Radiation Research

Published by: Radiation Research Society



Radiation Research 166(3):519-531. 2006
doi: 10.1667/RR0547.1

Microarray Comparative Genomic Hybridization Reveals Genome-Wide Patterns of DNA Gains and Losses in Post-Chernobyl Thyroid Cancer

Robert R. Kimmel1a, Lue Ping Zhaoc, Doan Nguyenb, Somnit Leeb, Mark Aronszajnd, Chun Chengc, Vladislav P. Troshine, Alexander Abrosimovf, Jeffrey Delrowb, R. Michael Tuttleg, Anatoli F. Tsybf, Kenneth J. Kopeckyc, Scott Davisch, and Paul E. Neimanbi

aClinical Research Division,

bDivision of Basic Science,

cDivision of Public Health Sciences,

dBiocomputing Shared Resources, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle, Washington;

eInstitute of Pathology, Bryansk, Russian Federation;

fRussian Academy of Medical Science, Medical Radiological Research Center, Obninsk, Russian Federation;

gDivision of Endocrinology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York;

hDepartment of Epidemiology, School of Public Health and Community Medicine, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington; and

iDepartment of Medicine, University of Washington School of Medicine, Seattle, Washington

1Address for correspondence: 1100 Fairview Avenue North, C2-023, Seattle, WA 98109;

Abstract

Kimmel, R. R., Zhao, L. P., Nguyen, D., Lee, S., Aronszajn, M., Cheng, C., Troshin, V. P., Abrosimov, A., Delrow, J., Tuttle, R. M., Tsyb, A. F., Kopecky, K. J., Davis, S. and Neiman, P. E. Microarray Comparative Genomic Hybridization Reveals Genome-Wide Patterns of DNA Gains and Losses in Post-Chernobyl Thyroid Cancer. Radiat. Res. 166, 519–531 (2006).

Genetic gains and losses resulting from DNA strand breakage by ionizing radiation have been demonstrated in vitro and suspected in radiation-associated thyroid cancer. We hypothesized that copy number deviations might be more prevalent, and/or occur in genomic patterns, in tumors associated with presumptive DNA strand breakage from radiation exposure than in their spontaneous counterparts. We used cDNA microarray-based comparative genome hybridization to obtain genome-wide, high-resolution copy number profiles at 14,573 genomic loci in 23 post-Chernobyl and 20 spontaneous thyroid cancers. The prevalence of DNA gains in tumors from cases in exposed individuals was two- to fourfold higher than for cases in unexposed individuals and up to 10-fold higher for the subset of recurrent gains. DNA losses for all cases were low and more prevalent in spontaneous cases. We identified unique patterns of copy variation (mostly gains) that depended on a history of radiation exposure. Exposed cases, especially the young, harbored more recurrent gains that covered more of the genome. The largest regions, spanning 1.2 to 4.9 Mbp, were located at 1p36.32-.33, 2p23.2-.3, 3p21.1-.31, 6p22.1-.2, 7q36.1, 8q24.3, 9q34.11, 9q34.3, 11p15.5, 11q13.2-12.3, 14q32.33, 16p13.3, 16p11.2, 16q21-q12.2, 17q25.1, 19p13.31-qter, 22q11.21 and 22q13.2. Copy number changes, particularly gains, in post-Chernobyl thyroid cancer are influenced by radiation exposure and age at exposure, in addition to the neoplastic process.

