Journal of Economic Entomology

Published by: Entomological Society of America



Journal of Economic Entomology 100(2):315-321. 2007
doi: 10.1603/0022-0493(2007)100[315:AOROIO]2.0.CO;2

Assessment of Risk of Introduction of Cylas formicarius elegantulus (Coleoptera: Brentidae) into Weevil-Free Areas in the Southern United States

Abraham Addo-Bediako12, Baharnu Tameru3, Louis E. N. Jackai4, and Conrad K. Bonsi4

1UNIFY Program, University of Limpopo, Sovenga 0727, South Africa.

2Corresponding author, e-mail: .

3Center for Computational Epidemiology, College of Veterinary Medicine, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL 36088.

4GWCAES and Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Tuskegee University, Tuskegee, AL 36088.

Abstract

We assessed the risk associated with introduction of sweet potato weevil, Cylas formicarius elegantulus (Summers) (Coleoptera: Brentidae), from infested areas to noninfested areas via shipment of sweet potato, Ipomoea batatas (L.), roots within the southern United States. Our study quantifies the effectiveness of risk mitigation procedures of sweet potatoes before shipment in relation to introduction of the weevil. The risk assessment relied on literature and expert information to determine appropriate parameters. Using a computational model, Monte Carlo simulations were conducted to estimate the likelihood of introduction of sweet potato weevil. Risk management options were incorporated and the risk analyses were performed to assess how the risk could be reduced. The study found the risk of introduction of the weevil for both domestic shipment and imports of sweet potatoes into new areas within the southern United States to be low. Sensitivity analysis was performed to assess model stability and the impact of parameter changes. Based on the sensitivity analysis, the most critical input was the postharvest mitigation, followed by the number of weevils per ton of sweet potatoes. We concluded that maintaining mitigations with monitoring in conjunction with public education to stop illegal transport of sweet potatoes and alternate hosts would significantly reduce the risk of introduction.

Received: June 22, 2006; Accepted: December 4, 2006

[AMS] Agricultural Marketing Service. Arrivals of fresh sweet potatoes in selected US cities by major shipping states from 1985–1998 1999. AMS–U.S. Dep. Agric.. Washington, DC.
[AMS] Agricultural Marketing Service. Importation of sweet potatoes and countries of origin (2000–2004) 2005. AMS–U.S. Dep. Agric.. Washington, DC.
Auclair, A. N D., G. Fowler, M. K. Hennessey, A. T. Hogue, M. Keena, D. R. Lance, R. M. McDowell, D. O. Oryang, and A. J. Sawyer. Assessment of the risk of introduction of Anoplophora glabripennis (Coeleoptera: Cerambycidae) in municipal solid waste from the quarantine area of New York city to landfills outside of the quarantine area: a pathway analysis of the risk of spread and establishment. J. Econ. Entomol. 98:2005. 4760. Abstract, PubMed
Cathey, H. M. U.S. Dep. Agric. Plant hardiness map 1990. USDA–ARS Misc. Publ. No. 1475.
Chalfant, R. B., R. K. Jansson, D. R. Seal, and J. M. Shalk. Ecology and management of sweet potato insects. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 35:1990. 157180. CrossRef
[DAFF] Australian Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. 2003. RiskAMP. (http://riskamp.com/library/pertdistribution.php).
Edmond, J. B. and G. R. Ammerman. Sweet potatoes: production, processing, and marketing 1971. Avi. Westport, CT.
[ERS] Agriculture Economic Research. 2002. Commodity highlight: sweet potatoes, vegetables, and melons outlook. (http://usda.mannlib.cornell.edu/reports/erssor/specialty/vgs-bb/2002/vgs290.pdf).
Hallman, G. Zapping sweet potato weevils. ARS News Service, USDA April :2003. 11.
[ISAAA] International Service for the Acquisition of Agri-biotech Applications. 2003. Sweet potato. (http://www.isaaa.org/africenter/html/sweetpotatoes.htm).
[NAPIS]. National Agricultural Pest Information System. 2000. Status of sweet potato weevil in United States. (http://www.ceris.purdue.edu/napis/states).
Newell, W. Sweet potato root weevil. Fla. State Plant Board Q. Bull. 2:1917. 81100.
Nilakhe, S. S. Quarantine programs for Cylas formicarius in the United States. Jansson, R. K. and K. V. Raman, editors. Sweet potato pest management—a global perspective 1991. 247262.Westview Press. Boulder, CO.
Nottingham, S. F., K. C. Son, D. D. Wilson, R. F. Severson, and S. J. Kays. Feeding by adult sweet potato weevils, Cylas formicarius elegantulus, on sweet potato leaves. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 48:1988. 157163. CrossRef, CSA
Palisade Corporation. @Risk 4.5 2003. Palisade Corporation. Newfield, NY.
Sorensen, K. A. Cultural, regulational and educational programmes on the sweet potato weevil in the United States. Insect Sci. Appl. 8:1987. 825830.
[USDA] U.S. Dep. Agric. 2005. United States standards for grades of sweet potatoes. (http://www.ams.usda.gov/standards/sweetpotnew.pdf).
Vail, P. V., J. S. Tebbets, B. E. Mackey, and C. E. Curtis. Quarantine treatments: a biological approach to decision-making for selected hosts of codling moth (Lepidoptera: Tortricidae). J. Econ. Entomol. 86:1993. 7075. CSA
Yasuda, K. Occurrence of West Indian sweet potato weevil Euscepes postfasciatus (Fairmaire) (Coleoptera: Curculionidae) and damage to sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas L.) fields. Jpn. J. Appl. Entomol. Zool. 41:1997. 8388.
click this button to close

Article Views

click this button to open

Citing Articles

 
BioOne is the product of innovative collaboration between scientific societies, libraries, academe and the private sector.
 
21 Dupont Circle NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036 • Phone 202.296.2296 • Fax 202.872.0884
 
Copyright © 2009 BioOne All rights reserved