Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
21 June 2018 Phylogenetic Systematics and Biogeography of the Pantropical Genus Sesbania (Leguminosae)
Frank T. Farruggia, Matt Lavin, Martin F. Wojciechowski
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

The pantropical genus Sesbania (Leguminosae) comprises approximately 85 species and 34 infraspecific taxa. This genus is unusual ecologically in its predilection for wetlands, and morphologically distinctive among legumes, yet has never been comprehensively investigated for the phylogenetic integrity of its subgeneric classification. We subjected a broad sampling of Sesbania species to phylogenetic analysis using both nuclear and plastid DNA sequence data. The resulting phylogenies support the monophyly of Sesbania and two constituent subclades, one represented by the New World endemic Sesbania sections Daubentonia, Daubentoniopsis and Glottidium, and the second comprising the pantropically distributed S. section Sesbania and former S. subgenera Pterosesbania and Agati. The species-rich S. section Sesbania is paraphyletic with respect to S. subg. Agati and Pterosesbania, while S. sect. Daubentonia is paraphyletic with respect to S. sect. Daubentoniopsis. Based on these results we revise the sectional classification of Sesbania. The genus is consistently thoughweakly supported as sister to tribe Loteae. Rate and age estimates suggest that the Sesbania crown clade has an estimated mean age of approximately 18.9 Ma. This implicates long-distance dispersal as causing the pantropical distribution of the genus. Regardless, the New World is optimized as the ancestral area for Sesbania. The prevalence of Sesbania in riparian, wetland, and coastal systems combined with low levels of geographic phylogenetic structure suggested that hydrochory and local extinction potentially explain present-day distributions.

The genus Sesbania Adanson (Papilionoideae, Leguminosae) includes approximately 85 species of trees, shrubs, and perennial or annual herbs,which are widely distributed in tropical and subtropical regions of the world. Africa and Madagascar harbor about 30 species, Asia, Australia, and Pacific islands about 16, and the Neotropics (southern USA to northern Argentina, especially North and Central America) with nine species. About five species are pantropical in distribution (Evans 1990; Lavin and Schrire 2005). Species of Sesbania are widely used and cultivated in agroforestry for soil improvement as green manures and other products (Evans 1990; Giller 2001; Bruning et al. 2015). The broad economic importance of Sesbania, especially in Africa andAsia, includes their use as shade plants, windbreaks, cover crops, ornamentals, fish poisons (e.g. source of isoflavones), fiber sources, construction materials, and food for both humans and livestock (Gillett 1963). Sesbania flowers and seeds also contain compounds that reduce anti-tumor activity (e.g. Powell et al. 1976; Laladhas et al. 2010). Several species have been shown to be very effective at bioremediation of lead, zinc, and copper from industrial waste sites and other contaminated soils (Barlow et al. 2000; Qureshi et al. 2002; Yang et al. 2003; Branzini et al. 2012).

Sesbania possesses several features that are distinctive among legumes, and combines morphologies that individually or in combination are atypical among papilionoids. For example, cytogenetically the genus is unique among tropical papilionoids in having a base chromosome number of six (Gillett 1963). The most unusual morphology of Sesbania is the evenpinnate (paripinnate) leaf, in which the strictly opposite leaflets fold forward during the night, a nyctinastic movement more like that found in dalbergioid and many non-papilionoid legumes, especially the “mimosoid” legumes (= Mimosoid clade of subfamily Caesalpinioideae; LPWG 2017). Although studies have revealed a diversity of nyctinastic movements within and among legume genera (e.g. Satter et al. 1988; Roblin et al. 1989; Luckow 1993; Hughes 1998), variation in nyctinasty is highly taxonomically correlated (e.g. Lavin 1988).

There is considerable variation among the fruits of Sesbania (Fig. 1), which has served as the basis for the subgeneric classification of Sesbania (Table 1; Rydberg 1923; Gillett 1963; Hutchinson 1964; Lavin and Sousa S. 1995). The fruits take on four forms: 1) tardily dehiscent, linear, and many-seeded (e.g. S. sect. Sesbania, Fig. 1E–H, L); 2) tardily dehiscent, torulose, and few- to several-seeded (S. sect. Daubentoniopsis (Rydb.) Lavin, Fig. 1B); 3) tardily dehiscent, bladdery-inflated, and 2-seeded (S. sect. Glottidium (Desv.) Lavin, Fig. 1A); and 4) sometimes indehiscent, quadrangular to 4-winged, and severalseeded (S. sect. Daubentonia (DC.) Benth., Fig. 1C–D, I–K).

Also in contrast to most legumes, at least one species of Sesbania forms nodules for symbiotic nitrogen fixation on both belowground roots and laterally on aboveground stems (e.g. Goormachtig et al. 1998). In Sesbania rostrata Bremek. & Oberm., these “stem nodules” are associated with junctions at the bases of lateral roots or adventitious roots, and the rhizobia enter the host plant shoot via cracks in the epidermis that arise from protrusion of lateral and adventitious roots (James et al. 1992; Goormachtig et al. 1998, 2004b; Bomfeti et al. 2013). Stem nodulation in S. rostrata is facultative and differs from the more typical form of root nodulation and occurs in plants with nonsubmerged or well-aerated roots (Goormachtig et al. 2004b). That this facultative form of nodulation is also found in aquatic species of the distantly related genera Aeschynomene L. (Loureiro et al. 1995; Chaintreuil et al. 2013) and Neptunia Lour. (James et al. 1992), both wetlands-inhabiting legumes, suggests that the underlying processes could be more widespread in legumes (Goormachtig et al. 2004a).

The ecological predilection of most Sesbania species for either riparian or wetland habitats (Evans 1990) is quite unusual compared to the mostly dry-site inhabiting members of the legume family (Schrire et al. 2005a, b), and especially compared to its closest relatives (tribes Loteae and Robinieae). Many Sesbania are well adapted to fluctuations in soil moisture and are tolerant of both drought and waterlogged conditions. Under flooded conditions, most species form floating roots and produce a surrounding thick layer of spongy aerenchyma to protect stems, roots, and root nodules. This tissue ensures the support and survival of nodulating rhizobial symbionts even when roots are temporarily submerged (Evans 1990).

Fig. 1.

Legume diversity within Sesbania. A. Sesbania vesicaria. B. S. cavanillesii. C. S. drummondii. D. S. macroptera. E. S. herbacea. F. S. grandiflora. G. S. exasperata. H. S. bispinosa. I–L. Cross-sections of Sesbania fruits. I. S. virgata fruit showing thickened mesocarp layer (*). J. S. punicea fruit showing prominent four wings, and thickened mesocarp. K. S. macroptera fruit showing prominent and contorted four wings. L. S. herbacea fruit showing typical morphology of sect. Sesbania taxa. Note lack of thickened mesocarp and lack of wings. M. S. herbacea calli on base of banner petal, and auricle on upper margin of keel and wing petals. Scale bars: A–H = 1 cm; I–M = 0.5 cm.

f01_414.jpg

Perhaps because of this preference for wet habitats, Sesbania includes some species with pantropical or transoceanic distributions. Such species distributions are never observed in legume groups like Loteae and Robinieae, which typically inhabit semi-arid vegetation and commonly show highly localized species distributions (Allan and Porter 2000; Duno de Stefano et al. 2010; Pennington et al. 2011; Queiroz and Lavin 2011). Few if any species of Loteae and Robinieae are widespread, and no individual species naturally occurs on different continents separated by open water, excepting islands adjacent to a mainland (e.g. Canary Islands), while species selected at random from Loteae or Robinieae are very likely to find their sister species in the same region, much more than would be predicted for Sesbania. This preference of Sesbania for seasonally flooded riverine and waterlogged sites suggests that transoceanic clades would have an average age that is younger than transcontinental crown clades of Loteae and Robinieae and that the Sesbania phylogeny should show less geographic phylogenetic structure compared to the phylogenies of Loteae and Robinieae (Lavin et al. 2004; Pennington et al. 2009; Pennington and Lavin 2016).

This study represents the first attempt to comprehensively sample the diversity of Sesbania worldwide to resolve its phylogenetic relationships in the context of its closest relatives (Lavin and Schrire 2005). This analysis is intended to improve our understanding of phylogenetic relationships within the genus, and to provide a phylogenetic framework for the subgeneric classification and subsequent revision of the New World species of Sesbania (Farruggia et al. in prep.). In addition, molecular phylogenetic analyses are used to estimate the ages of major subclades of the genus and infer a biogeographical history that can be compared to the patterns found in Loteae and Robinieae.

Materials and Methods

Taxonomic Sampling—Molecular sequence data were sampled from 48 species of Sesbania, as well as a broad representation of species from the Robinieae, Loteae, and the Inverted Repeat Lacking Clade (“IRLC”; Wojciechowski et al. 2004). Sesbania specimens from the following herbaria (A,ASU, B, BM, CTES, E, F, FLAS, G, GH, HAO, K, L, LL, MA, MEXU, MO, MU, NY, P, QCA, QCNE, RB, SI, TEX, UNR, US, USM, W, and WAG; Thiers 2017) represented the main source of data for this study (see Farruggia 2009). New voucher specimens and genomic DNAs are deposited primarily at ASU and the principal herbarium in the country of origin if other than USA (e.g. K). Species taxonomy follows that of Lavin and Sousa S. (1995) and Farruggia (2009).

