Open Access
How to translate text using browser tools
1 December 2013 Systematics and Biology of Caloptilia triadicae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae), A New Species of Leaf-Mining Moth of the Invasive Chinese Tallow Tree(Triadica sebifera (L.) Euphorbiaceae)
Donald R. Davis, Mark S. Fox, Rebecca F. Hazen
Author Affiliations +
Abstract

A new species of leaf-mining moth, Caloptilia triadicae, is described from the southern United States from Florida to eastern Texas. Larvae of this moth are known to feed preferentially and at high densities on the Chinese Tallow tree, Triadica (= Sapium) sebifera (L.) Roxb. (Euphorbiaceae), a tree first introduced into Georgia in 1772 from Asia, which has since become an invasive plant species of grave concern over much of the southeastern United States and California. Caloptilia triadicae is also known to feed rarely on Gymnanthes lucida Sw. (Euphorbiaceae), a tree not known to occur in the Old World but native to Florida, the Bahamas, the Caribbean, and Central America. Because of the origin of the preferred host and the morphological affinities of the moth to the Chinese species, Caloptilia hamulifera Liu and Yuan, it appears likely that C. triadicae also originated from Asia. The larvae of Caloptilia are hypometamorphic and possess two distinct larval body forms and feeding behaviors—an early stage sap-feeding form with a flattened body and prognathous mouthparts and a later stage tissue-feeding form with a more cylindrical body and possessing hypognathous mouthparts. The sap-feeding larvae initially construct long, serpentine, subepidermal mines on the upper (adaxial) leaf surface. After developing to the tissue-feeding form, the larva of C. triadicae leaves the mine and crawls to the edge of the leaf and cuts a narrow strip of leaf which is rolled into a tight coil. It continues feeding externally on the leaf inside the roll in which it eventually forms a silken cocoon for pupation.

Chinese tallow tree (Triadica sebifera (L.) Roxb., Euphorbiaceae) is native to south-southeastern China, Taiwan, and northern Vietnam (Pattison & Mack 2008), is cultivated in Japan and may have naturalized there (Huang et al. 2010), and is either naturalized or invasive in northern India, northern Pakistan, Bangladesh, Java, Indonesia, and southeastern Australia (Figure 1). Tallow tree is reported from Thailand (Sangsawang et al. 2009), and from Panama and Peru (Pattison & Mack, 2008), though the status of the tree populations in these countries is unknown. The species is presently cultivated in South Korea, where there is interest in its capacity to support honey production (Ryu et al. 2008).

In the United States, Triadica sebifera is a noxious and highly invasive species that reportedly was introduced into Georgia in 1772, by Benjamin Franklin (Bell 1966). Recent studies on the genetic variation of T. sebifera (DeWalt, et al 2011; Boyd 2011) have revealed that the genetic strain that Franklin imported (and now confined to coastal areas of southern South Carolina and northern Georgia) is genetically distinct from the more invasive, widespread strain which was introduced by federal biologists around 1905 and has since spread primarily from Florida to East Texas. DeWalt et al, (2011) also concluded that the different phenotypic traits and relative invasiveness evident between the different strains of T. sebifera probably resulted from their different origins within the native range in Asia as well as geographic differences in selective pressures within their introduced ranges. The tree generally is chemically well-defended (although this varies between the different genetic strains), and few native herbivores consume Chinese tallow, though the species has been in the United States for more than 240 years (Siemann & Rogers, 2001). T. sebifera has been documented in 12 states in the southeastern United States, as well as three counties in California and one county in Wisconsin (Figure 2). Tallow tree grows well in riparian or swampy areas where soil is consistently damp or frequently inundated. It is also highly successful in disturbed habitats and open fields where sunlight is plentiful, and thrives in urban areas including Baton Rouge and New Orleans, LA, and Houston, TX.

The earliest known records of the proposed new species, Caloptilia triadicae, are from Baton Rouge, Louisiana and Sumter County, Alabama, both based on diagnostic leaf mine damage from July (photograph) and October (herbarium specimen) of 2004, respectively (Fox et al. 2012). One year later, June 7, 2005, a single male was collected by G. T. Austin in Gainesville, Florida. Larvae of C. triadicae were first discovered on September 16, 2008 and reared by Jason Sharp from Triadica sebifera at Branchton Park in Tampa, Hillsborough County, Florida and from Gainesville, Florida on September 20, 2008 by Susan Wright and James Lollis (Heppner 2008). These adults were sent eventually to DRD who identified them as a probably undescribed species of Caloptilia, not closely allied to any known North American Caloptilia.

