The Auk

Published by: The American Ornithologists' Union



The Auk 126(4):839-852. 2009
doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/auk.2009.08174

Kentish Versus Snowy Plover: Phenotypic and Genetic Analyses of Charadrius alexandrinus Reveal Divergence of Eurasian and American Subspecies
Análisis Fenotípicos y Genéticos de Charadrius alexandrinus Muestran Divergencia entre las Subespecies de Eurasia y América

Clemens Küpper,1,2,4 Jakob Augustin,1,2,5 András Kosztolányi,1,6 Terry Burke,2 Jordi Flguerola,3 and Tamás Székely1

1 Department of Biology and Biochemistry, University of Bath, Bath BA2 7AY, United Kingdom

2 Natural Environmental Research Council Molecular Genetics Facility, Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield S10 2TN, United Kingdom

3 Department of Wetland Ecology, Estación Biológica de Doñana, CSIC, Avda. Americo Vespucio s/n, 41092 Sevilla, Spain

4 E-mail:

5 Present address: Department of Zoology, University of Gothenburg, Box 463, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.

6 Present address: Department of Ethology, Eötvös Loránd University, Pázmány Páter sétány 1/c, H-1117 Budapest, Hungary.

Associate Editor: K. T. Scribner

ABSTRACT.

Many shorebird species have widespread geographic distributions comprising several continents. Because shorebirds are excellent flyers and can migrate large distances, it is often unclear whether reproductive barriers between subspecies and populations from different continents exist. Kentish-Snowy Plovers (Charadrius alexandrinus) are cosmopolitan shorebirds. Whether the American and Eurasian subspecies-Snowy Plover and Kentish Plover, respectively—constitute a single species is the subject of a longstanding debate. We examined the divergence between American and Eurasian populations to reassess the current taxonomy by comparing genetic and phenotypic characters of the American subspecies C. a. nivosus and the Eurasian subspecies C. a. alexandrinus from seven populations. Genetic analyses revealed that American and Eurasian populations have strongly diverged, the Kentish Plover being more closely related to the White-fronted Plover (C. marginatus) than to the Snowy Plover. These results were consistent across all assessed nuclear markers (26 microsatellites and a partial CHD sequence) and two mitochondrial markers (ND3 and ATPase 6/8). Within subspecies, populations sampled across large geographic distances were not genetically differentiated (all F st ≤ 0.01 and all Φst ≤ 0.06), which suggests panmixia. Snowy Plovers differed morphologically from Kentish Plovers, having significantly shorter tarsi and wings. Chick plumage and calls also may serve as diagnostic characters to distinguish Snowy and Kentish plovers, although more data are needed to quantify these differences. Our combined results suggest that the taxonomic status of C. alexandrinus needs to be revised, and we propose that Kentish Plover and Snowy Plover be recognized as separate species: C. alexandrinus and C. nivosus, respectively.

RESUMEN.

Muchas especies de playeros tienen distribuciones amplias que incluyen continentes diferentes. Debido a que los playeros son excelentes voladores y tienen la capacidad de migrar largas distancias, muchas veces no está claro si existen barreras reproductivas entre poblaciones o subespecies de diferentes continentes. Charadrius alexandrinus es una especie cosmopolita. Hace mucho tiempo se ha debatido si las subespecies que se encuentran en las Américas y en Eurasia forman una sola especie. Para examinar su estado taxonómico, investigamos la divergencia entre las poblaciones de América y de Eurasia en características genéticas y fenotípicas de la subespecies C. a. nivosus (que se encuentra en América) y C. a. alexandrinus (que se encuentra en Eurasia) en siete poblaciones. Los análisis genéticos muestran que las poblaciones de América y Eurasia están marcadamente diferenciadas y que las poblaciones de Eurasia están más relacionadas con C. marginatus que con C. a. nivosus. Estos resultados genéticos fueron consistentes de acuerdo a todos los marcadores nucleares examinados (26 microsatélites y una parte del gen CHD) y a dos marcadores mitocondriales (ND3 y ATPasa 6/8). Dentro las subespecies, las poblaciones investigadas que estaban separadas por distancias grandes no estuvieron diferenciadas genéticamente (todos los valores de Fst ≤ 0.01 y de Φst ≤ 0.06), lo que sugiere que existe panmixia. Morfológicamente, C. a. nivosus presentó tarsos y alas más cortos que C. a. alexandrinus. El plumaje de los polluelos y las llamadas también pueden servir como caractàres diagnósticos para diferenciar las dos poblaciones, aunque es necesario evaluar más datos para cuantificar las diferencias. Estas resultados sugieren que se necesita revisar la taxonomía de C. alexandrinus. Proponemos que las poblaciones de las Américas y de Eurasia sean reclasificadas como dos especies diferentes: C. nivosus y C. alexandrinus, respectivamente.