Received: January 17, 2006; Accepted: April 21, 2006



REFERENCES

Brodeur, G. and M. Hogarty. Gene amplification in human cancers: biological and clinical significance. In The Genetic Basis of Human Cancer (B. Vogelstein and K. Kinzler, Eds.), pp. 161–172. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1998.
Windle, B., B. W. Draper, Y. X. Yin, S. O'Gorman, and G. M. Wahl. A central role for chromosome breakage in gene amplification, deletion formation, and amplicon integration. Genes Dev 5:160174.1991. CrossRef, PubMed
Pipiras, E., A. Coquelle, A. Bieth, and M. Debatisse. Interstitial deletions and intrachromosomal amplification initiated from a double-strand break targeted to a mammalian chromosome. EMBO J 17:325333.1998). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Sankaranarayanan, K. and J. S. Wassom. Ionizing radiation and genetic risks XIV. Potential research directions in the post-genome era based on knowledge of repair of radiation-induced DNA double-strand breaks in mammalian somatic cells and the origin of deletions associated with human genomic disorders. Mutat. Res 578:333370.2005. PubMed
Hahn, P., B. Nevaldine, and W. F. Morgan. X-ray induction of methotrexate resistance due to dhfr gene amplification. Somat. Cell. Mol. Genet 16:413423.1990). CrossRef, PubMed
Coquelle, A., E. Pipiras, F. Toledo, G. Buttin, and M. Debatisse. Expression of fragile sites triggers intrachromosomal mammalian gene amplification and sets boundaries to early amplicons. Cell 89:215225.1997). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Coquelle, A., F. Toledo, S. Stern, A. Bieth, and M. Debatisse. A new role for hypoxia in tumor progression: Induction of fragile site triggering genomic rearrangements and formation of complex DMs and HSRs. Mol. Cell 2:259265.1998). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Goldberg, Z. Clinical implications of radiation-induced genomic instability. Oncogene 22:70117017.2003). CrossRef, PubMed
Shore, R. E. Issues and epidemiological evidence regarding radiation-induced thyroid cancer. Radiat. Res 131:98111.1992). CrossRef, PubMed
Ron, E., J. H. Lubin, R. E. Shore, K. Mabuchi, B. Modan, L. M. Pottern, A. B. Schneider, M. A. Tucker, and J. D. Boice Jr.. Thyroid cancer after exposure to external radiation: A pooled analysis of seven studies. Radiat. Res 141:259277.1995). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Astakhova, L. N., L. R. Anspaugh, G. W. Beebe, A. Bouville, V. V. Drozdovitch, V. Garber, Y. I. Gavrilin, V. T. Khrouch, A. V. Kuvshinnikov, and Y. N. Kuzmenkov. Chernobyl-related thyroid cancer in children of Belarus: A case-control study. Radiat. Res 150:349356.1998. CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Nikiforov, Y. and D. R. Gnepp. Pediatric thyroid cancer after the Chernobyl disaster. Pathomorphologic study of 84 cases (1991–1992) from the Republic of Belarus. Cancer 74:748766.1994). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Richter, H., H. Braselmann, L. Hieber, G. Thomas, T. Bogdanova, N. Tronko, and H. Zitzelsberger. Chromosomal imbalances in post-Chernobyl thyroid tumors. Thyroid 14:10611064.2004). CrossRef, PubMed
Chen, X., J. A. Knauf, R. Gonsky, M. Wang, E. H. Lai, S. Chissoe, J. A. Fagin, and J. R. Korenberg. From amplification to gene in thyroid cancer: A high-resolution mapped bacterial-artificial-chromosome resource for cancer chromosome aberrations guides gene discovery after comparative genome hybridization. Am. J. Hum. Genet 63:625637.1998). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Namba, H., R. A. Gutman, K. Matsuo, A. Alvarez, and J. A. Fagin. H-ras protooncogene mutations in human thyroid neoplasms. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 71:223229.1990). PubMed, CSA