Figs. 1–2.

Distributions of Chinese Tallow tree (Triadica sebifera) and Caloptilia triadicae. 1. World distribution of Triadica sebifera. 2. Distributions of Caloptilia triadicae and its host, Triadica sebifera, in the United States.

f01_281.jpg

Because of the morphological characteristics observed, as well as the origin of its host, DRD suspected that C. triadicae may have originated from Asia. A search for all Caloptilia known to feed on Triadica (= Sapium) revealed three Old World species: Caloptilia octopunctata Turner (= C. cirrhocrotala (Meyrick), C. tetratype (Meyrick)), reported from Australia and India; C. sapina Vári, from South Africa; and C. sapiivora Kumata, from Japan (De Prins & De Prins 2012). Caloptilia sapina resembles C. octopunctata in morphology and the two may be conspecific (Kumata 1981). The male genitalia of all three species are distinct from that of C. triadicae, and none possess the relatively large spine from the ventral angle of the cucullus which partally characterizes triadicae. Images of C. triadicae also were sent to colleagues T. Kumata (Japan) and D. Yuan (China), as well as to the late G. Robinson at the Natural History Museum, London, for comparison with other possibly similar Old World species. Nothing identical was reported.

The biology, morphology, and synonymy of Caloptilia (Sphyrophora) octopunctata (Turner) were treated in detail by Kumata (1981). Kumata followed Vári (1961) in recognizing Sphyrophora as a valid subgenus, characterized primarily by the strongly constricted valvae and presence of only a single, short pair of coremata on the male abdomen. Although these characters clearly distinguish C. triadicae (without constricted valvae and with two pairs of long coremata) from this subgenus, it is interesting to note that the late instar larval biology of C. triadicae resembles that of octopunctata with the larva cutting a strip from the leaf margin of its host and rolling this to form a cone on the abaxial (underside) of the leaf, within which it eventually pupates. Caloptilia triadicae closely agrees in wing venation with C. octopunctata, particularly with regard to their extremely narrow hindwings and separation of M2 and M3 in the forewing (Fig. 9). The forewing pattern of C. octopunctata also is similar to that of C. triadicae in possessing four evenly spaced, whitish strigulae along the wing margins, compared to three pairs in the latter. All subgenera previously recognized in Caloptilia were treated as synonyms of Caloptilia by W. and J. De Prins (2005). Adults of the four species of Caloptilia currently known to feed on Triadica sebifera can be distinguished using the following key.

1. Forewing with four white marginal spots, two on the costa and two on the hind margin; male valva constricted at apical third to form relatively large, lobate cucullus 2

Forewing either lacking spots or with only 3 white spots; male valva not constricted; cucullus connected smoothly to base of valve 3

2. Male valva with sacculus bearing prominent lobe (ampulla) arising near base of cucullus; dorsal margin of cucullus rounded; distribution Australia, India octopunctata

Ampulla indistinct; dorsal margin of cucullus angulate; distribution South Africa sapina

3. Forewing with 3 large white spots, two on costa and one on hind margin; fascia absent; male valva with short spine present from lower apical margin of cucullus (Fig. ); distribution United States triadicae

Forewing without large white spots, instead with 3 narrow, oblique, lemon-yellow fascia; spine absent from lower apical margin of cucullus; distribution Japan sapiivora

Materials and Methods

Specimens examined in this study are deposited in the following institutions:

FSCA

Florida State Collections of Arthropods, Gainesville, FL, USA.

USNM

Collections of the former United States National Museum, now deposited in the National Museum of Natural History, Smithsonian Institution, Washington, D.C., USA.

Specimen preparation. Genitalic dissections were cleared by heating in hot 10% KOH for ∼30 minutes, and subsequently cleaned and stained with either 2% chlorazol black E or mercurochrome solutions. All genitalic illustrations were drawn from dissections temporarily stored in glycerine, which were later permanently embedded in Canada balsam. Genitalic terminology follows Klots (1970) and Kristensen (1984b).