Received: September 15, 2008; Accepted: April 28, 2009



LITERATURE CITED

Akaike, H. 1974. A new look at the statistical model identification. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, AC-19:716723. CrossRef
Amat, J. A., R. M. Fraga, and G. M. Arroyo. 1999. Brood desertion and polygamous breeding in the Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus. Ibis 141:596607. CrossRef
Baker, A. J., S. L. Pereira, and T. A. Paton. 2007. Phylogenetic relationships and divergence times of Charadriiformes genera: Multigene evidence for the Cretaceous origin of at least 14 clades of shorebirds. Biology Letters 3:205209. CrossRef, PubMed
Bergmann, C. 1847. Über die Verhältnisse der Wärmeökonomie der Thiere zu ihrer Grosse. Gröttinger Studien 3:595708.
Bickford, D., D. J. Lohman, N. S. Sodhi, P. K. L. Ng, R. Meier, K. Winker, K. K. Ingram, and I. Das. 2007. Cryptic species as a window on diversity and conservation. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 22:148155. CrossRef, PubMed
BIRDLIFE INTERNATIONAL. 2007. Species factsheet: Charadrius alexandrinus . [Online.] Available at www.birdlife.org/datazone/species/index.html.
Blackburn, T. M., K. J. Gaston, and N. Loder. 1999. Geographic gradients in body size: A clarification of Bergmann's rule. Diversity and Distributions 5:165174. CrossRef
Bleidorn, C., I. Kruse, S. Albrecht, and T. Bartolomaeus. 2006. Mitochondrial sequence data expose the putative cosmopolitan polychaete Scoloplos armiger (Annelida, Orbiniidae) as a species complex. BMC Evolutionary Biology 6:47. CrossRef, PubMed
Blomqvist, D., M. Andersson, C. Küpper, I. C. Cuthill, J. Kis, R. B. Lanctot, B. K. Sandercock, T. Székely, J. Wallander, and B. Kempenaers. 2002. Genetic similarity between mates and extra-pair parentage in three species of shorebirds. Nature 419:613615. CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Bruford, M. W., O. Hanotte, J. F. Y. Brookfield, and T. Burke. 1998. Multilocus and single-locus DNA fingerprinting. Pages 287336 in Molecular Genetic Analysis of Populations: A Practical Approach (A. R. Hoelzel, Ed.). IRL Press, Oxford.
Chesser, R. T. 1999. Molecular systematics of the rhinocryptid genus Pteroptochos. Condor 101:439446. CrossRef
Corander, J., and P. Marttinen. 2006. Bayesian identification of admixture events using multilocus molecular markers. Molecular Ecology 15:28332843. CrossRef, PubMed
Corander, J., P. Waldmann, and M. J. Sillanpää. 2003. Bayesian analysis of genetic differentiation between populations. Genetics 163:367374. PubMed, CSA
Cramp, S., ED. 1983. Handbook of the Birds of Europe, the Middle East and North Africa: The Birds of the Western Palearctic, vol. 3: Waders to Gulls. Oxford University Press, New York.
Dawson, D. A., J. Chittock, R. Jehle, A. Whitlock, D. Nogueira, J. Pellatt, T. Birkhead, and T. Burke. 2005. Identification of 13 polymorphic microsatellite loci in the Zebra Finch, Taeniopygia guttata (Passeridae, Aves). Molecular Ecology Notes 5:298301. CrossRef
Del Hoyo, J., A. Elliott, and J. Sargatal, EDS. 1996. Handbook of the Birds of the World, vol. 3: Hoatzin to Auks. Lynx Edicions, Barcelona, Spain.
Eberhard, J. R., and E. Bermingham. 2004. Phylogeny and biogeography of the Amazona ochrocephala (Aves: Psittacidae) complex. Auk 121:318332. BioOne
Ericson, P. G. P., I. Envall, M. Irestedt, and J. A. Norman. 2003. Inter-familial relationships of the shorebirds (Aves: Charadriiformes) based on nuclear DNA sequence data. BMC Evolutionary Biology 3:16. CrossRef, PubMed
Evanno, G., C. Regnaut, and J. Goudet. 2005. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: A simulation study. Molecular Ecology 14:26112620. CrossRef, PubMed
Excoffier, L., G. Laval, and S. Schneider. 2005. Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis. Evolutionary Bioinformatics Online 1:4750. PubMed
Excoffier, L., P. E. Smouse, and J. M. Quattro. 1992. Analysis of molecular variance inferred from metric distances among DNA haplotypes: Application to human mitochondrial DNA restriction data. Genetics 131:479491. PubMed, CSA
Fenchel, T., and B. J. Finlay. 2004. The ubiquity of small species: Patterns of local and global diversity. BioScience 54:777784. BioOne
Funk, W. C., T. D. Mullins, and S. M. Haig. 2007. Conservation genetics of Snowy Plovers (Charadrius alexandrinus) in the Western Hemisphere: Population genetic structure and delineation of subspecies. Conservation Genetics 8:12871309. CrossRef
Gaston, K. J. 2003. The Structure and Dynamics of Geographic Ranges. Oxford University Press, Oxford, United Kingdom.