DNA Sequence Data—Previous molecular phylogenetic studies that have included representatives of Sesbania and closely related taxa (i.e. Loteae, Robinieae, and genera of the IRLC; Lavin et al. 2003; Wojciechowski et al. 2004) have shown that high quality DNA is easily extracted from herbarium specimens and amenable to PCR amplification for the markers used in this study. In addition to sampling herbarium specimens (e.g.DNA samples from Old World taxa were all obtained from herbarium sheets), field collections targeting the principal diversity of Sesbania in the New World were made in the southeastern USA (North Carolina, South Carolina, Georgia, Florida) and northeastern Argentina. Genomic DNAs were extracted using Qiagen DNeasy kits (Valencia, California) as per the manufacturer's instructions.

Table 1.

List of Sesbania species used in this study, showing membership in traditional classification sensu Rydberg (1923), Gillett (1963), Burbidge (1965), Sachet (1987), and current sectional classification as revised here in brackets. Native geographic distributions indicated.

t01_414.gif

DNA sequence analyses included the plastid trnK intron-matK gene (Hu et al. 2000) and the trnG-trnS (Shaw et al. 2005) regions, and the nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS/5.8S region (nrDNA ITS; Baldwin et al. 1995), the triosphosphate translocator gene, TRPT (Farruggia and Howard 2011), and the phosphogluconate dehydrogenase gene (Choi et al. 2006). These loci have been shown to provide excellent phylogenetic resolution compared to other plastid loci (e.g. Hu et al. 2000, 2002; Lavin et al. 2003; Luckow et al. 2003; McMahon and Hufford 2004; Wojciechowski et al. 2004; Farruggia and Howard 2011).Amplification of the TRPT locus using the Choi et al. (2006) primers involved subsequent cloning of PCR products to detect potential paralogs, which sequence analysis failed to reveal.

The nrDNA ITS region has been used extensively for phylogenetic reconstruction in flowering plants (Baldwin et al. 1995; Hershkovitz et al. 1999), especially in legumes (Amorpheae, McMahon and Hufford 2004; Astragalus L., Wojciechowski et al. 1999; Indigofereae, Schrire et al. 2009; Leucaena Benth., Hughes et al. 2003; and Wajira Thulin, Thulin et al. 2004), including the taxa that are the focus of this study, Loteae (Allan and Porter 2000; Allan et al. 2003), Robinieae (Lavin et al. 2003), and other close relatives (Sanderson and Wojciechowski 1996; Hu et al. 2002). Furthermore, nrDNA ITS sequences are effective for exhaustive taxon sampling because they are readily PCR amplified, straightforward to align for the groups of interest in this study, and contain high levels of informative variation at and below the species level (e.g. Lavin et al. 2003).

The PCR products were amplified using an annealing temperature of 55°C and sequenced directly in both the forward and reverse directions for 100% overlap. Sequence reads (and alignments) were directly examined to detect any sequence polymorphism. PCR results suggested that cloning of TRPT sequences was required for only S. drummondii (Rydb.) Cory, S. punicea (Cav.) Benth., S. macroptera Micheli, and S. virgata (Cav.) Poir. The PCR amplified products (and cloned copies of PCR products) from all molecular regions used in this study were sequenced on ABI capillary sequencers at the DNA Laboratory at Arizona State University. Primary sequence data was assembled into contigs and edited using Sequencher v. 4.0 (GeneCodes). Initial alignments were made using ClustalX (Thompson et al. 1997), then manually edited in MacClade v. 4.06 (Maddison and Maddison 2003). All new sequences have been deposited in GenBank (see Appendix 1) and final data matrices have been deposited in TreeBASE (study number S20641) and Dryad (Farruggia et al. 2018).

Phylogenetic Analyses—Relationships among the species of Sesbania and among potential sister groups were explored using phylogenetic analyses, which included accessions of all the New World taxa plus representative Old World species of Sesbania (Table 1). To account for sequence variation at the infraspecific level and to verify the monophyly of geographically disjunct species, and the pantropical distribution of many species, multiple accessions were sampled for several widespread taxa (e.g. Sesbania sesban).

Representatives of two monophyletic groups, Loteae s. l. (Allan et al. 2003), and Robinieae (Lavin et al. 2003), as well as two early branching genera of the IRLC, Caragana Fabr. and Wisteria Nutt., were designated outgroups in this study. This outgroup sampling is sufficient to test the monophyly and resolve the root of Sesbania, aswell as assess its sister group relationships (e.g. Wojciechowski et al. 2004; LPWG 2017).

Maximum parsimony (MP) and Bayesian inference methods, implemented in PAUP* (Swofford 2002) and MrBayes 3.04 (Ronquist and Huelsenbeck 2003) respectively, were used for phylogeny reconstruction. Modeltest 3.06 (Posada and Crandall 1998) was used to choose among nucleotide substitution models for each of the data sets using the AIC criterion. The MP analyses were conducted using heuristic searches with random addition sequence and TBR branch swapping options in PAUP*, saving a maximum of 10,000 trees per analysis. Clade support was estimated by non-parametric bootstrapping (Felsenstein 1985) and from Bayesian posterior probabilities (Huelsenbeck et al. 2002). Bootstrap values were derived from 1000 replicates using similar branch swapping options and one random addition per replicate. We derived posterior probabilities by running Bayesian analyses for 5,000,000 to 20,000,000 generations and sampling every 1000 to 200,000 generations and using the default 25% burn-in. This large number of generations and burn-in were consistently identified as achieving likelihood stationarity by using the convergence diagnostics implemented in the MrBayes sump function. Gene trees derived from analyses of each locus and search method were evaluated for congruence.

We have taken a relatively conservative conditional combination approach (Huelsenbeck et al. 1996) for evaluating phylogenetic congruence, which was assessed in three ways: 1) parsimony bootstrap proportions and Bayesian posterior probabilities were compared among corresponding clades on trees derived from separate analyses; 2) the parsimony-based “partition homogeneity” or “ILD” test (Farris et al. 1995), implemented in PAUP*, was used to assess heterogeneity among data sets using a p < 0.05 threshold of significance; and 3) Matrix Representation using Parsimony (MRP) was used to compare topologies obtained from traditional consensus methods (Bininda-Emonds and Bryant 1998; Baum and Ragan 2004). For the MRP analysis, the strict consensus tree of 200 Bayesian trees sampled at stationarity for each data analysis was converted to a data matrix representing taxon membership in resolved nodes (scored as 0 = not a member, 1 = member) using Mesquite v. 2.6 (Maddison and Maddison 2009). The matrices for each molecular sequence region were concatenated into a single data set. This required the addition of unknown positional relationships, coded as a “?”, when taxa were not included in the original data sets. This data set was then analyzed using the parsimony and Bayesian methods described above.

Table 2.

Taxon coverage and phylogenetic utility of complete bi-directional sequences for each DNA sequence locus. 1Total does not include subspecies or varietal level taxa. MP = Maximum Parsimony.

t02_414.gif

Biogeographic Analysis—To investigate the geographic structure within Sesbania, ages for each of the subclades of Sesbania were estimated as described below. Continental occurrences of the taxa were traced on 100 randomized trees generated in MacClade. Areas defined and taxa scored as present or absent in each area used native ranges (Table 2). Distribution of tree lengths reflected only geographic characters, which were mapped onto the phylogeny of Sesbania. The resulting randomized tree length distribution was compared with the actual tree length for the given biogeographical characters using the trace option in MacClade.

To determine the ages of transoceanic clades, penalized likelihood rate analyses (r8s; Sanderson 2002, 2003) were conducted on 200 Bayesian trees sampled at stationarity.Means and standard errors were estimated for both ages and rates of substitution for selected nodes for each of the three gene data sets, andwere calculated from three independent analyses (Lavin et al. 2005). Relative substitution rates and ageswere converted to absolute rates and ages using fossil calibrations from a previous study: a minimum age constraint derived from the Robinia L. wood fossil record (discussed in Lavin et al. 2003, 2005) was imposed on the Robinieae clade (34 Ma), and the age of the Robinioid crown clade (i.e. defined by most recent common ancestor of Robinieae, Loteae and Sesbania) was fixed at 48 MYA, as estimated by Lavin et al. (2005). A test of a clock-like rate of sequence evolution for each of the molecular sequence regions was determined using a likelihood ratio test of Felsenstein (1981) and the x2 test of the difference in likelihood scores (at the 0.05 level).

Results

Plastid trnK-matK Phylogenetic Analyses—The final trnKmatK data set contained 24 terminal Sesbania taxa, and seven outgroup taxa by 2662 total aligned characters, of which 403 were potentially parsimony-informative. All trees derived from the analyses of trnK-matK sequences resolved two principal Sesbania clades corresponding to a “New World clade” that included traditional sections Glottidium, Daubentonia, and Daubentoniopsis, and a “Pantropical clade” comprising a more broadly defined sect. Sesbania with linear fruits that includes the formerly recognized Pacific subg. Agati (Adans.) Baker and the African subg. Pterosesbania Gillett with 4-winged fruits (see revised sectional taxonomy below).

Relationships within the New World clade are mostly poorly resolved apart from the bladdery-fruited sect. Glottidium, which is the well-supported sister to the rest of the New World species. Relationships among the species of the 4-winged-fruited sect. Daubentonia, are poorly resolved and the monotypic sect. Daubentoniopsis (S. cavanillesii S. Watson (= S. longifolia (Cavanilles) DC.) with its torulose fruits is nested within it. Despite their close relationship, species of the sects. Daubentoniopsis and Daubentonia, which are very similar in regard to floral and seed morphology, habit and habitat, and geographic distribution, are very distinct in legume morphology.