The COI mitochondrial gene region was sequenced for C. triadicae recovered from Florida (n = 18) and Louisiana (n = 20) (Table 1). Specimens were field collected in 2008, curated in 95% EtOH, and were destructively sampled using whole larvae. DNA extraction was performed on each specimen using a Chelex extraction protocol. Each mtDNA PCR was carried out with Stratagene © Paq polymerase (0.1 μl), with primers LCOI-2198 and HCOI-1490 (Folmer et al. 1994) (1.5 μl) and additional MgCl2 (0.5 μl). Samples were thermocycled on MBS Satellite 0.2 G © units at an annealing temperature of 49° C for 35 cycles. PCR products were cleaned using Exo-SAP IT (Affymetrix) and then prepared in separate forward and reverse PCR reactions with Dyenamic dye-terminator chemistry (GE Health Care) for sequencing. Resulting products were cleaned with Sephadex columns. Sequences were then electrophoresed on an ABI 3730xl Genetic Analyzer ©.

Table 1.

Sample information for specimens submitted for COI barcoding.

t01_281.gif

Results

Caloptilia triadicae Davis, new species
(Figs. 315)

  • Diagnosis. The forewing pattern of Caloptilia triadicae, consisting of two, white, slightly oblique, costal stigulae and a single white dorsal strigula, is distinct among the North American species of Caloptilia. In addition, the presence of a relatively large, curved spine from the ventral angle of the male cucullus is not known to occur in any other American species. A similar spine is present on the cucullus of Caloptilia hamulifera Liu and Yuan, an unreared species described from two males from Hunan and Sichuan Provinces, China. The distal half of the valva of C. hamulifera differs significantly from that of triadicae in being curved more sharply dorsad. The forewing pattern of hamulifera also differs from that of triadicae in being “brown and scattered with yellow spots.”

  • Description. Adult (Figs. 3 – 4). Forewing length 4.3 –4.7 mm.

    Head: Vestiture mostly smooth, covered with moderately broad, round-tipped scales; a pair of raised, broad scale tufts from either side of occiput; all scales with pale grayish-white apices, dark fuscous subapically, and with more slender bases pale grayish white. Antenna ∼ equal to forewing in length; scape mostly fuscous dorsally, minutely irrorated with pale cream; mostly pale cream ventrally; pedicel mostly pale cream with dark fuscous base; flagellomeres with single annulus of slender, dark fuscous-tipped scales with pale brownish bases. Maxillary and labial palpi mostly dark fuscous laterally and ventrally, pale cream mesally.

    Thorax: Smoothly scaled, concolorous with head and base of forewings; scales moderately broad with pale grayish-white apices, dark fuscous subapically, with more slender bases pale grayish white. Vestiture along caudal margin of mesothorax white on lateral-ventral surfaces. Forewing mostly dark fuscous (fuscous scales with pale gray bases), with two white, slightly diagonal strigulae located at basal ¼ and distal ¾ of costa; a single median strigula near middle of dorsal (hind) margin; margins of strigulae irregular, lined with black scales; a small white spot often present along anal hind margin; cilia fuscous, with a subterminal row of pale gray scales. Hindwing immaculate, with similar ground color as forewing. Foreleg mostly dark fuscous, white at base of coxa; tarsomeres mostly white, banded with dark fuscous. Midleg similar in color to foreleg but with less white at base of coxa. Hindleg similar to other legs in color but with white annuli on tarsomeres more reduced in width.

    Abdomen: Dark fuscous dorsally, mostly pale cream irorrated with fuscous scales ventrally. Seventh abdominal segment of male mostly membranous, with a narrow, transverse sternum and a pair of large, dense coremata with piliform scales as long as segment VI; eighth segment also membranous with a much smaller, slender “T”-shaped sternum and a pair of slightly shorter coremata ∼ 2/3 the length of previous pair. Female abdomen unspecialized.

    Male genitalia (Figs. 7–8): Tegumen simple, smoothly rounded, weakly sclerotized, sparsely setose. Vinculum U-shaped, slightly narrowing anteriorly. Valva becoming gradually broader from base to nearly truncate apex of cucullus; subapical region of cucullus densely covered with long setae with apical margin of cucullus nearly devoid of setae; costal margin of valva smoothly curved ventrally; subapical margin below apex of valva curved inwards (dorsally); a short, slightly curved spine present at lower angle of cucullus. Transtilla with a slender process directed anteriorly. Aedeagus ∼ 1.5 × length of valva, consisting of a slender, subacute cylinder, without cornuti; hood of phallobase relatively slender, elongate, ∼ 1.3 × length of aedeagus.