Griffiths, R., M. C. Double, K. Orr, and R. J. G. Dawson. 1998. A DNA test to sex most birds. Molecular Ecology 7:10711075. CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Hardy, O. J., and X. Vekemans. 2002. SPAGeDi: A versatile computer program to analyse spatial genetic structure at the individual or population levels. Molecular Ecology Notes 2:618620. CrossRef, CSA
Hasegawa, M., H. Kishino, and T. Yano. 1985. Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. Journal of Molecular Evolution 22:160174. CrossRef, PubMed
Hayman, P., J. Marchant, and T. Prater. 1986. Shorebirds: An Identification Guide to the Waders of the World. Houghton Mifflin, Boston.
Huelsenbeck, J. P., and F. Ronquist. 2001. MRBAYES: Bayesian inference of phylogenetic trees. Bioinformatics 17:754755. CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
James, F. C. 1970. Geographic size variation in birds and its relationship to climate. Ecology 51:365390. CrossRef
Jehl, J. R., Jr. 1968. Relationships in the Charadrii (shorebirds): A taxonomic study based on color patterns of the downy young. San Diego Society of Natural History Memoirs, no. 3.
Klautau, M., C. A. M. Russo, C. Lazoski, N. Boury-Esnault, J. P. Thorpe, and A. M. Solé-Cava. 1999. Does cosmopolitanism result from overconservative systematics? A case study using the marine sponge Chondrilla nucula. Evolution 53:14141422. CrossRef
Kosztolányi, A., T. Székely, I. C. Cuthill, K. T. Yilmaz, and S. Berberoğlu. 2006. Ecological constraints on breeding system evolution: The influence of habitat on brood desertion in Kentish Plover. Journal of Animal Ecology 75:257265. CrossRef, PubMed
Krokene, C., K. Anthonisen, J. T. Lifjeld, and T. Amundsen. 1996. Paternity and paternity assurance behaviour in the Bluethroat, Luscinia s. svecica. Animal Behaviour 52:405417. CrossRef, CSA
Küpper, C., G. J. Horsburgh, D. A. Dawson, R. FfrenchConstant, T. Székely, and T. Burke. 2007. Characterization of 36 polymorphic microsatellite loci in the Kentish Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus) including two sex-linked loci and their amplification in four other Charadrius species. Molecular Ecology Notes 7:3539. CrossRef
Kupper, C., J. Kis, A. Kosztolányi, T. Székely, I. C. Cuthill, and D. Blomqvist. 2004. Genetic mating system and timing of extra-pair fertilizations in the Kentish Plover. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 57:3239. CrossRef
Lessells, C. M. 1984. The mating system of Kentish Plovers Charadrius alexandrinus. Ibis 126:474483. CrossRef, CSA
Lloyd, P. 2008. Adult survival, dispersal and mate fidelity in the White-fronted Plover Charadrius marginatus. Ibis 150:182187. CrossRef
Marthinsen, G., L. Wennerberg, and J. T. Lifjeld. 2007. Phylogeography and subspecies taxonomy of Dunlins (Calidris alpina) in western Palearctic analysed by DNA microsatellites and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society 92:713726. CrossRef
Monroe, B. L., Jr., and C. G. Sibley. 1993. A World Checklist of Birds. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Nei, M. 1978. Estimation of average heterozygosity and genetic distance from a small number of individuals. Genetics 89:583590. PubMed
Nicholls, J. A., M. C. Double, D. M. Rowell, and R. D. Magrath. 2000. The evolution of cooperative and pair breeding in thornbills Acanthiza (Pardalotidae). Journal of Avian Biology 31:165176. CrossRef
Nylander, J. A. A. 2004. MrModeltest, version 2. Software distributed by the author. [Online.] Available at www.abc.se/~nylander/.
Oberholser, H. C. 1922. Notes on North American birds. XI. Auk 39:7278.
Ottvall, R., J. Höglund, S. Bensch, and K. Larsson. 2005. Population differentiation in the Redshank (Tringa totanus) as revealed by mitochondrial DNA and amplified fragment length polymorphism markers. Conservation Genetics 6:321331. CrossRef
Oyler-Mccance, S. J., J. St. John, F. L. Knopf, and T. W. Quinn. 2005. Population genetic analysis of Mountain Plover using mitochondrial DNA sequence data. Condor 107:353362. BioOne
Page, G. W., J. S. Warriner, J. C. Warriner, and P. W. C. Paton. 1995. Snowy Plover (Charadrius alexandrinus). In The Birds of North America, no. 154 (A. Poole and F. Gill, Eds.). Academy of Natural Sciences, Philadelphia, and American Ornithologists' Union, Washington, D.C.
Page, R. D. M. 1996. TREEVIEW: An application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Computer Applications in the Biosciences 12:357358. PubMed, CSA
Paton, T. A., A. J. Baker, J. G. Groth, and G. F. Barrowclough. 2003. RAG-I sequences resolve phylogenetic relationships within Charadriiform birds. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 29:268278. CrossRef, PubMed