The Pantropical clade comprises species with linear fruits and corresponds closely to sect. Sesbania and includes the Pacific subg. Agati, also with linear fruits, and the African subg. Pterosesbania with 4-winged fruits. A few well-resolved and well-supported subclades include a subclade containing Sesbania herbacea (Mill.) McVaugh and Sesbania sericea (Willd.) Link, two species often mistaken for each other in herbarium specimens. Another subclade is primarily Austral-Pacific in distribution and includes the widely cultivated, large-flowered tree species Sesbania grandiflora (L.) Poir., along with Sesbania brachycarpa F.Muell., Sesbania campylocarpa (Domin) N.T.Burb., and Sesbania chippendalei N.T.Burb. A third well-supported subclade includes the southeastern African Sesbania dummeri Phillips & Hutch., Sesbania goetzii Harms, Sesbania greenwayii J.B. Gillett, and the widely distributed Sesbania sesban (L.) Merr. complex (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Phylogeny of Sesbania based on a Bayesian analysis of plastid trnK-matK sequences (2662 included characters), with designated outgroups. Tree shown is majority-rule consensus of final 200 trees sampled post-stationarity in a minimum 5 million generation analysis, assuming TVM + G model of sequence evolution, with trees saved every 1000 generations. Average -ln L = 8917.8; base frequencies: A = 0.3368, C = 0.1380, G = 0.1576, T = 0.3676; rate matrix: A-C = 1.2634, A-G = 2.1365, A-T = 0.4894, C-G =1.3339, C-T = 2.1365, G-T = 1.0000; proportion of invariant sites = 0; rates =gamma, with shape parameter=0.8720. Non-parametric bootstrap proportions (from maximum parsimony analyses) and Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 50% and 0.5, respectively, are indicated below each supported node.

f02_414.jpg

Nuclear rDNA ITS Phylogenetic Analyses—The final nrDNA ITS data set contained 48 Sesbania and 20 outgroup taxa by 703 total aligned characters, of which 326 were potentially parsimony-informative characters (Table 2). Because the nrDNA ITS sequences had the highest percentage of informative characters of any of the DNA sequence loci used in this study (Table 2), this region was extensively sampled across Sesbania.

The phylogenies derived from maximum parsimony and Bayesian analyses of the nrDNA ITS data (Fig. 3) resolved several well-supported clades. The posterior probabilities show broad, robust support (0.9–1.0 posterior probability) throughout Sesbania. These results show weak support for Loteae as sister to Sesbania by maximum parsimony analysis, consistent with previous studies based on nrDNA ITS (e.g. Lavin et al. 2003) and matK (Wojciechowski et al. 2004) sequence analyses, but the relationship is strongly supported by Bayesian inference.

Within Sesbania, relationships based on analysis of nrDNA ITS sequence are largely congruent with those of the trnK-matK phylogenies. Notably, the New World clade is sister to the Pantropical clade and the former subgenera Pterosesbania (S. tetraptera Hochst. ex Baker) and Agati (S. formosa (F.Muell.) N.T.Burb., S. grandiflora) are nested within sect. Sesbania. Many subclades within the Pantropical clade also are resolved and well-supported. The New World species S. exasperata Kunth and S. oligosperma Taub. are sister to each other and nested within a pantropically distributed clade that is largely dominated by African taxa.

Three accessions of the polyploid S. bispinosa (Jacq.) W. Wight are scattered throughout the Pantropical clade (Fig. 3), rendering this species polyphyletic on the nrDNA ITS tree. Interestingly, each of these accessions groups with accessions of other taxa collected from geographically adjacent localities. For example, the specimen S. bispinosa FTF38 (JX453669; Fig. 3), collected in Australia, is sister to S. campylocarpa, an endemic Australian species. Accession FTF38 morphologically matches S. bispinosa var. bispinosa, and it is indistinguishable from the other S. bispinosa accessions from worldwide collections.

Nuclear TRPT Gene Phylogenetic Analyses—The final TRPT gene data set consisted of 37 terminal Sesbania taxa, plus five outgroup taxa, and 345 total aligned characters, of which 75 were potentially parsimony-informative characters. Analyses of TRPT sequences using parsimony and Bayesian searches (e.g. Fig. 4) generally support the relationships resolved in both the nrDNA ITS and trnK-matK analyses.

Combined Molecular Data Analysis—Results of the partition homogeneity test, conducted on all combinations of the sequence data sets, were significant at the 0.01 level, suggesting that the data are providing information supporting different evolutionary histories, i.e. evidence of incongruence among the data sets. Next, the topologies of trees derived from each data set were compared for bootstrap/posterior probability support and using MRP. The resulting MRP supertree (Fig. 5) shows low support for the previously suggested outgroup relationships of Sesbania; Loteae and Sesbania form a clade, albeit with weak support, that is sister to Robinieae, while each of these three groups individually are strongly supported as monophyletic.

Age and Biogeographic Analyses—Age estimates for specific clades varied slightly among trees derived from analyses of the nrDNA ITS and plastid trnK-matK data sets, but age estimates derived from analyses of the nuclear TRPT region were older than those obtained from the other loci (Table 3). However, the age estimates are mostly within a standard deviation of each other. The average of the Sesbania crown clade is estimated at 19.4 ± 2.4 Ma, whereas the age of the Loteae crown clade from nrDNA ITS sequences is estimated at 21.5 ± 2.5 Ma, which is older than the matK sequence estimate of 14.4 ± 1.3 Ma (Lavin et al. 2005). These relatively young age estimates are for the older clades that are well distributed globally.

Continental distributions scored for each of the terminal taxa (Tables 1, 4) showed a pattern of aggregation or phylogenetic structure (Fig. 5). Parsimony optimization of geographic characters resulted in a tree length distinctly shorter than a distribution of tree lengths derived from the optimization of those same characters on 100 random trees (data not shown). The alternative, which was not supported by our results, is the finding that the length of the supertree was within the random distribution of tree lengths. This then would have suggested that geography had imposed little if any constraint on the phylogeny of Sesbania.

Discussion

Phylogenetic Relationships within Sesbania—Loteae remains poorly supported as the sister group to the genus Sesbania. Sesbania comprises two principal, strongly-supported groups corresponding to the New World and Pantropical clades according to the molecular phylogeny (Fig. 5), a division consistent with morphology. The New World clade is marked by a stipitate legume bearing few reniform seeds (typically much fewer than 12), the claw of the banner petal lacking calli at distal end, and keel and wing petals with ventral margins lacking an auricle (“tooth”). The molecular phylogeny resolves the annual Sesbania vesicaria (Jacq.) Elliott, which sometimes has an inconspicuous auricle along the ventral margin of the keel petal, as sister to the rest of the New World clade, which comprises shrubs and trees. This early branching position of Sesbania vesicaria mirrors its presumed pleisiomorphic traits, such as the annual habit and the sometimes-toothed ventral margin of keel, that are shared with species of the Pantropical clade.

The Pantropical clade includes all members of the section Sesbania (incl. former subgenera Agati and Pterosesbania). This clade has a few potential morphological synapomorphies, the most distinguishing of which are the many-seeded legume (usually well over 20 seeds per legume; Fig. 1E–H) with a short stipe and columnar seeds (except for S. grandiflora and S. formosa which have reniform seeds), well-developed calli along the banner claw, and the presence of a pronounced auricle along the ventral margin of the keel and wing petals (e.g. Fig. 1M). Of all the species in this clade, only S. oligosperma, S. tetraptera, and a few Australian species, all of which are nested well within the Pantropical clade, appear to have reverted back somewhat to the ancestral condition by producing legumes with occasionally fewer seeds (less than 20). The nested position of Pterosesbania within the sect. Sesbania clade supports Gillett's (1963) description of Pterosesbania as being closely related to sect. Sesbania.

The New World species S. herbacea, the Hawaiian S. tomentosa Hook. & Arn. complex (circumscribed by Char 1983; Cole 2015), and the pantropical S. sericea and S. cannabina (Retz.) Poir. form a well-supported clade that is sister to the rest of the Pantropical clade. This placement of the S. tomentosa complex is unexpected given the morphological similarity of its members to the South Pacific species S. coccinea (L. f.) Poir., S. grandiflora, and S. formosa (Char 1983; Sachet 1987).

Fig. 3.

Phylogeny of Sesbania based on a Bayesian analysis of nrDNA ITS sequences (703 included characters), with designated outgroups. Tree shown is majority-rule consensus of final 200 trees sampled post-stationarity in a minimum 5 million generation analysis, assuming GTR + G + I model of sequence evolution, with trees saved every 1000 generations. Average -ln L= 9634.266; base frequencies: A =0.2331, C =0.2782, G =0.2646, T=0.2241; rate matrix: A-C = 0.8683, A-G = 2.0524, A-T = 1.2007, C-G = 0.5965, C-T = 4.5447, G-T = 1.0000; proportion of invariant sites = 0.3005; rates = gamma, with shape parameter=1.4505. Non-parametric bootstrap proportions (from maximum parsimony analyses) and Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 50% and 0.5, respectively, are indicated below each supported node.

f03_414.jpg

The Pantropical clade is dominated by African taxa that in some instances are poorly resolved. Such instances of low resolution may be the result of interspecific hybridization among closely related species. For example, within the S. sesban-S. dummeri clade (node J; Fig. 5), morphological, geographic, and molecular evidence suggests that S. sesban, S. goetzii, and S. keniensis J.B. Gillett are distinct species but successful hybrids can be produced between them (Heering and Hanson 1993). Similarly, there are various possible explanations for the apparent polyphyly of S. bispinosa in the nrDNA ITS tree. The African and Madagascan accessions of S. bispinosa (JX453664 from Africa and JX453666 from Madagascar) group with other African Sesbania species whereas an Australian accession (JX453665) groups with Austral-Pacific species (Figs. 2, 5, S1). Sesbania bispinosa, a polyploid taxon, may have multiple hybrid origins given the findings of wide hybridization in the genus (Heering 1994; Jamnadass et al. 2005). Of course, other explanations are equally plausible, such as: specimen misidentification; the taxon S. bispinosa comprises more than one distinct species; and/or the polyploid is hybridizing with other species in different areas. This widespread taxon needs to be investigated further.