    Female genitalia (Figs. 5– 6): Anterior apophyses short, ∼ 0.8 × length of posterior apophyses. Eighth abdominal segment ∼ equal in length to papilla analis. Ostium bursae a small opening in membrane between abdominal sterna VII and VIII; ventral rim of ostium (antrum) with more sclerotization than dorsal rim; ductus bursae slender, walls of anterior 2/3 finely wrinkled; corpus bursae pyriform, walls minutely wrinkled, with a pair of cresentic signa; one signum ∼ ¼ × larger than other; arms of both signa minutely serrated, but more densely serrated along inner margins

  • Types. Holotype - ♂; UNITED STATES: FLORIDA: Alachua Co: Gainesville, 29 Oct 2008, S. Wright & J. Lollis 08-6506, ex. Triadica (= Sapium) sebifera, digital image captured. (FSCA). Paratypes. UNITED STATES: FLORIDA: Alachua Co: Gainesville: 2004 SE 41st Avenue: 29°36.95'N, 82°17.91'W: 1 ♂, 7 Jun 2005, G. T. Austin. Gainesville: 5 ♂, 7 ♀, 25 Aug – 2 Sep 2008, S. Wright & J. Lollis 08- 6506, Host: Triadica sebifera, slide USNM 34067, (USNM). Gainesville: lot 0811971, 2 ♂, 2 ♀, 2 Sep 2008, J. A. Wright, Host: Triadica sebifera, slide USNM 34065, (USNM). Gainesville: 1 ♂, 1 ♀, 29 Oct 2008, S. Wright & J. Lollis 08-6506, Host: Triadica sebifera, slide USNM 34066, (USNM). Gainesville: N 29° 38.114' W 082° 22.245': 1 ♂, 1 ♀, 23 Sep 2011, em. 6, 17, and 31 October 2011, J. G. Duncan, Host: Gymnanthes lucida, collected from live plant cage, (USNM). Broward Co: USDA ARS PRL: 1 ♀, 27 Jun 2012, Wheeler and Dyer, reared from Triadica sebifera; 2 ♂, 2 ♀, 27 Jun 2012, Wheeler and Dyer, reared from leaves Triadica sebifera, (USNM). Miami/Dade Co: Alice Wainwrite Park: 1 ♂, 27 Jun 2012, Wheeler and Duncan, reared from leaves Gymnanthes lucida, slide USNM 34520, (USNM). LOUISIANA: St. Tammany Par: near Pearl River, PRWMA, Honey Island Swamp: 6 ♂, 4 ♀, 22 May 2009, R. Hazen & M. Fox. PRWMA 30'23.442"N/89'43.297"W Plot 240: 8 ♂, 4 ♀, 22 May 2009, Rebecca Hazen, Host: Triadica sebifera. (Paratypes deposited in FSCA, USNM).

  • Distribution (Fig. 2). Though it has not yet been collected from any other country, Caloptilia triadicae is presumed to be adventitious to the United States. This presumption is partly based on the close association with its host plant, the Chinese tallow tree (Triadica sebifera), which is native to southeastern China (Fig. 1). Caloptilia triadicae has only been collected on or in the vicinity of its host plant, accordingly the known distribution of the moth is entirely encompassed by the distribution of the Chinese tallow tree (Fig. 2). The earliest U.S. records of C. triadicae are from 2004, in coastal Louisiana and Alabama. The species has since been found in Texas, Oklahoma, Mississippi, Florida, Georgia, South Carolina and Tennessee. In the U.S. it appears that C. triadicae is an effective disperser and that there may be little or no temporal lag between the invasion of new territory by the host tree and by the moth. The first photographic records of the moth in Davidson County, TN (S. Bren, 2009) and Washington County, OK (Fig. 4; M. Dreiling, 2012) actually preceded the first documentation of Chinese tallow tree in those counties.

