and C. O. Cuhaciyan. 2006. Hydrologic variation with land use across the contiguous United States: geomorphic and ecological consequences for stream ecosystems. Geomorphology 79:264285. CrossRef
Porter, S. G., T. F. Cuffney, M. E. Gurtz, and M. R. Meador. 1993. Methods for collecting algal samples as part of the National Water-Quality Assessment Program. U.S. Geological Survey Open-File Report 93-409 US Geological Survey Raleigh, North Carolina.
Propst, D. L., K. B. Gido, and J. A. Stefferud. 2008. Natural flow regimes, nonnative fishes, and native fish persistence in arid-land river systems. Ecological Applications 18:12361252. CrossRef, PubMed
Purcell, A. H., D. W. Bressler, M. J. Paul, M. T. Barbour, E. T. Rankin, J. L. Carter, and V. H. Resh. 2009. Assessment tools for urban catchments: developing biological indicators based on benthic macroinvertebrates. Journal of the American Water Resources Association 45:306319. CrossRef
Roy, A. H., B. J. Freeman, and M. C. Freeman. 2007. Riparian influences on stream fish assemblage structure in urbanizing stream. Landscape Ecology 22:385402. CrossRef
Roy, A. H., A. D. Rosemond, M. J. Paul, D. S. Leigh, and J. B. Wallace. 2003. Stream macroinvertebrate response to catchment urbanisation (Georgia, U.S.A.). Freshwater Biology 48:329346. CrossRef, CSA
Roy, A. H., A. L. Dybas, K. M. Fritz, and H. R. Lubbers. 2009. Urbanization affects the extent and hydrologic permanence of headwater streams in a Midwestern US metropolitan area 42:344–359. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28:911928. BioOne
Schueler, T. R. 1994. The importance of imperviousness. Watershed Protection Techniques 1:100111.
Sonneman, J. A., C. J. Walsh, P. F. Breen, and A. K. Sharpe. 2001. Effects of urbanization on streams of the Melbourne Region, Victoria, Australia II: benthic diatom communities. Freshwater Biology 46:553565. CrossRef, CSA
Sprague, L. A., D. A. Harned, D. W. Hall, L. H. Nowell, N. J. Bauch, and K. D. Richards. 2007. Response of stream chemistry during base flow to gradients of urbanization in selected locations across the conterminous United States, 2002–04. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2007–5083 US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia.
Sprague, L. A. and L. H. Nowell. 2008. Comparison of pesticide concentrations in streams at low flow in six metropolitan areas of the United States. Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry 27:288298. CrossRef, PubMed
Stevenson, R. J. and Y. Pan. 1999. Assessing environmental conditions in rivers and streams with diatoms. 1140. in E. F. Stoermer, J. P. Smol (Editors). The diatoms: applications for the environmental and earth sciences Cambridge University Press Cambridge, UK. CrossRef
Tate, C. M., T. F. Cuffney, G. McMahon, E. M. P. Giddings, J. F. Coles, and H. Zappia. 2005. Use of an urban intensity index to assess urban effects on streams in three contrasting environmental settings. American Fisheries Society Symposium 47:291315.
Turner, B. L., R. E. Kasperson, P. A. Matson, J. J. McCarthy, R. W. Corell, L. Christensen, N. Eckley, J. X. Kasperson, A. Luers, M. L. Martello, C. Polsky, A. Pulsipher, and A. Schiller. 2003. A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 100:80748079. CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) 1997. Urbanization and streams: studies of hydrologic impacts. EPA841-R-97-009 US Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC.
USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) 2002a. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment Program research strategy. EPA 620/R-02/002 US Environmental Protection Agency Research Triangle Park, North Carolina.
USEPA (US Environmental Protection Agency) 2002b. Summary of biological assessment programs and biocriteria development for states, tribes, territories, and interstate commissions: streams and wadeable rivers. EPA-822-R-02-048 US Environmental Protection Agency Washington, DC.
USGS (US Geological Survey) 2005. National Land Cover Database 2001 (NLCD01). US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia (Available from: http://www.mrlc.gov/mrlc2k_nlcd.asp).
Van Metre, P. C. and B. J. Mahler. 2005. Trends in hydrophobic organic contaminants in urban and reference lake sediments across the United States, 1970–2001. Environmental Science and Technology 39:55675574. CrossRef, PubMed
Waite, I. A., S. Sobieszczyk, K. D. Carpenter, A. J. Arnsberg, H. M. Johnson, C. A. Hughes, M. J. Sarantou, and F. A. Rinella. 2008. Effects of urbanization on stream ecosystems in the Willamette Valley Ecoregion, Oregon and Washington. U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigation Report 2006–5101-D US Geological Survey Reston, Virginia.
Walker, C. E. and Y. Pan. 2006. Using diatom assemblages to assess urban stream conditions. Hydrobiologia 561:179189. CrossRef
Walter, R. C. and D. J. Merritts. 2008. Natural streams and the legacy of water-powered mills. Science 319:299304. CrossRef, PubMed
Walsh, C. J., T. D. Fletcher, and A. R. Ladson. 2005a. Stream restoration in urban catchments through redesigning stormwater systems: looking to the catchment to save the stream. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24:690705. BioOne
Walsh, C. J., A. H. Roy, J. W. Feminella, P. D. Cottingham, P. M. Groffman, and R. P. Morgan. 2005b. The urban stream syndrome: current knowledge and the search for a cure. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 24:706723. BioOne
Wenger, S. J., A. H. Roy, C. R. Jackson, E. S. Bernhardt, T. L. Carter, S. Filoso, C. A. Gibson, W. C. Hession, S. S. Kaushal, E. Martí, J. L. Meyer, M. A. Palmer, M. J. Paul, A. H. Purcell, A. Ramirez, A. D. Rosemond, K. A. Schofield, E. B. Sudduth, and C. J. Walsh. 2009. Twenty-six key research questions in urban stream ecology: an assessment of the state of the science. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28:10801098. BioOne
Whittier, T. R., J. L. Stoddard, D. P. Larsen, and A. T. Herlihy. 2007. Selecting reference sites for stream biological assessments: best professional judgment or objective criteria. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 26:349360. BioOne
Wilde, F. D., D. B. Radtke, J. Gibs, and R. T. Iwatsubo. (Editors). 1999. Collection of water samples. U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chapter A4. US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. (Available from: http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/twri9A4/).
Wilde, F. D., D. B. Radtke, J. Gibs, and R. T. Iwatsubo. (Editors). 2002. Processing of water samples (version 2.1). U.S. Geological Survey Techniques of Water-Resources Investigations, book 9, chapter A5. US Geological Survey, Reston, Virginia. (Available from: http://pubs.water.usgs.gov/twri9A5/).
Wolman, M. G. and A. P. Schick. 1967. Effects of construction on fluvial sediment, urban and suburban areas of Maryland. Water Resources Research 3:451464. CrossRef