Fig. 4.

Phylogeny of Sesbania based on a Bayesian analysis of nuclear TRPT sequences (345 included characters), with designated outgroups. Tree shown is majority-rule consensus of final 200 trees sampled post-stationarity in a minimum 5 million generation analysis, assuming TVM + G model of sequence evolution, with trees saved every 1000 generations. Average -ln L = 1622.6; base frequencies: A = 0.2742, C = 0.1703, G = 0.2630, T = 0.2925; rate matrix: A-C = 0.6304, A-G = 3.0282, A-T = 0.9540, C-G = 1.8234, C-T = 3.0282, G-T = 1.0000; proportion of invariable sites = 0.0; rates = gamma, with shape parameter=0.9118. Non-parametric bootstrap proportions (frommaximum parsimony analyses) and Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 50% and 0.5, respectively, are indicated below each supported node.

f04_414.jpg

Fig. 5.

Supertree of Sesbania and designated outgroups. Tree shown is majority-rule consensus of final 100 trees derived from the MRP analysis of a supermatrix generated from a combination of nrDNA ITS, nuclear TRPT, and plastid trnK-matK strict consensus trees (104 included characters). Nonparametric bootstrap proportions (from maximum parsimony analyses) and Bayesian posterior probabilities greater than 50% and 0.5, respectively, are indicated below each supported node. Letters indicate selected nodes in Table 3. Taxon distributions are indicated to right of phylogeny.

f05_414.jpg

Table 3.

Estimates of ages for specific crown clades of Robinioid legumes (nodes labeled as in Fig. 5). Absolute ages were estimated using the program r8s (Sanderson 2003) on 200 trees derived from Bayesian analyses of three data sets. Numbers in parentheses are standard deviations. Age estimates are missing (-) for unresolved nodes in the trees derived from analyses of trnK-matK and TRPT sequences. Repeated analyses of TRPT region sequences failed to return an age estimate (*) for the New World clade despite its presence across all trees. The age of Robinieae and Robinioids were fixed based on ages reported in Lavin et al. (2005).

t03_414.gif

Biogeography—An analysis of area relationships suggest a hypothetical ancestral geographic area centered in the New World for the Loteae-Sesbania clade, supported by the early-diverging New World clades and the predominantly tropical North American distribution of Robinieae. The recent origins of most of the geographic phylogenetic structure (Table 3) suggest that long-distance dispersal events have led to the pantropical distribution of Sesbania (Fig. 6). This is the case also with the intercontinental distributions of some individual Sesbania species (e.g. S. cannabina). This is consistent with the findings of Lavin et al. (2004) who suggested that legumes inhabiting wet forests or wetlands generally have a higher incidence of transoceanic clades compared to legumes inhabiting seasonally dry settings. Also, Les et al. (2003) suggested a general angiosperm pattern of a high incidence of transoceanic dispersal associated mostly with clades confined to wetlands habitats.

In contrast to the biogeography of Sesbania, Loteae and Robinieae have few if any naturally occurring transcontinental and transoceanic species or subclades. In the case of Loteae, with 22 constituent genera and about 280 species, only one or possibly two dispersal events are suggested between the Old and New World and no Loteae species is known to have a transcontinental distribution (Allan et al. 2003). Robinieae, with 12 constituent genera and about 77 species (Lavin and Sousa S. 1995; Lavin et al. 2003), is naturally confined to the New World.

Sesbania subclades with recently evolved transoceanic distributions (Table 3) include the American S. exasperata and S. oligosperma within what is otherwise a paleotropical clade. Sesbania exasperata is found throughout South America and northward into Mexico, Cuba, and southern Florida, whereas S. oligosperma is restricted to southeast Brazil. Also included here is the South Pacific and Australian clade comprising S. grandiflora, S. formosa, S. campylocarpa, S. chippendalei, and S. brachycarpa, which is nested among mainly African clades (Fig. 5). These species share similar geographic distributions and have larger flowers than most other Sesbania species. Also, the American S. herbacea is sister to the clade comprising the paleotropical species S. tomentosa, S. cannabina, and S. sericea. Long distance dispersal also might explain the pantropical distributions of each of S. sericea, S. cannabina, and S. bispinosa, but it is uncertain whether this is due to natural or humanmediated dispersal (Gillett 1963; Burbidge 1965).

Phylogenetic patterns suggest a directionality of dispersal in Sesbania with a New World to Old World trend. Early-diverging lineages of the Pantropical clade (sect. Sesbania) are from the New World and western Africa whereas the more distally-branching clades show an east Africa clade (node J, Fig. 5) sister to an Austral-Pacific clade (node K, Fig. 5). These are hypothesized dispersal events because the associated age estimates are about 10 Ma or less (Fig. 6). We elaborate on the main dispersal events using the vector labels (Fig. 6), below.

Ia—The sister group to the rest of Sesbania is the New World clade (clade F, Fig. 5), which has early-diverging branches that are North American. Of the species occurring in South America, only Sesbania macroptera is endemic to the continent in Paraguay and adjacent Argentina and Brazil. Haffer (2008) explains such patterns by dispersal to the subtropical dry region of northern Argentina or isolation due to the shifting ecological conditions over the last 4 to 6 million years during the Miocene and Pliocene.

Ib—The estimated time of divergence of the Pantropical clade (=sect. Sesbania; clade H, Fig. 5) from New World Sesbania is far too young to invoke vicariance to explain its distribution between the New World and West Africa (Table 3; Fig. 6). The New World Sesbania herbacea is notably the earliest-branching species in an otherwise pantropically distributed clade that is sister to clade I (Figs. 5, 6), which contains most of the Old World Sesbania species. West Africa harbors all of the early-branching species in this predominantly African clade (clade I; Figs. 5, 6). The estimated age of clade I (Figs. 5, 6), 7.8 ± 2.0 Ma, is similar to the age estimate of the legume genus Vigna s. s., 6.0 ± 0.7 Ma, which has a comparable geographic distribution centered in Africa (Delgado-Salinas et al. 2011). The ability of species in the Pantropical clade to disperse may be related to Sesbania seeds as a potential food resource for birds. Flunker et al. (1991) cite reports from wildlife enthusiasts and seed providers suggesting that the species of sect. Sesbania are not poisonous to birds and serves as food sources for waterfowl. In contrast, Flory and Hebert (1984) report that the seeds of S. drummondii, in addition to S. punicea, are toxic to chickens and other birds and suggest that this toxicity may explain why the distribution of these species is naturally restrictedto the New World.

IIa—The sister group relationship between the American S. herbacea and the Hawaiian S. tomentosa complex is reminiscent of patterns seen in other vascular plants (e.g. Hawaiian Silverswords, Asteraceae, Baldwin et al. 1991; Sanicula L., Apiaceae, Vargas et al. 1998). Although such long-distance dispersal may be rare, successful dispersal does occur (Carlquist 1967). The pattern of diversification in the S. tomentosa complex mirrors that of other recent island radiations (e.g. Hawaiian Silverswords, Baldwin et al. 1991; MacArthur and Wilson 1967) in terms of many morphological, ecological, and isozyme differences contrasting to low levels of DNA sequence variation.

Table 4.

Geographic area character matrix used in the cladistic analysis of Sesbania biogeography. Eight areas are defined: A. North America, B. Central America and Caribbean, C. South America, D. Europe and Middle East, E. Africa and Madagascar, F. Asia, G. Pacific Islands, H. Australia. Presence in (“1″) or absence from (“0″) a geographic area was determined only on the native ranges for each taxon.

t04a_414.gif

(Continued).

t04b_414.gif

IIb—The hypothesized dispersal of a clade containing S. exasperata and S. oligosperma from western Africa to possibly the subtropical regions of Brazil, Argentina, and Uruguay represents a pattern exhibited by other plant groups (e.g. Annona L., Annonaceae, and Menodora Bonpl., Oleaceae; Renner 2004a).

IIc—The dispersal of S. sericea and S. bispinosa from Africa to the Caribbean has been postulated by Gillett (1963) and Burbidge (1965) to be due to human-mediated dispersal, despite having somewhat narrow native African distributions. Renner (2004a) suggests potential routes for floating plant “islands” across the Atlantic Ocean, which include the North Equatorial Counter-Current and the South Equatorial Current. Rates of surface transport along these two currents could deliver a rafting plant from South America to West Africa in approximately two weeks (Renner 2004a). These currents could readily disperse species like those of Sesbania that are abundant in disturbed riparian habitats, coastlines, and the major river deltas of the large rivers like the Amazon, the Congo, and the Senegal Rivers.