  • Etymology. The species name is derived from the generic name of its primary plant host, Triadica, and is considered an adjective in the nominative singular.

  • Hosts. Euphorbiaceae: Triadica (= Sapium) sebifera (L.) Roxb.; Gymnanthes lucida Sw.

  • FIgs. 3–4.

    Caloptilia triadicae, adults. 3. Holotype m, Gainesville, Florida. 4. Adult in resting posture, Bartlesville, Oklahoma.

    f03_281.jpg

    Discussion

    Biology. Eggs are laid on either the lower or upper leaf surface of young, tender leaves (Hazen and Fox 2011), often adjacent to a major vein or at the junction of two veins (Fig. 12). The eggs are flat and ∼ 0.3 mm in diameter with a white, reflective surface; they are pressed to the leaf surface, resembling a small blemish on the leaf epidermis. First instar larvae emerge from the egg and immediately chew into the cuticle of the leaf. The initial subepidermal, serpentine mine is ∼ the same width as the diameter of the egg (∼ 0.3 mm). The sapfeeding larva tends to form a rather meandering mine, except upon encountering a vein or the margin of the leaf it typically follows that boundary (Figs. 10, 13). The mine is often enlarged two- or threefold into a chamber at two or three locations along its course. If such a chamber occurs at the leaf margin, the entire leaf may be slightly folded over giving the superficial appearance of an external shelter, but the epidermis of the leaf is not broken and the larva continues to feed internally. Sapfeeding larvae do not consume all the tissue between the upper and lower leaf surfaces and on heavily infested trees there may be distinct mines on both upper and lower leaf surfaces which overlap without interfering with each other. The later externally feeding larval stages (tissue-feeding instars) construct a coiled, rosette-shaped leaf shelter (Figs. 10, 11, 14, 15). An incision is chewed across the leaf, perpendicular to the leaf margin, and the larva uses silk to coil the resulting flap of leaf (usually the flap closer to the apex of the leaf) into the shape of a cone. The dimensions of the coiled leaf shelter vary with the size of the larva and the size of the leaf, but it is always approximately coneshaped, with the smaller base of the cone (diameter 4– 9 mm) toward the midline of the leaf, and the apex of the cone (diameter 7–16 mm, or typically ∼1.75 × diameter of base) at the leaf margin. Pupation takes place within the same shelter, and following the emergence of the adult moth the empty pupal exuvium remains protruding from the center of the leaf coil.

    Figs. 5–9.

    Caloptilia triadicae, adult morphology. 5. Female genitalia, lateral view, USNM 34067. 6. Female genitalia, ventral view. 7. Male genitalia, ventral view, USNM 34065. 8. Male aedeagus. 9. Wing venation, USNM 34065, male.

    f05_281.jpg

    FIgs. 10–15.

    Triadica sebifera, biology and larval feeding by Caloptilia triadicae. 10. Foliage with initial evidence of larval feeding (New Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana. 22 June 2012). 11. Infested tree with detail insets showing various stages of larval feeding (along Hwy 90, Lake St. Catherine, Orleans Parish, Louisiana. 14 May 2012.) 12. Oviposition sites of Caloptilia triadicae (indicated by arrows) (same collection site as 11). 13. Serpentine mines of early stage sapfeeding larvae (New Orleans, Orleans Parish, Louisiana. 10 October 2012). 14. Characteristic leaf cones rolled by later stage tissue feeding larva (same collection site as 13). 15. Larval predation within cones by ant, Pseudomyrmex gracilis (Bell Chasse, Plaquemines Parish, Louisiana. 19 August 2011).

    f10_281.jpg

    Fig. 16.

    C. triadicae haplotype tree generated for four haplotypes exhibited by study populations in North America. Bars on connecting lines indicate single basepair changes that differentiate lineages. The size of the numbered shapes, representing different haplotypes, corresponds with the abundance of each haplotype relative to the overall sample size for North America. The colors of the numbered shapes correspond to the pie charts in Figure 17, illustrating haplotype distribution by geography).

    f16_281.jpg

    Fig. 17.