Figure 1. US metropolitan areas studied. Shaded areas contain the watersheds surveyed in each study.

Figure 2. Comparison of the nationally scaled urban intensity index (NUII) across 9 metropolitan areas and NUII scores standardized to 0 to 100 scale in each metropolitan area (MA-NUII). Metropolitan areas are ordered from east (BOS) to west (POR). See Table 1 for abbreviations.

Figure 3. Land use/land cover in nonurban watersheds (metropolitan area urban intensity index [MA-NUII] ≤ 10) in the 9 metropolitan areas. Numbers above columns indicate number of watersheds with MA-NUII ≤ 10. Land cover in SLC included a large percentage of shrubland. Percentages do not add up to 100% because minor land covers are not shown (e.g., wetlands, barren land). See Table 1 for abbreviations.

Figure 4. Plots of site scores from axis 1 of nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis of algal species composition vs metropolitan area urban intensity index (MA-NUII) for metropolitan areas in which the correlation was moderate (0.50 ≤ |rs| < 0.70) or strong (|rs| ≥ 0.70). See Table 1 for abbreviations.

Figure 5. Plots of site scores from axes 1 and 2 of nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis of fish species composition vs metropolitan area urban intensity index (MA-NUII) for metropolitan areas in which the correlation was moderate (0.50 ≤ |rs| < 0.70) or strong (|rs| ≥ 0.70). See Table 1 for abbreviations.

Figure 6. Plots of site scores from axis 1 of nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) analysis of macroinvertebrate species composition (qualitative multihabitat sample) vs metropolitan area urban intensity index (MA-NUII) for 9 metropolitan areas. See Table 1 for abbreviations.

table

Table 1. Minimum and maximum values for selected watershed characteristics, 2000 population density, mean annual precipitation (1980–1997), and level III ecoregion (Omernik 1987) for 9 metropolitan study areas in the US.

table

Table 2. Spearman rank correlations of metropolitan area urban intensity index (MA-NUII) with selected hydrologic characteristics for 9 metropolitan areas in the US (see Table 1 for abbreviations). Moderate correlations (0.50 ≤ |rs| < 0.70) are italicized and strong correlations (|rs| ≥ 0.70) are bolded. All such correlations are statistically significant (p < 0.05).

table

Table 3. Spearman rank correlations of metropolitan area urban intensity index (MA-NUII) with selected habitat characteristics for 9 metropolitan areas in the US (see Table 1 for abbreviations). Moderate correlations (0.50 ≤ |rs| < 0.70) are italicized and strong correlations (|rs| ≥ 0.70) are bolded. All such correlations are statistically significant (p < 0.05).

table

Table 4. Spearman rank correlations of metropolitan area urban intensity index (MA-NUII) with selected water-quality characteristics for 9 metropolitan areas in the US (see Table 1 for abbreviations). Moderate correlations (0.50 ≤ |rs| < 0.70) are italicized and strong correlations (|rs| ≥ 0.70) are bolded. All such correlations are statistically significant (p < 0.05). NC  =  not calculated.

table

Table 5. Spearman rank correlations of metropolitan area urban intensity index (MA-NUII) with toxicity indices, total number of compounds, and concentrations of compounds obtained from semipermeable membrane devices for 6 metropolitan areas in the US (see Table 1 for abbreviations). Moderate correlations (0.50 ≤ |rs| < 0.70) are italicized and strong correlations (|rs| ≥ 0.70) are bolded. All such correlations are statistically significant (p < 0.05). Correlations were not calculated (NC) for compounds detected at <25% of sites within a metropolitan area or nationally (Bryant et al. 2007). PAH  =  polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons, AhR  =  aryl hydrocarbon receptor.

table

Table 6. Spearman rank correlations of metropolitan area urban intensity index (MA-NUII) with the first 2 axes of nonmetric multidimensional scaling ordinations (NMDS) of algal, benthic macroinvertebrate (richest targeted habitat [RTH] and qualitative multihabitat [QMH] samples), and fish assemblage species composition for 9 metropolitan areas in the US (see Table 1 for abbreviations). Three algal metrics (Coles et al. 2009) also were analyzed. Moderate correlations (0.50 ≤ |rs| < 0.70) are italicized and strong correlations (|rs| ≥ 0.70) are bolded. All such correlations are statistically significant (p < 0.05).

table

Table 7. Results from linear regressions of nonmetric multidimensional scaling (NMDS) axis 1 scores from richest targeted habitat (RTH) and qualitative multihabitat (QMH) samples against urbanization as characterized by the metropolitan area urban intensity index (MA-NUII) for 9 metropolitan areas in the US (see Table 1 for abbreviations).