IIIa and IIIb—The close relationship between the eastern African (clade J, Figs. 5, 6) and the Austral-Pacific taxa (clade K, Figs. 5, 6) may be explained by dispersal over land (i.e. via East Africa and southern Asia, IIIa) or by sea (i.e. via the Indian Ocean, IIIb). The floristic similarities between East Africa, Madagascar, Southeast Asia, and Australasia because of dispersal from Africa is well documented (e.g. Malcomber 2002; Renner 2004b, 2005; Yuan et al. 2005) with notable examples in legumes (e.g. Ormocarpum P. Beauv.; Thulin and Lavin 2001; Vigna Savi, s. s.; Delgado-Salinas et al. 2011; Wajira; Thulin et al. 2004).

IV—The strong relationship between the Australian and the Pacific groups of Sesbania was originally proposed by Burbidge (1965), who postulated this relationship based upon the morphological similarity of Pacific taxa, such as S. coccinea and S. grandiflora, and the Australian S. formosa. Our results support the taxonomic relationships proposed by Burbidge and suggest that dispersal and local isolation of Sesbania populations throughout the South Pacific has led to the evolution of species complexes, as exemplified by Sesbania coccinea (Sachet 1987) and S. tomentosa (Cole 2015).

Phylogenetic analyses, evolutionary age estimates, and current geographic distributions all suggest that the Sesbania crown clade has at most a Miocene origin and a history that involved transoceanic long-distance dispersals. As is the case for all the many recent origins of transcontinental crown clades in legumes (Lavin et al. 2004), these young age estimates of Sesbania are much younger than the proposed Cretaceous opening of the southern Atlantic (Parrish 1993), the latest Mid- Tertiary North Atlantic land bridge (Tiffney 1985), and the Mid-Tertiary connection between North and South America, including the proto-Antilles (Coates et al. 1992; Iturralde-Vinent and MacPhee 1999; O'Dea et al. 2016). Sesbania populations commonly inhabit coastal and riparian areas on most continents, which have the potential for recurrent episodes of highenergy flooding (e.g. the Amazon, Paraná, and Mississippi Rivers of the Americas), and this increases the chance for dispersal especially of the shallow-rooted annual species that are common in the Pantropical clade. Off-shore ocean currents could disperse coastal and riparian Sesbania species across the Atlantic Ocean, Indian Ocean, and throughout the PacificOcean in a relatively short time, perhaps on the order of only a couple of weeks (e.g. Renner 2004a, b). Sesbania populations can establish rapidly (e.g. Hoffmann and Moran 1997; Hrusa et al. 2002), have a potential for selfing (Heering and Hanson 1993), and produce high annual seed yields (;1000–10,000 seeds/ plant/yr). These features would facilitate transoceanic dispersal and subsequent establishment (e.g. Jamnadass et al. 2005).

Fig. 6.

Phylogenetic relationships of Sesbania species and hypotheses of dispersal history using current distributions of subclades. Estimated ages (average ± s.d.) are reported for some of the principal subclades (Table 3; Fig. 5). Hypothesized dispersal corridors depicted alphanumerically follow the Discussion section. Dashed vectors suggest hypothesized long-distance transoceanic dispersal.

f06_414.jpg

Other features may promote dispersal ability via hydrochory (e.g. Nilsson et al. 2010). For example, we have noted elsewhere the structural differences in fruit anatomy/ morphology among Sesbania species (Fig. 1), differences that may be related to or promote differential buoyancy and survival under waterlogged or flooded conditions. We tested both fruit buoyancy and seed survival, as measured by imbibition, under both fresh and simulated salt water conditions for six species representing S. sects. Daubentonia and Sesbania. Our results (Farruggia 2009; data not shown) show no significant differences in mean fruit buoyancy or seed survival between Sesbania species and across treatments although the species in S. sect. Daubentonia (S. macroptera and S. virgata) exhibited longer periods of fruit buoyancy. Crosssections of the fruits of Sesbania species reveal the structural differences that likely promote buoyancy in S. sect. Daubentonia (Fig. 1I–K). Such features include a thickened mesocarp in S. virgata and S. punicea, and air pockets created by the convoluted wings of S. macroptera (Fig. 1K). The lack of these structures in S. herbacea (Fig. 1L), as well as most of S. sect. Sesbania taxa may relate to their potentially more limited fruit buoyancy.

Survival and dispersal in fresh water is also potentially enhanced by a newly observed feature of Sesbania species from both the New World and Pantropical clades (Farruggia 2009; data not shown). Sesbania seeds in the fresh water buoyancy treatments ultimately imbibed water while those in the saltwater treatment remained dormant. In the fresh water treatments, seedlings developed while submerged but soon became buoyant and ultimately produced second, third, and fourth sets of true leaves while floating. These seedlings remained buoyant until the termination of those experiments.

That the pantropical distribution of Sesbania may have been facilitated by certain distinctive morphological features involving the entire plant prompted our initial investigation of hydrochory. Additional studies could focus on the abilities of Sesbania species to either readily uproot or dislodge such that the above-ground plant laden with fruit is a potential dispersal unit, perhaps facilitated by chambered or spongy pith occupying significant portions of the stem. In essence, Sesbania may be distinct in its ability to disperse in the form of seeds, fruits, seedlings, or entire plants. These life history traits can confer an advantage in environments with seasonal waterlogging or flooding, thus contributing to the pantropical distribution of the genus, its subclades, and some of its constituent species.

Taxonomic Treatment

Sesbania Adanson, Fam. pl. 2: 327. 1763, nomen conserv. (as Sesban, but corrected to Sesbania by Scopoli, Intr. hist. nat. 308. 1777; see Gillett 1963). TYPE: Sesbania sesban (L.) Merrill.

A sectional classification of the genus Sesbania is adapted from Lavin and Sousa S. (1995) and revised and updated using information produced since that study. We arrive at a classification of all species of Sesbania into just three sections (Fig. 5).

Sesbania sect. Glottidium (Desvaux) Lavin, Syst. Bot. Monogr. 45: 44. 1995. Glottidium Desvaux, J. Bot. Agric. 1: 119. 1813. TYPE: Sesbania vesicaria (Jacquin) Elliott.

Although strongly resolved as New World sister clades, sect. Glottidium is maintained as distinct from sect. Daubentonia (DC.) Bentham because of the large genetic (Fig. 5) and morphological differences that separate Glottidium from Daubentonia. The morphological differences include an annual growth habit and auricle along the upper margin of the keel petals, albeit inconspicuous, which are pleisomorphic traits shared by Glottidium and the Pantropical clade. Differences also pertain mostly to the inflated pod of Glottidium, which contains two seeds that are together enclosed inside an endodermal sac that has abscised from the other dermal layers of the fruit wall, compared to the typical 4-winged, severalseeded sect. Daubentonia. Whereas Daubentonia is mostly neotropical in distribution, Glottidium occurs in temperate southeastern U.S.A.

Sesbania sect. Daubentonia (DC.) Bentham in Bentham & Hooker, Gen. pl. 1: 502. 1865. Daubentonia DC., Mém. Légum. 285. 1823. Sesbania subg. Daubentonia (DC.) Baker in Oliver, Fl. trop. Afr. 2: 133. 1871. TYPE: Sesbania punicea (Cavanilles) Bentham.

Sesbania sect. Daubentoniopsis Lavin, Syst. Bot. Monog. 45: 43. 1995. Daubentoniopsis Rydberg, Amer. J. Bot. 10: 497. 1923. TYPE: Sesbania longifolia (Cavanilles) DC.

As now circumscribed, sect. Daubentonia comprises only New World species, although Sesbania punicea is an escaped ornamental in Africa and elsewhere (Lewis 1988). Daubentonia now includes sect. Daubentoniopsis, which has long, linear, but torulose pods that are quite different from the short, quadrate-bodied, often-winged pods of the traditionally circumscribed Daubentonia. Given the distribution of Daubentoniopsis is centered in Jalisco and Michoacan, Mexico (McVaugh 1987), geographic proximity predicts the degree of phylogenetic relatedness more than similarities in pod morphology, at least for species of Sesbania. McVaugh (1987; pp. 697–698) details the complicated nomenclature of the sole species of Daubentoniopsis, Sesbania cavanillesii S. Watson (= S. longifolia DC.).

Sesbania sect. Sesbania.

Agati Adanson, Fam. pl. 2: 326. 1763. Sesbania subg. Agati (Adanson) Baker in J. D. Hooker, Fl. Brit. Ind. 2: 115. 1876. type: Agati grandiflora (L.) Desvaux [=Sesbania grandiflora (L.) Poiret].

Resupinaria Rafinesque, Sylva tell. 115. 1838. TYPE: Resupinaria (L.) Rafinesque [=Sesbania grandiflora (L.) Poiret].

Darwinia Rafinesque, Fl. ludov. 106. 1817, non Darwinia Rudge, 1815 [Myrtaceae]. Monoplectra Rafinesque, Fl. ludov. 106. 1817, pro. syn. TYPE: Darwinia exaltata Rafinesque [=Sesbania herbacea (Mill.) McVaugh].

Sesbania subgenus Pterosesbania Gillett, Kew Bull. 17: 149. 1963. TYPE: Sesbania tetraptera Hochst. ex Baker.

Werecircumscribe the pantropical S. sect. Sesbania to include former S. subg. Agati and S. subg. Pterosesbania, which comprises two species mainly from southern Africa, S. tetraptera and S. rogersii Phill. & Hutch., the latter of which is now considered a subspecies of S. tetraptera (Lewis 1988). These two species (or subspecies) produce mature legumes that are very similar to those of S. sect. Daubentonia (DC.) Benth. in that they have legumes with four longitudinal wings along the legume body. This shared similarity in legume morphology prompted Lavin and Sousa S. (1995) to synonymize S. subg. Pterosesbania under S. sect. Daubentonia. Results of our phylogenetic analysis strongly suggest that the four-winged legume was independently evolved in the New World sect. Daubentonia and the African S. tetraptera (including S. rogersii). However, S. subg. Pterosesbania have generally long, many-seeded linear fruits, which are characteristic of the species of S. sect. Sesbania.