    Distribution of North American C.triadicae haplotype diversity from initial collections in the southeastern U.S. in Louisiana and Florida.

    f17_281.jpg

    In New Orleans, LA, both pupae and external feeding larvae of C. triadicae were collected in February, 2012 by RH and MF; adults were photographed by R. L. Zimlich in Mobile, AL, in January, November, and December of 2012. These observations suggest that there is no extended overwintering stage for C. triadicae, at least for the populations in the southeastern United States. In the vicinity of New Orleans, in a typical year, the authors commonly begin observing damaged leaves of T. sebifera in April or May, with adult C. triadicae emerging shortly thereafter. A complete generation takes only a few weeks, and abundance increases through the growing season, typically reaching a nearly total infestation of host trees by July or August. However, it seems that abundance of the moth early in the growing season and its subsequent rate of population growth are associated with the severity of the preceding winter: following several sustained hard freezes in winter of 2009–10, MF did not observe any evidence of C. triadicae in New Orleans until August, 2010. The population of C. triadicae plummets in winter when the temperature first approaches freezing and the host trees shed their leaves. Winter temperatures may determine the eventual northern boundary of the Chinese tallow tree's distribution, and therefore should present a similar boundary for C. triadicae.

    Three species of Triadica, all native to Eastern and southeastern Asia, are currently recognized (Esser 2002). All are trees growing to maximum heights between 10–25 meters. Triadica cochinchinensis Lour. ranges widely from India to China and the Philippines. Triadica rotundifolia (Hemsl.) Esser is the least widespread of the species and occurs from southern China into Vietnam. The native range of Triadica sebifera (L.) Small includes the more southern provinces of Japan and China and is widespread in Taiwan. Because this species can grow within a wide range of dry or wet conditions and is frost hardy, its potential as an invasive species is the greatest. It is likely that larvae of Caloptilia triadicae are capable of feeding on all three species of Triadica.

    Adults of Caloptilia triadicae have also been reared in Florida from a secondary host, Gymnanthes lucida Sw. (Euphorbiaceae). The genital morphology of males from this host was found to be identical with those reared from T. sebifera. Gymnanthes lucida is native to Florida, the Bahamas, the Caribbean, and Central America, and is not known to occur in the Old World (Miroslav 2005). Although possessing dissimilar native distributions and are not considered sister taxa, Gymnanthes and Triadica are closely related and belong to the same subclade within the tribe Hippomaneae of the Euphoriaceae (Wurdack et al 2005). Both genera have latex and appear relatively pest free except for specialist herbivores. Consequently, host switching between these two genera by certain herbivores may be possible. Because Caloptilia triadicae is most similar mophologically to other Asian species of Caloptilia, particularly Caloptilia hamulifera Liu and Yuan, and not to any North American Caloptilia, its utililization of New World Gymnanthes as a host is believed to be a later, secondary adaptation.

    Natural enemies. The authors (RH & MF) have commonly seen polistine wasps investigating leaf rolls on tallow trees heavily infested with C. triadicae, though actual predation by these wasps has not been observed. Ants, most commonly Pseudomyrmex gracilis (Fabricius 1804), have been observed marauding leaf rolls and removing larvae of C. triadicae (Figure 15). Arachnids are often found residing in leaf rolls formerly inhabited by C. triadicae, but it is unclear whether the spiders consumed the resident larva or pupa or were opportunistically using empty shelters. Several species of parasitoid wasp have also been reared from C. triadicae in the U.S., but have not yet been identified (Hazen and Fox, unpublished data, Greg Wheeler, personal communication).

    COI Sequence data. To date, sequence data for the mtDNA COI gene region of C. triadicae from two North American locations (Florida and Louisiana), suggest that populations exhibit multiple mtDNA haplotypes (Fig. 16) and appear to comprise a single species. Analysis of mtDNA sequences yielded four total haplotypes, all of which were found in Louisiana while only two were found in Florida (Fig. 17). This degree of genetic diversity is consistent with field observations (by MF and RH) of outbreak-level infestations of C. triadicae larvae on T. sebifera trees.