Pfenninger, M., and K. Schwenk. 2007. Cryptic animal species are homogeneously distributed among taxa and biogeographical regions. BMC Evolutionary Biology 7:121. CrossRef, PubMed
Price, T. 2007. Speciation in Birds. Roberts, Greenwood Village, Colorado.
Primmer, C. R., A. P. Møller, and H. Ellegren. 1995. Resolving genetic relationships with microsatellite markers: A parentage testing system for the swallow Hirundo rustica. Molecular Ecology 4:493498. CrossRef, PubMed, CSA
Primmer, C. R., J. N. Painter, M. T. Koskinen, J. U. Palo, and J. Merilä. 2005. Factors affecting avian cross-species microsatellite amplification. Journal of Avian Biology 36:348360. CrossRef
Pritchard, J. K., M. Stephens, and P. Donnelly. 2000. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945959. PubMed, CSA
R DEVELOPMENT CORE TEAM. 2006. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. [Online.] R Development Core Team, Vienna. Available at www.r-project.org/.
Raymond, M., and F. Rousset. 1995. GENEPOP (version 1.2): Population genetics software for exact tests and ecumenicism. Journal of Heredity 86:248249.
Rensch, B. 1938. Some problems of geographical variation and species-formation. Proceedings of the Linnean Society of London 150:275285.
Reynolds, J. D. 1996. Animal breeding systems. Trends in Ecology and Evolution 11:6872. CrossRef, CSA
Rice, W. R. 1989. Analyzing tables of statistical tests. Evolution 43:223225. CrossRef
Rittinghaus, H. 1961. Der Seeregenpfeifer. A. Ziemsen Verlag, Wittenberg, Germany.
Sáez, A. G., and E. Lozano. 2005. Body doubles. Nature 433:111. CrossRef, PubMed
Schug, M. D., S. G. Smith, A. Tozier-Pearce, and S. F. Mcevey. 2007. The genetic structure of Drosophila ananassae populations from Asia, Australia and Samoa. Genetics 175:14291440. CrossRef, PubMed
Seutin, G., B. N. White, and P. T. Boag. 1991. Preservation of avian blood and tissue samples for DNA analyses. Canadian Journal of Zoology 69:8290. CrossRef
Sibley, C. G., and B. L. Monroe, Jr. 1990. Distribution and Taxonomy of Birds of the World. Yale University Press, New Haven, Connecticut.
Stroud, D. A., N. C. Davidson, R. West, D. A. Scott, L. HaanStra, O. Thorup, B. Ganter, and S. Delany. 2004. Status of migratory wader populations in Africa and western Eurasia in the 1990s. International Wader Studies 15.
Swofford, D. L. 2000. PAUP*: Phylogenetic Analysis Using Parsimony (* and Other Methods). Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, Massachusetts.
Székely, T., A. Kosztolanyi, and C. Küpper. 2008. Practical guide for investigating breeding ecology of Kentish Plover Charadrius alexandrinus. University of Bath, Bath, United Kingdom. [Online.] Available at www.biodiversity-lab.org.
Székely, T., and C. M. Lessells. 1993. Mate change by Kentish Plovers Charadrius alexandrinus . Ornis Scandinavica 24:317322. CrossRef
Székely, T., and J. D. Reynolds. 1995. Evolutionary transitions in parental care in shorebirds. Proceedings of the Royal Society of London, Series B 262:5764. CrossRef
Székely, T., G. H. Thomas, and I. C. Cuthill. 2006. Sexual conflict, ecology, and breeding systems in shorebirds. BioScience 56:801808. BioOne
Székely, T., and T. D. Williams. 1995. Costs and benefits of brood desertion in female Kentish Plovers, Charadrius alexandrinus. Behavioral Ecology and Sociobiology 37:155161. CrossRef, CSA
Thomas, G. H., and T. Székely. 2005. Evolutionary pathways in shorebird breeding systems: Sexual conflict, parental care, and chick development. Evolution 59:22222230. BioOne
Thomas, G. H., T. Székely, and J. D. Reynolds. 2007. Sexual conflict and the evolution of breeding systems in shorebirds. Advances in the Study of Behavior 37:279342. CrossRef
Thomas, G. H., M. A. Wills, and T. Székely. 2004a. A supertree approach to shorebird phylogeny. BMC Evolutionary Biology 4:28. CrossRef, PubMed
Thomas, G. H., M. A. Wills, and T. Székely. 2004b. Phylogeny of shorebirds, gulls, and alcids (Aves: Charadrii) from the cytochrome-b gene: Parsimony, Bayesian inference, minimum evolution, and quartet puzzling. Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution 30:516526. CrossRef, PubMed
Van De Kam, J., B. Ens, T. Piersma, and L. Zwarts. 2004. Shorebirds: An Illustrated Behavioural Ecology. KNNV Publishers, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Warriner, J. S., J. C. Warriner, G. W. Page, and L. E. Stenzel. 1986. Mating system and reproductive success of a small population of polygamous Snowy Plovers. Wilson Bulletin 98:1537. CSA