Acknowledgments.

We greatly appreciate early comments on this manuscript provided by Leslie Landrum, Kathleen Pigg, and Anthony Gill. Dr. Darién Prado and Mr. Luis Oakley of the University of Rosario, Argentina, assisted FTF in the field while conducting research in Argentina. Although numerous individuals have held discussion with us about Sesbania taxonomy, phylogenetics, and ecology, Michael Vincent, Gwilym Lewis, Alfonso Delgado-Salinas, and Jamie Howard have contributed significantly to our understanding and deserve special thanks. We also thank two anonymous reviewers and the editors for their many helpful comments. The curators and staff at the following herbaria provided the specimens for this work: A, ASU, B, BM, BR, CTES, COL, E, F, FLAS, G, GH, HAO, K, L, LL, MA, MEXU, MO, MU, NY, P, QCA, QCNE, RB, SI, TEX, UNR, US, USM,W, and WAG. This research was funded in part by grants from the US National Science Foundation (OISE Doctoral Dissertation Enhancement Grant 0812994 to FTF and MFW, and DEB-0542958 toMFW), by the USDA National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Hatch project 182272 to ML, and the Graduate and Professional Student Association at Arizona State University, and the School of Life Sciences at Arizona State University.

Author Contributions.

FTF and MFW designed and performed the research; FTF, ML and MFW analyzed the data; FTF, ML, andMFW wrote the paper.

Literature Cited

1.

Allan, G. J. and J. M. Porter. 2000. Tribal delimitation and phylogenetic relationships of Loteae and Coronilleae (Faboideae: Fabaceae) with special reference to Lotus: Evidence from nuclear ribosomal ITS sequences. American Journal of Botany 87: 1871–1881. Google Scholar

2.

Allan, G. J., E. A. Zimmer, W. L. Wagner, and D. D. Sokoloff. 2003. Molecular phylogenetic analyses of tribe Loteae (Leguminosae): Implications for classification and biogeography. Pp. 371–393 in Advances in Legume Systematics, part 10, eds. B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens. Google Scholar

3.

Baldwin, B. G., D. W. Kyhos, J. Dvorak, and G. D. Carr. 1991. Chloroplast DNA evidence for a North American origin of the Hawaiian silversword alliance (Asteraceae: Madiinae). Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 88: 1840–1843. Google Scholar

4.

Baldwin, B. G., M. J. Sanderson, J. M. Porter, M. F. Wojciechowski, C. S. Campbell, and M. J. Donoghue. 1995. The ITS region of nuclear ribosomal DNA: A valuable source of evidence on angiosperm phylogeny. Annals of the Missouri Botanical Garden 82: 247–277. Google Scholar

5.

Barlow, R., N. Bryant, J. Andersland, and S. Sahi. 2000. Lead hyperaccumulation by Sesbania drummondii. Pp. 112–114 in Proceedings of the 2000Conference onHazardousWaste Research. Denver,CO: The Great Plains/Rocky Mountain Hazardous Substance Research Center. Google Scholar

6.

Baum, B. R. and M. A. Ragan. 2004. The MRP method. Pp. 17–34 in Phylogenetic supertrees: Combining information to reveal the tree of life, ed. O. R. P. Bininda-Emonds. New York: Springer-Verlag. Google Scholar

7.

Bininda-Emonds, O. R. P. and H. N. Bryant. 1998. Properties of matrix representation with parsimony analyses. Systematic Biology 47: 497–508. Google Scholar

8.

Bomfeti, C. A., P. A. A. Ferreira, T. S. Carvalho, R. De Rycke, F. M. S. Moreira, S. Goormachtig, and M. Holsters. 2013. Nodule development on the tropical legume Sesbania virgata under flooded and non-flooded conditions. Plant Biology 15: 93–98. Google Scholar

9.

Branzini, A., R. S. Gonzalez, and M. Zubillaga. 2012. Absorption and translocation of copper, zinc and chromiumby Sesbania virgata. Journal of Environmental Management 102: 50–54. Google Scholar

10.

Bruning, B., R. van Logtestijn, R. Broekman, A. de Vos, A. Parra Gonzales, and J. Rozema. 2015. Growth and nitrogen fixation of legumes at increased salinity under field conditions: Implications for the use of green manures in saline environments. AoB Plants 7: plv010. , https://doi.org/10.1093/aobpla/plv010. Google Scholar

11.

Burbidge, N. T. 1965. Australian species of Sesbania. Australian Journal of Botany 13: 103–141. Google Scholar

12.

Carlquist, S. 1967. Biota of long distance dispersal V. Plant dispersal to Pacific islands. Bulletin of the Torrey Botanical Club 94: 129–162. Google Scholar

13.

Chaintreuil, C., J.-F. Arrighi, E. Giraud, L. Miche, L. Moulin, B. Dreyfus, J.-A. Munive-Hernández, M. del Carmen Villegas-Hernandez, and G. Béna. 2013. Evolution of symbiosis in the legume genus Aeschynomene. The New Phytologist 200: 1247–1259. Google Scholar

14.

Char, W. P. 1983. A Revision of the Hawaiian Species of Sesbania (Leguminosae). M.S. thesis. Honolulu: University of Hawaii. Google Scholar

15.

Choi, H. K., M. A. Luckow, J. J. Doyle, and D. R. Cook. 2006. Development of nuclear gene-derived molecular markers linked to legume genetic maps. Molecular Genetics and Genomics 276: 56–70. Google Scholar

16.

Coates, A. G., J. B. Jackson, L. S. Collins, T. M. Cronin, H. J. Dowsett, L. M. Bybell, P. Jung, and J.A. Obando. 1992. Closure of the Isthmus of Panama: The near-shore marine record of Costa Rica and western Panama. Geological Society of America Bulletin 104: 814–828. Google Scholar

17.

Cole, D. 2015. Population Divergence and Evolution of the Endangered Sesbania tomentosa (Fabaceae). Ph.D. dissertation. Manoa: University of Hawaii. Google Scholar

18.

Delgado-Salinas, A., M. Thulin, R. Pasquet, N. Weeden, and M. Lavin. 2011. Vigna (Leguminosae) sensu lato: The names and identities of the American segregate genera. American Journal of Botany 98: 1694–1715. Google Scholar

19.

Duno de Stefano, R., G. C. Fernández-Concha, L. L. Can-Itza, and M. Lavin. 2010. The morphological and phylogenetic distinctions of Coursetia greenmanii (Leguminosae): Taxonomic and ecological implications. Systematic Botany 35: 289–295. Google Scholar

20.

Evans, D. O. 1990. What is Sesbania? Botany, taxonomy, plant geography and natural history of the perennial members of the genus. Pp. 5–18 in Perennial Sesbania Species in Agroforestry Systems, eds. B. Macklin and D. O. Evans. Waimanalo, Hawaii: Nitrogen Fixing Tree Association. Google Scholar

21.

Farris, J. D., M. Källersjö, A. G. Kluge, and C. Bult. 1995. Constructing a significance test for incongruence. Systematic Biology 44: 570–572. Google Scholar

22.

Farruggia, F. T. 2009. Phylogenetic and Monographic Studies of the Pantropical Genus Sesbania Adanson (Leguminosae). Ph.D. dissertation. Tempe: Arizona State University. Google Scholar

23.

Farruggia, F. T. and J. H. Howard. 2011. Examination of five nuclear markers for phylogenetic study of Hologalegina (Leguminosae). Brittonia 63: 489–499. Google Scholar

24.

Farruggia, F. T., M. Lavin, and M. F. Wojciechowski. 2018. Data from: Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of the pantropical genus Sesbania Adanson (Leguminosae). Dryad Digital Repository. https://doi.org/10.5061/dryad.2007vq5 Google Scholar

25.

Felsenstein, J. 1981. Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approach. Journal of Molecular Evolution 17: 368–376. Google Scholar

26.

Felsenstein, J. 1985. Confidence limits on phylogenies: An approach using the bootstrap. Evolution 39: 783–791. Google Scholar

27.

Flory, W. and C. D. Hebert. 1984. Determination of the oral toxicity of Sesbania drummondii seeds in chickens. American Journal of Veterinary Research 45: 955–958. Google Scholar

28.

Flunker, L. K., B. L. Damron, and H. R. Wilson. 1991. Research note: Feeding various levels of ground Sesbania macrocarpa Muhl. seed to bobwhite quail. Poultry Science 70: 658–660. Google Scholar

29.

Giller, K. E. 2001. Pp. 37, 222–250 in Nitrogen Fixation in Tropical Cropping Systems, Ed. 2. Wallingford, UK: CAB International. Google Scholar

30.

Gillett, J. B. 1963. Sesbania in Africa (excluding Madagascar) and southern Arabia. Kew Bulletin 17: 91–159. Google Scholar

31.

Goormachtig, S., P. Mergaert, M. VanMontagu, and M. Holsters . 1998. The symbiotic interaction between Azorhizobium caulinodans and Sesbania rostrata. Pp. 117–164 in Plant-Microbe Interactions, vol. 29, eds. B. B. Biswas, and H. K. Das. New York: Plenum. Google Scholar

32.

