Radiation Research
Published by: Radiation Research Society
Radiation Research 166(3):519-531. 2006
doi: 10.1667/RR0547.1
Microarray Comparative Genomic Hybridization Reveals Genome-Wide Patterns of DNA Gains and Losses in Post-Chernobyl Thyroid Cancer














aClinical Research Division,
bDivision of Basic Science,
cDivision of Public Health Sciences,
dBiocomputing Shared Resources, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington;
eInstitute of Pathology, Bryansk, Russian Federation;
fRussian Academy of Medical Science, Medical Radiological Research Center, Obninsk, Russian Federation;
gDivision of Endocrinology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;
hDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and
iDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington
1Address for correspondence: 1100 Fairview Avenue North, C2-023, Seattle, WA 98109; kimmel@fhcrc.org
Abstract
Kimmel, R. R., Zhao, L. P., Nguyen, D., Lee, S., Aronszajn, M., Cheng, C., Troshin, V. P., Abrosimov, A., Delrow, J., Tuttle, R. M., Tsyb, A. F., Kopecky, K. J., Davis, S. and Neiman, P. E. Microarray Comparative Genomic Hybridization Reveals Genome-Wide Patterns of DNA Gains and Losses in Post-Chernobyl Thyroid Cancer. Radiat. Res. 166, 519–531 (2006).
Genetic gains and losses resulting from DNA strand breakage by ionizing radiation have been demonstrated in vitro and suspected in radiation-associated thyroid cancer. We hypothesized that copy number deviations might be more prevalent, and/or occur in genomic patterns, in tumors associated with presumptive DNA strand breakage from radiation exposure than in their spontaneous counterparts. We used cDNA microarray-based comparative genome hybridization to obtain genome-wide, high-resolution copy number profiles at 14,573 genomic loci in 23 post-Chernobyl and 20 spontaneous thyroid cancers. The prevalence of DNA gains in tumors from cases in exposed individuals was two- to fourfold higher than for cases in unexposed individuals and up to 10-fold higher for the subset of recurrent gains. DNA losses for all cases were low and more prevalent in spontaneous cases. We identified unique patterns of copy variation (mostly gains) that depended on a history of radiation exposure. Exposed cases, especially the young, harbored more recurrent gains that covered more of the genome. The largest regions, spanning 1.2 to 4.9 Mbp, were located at 1p36.32-.33, 2p23.2-.3, 3p21.1-.31, 6p22.1-.2, 7q36.1, 8q24.3, 9q34.11, 9q34.3, 11p15.5, 11q13.2-12.3, 14q32.33, 16p13.3, 16p11.2, 16q21-q12.2, 17q25.1, 19p13.31-qter, 22q11.21 and 22q13.2. Copy number changes, particularly gains, in post-Chernobyl thyroid cancer are influenced by radiation exposure and age at exposure, in addition to the neoplastic process.
Received: January 17, 2006; Accepted: April 21, 2006
REFERENCES
and
. Gene amplification in human cancers: biological and clinical significance. In The Genetic Basis of Human Cancer (B. Vogelstein and K. Kinzler, Eds.), pp. 161–172. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998.
,
,
,
, and
. A central role for chromosome breakage in gene amplification, deletion formation, and amplicon integration. Genes Dev 5:160–174.1991. CrossRef, PubMed
,
,
, and
. Interstitial deletions and intrachromosomal amplification initiated from a double-strand break targeted to a mammalian chromosome. EMBO J 17:325–333.1998). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
and
. Ionizing radiation and genetic risks XIV. Potential research directions in the post-genome era based on knowledge of repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian somatic cells and the origin of deletions associated with human genomic disorders. Mutat. Res 578:333–370.2005. PubMed
,
, and
. X-ray induction of methotrexate resistance due to dhfr gene amplification. Somat. Cell. Mol. Genet 16:413–423.1990). CrossRef, PubMed
,
,
,
, and
. Expression of fragile sites triggers intrachromosomal mammalian gene amplification and sets boundaries to early amplicons. Cell 89:215–225.1997). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
, and
. A new role for hypoxia in tumor progression: Induction of fragile site triggering genomic rearrangements and formation of complex DMs and HSRs. Mol. Cell 2:259–265.1998). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Clinical implications of radiation-induced genomic instability. Oncogene 22:7011–7017.2003). CrossRef, PubMed
Issues and epidemiological evidence regarding radiation-induced thyroid cancer. Radiat. Res 131:98–111.1992). CrossRef, PubMed
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. Thyroid cancer after exposure to external radiation: A pooled analysis of seven studies. Radiat. Res 141:259–277.1995). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. Chernobyl-related thyroid cancer in children of Belarus: A case-control study. Radiat. Res 150:349–356.1998. CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
and
. Pediatric thyroid cancer after the Chernobyl disaster. Pathomorphologic study of 84 cases (1991–1992) from the Republic of Belarus. Cancer 74:748–766.1994). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. Chromosomal imbalances in post-Chernobyl thyroid tumors. Thyroid 14:1061–1064.2004). CrossRef, PubMed
