Wetlands have an important role in ecosystem function and biodiversity. Effective management of wetlands requires accurate and comprehensive spatial information on location, size, classification, and connectivity in the landscape. Using a GIS, two provincial wetland maps were compared with regard to their areal correspondence across different ecoregions of New Brunswick. The first consisted of discrete wetland units (vector data) derived from aerial photo interpretation. The second consisted of wet areas modeled by a newly developed depth-to-water index with continuous coverage across the landscape (raster data). This index was derived from a digital elevation model and hydrographic data. The relative advantages and disadvantages of the two approaches were assessed. The two maps were generally consistent with most discrete wetland areas (51%–67 %) embedded in the 0–10 cm depth-to-water class, verifying the continuous modeling approach. The continuous model identified a larger wetland area. Much of this additional area consisted of riparian zones and numerous small wetlands (< 1 ha) that were not captured by aerial photo interpretation. Unlike the discrete map, the continuous model showed the hydrological connectivity of wetlands across the landscape. Both approaches revealed that topography was a major control on wetland distribution between ecoregions, with more wetland in ecoregions with flatter topography.
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2007
MAPPING WETLANDS: A COMPARISON OF TWO DIFFERENT APPROACHES FOR NEW BRUNSWICK, CANADA
Paul N. C. Murphy,
Jae Ogilvie,
Kevin Connor,
Paul A. Arp
ACCESS THE FULL ARTICLE
It is not available for individual sale.
This article is only available to subscribers.
It is not available for individual sale.
It is not available for individual sale.
Wetlands
Vol. 27 • No. 4
December 2007
Vol. 27 • No. 4
December 2007
GIS
riparian zones
soil mapping
soil wetness index
topographic modeling
topography
wetland management