    Acknowledgments

    We are indebted to Vichai Malikul, Donald Harvey, and Karolyn Darrow of the Department of Entomology, Smithsonian Institution, for the illustrations, graphics, and the preparation of plates used in this publication. Mignon Davis assisted with data capture and specimen curation. We especially wish to thank Jason Sharp, Susan A. Wright, and James Lollis, USDA IPRL, Gainesville, Florida, and John Heppner of the McGuire Center for Lepidoptera and Biodiversity, Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, Florida, for bringing this insect to our attention and for submitting specimens for identification and study. We also thank Kenneth Wurdack of the Department of Botany, Smithsonion Institution, for his comments on the systematic relationships of Triadica and Gymnanthes, M. Sedonia Steininger for developing a rearing method for C. triadicae and for documenting its seasonal occurrence, and James G. Duncan and Greg Wheeler, USDA ARS Invasive Plant Research Lab, Fort Lauderdale, Florida, for specimens and for exploring the potential host range and distribution of C. triadicae which resulted in this species being reared on Gymnanthes. Yuan Decheng, Institute of Zoology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, PRC, Tosio Kumata, Ebetu City, Hokkaido, Japan, and Gaden Robinson, formerly of the Natural History Museum, London, UK, were helpful in providing information regarding old world species of Caloptilia. The contributors to Bugguide.net were instrumental in documenting the temporal and spatial distribution Of C. triadicae in the southeastern U.S., and we are particularly grateful to Steven Bren, Mark Dreiling, and Robert Lord Zimlich, whose photographs were reproduced or cited in this paper. Finally we wish to thank David Adamski and Erik van Nieukerken for their reviews of the manuscript.

    Literature Cited

    1.

    M.I. Bell 1966. Some notes and reflections upon a letter from Benjamin Franklin to Noble Wimberly Jones, October 7, 1772. Ashantilly Press, Darien, GA, USA. Google Scholar

    2.

    J. Boyd 2011. Invasive tree afflicting Gulf Coast was not brought to US by Ben Franklin. Rice University News & Media. Current News, July 28, 2011. 2 pages. Google Scholar

    3.

    S. Bren 2009. Photograph uploaded to Bugguide.net.  http://bugguide.net/node/view/330860 [accessed 18 January 2013]. Google Scholar

    4.

    D.R. Davis 1983. Gracillariidae, In R.W. Hodges et al, Check List of the Lepidoptera of America North of Mexico. E.W. Classey Ltd. and the Wedge Entomological Research Foundation. London, pp. 2–11. Google Scholar

    5.

    D. R. Davis 1987. Gracillariidae, pp. 372–374, 376–378. In F.W. Stehr (editor), Immature insects, Vol. 1, Kendall/Hunt Publ. Co., Dubuque, Iowa. Google Scholar

    6.

    J. De Prins & W. De Prins 2012. Global Taxonomic Database of Gracillariidae (Lepidoptera).  http://www.gracillariidae.net [accessed 5 Februray 2012]. Google Scholar

    7.

    W. De Prins & J. De Prins 2005. Gracillariidae (Lepidoptera). In B. Landry (ed.) World Catalogue of Insects, vol. 6 Apollo Books, Stenstrup, 1–502. Google Scholar

    8.

    S. J. Dewalt , E. Siemann , and W. E. Rogers 2011. Geographic Distribution of Genetic Variation among Native and Introduced Populations of Chinese Tallow Tree. Triadica sebifera (Euphorbiaceae). Amer. J. Botany. 98: 1128–1138. Google Scholar

    9.

    M. Dreiling 2012. Photograph uploaded to Bugguide.net.  http://bugguide.net/node/view/696216 [accessed 18 January 2012] Google Scholar

    10.

    H.-J. Esser 2002. A revision of Triadica Lour. (Euphorbeaceae). Harvard Papers in Botany, 7: 17–21. Google Scholar

    11.

    O. Folmer , M. Black , M. Hoeh , R. Lutz , & R. Vrijenhoek 1994. DNA Primers for Amplification of Mitochondrial Cytochrome c Oxidase Subunit I from Diverse Metazoan Invertebrates. Mol. Marine Biol. Biotech. 3: 294–299. Google Scholar

    12.

    M. Fox , R. Hazen , G.S. Wheeler , & D.R. Davis 2012. “Using Internet Images to Gather Distributional Data for a Newly Discovered Caloptilia Species (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae) Specializing on Chinese Tallow in North America.” Amer. Entomol. 58: 32–35. Google Scholar

    13.

    R.F. Hazen & M.S. Fox 2011. A cascading classroom: the benefits of utilizing teachers and students as citizen scientists in research. Amer. Entomol. 58: 11–14. Google Scholar

    14.