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. From amplification to gene in thyroid cancer: A high-resolution mapped bacterial-artificial-chromosome resource for cancer chromosome aberrations guides gene discovery after comparative genome hybridization. Am. J. Hum. Genet 63:625–637.1998). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
, and
. H-ras protooncogene mutations in human thyroid neoplasms. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 71:223–229.1990). PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
, and
. DNA copy number changes in thyroid carcinoma. Am. J. Pathol 154:1539–1547.1999). PubMed
,
,
, and
. Studies of allelic loss in thyroid tumors reveal major differences in chromosomal instability between papillary and follicular carcinomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 83:525–530.1998). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
, and
. Association of allelic loss on 1q, 4p, 7q, 9p, 9q, and 16q with postoperative death in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res 6:1819–1825.2000. PubMed
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nat. Genet 23:41–46.1999). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:12963–12968.2002). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. High-resolution analysis of gene copy number alterations in human prostate cancer using CGH on cDNA microarrays: impact of copy number on gene expression. Neoplasia 6:240–247.2004). CrossRef, PubMed
,
,
, and
. Array rank order regression analysis for the detection of gene copy-number changes in human cancer. Genomics 82:122–129.2003). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. Identification of a 7-cM region of frequent allelic loss on chromosome band 16p13.3 that is specifically associated with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Oncol. Rep 7:529–533.2000). PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. Cytogenetic effects of radiotherapy. Breakpoint distribution in induced chromosome aberrations. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet 41:61–70.1989). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
,
, and
. Chromosome breakage at sites of oncogenes in a population accidentally exposed to radioactive chemical pollution. Mutagenesis 14:83–86.1999). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
and
. High-resolution mapping of a 130-kb core region of the MYCN amplicon in neuroblastomas. Genomics 32:97–103.1996). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
,
, and
. Refined mapping of 12q13-q15 amplicons in human malignant gliomas suggests CDK4/SAS and MDM2 as independent amplification targets. Cancer Res 56:5141–5145.1996. PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. Mapping of DNA amplifications at 15 chromosomal localizations in 1875 breast tumors: Definition of phenotypic groups. Cancer Res 57:4360–4367.1997). PubMed, CSA
,
,
, and
. A review of studies of ionizing radiation-induced double-strand break clustering. Radiat. Res 156:572–576.2001). Abstract, PubMed, CSA
,
,
, and
. Short inverted repeats initiate gene amplification through the formation of a large DNA palindrome in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:8772–8777.2002). PubMed, CSA
and
. Natural selection in neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus. Semin. Cancer Biol 15:474–483.2005). CrossRef, PubMed
,
,
, and
. Prevalence of mutations of ras and p53 in benign and malignant thyroid tumors from children exposed to radiation after the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Oncogene 13:687–693.1996). PubMed, CSA
,
,
, and
. Absence of RAS and p53 mutations in thyroid carcinomas of children after Chernobyl in contrast to adult thyroid tumours. Br. J. Cancer 77:952–955.1998). PubMed, CSA
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science 305:525–528.2004). CrossRef, PubMed
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. Risk of thyroid cancer in the Bryansk Oblast of the Russian Federation after the Chernobyl Power Station accident. Radiat. Res 162:241–248.2004). Abstract, PubMed
,
,
, and
. Detection of DNA damage by the alkaline comet assay after exposure to low-dose gamma radiation. Radiat. Res 149:396–400.1998). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
,
,
, and
. DNA-damage detection in man after radiation exposure—the comet assay—its possible application for human biomonitoring. Stem Cells 13:(Suppl. 1),. 215–222.1995). CrossRef, PubMed
Paradigm shifts in radiation biology: Their impact on intervention for radiation-induced disease. Radiat. Res 164:454–461.2005. Abstract, PubMed
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
, and
. Estimating individual thyroid doses for a case-control study of childhood thyroid cancer in Bryansk Oblast, Russia. Radiat. Prot. Dosim 108:143–160.2004). CrossRef, PubMed
,
, and
. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278:680–686.1997). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
,
, and
. Detection of amplified oncogenes by differential polymerase chain reaction. Oncogene 4:1153–1157.1989. PubMed
and
. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1993.