Hemmer, S., V. M. Wasenius, S. Knuutila, K. Franssila, and H. Joensuu. DNA copy number changes in thyroid carcinoma. Am. J. Pathol 154:15391547.1999). PubMed
Ward, L. S., G. Brenta, M. Medvedovic, and J. A. Fagin. Studies of allelic loss in thyroid tumors reveal major differences in chromosomal instability between papillary and follicular carcinomas. J. Clin. Endocrinol. Metab 83:525530.1998). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Kitamura, Y., K. Shimizu, S. Tanaka, K. Ito, and M. Emi. Association of allelic loss on 1q, 4p, 7q, 9p, 9q, and 16q with postoperative death in papillary thyroid carcinoma. Clin. Cancer Res 6:18191825.2000. PubMed
Pollack, J. R., C. M. Perou, A. A. Alizadeh, M. B. Eisen, A. Pergamenschikov, C. F. Williams, S. S. Jeffrey, D. Botstein, and P. O. Brown. Genome-wide analysis of DNA copy-number changes using cDNA microarrays. Nat. Genet 23:4146.1999). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Pollack, J. R., T. Sorlie, C. M. Perou, C. A. Rees, S. S. Jeffrey, P. E. Lonning, R. Tibshirani, D. Botstein, A. L. Borresen-Dale, and P. O. Brown. Microarray analysis reveals a major direct role of DNA copy number alteration in the transcriptional program of human breast tumors. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:1296312968.2002). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Wolf, M., S. Mousses, S. Hautaniemi, R. Karhu, P. Huusko, M. Allinen, A. Elkahloun, O. Monni, Y. Chen, and A. Kallioniemi. High-resolution analysis of gene copy number alterations in human prostate cancer using CGH on cDNA microarrays: impact of copy number on gene expression. Neoplasia 6:240247.2004). CrossRef, PubMed
Cheng, C., R. Kimmel, P. Neiman, and L. P. Zhao. Array rank order regression analysis for the detection of gene copy-number changes in human cancer. Genomics 82:122129.2003). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Kadota, M., Y. Tamaki, I. Sakita, Y. Komoike, M. Miyazaki, M. Ooka, N. Masuda, Y. Fujiwara, T. Ohnishi, and M. Monden. Identification of a 7-cM region of frequent allelic loss on chromosome band 16p13.3 that is specifically associated with anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. Oncol. Rep 7:529533.2000). PubMed, CSA
Barrios, L., R. Miro, M. R. Caballin, C. Fuster, F. Guedea, A. Subias, and J. Egozcue. Cytogenetic effects of radiotherapy. Breakpoint distribution in induced chromosome aberrations. Cancer Genet. Cytogenet 41:6170.1989). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Ilyinskikh, N. N., I. N. Ilyinskikh, and E. N. Ilyinskikh. Chromosome breakage at sites of oncogenes in a population accidentally exposed to radioactive chemical pollution. Mutagenesis 14:8386.1999). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Reiter, J. L. and G. M. Brodeur. High-resolution mapping of a 130-kb core region of the MYCN amplicon in neuroblastomas. Genomics 32:97103.1996). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Reifenberger, G., K. Ichimura, J. Reifenberger, A. G. Elkahloun, P. S. Meltzer, and V. P. Collins. Refined mapping of 12q13-q15 amplicons in human malignant gliomas suggests CDK4/SAS and MDM2 as independent amplification targets. Cancer Res 56:51415145.1996. PubMed, CSA
Courjal, F., M. Cuny, J. Simony-Lafontaine, G. Louason, P. Speiser, R. Zeillinger, C. Rodriguez, and C. Theillet. Mapping of DNA amplifications at 15 chromosomal localizations in 1875 breast tumors: Definition of phenotypic groups. Cancer Res 57:43604367.1997). PubMed, CSA