    J. H. Heppner 2008. Sapium sebiferum (Chinese tallow tree, popcorn tree). TRI-OLOGY, DACS-P- 00124 47: 1–13. Google Scholar

    15.

    W. Huang , E. Siemann , G.S. Wheeler , J. Zou , J. Carrillo & J. Ding 2010. “Resource Allocation to Defence and Growth are Driven by Different Responses to Generalist and Specialist Herbivory in an Invasive Plant.” J. Ecol. 98: 1157–1167. Google Scholar

    16.

    T. Kumata 1981. Notes on Caloptilia (Sphyrophora) octopunctata (Turner 1894) of India, with descriptions of its larva (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae).Insecta Matsum., New Series 24: 1–16. Google Scholar

    17.

    T. Kumata 1982. A taxonomic revision of the Gracillaria group occurring in Japan (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae). Insecta Matsum., New Series 26: 1– 186. Google Scholar

    18.

    Y. Liu & D. Yuan 1990. A Study of the Chinese Caloptilia Hübner, 1825 (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae: Gracillariinae). Sinozoologia 9: 181–207. Google Scholar

    19.

    M. G. Miroslav 2005. “Gymnanthes lucida Sw.”. Elsevier's Dictionary of Trees. Volume 1: North America. Elsevier. p. 404. Google Scholar

    20.

    R. R. Pattison , & R.N. Mack 2008. “Potential Distribution of the Invasive Tree Triadica sebifera (Euphorbiaceae) in the United States: Evaluating CLIMEX Predictions with Field Trials.” Global Change Biol. 14: 813–826. Google Scholar

    21.

    J. B. Ryu , J. W. Jang , & S. A. Shin 2008. Studies on Flowering Characteristics and Foraging Activity of Honeybees at Sapium sebiferum (L.) Roxb. Korean J. Apicul. 23: 1–23. Google Scholar

    22.

    J. Sangsawang , N. Pipattanawong , K. Jutamanee , C. Indara , & W. Stienswat (2009). Morphology of Chinese Tallow Tree (Sapium sebiferum (L) Roxb.) flower in Thailand. In Proceedings of the 47th Kasetsart University Annual Conference, Kasetsart, 17–20 March, 2009. Subject: Plants. (pp. 243–251). Kasetsart University. Google Scholar

    23.

    E. Siemann & W.E. Rogers 2001. Genetic differences in growth of an invasive tree species. Ecology Letters 4:514–518. Google Scholar

    24.

    USDA, NRCS. 2012. The PLANTS Database.  http://plants.usda.gov/ [accessed 11 December 2012]. National Plant Data Team, Greensboro, NC 27401–4901 USA. Google Scholar

    25.

    D. Yuan & G.S. Robinson 1993. Caloptilia leaf-miner moths (Gracillariidae) of South-East Asia. Bull. Natural Hist. Mus. London 62: 1–37. Google Scholar

    26.

    J. Vandyk & T. Bartlett 2012. Bugguide.  http://bugguide.net/ [accessed 1 December 2012]. Google Scholar

    27.

    L. Vári 1961. South African Lepidoptera, Vol. 1, Lithocolletidae. Mem. 12: 1–239. Transvaal Museum, Pretoria. Google Scholar

    28.

    J. W. Wurdack , P. Hoffmann , & M. W. Chase 2005. Molecular phylogenetic analysis of uniovulvate Euphorbiaceae (Euphorbiaceae sensu stricto) using plastid RBCL and TRNL-F DNA sequences. Amer. J. Bot. 92: 1397–1420. Google Scholar
    Donald R. Davis, Mark S. Fox, and Rebecca F. Hazen "Systematics and Biology of Caloptilia triadicae (Lepidoptera: Gracillariidae), A New Species of Leaf-Mining Moth of the Invasive Chinese Tallow Tree(Triadica sebifera (L.) Euphorbiaceae)," The Journal of the Lepidopterists' Society 67(4), 281-290, (1 December 2013). https://doi.org/10.18473/lepi.v67i4.a5
    Received: 29 January 2013; Accepted: 28 May 2013; Published: 1 December 2013
    KEYWORDS
    biocontrol
    biogeography
    genital morphology
    hypermetamorphic larva
    invasive plant species
    larval biology
    Back to Top