A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 18:800–802.1988). CrossRef
FIG. 1. Prevalence of copy number gains and losses in Bryansk and Seattle thyroid tumors. Box plots show (panel A) total (random plus recurrent) gains (FR > 1.72) in Bryansk and Seattle tumors for young and adult cases and (panel B) total losses (FR < 0.48) for young and adult cases. “Mean” refers to average for replicates. See text for significant P values for the differences between means. The distributions of (panel C) recurrent gains and (panel D) recurrent losses are shown for each tumor group. FR, fluorescence ratio; ATA, at time of accident; ATD, at time of diagnosis. Boxes in panel A define the interquartile range (IQR), which is bound by upper (0.75) and lower (0.25) quartiles; whiskers extend to include adjacent values that are 1.5 × IQR above and below the IQR
FIG. 2. Distribution of genomic distances between adjacent pairs of recurrent gains in tumors. Bryansk tumor (young and adult ATA) and Seattle tumor (young ATD) distributions are shown for intervals up to 3 Mbp. Frequencies of occurrence are normalized to the total number of gains in each respective group. Each distribution is non-random (P < 0.001) by permutation analysis. P values for comparison of median adjacent intervals show that only Bryansk young tumor gains differ significantly from Bryansk adults and Seattle young. ATA: at time of accident; ATD, at time of diagnosis
FIG. 3. Recurrent gain clusters in radiation-associated thyroid tumors. Size (genomic span) distributions of recurrent gain clusters are shown for all Bryansk tissue (panels A–C) and Seattle tumors, young ATD (panel D). Loci within these clusters are mapped to chromosomal ideograms (panel E) by color-coded, horizontal lines whose length is proportional to log2(fluorescence ratio). Centromeres are plotted as points. Gray scale simulates G-bands [Golden Path cytoBand. txt (44)]. Y-chromosome genes are removed from this analysis. FR, fluorescence ratio; ATA, at time of accident; ATD, at time of diagnosis
FIG. 4. DNA copy number gains and losses in non-tumor thyroid. Box plots show (panel A) total (random plus recurrent) gains (FR > 1.72) in Bryansk and Seattle non-tumor thyroid for adult cases and (panel B) total losses (FR < 0.48) in adult cases. The distributions of recurrent gains (panel C) and recurrent losses (panel D) are shown for each non-tumor group. FR, fluorescence ratio; SD, standard deviation; ATA, at time of accident; ATD, at time of diagnosis
FIG. 5. Differential PCR confirmation of adrenomedullin (ADM, GenBank accession no. AA446120) and aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP, GenBank accession no. AA454926) gene amplification in post-Chernobyl thyroid carcinoma. Normal human genomic DNA (N) and genomic tumor DNA (T) were templates in differential PCR (41). Experimental (Expt.)/Control are the ratios of band intensities within a lane. Fold Tumor vs. Normal are the fold changes for Expt./ Normal ratios in tumor DNA compared to normal DNA. Inset shows that MYC out-competes the control gene in HL60 (right lane) but not in normal DNA (left lane). Lanes 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 9 show the PCR products of the individual primer sets for IFNG (diploid control), ADM or AIP, using either normal (N) or tumor (T) DNA template, as indicated. These show that PCR amplification is robust in the absence of competition between primers for template. Lanes 3 and 6 for ADM (lanes 8 and 10 for AIP) show PCR products of the primer set pairs in competition with normal or tumor template, respectively. The band intensity ratios (lanes 3 and 8, or 6 and 10) for the experimental gene and IFNG control for PCR efficiency. “Tumor/Normal” is an estimated fold copy number of 2.1 for ADM (4.7 for AIP) relative to normal, (tumor ratio)/(normal ratio) in each case
Annotated lists of recurrent gains and losses for all tissue groups are available online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR0547.1.s1, http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR0547.1.s2, http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR0547.1.s3, http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR0547.1.s4,http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR0547.1.s5, http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR0547.1.s6,http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR0547.1.s7, http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR0547.1.s8, http://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR0547.1.s9, andhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1667/RR0547.1.s10.
Cited by
Online publication date: 1-May-2009.
CrossRef
Online publication date: 1-Mar-2008.
Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (464 KB) : Rights & Permissions
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007.
Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (518 KB) : Rights & Permissions





