Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 April 2012 Our View
K. Neil Harker, John T. O'Donovan, Robert E. Blackshaw, Hugh J. Beckie, C Mallory-Smith, Bruce D. Maxwell
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

Perhaps the incidence and impact of glyphosate-resistant weed species are now great enough that real solutions to glyphosate resistance can be discussed without much backlash. It is clear to most weed scientists who are involved in herbicide research, and even those who are not, that the best way to reduce selection pressure for herbicide resistance is to minimize herbicide use. However, the “solutions” that have emerged in most recent meetings on herbicide resistance have usually involved more herbicide use—herbicide rotation, tank-mixtures, PRE- followed by POST-herbicides, “right-rates,” etc. To an unbiased observer, it would appear that many weed emperors are wearing no clothes. Are we as a weed science discipline choosing to ignore true integrated solutions to the herbicide resistance problem?

Weed Science Society of America
K. Neil Harker, John T. O'Donovan, Robert E. Blackshaw, Hugh J. Beckie, C Mallory-Smith, and Bruce D. Maxwell "Our View," Weed Science 60(2), 143-144, (1 April 2012). https://doi.org/10.1614/WS-D-11-00177.1
Received: 20 October 2011; Accepted: 1 November 2011; Published: 1 April 2012
Back to Top