Cited by

Jonathan G. Kennen, Daniel J. Sullivan, Jason T. May, Amanda H. Bell, Karen M. Beaulieu, Donald E. Rice. (2012) Temporal changes in aquatic-invertebrate and fish assemblages in streams of the north-central and northeastern US. Ecological Indicators 18, 312-329
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2012.
CrossRef
Song S. Qian, Thomas F. Cuffney. (2012) To threshold or not to threshold? That's the question. Ecological Indicators 15:1, 1-9
Online publication date: 1-Apr-2012.
CrossRef
R Thompson, S Parkinson. (2011) Assessing the local effects of riparian restoration on urban streams. New Zealand Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research1-12
Online publication date: 6-Sep-2011.
CrossRef
Thomas F. Cuffneya,, Roxolana Kashubab,, Song S. Qianb,, Ibrahim Alameddineb,, Yoon Kyung Chab,, Boknam Leeb,, James F. Colesc,, and Gerard McMahond,. (2011) Multilevel regression models describing regional patterns of invertebrate and algal responses to urbanization across the USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30:3, 797-819
Online publication date: 1-Sep-2011.

Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (718 KB) : Rights & Permissions 

Lucy Shuker, Angela M. Gurnell, Mike Raco. (2011) Some simple tools for communicating the biophysical condition of urban rivers to support decision making in relation to river restoration. Urban Ecosystems
Online publication date: 18-Aug-2011.
CrossRef
Scott A. Stranko, Robert H. Hilderbrand, Margaret A. Palmer. (2011) Comparing the Fish and Benthic Macroinvertebrate Diversity of Restored Urban Streams to Reference Streams. Restoration Ecologyno-no
Online publication date: 1-Aug-2011.
CrossRef
Robert A. Leidy, Kristina Cervantes-Yoshida, Stephanie M. Carlson. (2011) Persistence of native fishes in small streams of the urbanized San Francisco Estuary, California: acknowledging the role of urban streams in native fish conservation. Aquatic Conservation: Marine and Freshwater Ecosystems 21:5, 472-483
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011.
CrossRef
Wing Y. Tsoi, Wade L. Hadwen, and Christine S. Fellows. (2011) Spatial and temporal variation in the ecological stoichiometry of aquatic organisms in an urban catchment. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30:2, 533-545
Online publication date: 1-Jun-2011.

Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (602 KB) : Rights & Permissions 

Cassie J. Herringshawa,, Timothy W. Stewarta,2, Janette R. Thompsona, and Paul F. Andersonb. (2011) Land Use, Stream Habitat and Benthic Invertebrate Assemblages in a Highly Altered Iowa Watershed. The American Midland Naturalist 165:2, 274-293
Online publication date: 1-Apr-2011.

Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (369 KB) : Rights & Permissions 

Ryan M. Utz and Robert H. Hilderbrand. (2011) Interregional variation in urbanization-induced geomorphic change and macroinvertebrate habitat colonization in headwater streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30:1, 25-37
Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011.

Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (923 KB) : Rights & Permissions 

Robert M. Hughesa, Philip R. Kaufmannb, and Marc H. Weberb. (2011) National and regional comparisons between Strahler order and stream size. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 30:1, 103-121
Online publication date: 1-Mar-2011.

Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (1931 KB) : Supplementary Materials : Rights & Permissions 