Prise, K. M., M. Pinto, H. C. Newman, and B. D. Michael. A review of studies of ionizing radiation-induced double-strand break clustering. Radiat. Res 156:572576.2001). Abstract, PubMed, CSA
Tanaka, H., S. J. Tapscott, B. J. Trask, and M. C. Yao. Short inverted repeats initiate gene amplification through the formation of a large DNA palindrome in mammalian cells. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99:87728777.2002). PubMed, CSA
Maley, C. C. and B. J. Reid. Natural selection in neoplastic progression of Barrett's esophagus. Semin. Cancer Biol 15:474483.2005). CrossRef, PubMed
Nikiforov, Y., M. N. Nikiforova, D. R. Gnepp, and J. A. Fagin. Prevalence of mutations of ras and p53 in benign and malignant thyroid tumors from children exposed to radiation after the Chernobyl nuclear accident. Oncogene 13:687693.1996). PubMed, CSA
Suchy, B., V. Waldmann, S. Klugbauer, and H. M. Rabes. Absence of RAS and p53 mutations in thyroid carcinomas of children after Chernobyl in contrast to adult thyroid tumours. Br. J. Cancer 77:952955.1998). PubMed, CSA
Sebat, J., B. Lakshmi, J. Troge, J. Alexander, J. Young, P. Lundin, S. Maner, H. Massa, M. Walker, and M. Chi. Large-scale copy number polymorphism in the human genome. Science 305:525528.2004). CrossRef, PubMed
Davis, S., V. Stepanenko, N. Rivkind, K. J. Kopecky, P. Voilleque, V. Shakhtarin, E. Parshkov, S. Kulikov, E. Lushnikov, and A. Abrosimov. Risk of thyroid cancer in the Bryansk Oblast of the Russian Federation after the Chernobyl Power Station accident. Radiat. Res 162:241248.2004). Abstract, PubMed
Malyapa, R. S., C. Bi, E. W. Ahern, and J. L. Roti Roti. Detection of DNA damage by the alkaline comet assay after exposure to low-dose gamma radiation. Radiat. Res 149:396400.1998). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Plappert, U., K. Raddatz, S. Roth, and T. M. Fliedner. DNA-damage detection in man after radiation exposure—the comet assay—its possible application for human biomonitoring. Stem Cells 13:(Suppl. 1),. 215222.1995). CrossRef, PubMed
Brooks, A. L. Paradigm shifts in radiation biology: Their impact on intervention for radiation-induced disease. Radiat. Res 164:454461.2005. Abstract, PubMed
Stepanenko, V. F., P. G. Voilleque, Y. I. Gavrilin, V. T. Khrouch, S. M. Shinkarev, M. Y. Orlov, A. I. Kondrashov, D. V. Petin, E. K. Iaskova, and A. F. Tsyb. Estimating individual thyroid doses for a case-control study of childhood thyroid cancer in Bryansk Oblast, Russia. Radiat. Prot. Dosim 108:143160.2004). CrossRef, PubMed
DeRisi, J. L., V. R. Iyer, and P. O. Brown. Exploring the metabolic and genetic control of gene expression on a genomic scale. Science 278:680686.1997). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Frye, R. A., C. C. Benz, and E. Liu. Detection of amplified oncogenes by differential polymerase chain reaction. Oncogene 4:11531157.1989. PubMed
Efron, B. and R. J. Tibshirani. An Introduction to the Bootstrap. Chapman and Hall, New York, 1993.
Hochberg, Y. A sharper Bonferroni procedure for multiple tests of significance. Biometrika 18:800802.1988). CrossRef
Kent, W. J., C. W. Sugnet, T. S. Furey, K. M. Roskin, T. H. Pringle, A. M. Zahler, and D. Haussler. The human genome browser at UCSC. Genome Res 12:9961006.2002). PubMed, CSA
Mangano, R., E. Piddini, L. Carramusa, T. Duhig, S. Feo, and M. Fried. Chimeric amplicons containing the c-myc gene in HL60 cells. Oncogene 17:27712777.1998). CrossRef, PubMed, CSA