Goormachtig, S., W. Capoen, and M. Holsters. 2004a. Rhizobiuminfection: Lessons from the versatile nodulation behavior of water-tolerant legumes. Trends in Plant Science 9: 518–522. Google Scholar

33.

Goormachtig, S., W. Capoen, E. K. James, and M. Holsters. 2004b. Switch from intracellular to intercellular invasion during water stresstolerant legume nodulation. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 101: 6303–6308. Google Scholar

34.

Haffer, J. 2008. Hypotheses to explain the origin of species in Amazonia. Brazilian Journal of Biology 917–947. Google Scholar

35.

Heering, J. 1994. The reproductive biology of three perennial Sesbania species (Leguminosae). Euphytica 74: 143–148. Google Scholar

36.

Heering, J. and J. Hanson. 1993. Karyotype analysis and interspecific hybridisation in three perennial Sesbania species (Leguminosae). Euphytica 71: 21–28. Google Scholar

37.

Hershkovitz, M. A., E. A. Zimmer, and W. J. Hahn. 1999. Ribosomal DNA sequences and angiosperm systematics. Pp. 268–326 in Molecular Systematics and Plant Evolution, eds. P. M. Hollingsworth, R. M. Bateman, and R. J. Gornall. London: Taylor and Francis. Google Scholar

38.

Hoffmann, J. H. and V. C. Moran. 1997. The population dynamics of an introduced tree, Sesbania punicea, in South Africa, in response to longterm damage caused by different combinations of three species of biological control agents. Oecologia 114: 343–348. Google Scholar

39.

Hrusa, F., B. Ertter, A. Sanders, G. Leppig, and E. Dean. 2002. Catalog of nonnative vascular plants occurring spontaneously in California beyond those addressed in The Jepson Manual, Part I. Madroño 49: 61–98. Google Scholar

40.

Hu, J.-M., M. Lavin, M. F. Wojciechowski, and M. J. Sanderson. 2000. Phylogenetic systematics of the tribe Millettieae (Leguminosae) based on matK sequences, and implications for evolutionary patterns in Papilionoideae. American Journal of Botany 87: 418–430. Google Scholar

41.

Hu, J.-M., M. Lavin, M. F. Wojciechowski, and M. J. Sanderson. 2002. Phylogenetic analysis of nuclear ribosomal ITS/5.8 S sequences in the tribe Millettieae (Fabaceae): Poecilanthe-Cyclolobium, the core Millettieae, and the Callerya group. Systematic Botany 27: 722–733. Google Scholar

42.

Huelsenbeck, J. P., J. J. Bull, and C. W. Cunningham. 1996. Combining data in phylogenetic analysis. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 11: 152–158. Google Scholar

43.

Huelsenbeck, J. P., B. Larget, R. E. Miller, and F. Ronquist. 2002. Potential applications and pitfalls of Bayesian inference of phylogeny. Systematic Biology 51: 673–688. Google Scholar

44.

Hughes, C. E. 1998. Monograph of Leucaena (Leguminosae-Mimosoideae). Systematic Botany Monographs 55: 1–244. Google Scholar

45.

Hughes, C. E., C. D. Bailey, S. Krosnick, and M. A. Luckow. 2003. Relationships among genera of the informal Dichrostachys and Leucaena groups (Mimosoideae) inferred from nuclear ribosomal DNA sequences. Pp. 221–238 in Advances in Legume Systematics, part 10, Higher Level Systematics, eds. B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens. Google Scholar

46.

Hutchinson, J. 1964. The Genera of Flowering Plants. London: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar

47.

Iturralde-Vinent, M. A. and R. D. E.MacPhee. 1999. Paleogeography of the Caribbean region: Implications for Cenozoic biogeography. Bulletin of the American Museum of Natural History 238: 1–95. Google Scholar

48.

James, E. K., J. I. Sprent, J. M. Sutherland, S. G. McInroy, and F. R.Minchin. 1992. The structure of nitrogen fixing root nodules on the aquatic mimosoid legume Neptunia plena. Annals of Botany 69: 173–180. Google Scholar

49.

Jamnadass, R., J. Hanson, J. Poole, O. Hanotte, T. J. Simons, and I. K. Dawson. 2005. High differentiation among populations of the woody legume Sesbania sesban in sub-Saharan Africa: Implications for conservation and cultivation during germplasm introduction into agroforestry systems. Forest Biology and Management 210: 225–238. Google Scholar

50.

Laladhas, K. P., V. T. Cheriyan, V. T. Puliappadamba, S. V. Bava, R. G. Unnithan, P. L. Vijayammal, and R. J. Anto. 2010.Anovel protein fraction from Sesbania grandiflora shows potential anticancer and chemopreventive efficacy, in vitro and in vivo. Journal of Cellular and Molecular Medicine 14: 636–646. Google Scholar

51.

Lavin, M. 1988. Systematics of Coursetia (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae). Systematic Botany Monographs 21: 1–167. Google Scholar

52.

Lavin, M., P. S. Herendeen, and M. F. Wojciechowski. 2005. Evolutionary rates analysis of Leguminosae implicates a rapid diversification of lineages during the Tertiary. Systematic Biology 54: 530–549. Google Scholar

53.

Lavin, M. and B. D. Schrire. 2005. Sesbanieae. Pp. 452–453 in Legumes of the World, eds. G. P. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, and M. Lock. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens. Google Scholar

54.

Lavin, M., B. D. Schrire, G. P. Lewis, R. T. Pennington, A. Delgado-Salinas, M. Thulin, C. E. Hughes, A. Beyra Matos, and M. F. Wojciechowski. 2004. Meta-community processes rather than continental tectonic history better explain geographically structured phylogenies in legumes. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 359: 1509–1522. Google Scholar

55.

Lavin, M. and M. Sousa S. 1995. Phylogenetic systematics and biogeography of the tribe Robinieae. Systematic Botany Monographs 45: 1–165. Google Scholar

56.

Lavin, M., M. F. Wojciechowski, P. Gasson, C. Hughes, and E. Wheeler. 2003. Phylogeny of robinioid legumes (Fabaceae) revisited: Coursetia and Gliricidia recircumscribed, and a biogeographical appraisal of the Caribbean endemics. Systematic Botany 28: 387–409. Google Scholar

57.

Les, D. H., D. J. Crawford, R. T. Kimball, M. L. Moody, and E. Landolt. 2003. Biogeography of discontinuously distributed hydrophytes: A molecular appraisal of intercontinental disjunctions. International Journal of Plant Sciences 164: 917–932. Google Scholar

58.

Lewis, G. P. 1988. Sesbania Adans. in the Flora Zambesiaca region. Kirkia 13: 11–51. Google Scholar

59.

LPWG (Legume Phylogeny Working Group). 2017. A new subfamily classification of the Leguminosae based on a taxonomically comprehensive phylogeny. Taxon 66: 44–77. Google Scholar

60.

Loureiro, M. F., E. K. James, J. I. Sprent, and A. A. Franco. 1995. Stem and root nodules of the tropical wetland legume Aeschynomene fluminensis. The New Phytologist 130: 531–544. Google Scholar

61.

Luckow, M. 1993. Monograph of Desmanthus (Leguminosae-Mimosoideae). Systematic Botany Monographs 38: 1–166. Google Scholar

62.

Luckow, M., J. T. Miller, D. J. Murphy, and T. Livshultz. 2003. A phylogenetic analysis of the Mimosoideae (Leguminosae) based on chloroplast DNA sequence data. Pp. 197–220 in Advances in Legume Systematics, part 10, eds. B. B. Klitgaard and A. Bruneau. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens. Google Scholar

63.

MacArthur, R. H. and E. O. Wilson. 1967. The Theory of Island Biogeography. Princeton, New Jersey: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar

64.

Maddison, D. R. and W. P. Maddison. 2003. MacClade version 4: Analysis of phylogeny and character evolution. Sunderland, Massachusetts: Sinauer Associates. Google Scholar

65.

Maddison, W. P. and D. R. Maddison. 2009. Mesquite: A modular system for evolutionary analysis, version 2.6.  http://mesquiteproject.orgGoogle Scholar

66.

Malcomber, S. T. 2002. Phylogeny of Gaertnera Lam. (Rubiaceae) based on multiple DNA markers: Evidence of a rapid radiation in awidespread, morphologically diverse genus. Evolution 56: 42–57. Google Scholar

67.

McMahon, M. and L. Hufford. 2004. Phylogeny of Amorpheae (Fabaceae: Papilionoideae). American Journal of Botany 91: 1219–1230. Google Scholar

68.

McVaugh, R. 1987. Sesbania, in Leguminosae, Volume 5. Pp. 694–698 in Flora Novo-Galiciana, A Descriptive Account of the Vascular Plants of Western Mexico, ed. W. R. Anderson. Ann Arbor, MI, USA: University of Michigan Press. Google Scholar

69.

Nilsson, C., R. L. Brown, R. Jansson, and D. M. Merritt. 2010. The role of hydrochory in structuring riparian and wetland vegetation. Biological Reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society 85: 837–858. Google Scholar

70.