Ryan Utz, Keith Eshleman, Robert Hilderbrand. (2011) Variation in hydrologic, chemical and thermal responses to urbanization in streams between two physiographic regions of the Mid-Atlantic United States. Ecological Applications110220084802040
Online publication date: 14-Feb-2011.
CrossRef
Ryan King, Matthew Baker, Paul Kazyak, Donald Weller. (2011) How novel is too novel? Stream community thresholds at exceptionally low levels of catchment urbanization. Ecological Applications110220084802040
Online publication date: 14-Feb-2011.
CrossRef
Ryan King, Matthew Baker. (2011) An alternative view of ecological community thresholds and appropriate analyses for their detection. Comment. Ecological Applications110220084802040
Online publication date: 14-Feb-2011.
CrossRef
P. Sály, P. Takács, I. Kiss, P. Bíró, T. Erős. (2011) The relative influence of spatial context and catchment- and site-scale environmental factors on stream fish assemblages in a human-modified landscape. Ecology of Freshwater Fishno-no
Online publication date: 1-Feb-2011.
CrossRef
Kevin J. Collier, Bryan L. Clements. (2010) Influences of catchment and corridor imperviousness on urban stream macroinvertebrate communities at multiple spatial scales. Hydrobiologia
Online publication date: 24-Dec-2010.
CrossRef
S. Mark Nelson. (2010) Response of stream macroinvertebrate assemblages to erosion control structures in a wastewater dominated urban stream in the southwestern U.S.. Hydrobiologia
Online publication date: 6-Dec-2010.
CrossRef
Karen Riva-Murray, Rachel Riemann, Peter Murdoch, Jeffrey M. Fischer, Robin Brightbill. (2010) Landscape characteristics affecting streams in urbanizing regions of the Delaware River Basin (New Jersey, New York, and Pennsylvania, U.S.). Landscape Ecology 25:10, 1489-1503
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2010.
CrossRef
Alan D. Steinman, Mary E. Ogdahl, Carl R. Ruetz. (2010) An environmental assessment of a small shallow lake (Little Black Lake, MI) threatened by urbanization. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment
Online publication date: 9-Mar-2010.
CrossRef
Brian S. Helmsa, Jon E. Schoonoverb, and Jack W. Feminellac. (2009) Seasonal variability of landuse impacts on macroinvertebrate assemblages in streams of western Georgia, USA. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28:4, 991-1006
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009.

Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (583 KB) : Rights & Permissions 

Seth J. Wengera, Allison H. Royb, C. Rhett Jacksonc, Emily S. Bernhardtd, Timothy L. Cartera, Solange Filosoe, Catherine A. Gibsonf, W. Cully Hessiong, Sujay S. Kaushale, Eugenia Martíh, Judy L. Meyeri, Margaret A. Palmere, Michael J. Paulj, Alison H. Purcellk, Alonso Ramírezl, Amy D. Rosemondm, Kate A. Schofieldn, Elizabeth B. Suddutho, and Christopher J. Walshp. (2009) Twenty-six key research questions in urban stream ecology: an assessment of the state of the science. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28:4, 1080-1098
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009.

Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (1130 KB) : Rights & Permissions 

Mindy L. Robertsa and Robert E. Bilbyb. (2009) Urbanization alters litterfall rates and nutrient inputs to small Puget Lowland streams. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28:4, 941-954
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009.

Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (1062 KB) : Rights & Permissions 

Allison H. Roya, Alison H. Purcellb, Christopher J. Walshc, and Seth J. Wengerd. (2009) Urbanization and stream ecology: five years later. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28:4, 908-910
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009.

Citation : Full Text : PDF (99 KB) : Rights & Permissions 

Timothy Cartera, C. Rhett Jacksonb, Amy Rosemondc, Cathy Pringlec, David Radcliffed, William Tollnere, John Maerzb, David Leighf, and Amy Tricec. (2009) Beyond the urban gradient: barriers and opportunities for timely studies of urbanization effects on aquatic ecosystems. Journal of the North American Benthological Society 28:4, 1038-1050
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2009.

Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (309 KB) : Rights & Permissions 



 

Print ISSN: 0887-3593

Online ISSN: 1937-237X

Current: Mar 2012 : Volume 31 Issue 1

BioOne Member Since: 2004

Frequency: Quarterly

Previously titled: Journal of the North American Benthological Society

Impact Factor: 2.974

2010 ISI Journal Citation Reports® Rankings:

40/129 - Ecology

9/92 - Marine & Freshwater Biology

Eigenfactor™: Freshwater Science

 
BioOne is the product of innovative collaboration between scientific societies, libraries, academe and the private sector.
 
21 Dupont Circle NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036 • Phone 202.296.1605 • Fax 202.872.0884
 
Copyright © 2012 BioOne All rights reserved