FIG. 1. Prevalence of copy number gains and losses in Bryansk and Seattle thyroid tumors. Box plots show (panel A) total (random plus recurrent) gains (FR > 1.72) in Bryansk and Seattle tumors for young and adult cases and (panel B) total losses (FR < 0.48) for young and adult cases. “Mean” refers to average for replicates. See text for significant P values for the differences between means. The distributions of (panel C) recurrent gains and (panel D) recurrent losses are shown for each tumor group. FR, fluorescence ratio; ATA, at time of accident; ATD, at time of diagnosis. Boxes in panel A define the interquartile range (IQR), which is bound by upper (0.75) and lower (0.25) quartiles; whiskers extend to include adjacent values that are 1.5 × IQR above and below the IQR

FIG. 2. Distribution of genomic distances between adjacent pairs of recurrent gains in tumors. Bryansk tumor (young and adult ATA) and Seattle tumor (young ATD) distributions are shown for intervals up to 3 Mbp. Frequencies of occurrence are normalized to the total number of gains in each respective group. Each distribution is non-random (P < 0.001) by permutation analysis. P values for comparison of median adjacent intervals show that only Bryansk young tumor gains differ significantly from Bryansk adults and Seattle young. ATA: at time of accident; ATD, at time of diagnosis

FIG. 3. Recurrent gain clusters in radiation-associated thyroid tumors. Size (genomic span) distributions of recurrent gain clusters are shown for all Bryansk tissue (panels A–C) and Seattle tumors, young ATD (panel D). Loci within these clusters are mapped to chromosomal ideograms (panel E) by color-coded, horizontal lines whose length is proportional to log2(fluorescence ratio). Centromeres are plotted as points. Gray scale simulates G-bands [Golden Path cytoBand. txt (44)]. Y-chromosome genes are removed from this analysis. FR, fluorescence ratio; ATA, at time of accident; ATD, at time of diagnosis

FIG. 4. DNA copy number gains and losses in non-tumor thyroid. Box plots show (panel A) total (random plus recurrent) gains (FR > 1.72) in Bryansk and Seattle non-tumor thyroid for adult cases and (panel B) total losses (FR < 0.48) in adult cases. The distributions of recurrent gains (panel C) and recurrent losses (panel D) are shown for each non-tumor group. FR, fluorescence ratio; SD, standard deviation; ATA, at time of accident; ATD, at time of diagnosis

FIG. 5. Differential PCR confirmation of adrenomedullin (ADM, GenBank accession no. AA446120) and aryl hydrocarbon receptor-interacting protein (AIP, GenBank accession no. AA454926) gene amplification in post-Chernobyl thyroid carcinoma. Normal human genomic DNA (N) and genomic tumor DNA (T) were templates in differential PCR (41). Experimental (Expt.)/Control are the ratios of band intensities within a lane. Fold Tumor vs. Normal are the fold changes for Expt./ Normal ratios in tumor DNA compared to normal DNA. Inset shows that MYC out-competes the control gene in HL60 (right lane) but not in normal DNA (left lane). Lanes 1, 2, 4, 5, 7 and 9 show the PCR products of the individual primer sets for IFNG (diploid control), ADM or AIP, using either normal (N) or tumor (T) DNA template, as indicated. These show that PCR amplification is robust in the absence of competition between primers for template. Lanes 3 and 6 for ADM (lanes 8 and 10 for AIP) show PCR products of the primer set pairs in competition with normal or tumor template, respectively. The band intensity ratios (lanes 3 and 8, or 6 and 10) for the experimental gene and IFNG control for PCR efficiency. “Tumor/Normal” is an estimated fold copy number of 2.1 for ADM (4.7 for AIP) relative to normal, (tumor ratio)/(normal ratio) in each case

table

TABLE 1 Distribution of Thyroid Cancer Cases by Gender and Age

table

TABLE 2 Distribution of Tumor and Nodal Stagea for Thyroid Cancer Cases

table

TABLE 3 Age-Specific Recurrent DNA Copy Changes in Thyroid Cancer from Radiation-Exposed and Spontaneous Cases

table

TABLE 3 Continued

Cited by

Jiong Bi, Sze-Hang Lau, Liang Hu, Hui-Lan Rao, Hai-Bo Liu, Wen-Hua Zhan, Gong Chen, Jian-Ming Wen, Qian Wang, Bin Li, Xin-Yuan Guan. (2009) Downregulation of ZIP kinase is associated with tumor invasion, metastasis and poor prognosis in gastric cancer. International Journal of Cancer 124:7, 1587-1593
Online publication date: 1-May-2009.
CrossRef
Robert R. Kimmel, Shivali Agnani, Yin Yang, Robert Jordan, Jeffrey L. Schwartz. (2008) DNA Copy-Number Instability in Low-Dose Gamma-Irradiated TK6 Lymphoblastoid Clones. Radiation Research 169:3, 259-269
Online publication date: 1-Mar-2008.

Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (464 KB) : Rights & Permissions 

M. Port, C. Boltze, Y. Wang, B. Röper, V. Meineke, M. Abend. (2007) A Radiation-Induced Gene Signature Distinguishes Post-Chernobyl from Sporadic Papillary Thyroid Cancers. Radiation Research 168:6, 639-649
Online publication date: 1-Dec-2007.

Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (518 KB) : Rights & Permissions 

 
BioOne is the product of innovative collaboration between scientific societies, libraries, academe and the private sector.
 
21 Dupont Circle NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036 • Phone 202.296.2296 • Fax 202.872.0884
 
Copyright © 2009 BioOne All rights reserved