O'Dea, A., H. A. Lessios, A. G. Coates, R. I. Eytan, S. A. Restrepo-Moreno, A. L. Cione, L. S. Collins, A. de Queiroz, D. W. Farris, R. D. Norris, R. F. Stallard, M. O. Woodburne, O. Aguilera, M.-P. Aubry, W. A. Berggren, A. F. Budd, M. A. Cozzuol, S. E. Coppard, H. Duque-Caro, S. Finnegan, G. M. Gasparini, E. L. Grossman, K. G. Johnson, L. D. Keigwin, N. Knowlton, E. G. Leigh, J. S. Leonard-Pingel, P. B. Marko, N. D. Pyenson, P. G. Rachello-Dolmen, E. Soibelzon, L. Soibelzon, J. A. Todd, G. J. Vermeij, and J. B. C. Jackson. 2016. Formation of the Isthmus of Panama. Science Advances 2: https://doi.org/10.1126/ sciadv.1600883. Google Scholar

71.

Parrish, J. T. 1993. The palaeogeography of the opening South Atlantic. Pp. 8–27 in The Africa-South America Connection, eds. W. George and R. Lavocat. Oxford: Clarendon. Google Scholar

72.

Pennington, R. T., M. Lavin, and A. Oliveira-Filho. 2009. Woody plant diversity, evolution and ecology in the tropics: Perspectives from seasonally-dry tropical forests. Annual Review of Ecology Evolution and Systematics 40: 437–457. Google Scholar

73.

Pennington, R. T., A. Daza, C. Reynel, and M. Lavin. 2011. Poissonia eriantha (Leguminosae) from Cuzco, Peru: An overlooked species underscores a pattern of narrow endemism common to seasonally dry neotropical vegetation. Systematic Botany 36: 59–68. Google Scholar

74.

Pennington, R. T. and M. Lavin. 2016. The contrasting nature of woody plant species in different neotropical forest biomes reflects differences in ecological stability. The New Phytologist 210: 25–37. Google Scholar

75.

Posada, D. and K. A. Crandall. 1998. Modeltest: Testing the model of DNA substitution. Bioinformatics 14: 817–818. Google Scholar

76.

Powell, R. G., C. R. Smith Jr. , and R. V. Madvigal. 1976. Antitumor activity of Sesbania versicaria, S. punicea and S. drummondii seed extracts. Planta Medica 30: 1–8. Google Scholar

77.

Queiroz, L. P. de and M. Lavin. 2011. Coursetia (Leguminosae) from eastern Brazil: Nuclear ribosomal and chloroplast DNA sequence analysis reveal the monophyly of three caatinga-inhabiting species. Systematic Botany 36: 69–79. Google Scholar

78.

Qureshi, R. H., N. Ahamad, and M. Qadir . 2002. Amelioration of calcareous saline sodic soils through phytoremediation and chemical strategies. Soil Use and Management 18: 381–385. Google Scholar

79.

Renner, S. S. 2004a. Plant dispersal across the tropical Atlantic by wind and sea currents. International Journal of Plant Sciences 165(Suppl.): S23–S33. Google Scholar

80.

Renner, S. S. 2004b. Multiple Miocene Melastomataceae dispersal between Madagascar, Africa, and India. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences 359: 1485–1494. Google Scholar

81.

Renner, S. S. 2005. Relaxed molecular clocks for dating historical plant dispersal events. Trends in Plant Science 10: 550–558. Google Scholar

82.

Roblin, G., P. Fleurat-Lessard, and J. Bonmort. 1989. Effects of compounds affecting calciumchannels on phytochrome- and blue pigment-mediated pulvinar movements of Cassia fasciculata. Plant Physiology 90: 697–701. Google Scholar

83.

Ronquist, F. and J. P. Huelsenbeck. 2003. MrBayes 3.0: Bayesian phylogenetic inference using mixed models. Bioinformatics 19: 1572–1574. Google Scholar

84.

Rydberg, P. A. 1923. Genera of NorthAmerican Fabaceae I. TribeGalegeae. American Journal of Botany 10: 485–498. Google Scholar

85.

Sachet, M. H. 1987. The littoral species of Sesbania (Leguminosae) in the South Pacific islands and its relatives. Bulletin of the Museum of Natural History (or Sér. 3, Bot.) 9: 16. Google Scholar

86.

Sanderson, M. J. 2002. Estimating absolute rates of molecular evolution and divergence times: A penalized likelihood approach. Molecular Biology and Evolution 19: 101–109. Google Scholar

87.

Sanderson, M. J. 2003. R8s: Inferring absolute rates of evolution and divergence times in the absence of a molecular clock. Bioinformatics 19: 301–302. Google Scholar

88.

Sanderson, M. J. and M. F. Wojciechowski. 1996. Diversification rates in a temperate legume clade: Are there “so many species” of Astragalus (Fabaceae)? American Journal of Botany 83: 1488–1502. Google Scholar

89.

Satter, R. L., M. J. Morse, Y. Lee, R. C. Crain, G. Cote, and N. Moran. 1988. Light and clock-controlled leaflet movements in Samanea saman: A physiological, biophysical, and biochemical analysis. Botanica Acta 101: 205–213. Google Scholar

90.

Schrire, B. D., M. Lavin, and G. P. Lewis. 2005a. Global distribution patterns of the Leguminosae: Insights from recent phylogenies. Biologiske Skrifter 55: 375–422. Google Scholar

91.

Schrire, B. D., G. P. Lewis, and M. Lavin. 2005b. Biogeography of the Leguminosae. Pp. 21–54 in Legumes of the World, eds. G. P. Lewis, B. Schrire, B. Mackinder, and M. Lock. Kew, UK: Royal Botanic Gardens. Google Scholar

92.

Schrire, B. D., M. Lavin, N. P. Barker, and F. Forest. 2009. Phylogeny of the tribe Indigofereae (Leguminosae-Papilionoideae): Geographically structured more in succulent-rich and temperate settings than in grass-rich environments. American Journal of Botany 96: 816–852. Google Scholar

93.

Shaw, J., E. B. Lickey, J. T. Beck, S. B. Farmer, W. Liu, J. Miller, K. C. Siripun, C. T. Winder, E. E. Schilling, and R. L. Small. 2005. The tortoise and the hare II: Relative utility of 21 noncoding chloroplast DNA sequences for phylogenetic analysis. American Journal of Botany 92: 142–166. Google Scholar

94.

Swofford, D. L. 2002. PAUP*. Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony (*and other methods), v. 4. Sunderland: Sinauer Associates. Google Scholar

95.

Thiers, B. 2017. Index Herbariorum: A global directory of public herbaria and associated staff. New York Botanical Garden's Virtual Herbarium.  http://sweetgum.nybg.org/science/ih/Google Scholar

96.

Thompson, J. D., T. J. Gibson, F. Plewniak, F. Jeanmougin, and D. G. Higgins. 1997. The ClustalX windows interface: Flexible strategies for multiple sequence alignment aided by quality analysis tools. Nucleic Acids Research 24: 4876–4882. Google Scholar

97.

Thulin, M. and M. Lavin. 2001. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Ormocarpum group (Fabaceae): A new genus Zygocarpum from the Horn of Africa region. Systematic Botany 26: 299–317. Google Scholar

98.

Thulin, M., M. Lavin, R. Pasquet, and A. Delgado-Salinas. 2004. Phylogeny and biogeography of Wajira (Leguminosae): A monophyletic segregate of Vigna centered in the Horn of Africa region. Systematic Botany 29: 903–920. Google Scholar

99.

Tiffney, B. 1985. The Eocene North Atlantic land bridge: Its importance in Tertiary and modern phytogeography of the Northern Hemisphere. Journal of the Arnold Arboretum. Harvard University 66: 243–273. Google Scholar

100.

Vargas, P., B. G. Baldwin, and L. Constance. 1998. Nuclear ribosomal DNA evidence for a western North American origin of Hawaiian and South American species of Sanicula. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences USA 95: 235–240. Google Scholar

101.

Wojciechowski, M. F., M. J. Sanderson, and J.-M. Hu. 1999. Evidence on the monophyly of Astragalus (Fabaceae) and its major subgroups based on nuclear ribosomal DNA ITS and chloroplast DNA trnL intron data. Systematic Botany 24: 409–437. Google Scholar

102.

Wojciechowski, M. F., M. Lavin, and M. J. Sanderson. 2004. A phylogeny of legumes (Leguminosae) based on analysis of the plastid matK gene resolves many well-supported subclades within the family. American Journal of Botany 91: 1846–1862. Google Scholar

103.

Yang, B., W. Shu, Z. Ye, C. Lan, and M. Wong. 2003. Growth and metal accumulation in Vetiver and two Sesbania species on lead/zinc mine tailings. Chemosphere 52: 1593–1600. Google Scholar

104.

Yuan, Y.-M., S. Wohlhauser, M. Möller, J. Klackenberg, M. W. Callmander, and P. Küpfer. 2005. Phylogeny and biogeography of Exacum (Gentianaceae): A disjunctive distribution in the Indian Ocean basin resulted from long distance dispersal and extensive radiation. Systematic Biology 54: 21–34. Google Scholar

Appendices

Appendix 1.

Accessions included in this study. Species, Voucher, Country, Herbarium Acronym, GenBank Numbers (nrDNA-ITS, plastid trnK-matK, nuclear TRPT).

e01_414.gif
e02_414.gif
© Copyright 2018 by the American Society of Plant Taxonomists
Frank T. Farruggia, Matt Lavin, and Martin F. Wojciechowski "Phylogenetic Systematics and Biogeography of the Pantropical Genus Sesbania (Leguminosae)," Systematic Botany 43(2), 414-429, (21 June 2018). https://doi.org/10.1600/036364418X697175
Published: 21 June 2018
KEYWORDS
dispersal
hydrochory
legume morphology
riparian
Robinieae
taxonomy
Back to Top