APPENDIX

FIG. A1. Phenotypic differences between Kentish and Snowy plovers. Top: Downy chick plumage. Plumage of Kentish Plover chicks (left) features a dark central stripe on the back (indicated by arrow), whereas this stripe is missing in Snowy Plover chicks (right). Both chicks were photographed a few hours after hatching. (Kentish Plover photograph taken by T. Székely in Kujalnik, Ukraine, June 2007. Snowy Plover photograph taken by C. Küpper in Ceuta, Mexico, June 2007.) Bottom: Male courtship calls of Kentish Plovers sampled in France (left) and of Snowy Plovers sampled in North Dakota (right). The pattern is consistent among all transatlantic populations we have sampled. (Snowy Plover calls provided by Lang Elliot. Kentish Plover calls from males breeding in France provided by Jean Roché. Sonograms prepared using SAS LAB LIGHT software [Avisoft Bioacoustics, Berlin]).

Cited by

Susan M. Thomas 1, 12 , James E. Lyons 2 , Brad A. Andres 3, * , Elise Elliot T-Smith 4 , Eduardo Palacios 5 , John F. Cavitt 6 , J. Andrew Royle 7 , Suzanne D. Fellows 8 , Kendra Maty 1 , William H. Howe 9 , Eric Mellink 10 , Stefani Melvin 11, 13 and Tara Zimmerman 1, 14 . (2012) Population Size of Snowy Plovers Breeding in North America. Waterbirds 35:1, 1-14
Online publication date: 1-Mar-2012.

Abstract & References : Full Text : PDF (162 KB) 

R. Terry Chesser,1,12,13 Richard C. Banks,1 F. Keith Barker,2 Carla Cicero,3 Jon L. Dunn,4 Andrew W. Kratter,5 Irby J. Lovette,6 Pamela C. Rasmussen,7 J. V. Remsen, Jr.,8 James D. Rising,9 Douglas F. Stotz,10 and Kevin Winker11. (2011) Fifty-Second Supplement to the American Ornithologists' Union Check-List of North American Birds. The Auk 128:3, 600-613
Online publication date: 1-Jul-2011.

Citation : Full Text : PDF (262 KB) 

click this button to close

Article Views

click this button to open

Citing Articles

 
BioOne is the product of innovative collaboration between scientific societies, libraries, academe and the private sector.
 
21 Dupont Circle NW, Suite 800, Washington, DC 20036 • Phone 202.296.1605 • Fax 202.872.0884
 
Copyright © 2012 BioOne All rights reserved